📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 詞源與文集

詞源與文集 第 21 章 第 1/4 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 21:1–21:38(全章共 134 節)

← 第 20 章第 22 章 →
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
21:1
I. Quod Deus summus et incommutabilis sit. 1.1. Summum bonum Deus est, quia incommutabilis est et corrumpi omnino non potest. Creatura uero bonum, sed non summum est, quia mutabilis est ut, dum sit quidem bonum, non tamen esse potest et summum. 1.2. Quid est Dei inmortalitas, nisi eius incommutabilitas? Nam et angeli et animae inmortales sunt, sed inmutabiles non sunt. Ideoque solus Deus dicitur inmortalis quia solus incommutabilis. Nam anima moritur, dum, deserente Deo, de bono in malum mutatur. Sic et angelus, dum, deserente Deo, est lapsus. 1.3. Quod materiam habet unde existat, mutabile est, quia de informi ad formam transit.
第一 論天主是至高且不可改變的。1.1. 至高之善即天主,因為祂是不可改變的,且絕不能被敗壞。但受造物是善的,卻非至高,因為它是可改變的,以致它雖然的確是善的,卻仍不能同時也是至高的。1.2. 天主的不朽是什麼,若不是祂的不可改變性?因為天使與靈魂都是不朽的,但它們不是不可改變的。因此惟獨天主被稱為不朽,因為惟獨祂是不可改變的。因為靈魂會死亡,當天主離棄它時,它便由善變為惡。天使亦然,當天主離棄它時,它便墮落了。1.3. 凡有藉以存在之質料者是可改變的,因為它由無形轉向有形。
I. That God is supreme and unchangeable. 1.1. The supreme good is God, because He is unchangeable and cannot at all be corrupted. But the creature is good, yet not supreme, because it is changeable, so that, although it is indeed good, it nevertheless cannot be also supreme. 1.2. What is God's immortality, if not His unchangeableness? For both angels and souls are immortal, but they are not unchangeable. And therefore God alone is called immortal, because He alone is unchangeable. For the soul dies when, God forsaking it, it is changed from good to evil. So too the angel, when, God forsaking it, it fell. 1.3. That which has matter from which it exists is changeable, because it passes from the formless to form.
21:2
Quod uero non habet materiam, inmutabile est, sicut Deus utique est. Bene ac substantialiter sunt ista in Deo, id est incorruptio, inmortalitas, incommutabilitas. Inde et merito cunctae praeponitur creaturae. 1.4. Opus, non consilium apud Deum mutari, nec uariari eum quia per uaria tempora diuersa praecepit; sed manens idem incommutabilis et aeternus, quid cuique congruum esset tempori ab ipsa aeternitate in eius mansit disputatione consilii. 1.5. Non usu nostro aliud Deum putari, aliud pulchritudinem eius, atque aliud magnitudinem ipsius, sicut aliud est homo, aliud pulchritudo, quia, desistente pulchritudine, homo manet.
但那無質料者是不可改變的,天主無疑正是如此。這些性質在天主內是本然而屬於本體地存在的,即不朽壞、不朽與不可改變。因此祂理當被置於一切受造物之先。1.4. 在天主那裡改變的是工作,而非計劃,祂也不因在不同的時代命定了不同之事而有所變異;祂始終如一、不可改變且永恆,那對各時代所合宜者,從那永恆本身便存留於祂計劃的籌議中。1.5. 依我們的用法,不可將天主想成一物,將祂的美麗想成另一物,將祂的偉大本身想成又一物,正如人是一物,美麗是另一物,因為美麗消失時,人仍存留。
But that which has no matter is unchangeable, as God assuredly is. These qualities are in God well and substantially, that is, incorruption, immortality, unchangeableness. Hence deservedly He is set before every creature. 1.4. It is the work, not the counsel, that is changed with God, nor is He varied because through various times He has enjoined diverse things; but remaining the same, unchangeable and eternal, what was fitting for each time abode from that very eternity in the deliberation of His counsel. 1.5. God is not, according to our usage, to be thought one thing, and His beauty another, and His greatness itself yet another, just as a man is one thing, and beauty another, because, beauty ceasing, the man remains.
21:3
Ac per hoc, qui ita intellegit Deum, corporeum esse credit, dum pulchritudo et magnitudo Dei ipse Deus sit. 1.6a. Ideo Deus dicitur simplex, siue non amittendo quod habet, seu quia non aliud est ipse et aliud quod in ipso est. 1.6b. Inordinate dici seu conferri uitiis ea quae ordinate in Deo sunt, utpote simplicitas, quae aliquando dicitur pro stultitia, et non est. Apud Deum uero summa simplicitas est. Iuxta hanc regulam et cetera aestimanda sunt. II. Quod inmensus et omnipotens sit Deus. 2.1a. Non ideo caelum et terram implet Deus ut contineant eum, sed ut ipsa potius contineantur ab eo. Nec particulatim Deus implet omnia, sed cum sit idem unus, ubique tamen est totus. 2.1b.
為此之故,凡如此理解天主的人,便相信祂是有形體的,其實天主的美麗與偉大即是天主自己。1.6a. 因此天主被稱為單純的,或因祂不喪失所擁有的,或因祂自己與在祂內者並非一是一非兩物。1.6b. 那些在天主內以有序方式存在之物——如單純,它有時被用來指愚拙,其實並非如此——被無序地與惡習相提並論或比較。但在天主內有至高的單純。依此準則,其餘之事也當如此判斷。第二 論天主是無限且全能的。2.1a. 天主充滿天地,並非使天地容納祂,而是使天地本身被祂容納。天主也非零星片段地充滿萬物,而是雖然祂是同一位,卻無論何處都是完整的。2.1b.
And on this account, whoever thus understands God, believes Him to be corporeal, whereas the beauty and greatness of God is God Himself. 1.6a. Therefore God is called simple, either by not losing what He has, or because He Himself is not one thing and what is in Him another. 1.6b. Those things which are in God in an ordered way—such as simplicity, which is sometimes said in place of foolishness, though it is not so—are spoken of or compared disorderly with vices. But in God there is supreme simplicity. According to this rule the rest also are to be judged. II. That God is immeasurable and almighty. 2.1a. God does not fill heaven and earth in such a way that they should contain Him, but rather that they themselves should be contained by Him. Nor does God fill all things piecemeal, but although He is one and the same, yet He is everywhere whole. 2.1b.
21:4
Non ita putandus est esse in omnibus Deus ut unaquaeque res pro magnitudine portionis suae capiat eum, id est maxima maius, et minima minus, dum sit potius ipse totus in omnibus, siue omnia in ipso. 2.2. Omnipotentia diuinae maiestatis cuncta potestatis suae inmensitate concludit, nec euadendi potentiam eius quis aditum inuenire poterit, quia ille omnia circumquaque constringit. Cuncta enim intra diuini iudicii omnipotentiam coartantur, siue quae continenda sunt ut salua sint, siue quae amputanda sunt ut pereant. Nullatenus ergo posse effugi Deum quempiam. Qui enim non habet placatum, nequaquam euadet iratum. 2.3.
不可將天主想成如此存在於萬物中,以致每一單獨之物依其自身份量的大小而領受祂,即最大者領受較多、最小者領受較少;其實祂本身在萬物中都是完整的,或萬物都在祂內。2.2. 神性尊威的全能以其權能的無限包羅萬物,無人能找到逃脫祂權能的入口,因為祂在各方四圍約束萬物。因為萬物都被限制在神性審判的全能之內,無論是那些當被保存以致得救者,或那些當被剪除以致滅亡者。因此無人能以任何方式逃離天主。因為凡未使祂息怒者,斷不能逃避祂的震怒。2.3.
God is not to be thought to be in all things in such a way that each single thing receives Him according to the greatness of its own portion, that is, the greatest receiving more and the least receiving less; whereas He is rather Himself whole in all things, or all things in Him. 2.2. The omnipotence of the divine majesty encloses all things by the immeasurableness of its power, nor will anyone be able to find an entrance for escaping His power, because He binds all things round about on every side. For all things are confined within the omnipotence of the divine judgment, whether those which are to be contained so that they may be saved, or those which are to be cut off so that they may perish. In no way, then, can anyone flee from God. For he who does not have Him appeased will by no means escape Him angered. 2.3.
21:5
Inmensitas diuinae magnitudinis ista est ut intellegamus eum intra omnia sed non inclusum, extra omnia sed non exclusum; et ideo interiorem ut omnia contineat, ideo exteriorem ut incircumscriptae magnitudinis suae inmensitate omnia concludat. Per id ergo quod exterior est, ostenditur esse creator; per id uero quod interior, gubernare omnia demonstratur. Ac ne ea quae creata sunt sine Deo essent, Deus intra omnia est; uerum ne extra Deo essent, Deus exterior est, ut omnia concludantur ab eo. 2.4. De consummatione alicuius facti dicitur perfectio. Deus autem qui non est factus quomodo est perfectus?
神性偉大的無限性是如此,使我們得以理解祂在萬物之內卻不被封閉,在萬物之外卻不被排除;因此祂是內在的,好容納萬物,因此又是外在的,好以其無可界限之偉大的無限包羅萬物。因此,藉祂是外在的這一點,顯明祂是造物主;而藉祂是內在的這一點,證明祂治理萬物。為免受造之物脫離天主,天主便在萬物之內;而為免它們在天主之外,天主便是外在的,好使萬物都被祂包羅。2.4. 對於某項工作的完成,人說「完全」(perfectio)。但天主既非被造,如何是「完全」(perfectus,即「被造成的」)呢?
The immeasurableness of the divine greatness is such that we may understand Him to be within all things but not enclosed, outside all things but not excluded; and therefore interior, that He may contain all things, therefore exterior, that by the immeasurableness of His uncircumscribed greatness He may enclose all things. Through that, then, whereby He is exterior, He is shown to be the Creator; but through that whereby He is interior, He is demonstrated to govern all things. And lest the things which have been created should be without God, God is within all things; but lest they should be outside God, God is exterior, so that all things may be enclosed by Him. 2.4. Of the completion of some deed 'perfection' is spoken. But how is God, who was not made, 'perfect' (made-through)?
21:6
Sed hunc sermonem de usu nostro sumit humana inopia, sicut et reliqua uerba, quatenus id quod ineffabile est utcumque dici possit, quoniam de Deo nihil digne humanus sermo dicit. 2.5. Dum localis non sit Deus, localiter tamen in suis ambulat sanctis, dum de loco in loco praedicatur ab eis. Nam Deus, qui nec loco mouetur, nec tempore, in seruis tamen suis et tempore et loco mouetur, quotiens ab eisdem localiter praedicatur. 2.6. Dum de Deo nec secundum situm, nec secundum qualitatem, nec secundum habitum aut motum aliquid digne dicatur, inest tamen ei quodammodo latitudo caritatis, qua nos et ab errore colligit, et continet in ueritate.
但人的貧乏由我們的用法借取此字,一如其餘我們的言語,好使那不可言喻者得以多少被言說,因為人的言語論及天主毫無配得的話語。2.5. 天主雖非受地方所限,卻在祂的聖徒中按地方而行走,當祂被他們由此地傳揚至彼地時。因為天主既不受地方也不受時間所推動,卻在祂的僕人中按時間也按地方而被推動,凡祂被他們按地方而傳揚之時。2.6. 論及天主,雖不能按位置、按性質,或按狀態或運動而說出任何配得之言,然而在祂內以某種方式有仁愛的廣度,藉此祂既將我們從錯謬中聚集,又將我們持守在真理中。
But human poverty takes this word from our usage, as it does the rest of our words, so that what is ineffable may in some fashion be spoken, since human speech says nothing worthily concerning God. 2.5. Although God is not local, yet He walks locally in His saints, when He is preached by them from place to place. For God, who is moved neither by place nor by time, is nevertheless moved both in time and in place in His servants, as often as He is preached locally by them. 2.6. Although concerning God nothing may be worthily said according to position, nor according to quality, nor according to state or motion, yet there is in Him in a certain manner a breadth of charity, by which He both gathers us from error and holds us in the truth.
21:7
Inest ei et longitudo, qua nos longanimiter malos portat, donec emendatos patriae futurae restituat. Inest ei et altitudo, per quam omnem sensum suae scientiae inmensitate exsuperat. Inest ei et profundum, quo damnandos inferius iuxta aequitatem disponens praeordinat. III. Quod invisibilis sit Deus. 3.1a. Dum de Deo loquens scriptura plerumque dicat ecce Deus, non quasi uisibilem ostendit, sed ubique esse praesentem significat, per id quod dicit ecce Dominus; uel quod magnitudinem diuinitatis eius nullus possit sensus adtingere, etiam nec angelicus. 3.1b.
在祂內也有長度,藉此祂長久忍耐地擔待惡人,直到他們一旦悔改,祂便將他們帶回將來的家鄉。在祂內也有高度,藉此祂以其知識的無限超越一切理解。在祂內也有深度,藉此祂按公義安置那些當受定罪於下者,並預先命定他們。第三 論天主是不可見的。3.1a. 聖經論及天主時雖屢屢說「看哪,天主」,卻並非顯示祂彷彿可見,而是藉它所說的「看哪,主」表明祂無處不在;或因無論何種官能,甚至天使的官能,都不能觸及祂神性的偉大。3.1b.
There is in Him also length, by which He long-sufferingly bears with the evil, until, once amended, He restores them to the fatherland to come. There is in Him also height, through which He surpasses every understanding by the immeasurableness of His knowledge. There is in Him also depth, by which, disposing according to equity those to be condemned below, He foreordains them. III. That God is invisible. 3.1a. Although Scripture, speaking of God, very often says 'Behold, God,' it does not show Him as though visible, but signifies that He is present everywhere, through that which it says, 'Behold, the Lord'; or because no sense, not even the angelic, can attain to the greatness of His divinity. 3.1b.
21:8
Quamuis usque ad parilitatem angelicam humana post resurrectionem natura proficiat, et ad contemplandum Deum indefessa consurgat, uidere tamen eius essentiam plene non ualet, quam nec ipsa perfectio angelica in totum adtingit scire, secundum apostolum qui ait: Pax Dei, quae exsuperat omnem sensum, ut subaudias etiam angelorum. Sola enim Trinitas sibi integre nota est, et humanitas a Christo suscepta, quae tertia est in Trinitate persona. 3.2a. Intellegibiliter quodam miro modo Dei essentia sciri potest dum esse creditur. Opus uero eius, quod utique aequari ei non potest, et iudicia a nullo penitus sciuntur. 3.2b. Dei secreta iudicia non posse sensu penetrari, uel angelico uel humano.
人性在復活之後雖進至與天使同等,並不倦地上升以瞻仰天主,卻不能完全看見祂的本質,這本質連天使的完美本身也不能全然達到認識,正如使徒所言:「天主的平安,超越一切理解」——好使你明白這也包括天使的理解。因為惟獨三位一體對自身有完全的認識,還有基督所取的人性,那是三位一體中的第三位。3.2a. 天主的本質能以某種奇妙的方式被理性所認識,只要人相信祂存在。但祂的工作——那斷然不能與祂相比者——以及祂的審判,卻全然無人能知。3.2b. 天主隱秘的審判無論以天使的或人的官能都不能洞察。
Although after the resurrection human nature advances even to equality with the angels, and rises up untiring to the contemplation of God, yet it is not able fully to see His essence, which not even the angelic perfection itself wholly attains to knowing, according to the Apostle who says: 'The peace of God, which surpasses all understanding'—so that you may understand also that of the angels. For the Trinity alone is fully known to Itself, and the humanity assumed by Christ, which is the third Person in the Trinity. 3.2a. Intelligibly, in a certain wondrous manner, the essence of God can be known, while He is believed to be. But His work, which assuredly cannot be equaled to Him, and His judgments are known by no one at all. 3.2b. The secret judgments of God cannot be penetrated by sense, whether angelic or human.
21:9
Et ideo, quia occulta sed iusta sunt, tantundem uenerari ea opus est et timere, non discutere aut inquirere, secundum apostolum qui ait: Quis enim cognouit sensum Domini, aut quis consiliarius eius fuit? IIII. Quod ex creature pulchritudine agnoscator Creator. 4.1. Saepe ad incorpoream Creatoris magnitudinem, creaturarum corporea magnitudo conponitur, ut magna considerentur ex paruis, et ex uisibilibus inuisibilia aestimentur, atque ex pulchritudine factorum effector operum agnoscatur, non tamen parilitate consimili, sed ex quadam subdita et creata specie boni. 4.2a.
因此,既然它們雖隱秘卻公義,就當同樣地敬畏並崇敬它們,而非議論或探究它們,正如使徒所言:「有誰知道主的心意,或有誰作過祂的謀士?」第四 論可由受造物的美麗認識造物主。4.1. 受造之物有形的偉大常被拿來與造物主無形的偉大相比,好使人由小事思量大事,由可見之物推估不可見之物,並由所造之物的美麗認識工作的成就者——然而並非以相等的方式,而是由某種從屬且受造的善之形貌。4.2a.
And therefore, because they are hidden yet just, it is fitting equally to venerate and to fear them, not to discuss or to inquire into them, according to the Apostle who says: 'For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been His counselor?' IV. That the Creator may be recognized from the beauty of the creature. 4.1. Often the corporeal greatness of created things is compared to the incorporeal greatness of the Creator, so that great things may be considered from small, and invisible things estimated from visible, and the Maker of works recognized from the beauty of the things made—yet not by a like equality, but from a certain subordinate and created appearance of good. 4.2a.
21:10
Sicut ars in artificem retorquet laudem, ita rerum Creator per creaturam suam laudatur, et quanto sit excellentior, ex ipsa operis conditione monstratur. 4.2b. Ex pulchritudine circumscriptae creaturae, pulchritudinem suam, quae circumscribi nequit, facit Deus intellegi, ut ipsis uestigiis reuertatur homo ad Deum quibus auersus est, ut, quia per amorem pulchritudinis creaturae a Creatoris forma se abstulit, rursum per creaturae decorem ad Creatoris pulchritudinem reuertatur. 4.3.
正如藝術把讚美反射回工匠身上,照樣萬物的造物主也藉其受造物而受讚美,而祂何等卓越,也由那工作的塑造本身顯明出來。4.2b. 天主由有限受造物的美麗,使人得以理解祂自己那不能被界限的美麗,好使人藉著那些他曾轉離所循的蹤跡而歸回天主;如此,既然人因愛受造物的美麗而使自己脫離了造物主的形貌,他便可藉著受造物的美好再度歸回造物主的美麗。4.3.
Just as art reflects praise back upon the artist, so the Creator of things is praised through His creature, and how much more excellent He is, is shown from the very fashioning of the work. 4.2b. From the beauty of the circumscribed creature God causes His own beauty, which cannot be circumscribed, to be understood, so that by those very traces by which he was turned away man may return to God; so that, because through love of the beauty of the creature he withdrew himself from the form of the Creator, he may again through the loveliness of the creature return to the beauty of the Creator. 4.3.
21:11
Quibusdam gradibus intellegentiae per creaturam progreditur homo ad intellegendum Deum Creatorem, id est ab insensibilibus surgens ad sensibilia, a sensibilibus surgens ad rationabilia, a rationabilibus surgens ad Creatorem. Intellegibilia per se conlaudant Deum; inrationabilia et insensibilia non per se, sed per nos, dum ea considerantes Deum laudamus; sed ideo dicuntur laudare ipsa, quia eandem laudem earum parturit causa. 4.4. Dixerunt antiqui quod nihil tam hebes sit quod non sensum habeat in Deum. Hinc est illud quod ex silice duro scintilla excutitur. Et si ignis in saxo, utique ibi sensus sentitur ubi se uita non sentit. V. Quod ex usu nostro quaedam species ad Deum referantur. 5.1a.
人藉著理解的若干階梯,經由受造物前進,以認識造物主上帝:就是從無感之物上升到有感之物,從有感之物上升到有理性之物,再從有理性之物上升到造物主。可理解之物本身讚美上帝;無理性與無感覺之物並非本身讚美,而是藉著我們,當我們觀想它們時便讚美上帝;然而它們也被說成讚美,因為它們的成因產出了同樣的讚美。古人說,沒有任何東西如此遲鈍,以致對上帝毫無感知。因此堅硬的燧石也能擊出火花。火既在石中,感知必定被感受於那生命本身不能自覺之處。論某些形象如何按我們的用法被歸於上帝。
By certain degrees of understanding man advances through the creature to the knowledge of God the Creator: that is, rising from insensible things to sensible things, rising from sensible things to rational things, and rising from rational things to the Creator. Intelligible things praise God of themselves; irrational and insensible things praise Him not of themselves but through us, when, considering them, we praise God. Yet they too are said to praise, because the cause of them brings forth that same praise. The ancients said that nothing is so dull that it does not have some perception directed toward God. Hence it is that a spark is struck from the hard flint. And though the fire is in the stone, surely perception is there felt where life does not feel itself. That certain likenesses are applied to God from our own usage.
21:12
Nostro usu Deus zelare dicitur uel dolere. Horum enim motuum apud Deum perturbatio nulla est apud quem tranquillitas summa est. 5.1b-2. Non ita est praecipitanda mentis sententia ut credamus posse Deo furoris uel mutationis accidere perturbationem, sed ipsam aequitatem iustitiae qua reos punit iracundiam sacra lectio nominauit, quoniam quod iudicantis aequum est, furor est et indignatio patientis. - Ita ergo intellegere opus est et alias passiones quas de affectione humana ducit scriptura ad Deum, ut et iuxta se incommutabilis sit credendus, et tamen pro causarum effectibus, ut facilius intellegatur, nostrae locutionis more et mutabilitatis genere appelletur. 5.3.
按我們的用法,上帝被說成嫉妒或憂傷。因為在上帝裡面沒有這些情感的擾動,祂裡面有至高的平靜。心智的判斷不可如此草率倉促,以致我們相信憤怒或變動的擾動能臨到上帝;而是聖經把祂懲罰罪人的公義之公平稱作「憤怒」,因為在審判者是公平的,在受罰者則是憤怒與惱恨。所以我們也當如此理解聖經從人的情感中取來、歸於上帝的其他情緒:既當相信祂本身不變,然而為了因果的果效、為使人更易理解,便按我們言說的方式、用一種可變的形態來稱呼祂。
According to our usage God is said to be jealous or to grieve. For of such motions there is no disturbance in God, in whom there is the highest tranquillity. The judgment of the mind must not be so hastily precipitated that we should believe a disturbance of fury or of change can befall God; rather, Holy Scripture has named 'wrath' that very equity of justice by which He punishes the guilty, since what is equity in the one who judges is fury and indignation in the one who suffers it. So too, then, we must understand the other passions which Scripture draws from human affection and applies to God: that He is to be believed unchangeable in Himself, and yet, according to the effects of causes, that He may the more easily be understood, He is named after the manner of our speech and by a kind of mutability.
21:13
Tam clementer Deus humanae consulit infirmitati, ut, quia eum sicut est non possumus agnoscere, nostrae locutionis more se ipsum nobis insinuet. Vnde et membrorum nostrorum qualitatem habere scribitur, et passionum indigna dici de se uoluit, quatenus ad sua per nostra nos traheret, et dum condescendit nobis consurgeremus ei. 5.4a. Multis modis Deus ad significandum se hominibus de inferioribus rebus species ad se trahit. Quem reuera iuxta propriam substantiam inuisibilem esse et incorporeum constat. 5.4b-6.
上帝如此慈憐地體恤人的軟弱,以致因為我們不能按祂本相認識祂,祂便按我們言說的方式向我們表明自己。因此經上寫祂具有我們肢體的性質,祂也願意將論及情感的不相稱之事說在自己身上,好藉我們的事物將我們吸引到祂自己的事物,並在祂俯就我們時使我們得以上升就近祂。上帝為向人表明自己,以多種方式從卑下之物取形象歸於自己。然而按祂本有的本質,祂確實是不可見且無形體的。
So mercifully does God provide for human weakness that, since we cannot know Him as He is, He makes Himself known to us after the manner of our speech. Hence He is written to have the quality of our members, and He willed unworthy things concerning the passions to be said of Himself, that He might draw us to His own things through our own, and that while He condescends to us we might rise up to Him. In many ways God, to signify Himself to men, draws likenesses to Himself from lower things. Yet He is truly established, according to His own substance, to be invisible and incorporeal.
21:14
Plerumque de corporibus ad Deum sumuntur qualitatum species, quae tamen in Deo non sunt, quia in propria natura incorporeus est et incircumscriptus, sed pro efficientiis causarum, rerum in ipso species scribuntur, ut, quia omnia uidet, dicatur oculus; et propter quod audit omnia, dicatur auris; pro eo autem quod auertitur, ambulat; pro eo quod expectat, stat. - Sic et in ceteris horum similibus ab humanis mentibus trahitur similitudo ad Deum: sicut est obliuiscens et memorans. Hinc est quod et propheta dicit: Iurauit Dominus exercituum per animam suam, non quod Deus animam habeat, sed hoc nostro narrat affectu. Et alibi, simili figura, et uermis et scarabeus intellegitur.
屬性的形象常常從物體取來歸於上帝,雖然這些屬性並不在上帝裡面,因為祂本性中是無形體、無疆界的;然而按因果的果效,事物的形象被記在祂身上:因為祂看見萬物,就稱為眼;因為祂聽見萬物,就稱為耳;因為祂轉臉離去,就說祂行走;因為祂等候,就說祂站立。在其他類似之事上也照樣從人的心思取相似之處歸於上帝:如遺忘與記念。因此先知說:「萬軍之耶和華指著自己的心起誓」——並非上帝有魂,而是照我們的情感這樣述說。別處也用類似的比喻,將祂理解為蟲和甲蟲。
Very often likenesses of qualities are taken from bodies and applied to God, which nevertheless are not in God, since in His own nature He is incorporeal and uncircumscribed; but according to the effects of causes the likenesses of things are written of Him: so that, because He sees all things, He is called an eye; and because He hears all things, He is called an ear; but because He turns away, He is said to walk; because He waits, He is said to stand. So too in other things like these, a likeness is drawn to God from human minds: as being forgetful and remembering. Hence the prophet says: 'The Lord of hosts has sworn by His own soul' — not that God has a soul, but He tells this according to our affection. And elsewhere, by a similar figure, He is understood as both a worm and a beetle.
21:15
- Nec mirum si uilibus significationibus figuretur qui usque ad nostrarum passionum, seu carnis contumelias descendisse cognoscitur. Nam et Christus agnus, non pro natura, sed pro innocentia, et leo pro fortitudine, non pro natura; et serpens pro morte et sapientia, non pro natura scribitur. Nam et in propheta plaustri portantis faenum species ducitur ad Deum. Et haec omnia ideo per figuram Christus, quia nihil est horum ad proprietatem substantiae eius. 5.6 bis. Non secundum essentiam, sed secundum similitudinem species ducuntur ad Deum, neque pro substantiae proprietate, sed pro efficientiis causarum.
祂既被認為降卑到甚至承受我們情感與肉體的凌辱,若用卑微的記號來表徵祂,也就不足為奇。因為基督被寫作羔羊——不是按本性,而是為表無辜;作獅子——為表剛強,不是按本性;作蛇——為表死亡與智慧,不是按本性。在先知書中,載乾草的車的形象也被歸於上帝。基督藉比喻是這一切,因為其中沒有一樣屬於祂本質的固有性。這些形象歸於上帝並非按本質,而是按相似;並非為本質的固有性,而是為因果的果效。
Nor is it any wonder if He is figured by lowly signs, who is known to have descended even to the reproaches of our passions and of the flesh. For Christ is written as a lamb — not by nature but for innocence; and a lion — for strength, not by nature; and a serpent — for death and wisdom, not by nature. For in the prophet the likeness of a wagon carrying hay is applied to God. And Christ is all these things by figure, because none of them belongs to the propriety of His substance. Not according to essence but according to likeness are these images applied to God, nor for the propriety of substance but for the effects of causes.
21:16
Vnde et creditur Deum nunquam uisibiliter hominibus apparuisse, nisi per adsumptam creaturarum speciem. 5.7. Falluntur quidam stultorum, dum legunt ad imaginem Dei factum esse hominem, arbitrantes Deum esse corporeum, dum non caro, quod est corpus, sed anima, quod est spiritus, Dei imaginem habeat. Non ergo esse corporis formam in Deum, qui hominem ad imaginem suam fecit, quia mentem, non carnem, ad similitudinem suam creauit. Cogita igitur quale corpus habeat ueritas, et dum non inueneris, hoc est Deus. 5.8. Facies Dei in scripturis sacris non caro, sed diuina cognitio intellegitur eadem ratione, quia per faciem conspectam quisque cognoscitur. Hoc enim in oratione dicitur Deo:
因此人相信上帝從未有形可見地向人顯現,除非藉著所取用的受造之物的形象。有些愚昧人讀到人是按上帝的形像所造,便被迷惑,以為上帝是有形體的;其實承載上帝形像的不是肉體(就是身體),乃是靈魂(就是靈)。所以那按自己形像造人的上帝並無身體的形狀,因為祂是按自己的樣式造了心智,而非肉體。那麼你想想真理有怎樣的身體;當你找不到時,這就是上帝。聖經中上帝的「臉面」不解作肉體,而解作屬神的認識,理由在於:藉著所見的臉面各人得以被認出。因為在禱告中對上帝這樣說:
Hence it is believed that God never appeared visibly to men except through an assumed likeness of created things. Certain foolish men are deceived when they read that man was made to the image of God, thinking that God is corporeal, whereas it is not the flesh, which is body, but the soul, which is spirit, that bears the image of God. Therefore there is no bodily form in God, who made man to His own image, since He created the mind, not the flesh, to His likeness. Consider, then, what sort of body Truth has; and when you cannot find one, this is God. The face of God in the Holy Scriptures is understood not as flesh but as divine knowledge, for this reason: that by the face beheld each person is recognized. For this is said to God in prayer:
21:17
Ostende nobis faciem tuam, ac si dicatur: da nobis cognitionem tuam. 5.9. Os Dei unigenitus eius est. Nam sicut pro uerbis quae per linguam fiunt saepe dicimus illa et illa lingua, ita et pro Dei Verbo os ponitur, quia mos est ut ore uerba formentur. Et si uolueris genere locutionis illo demonstrare, quo is qui efficit per id quod efficitur nominatur, bene os pro Verbo ponis, sicut linguam pro uerbis, sicut manum pro litteris. 5.10. Vestigia Dei sunt qua nunc Deus per speculum agnoscitur.
「求你向我們顯出你的臉面」——彷彿是說:求你將對你的認識賜給我們。上帝的口就是祂的獨生子。因為正如對於舌頭所發的話,我們常說「這種或那種舌頭」,照樣對於上帝的道也用「口」,因為習慣上話語是由口形成的。若你願意用那種以行事者由其所成之事稱呼的說法來表達,你就恰當地以「口」代替「道」,正如以「舌」代替話語,以「手」代替文字。上帝的足跡就是如今藉著鏡子認出上帝的憑藉。
'Show us Thy face' — as if it were said: give us the knowledge of Thee. The mouth of God is His only-begotten Son. For just as, for the words which are made by the tongue, we often say 'this or that tongue,' so also for the Word of God 'mouth' is put, because it is the custom that words be formed by the mouth. And if you wish to demonstrate by that manner of speech in which he who effects is named by that which is effected, you rightly put 'mouth' for the Word, just as 'tongue' for words, just as 'hand' for letters. The footprints of God are that by which God is now recognized through a mirror.
21:18
Ad perfectum uero omnipotens repperitur, dum in futurum facie ad faciem quibusque electis praesentabitur, ut ipsam speciem contemplentur, cuius nunc uestigia conprehendere conantur, hoc est, quem uidere per speculum dicitur. Sic et cetera. VI. Quod Deo nulla temporum successio adscribatur. 6.1a. Omnia tempora praecedit diuina aeternitas, nec in Deo praeteritum, praesens futurumue aliquid creditur, sed omnia praesentia in eo dicuntur, quia aeternitate sua cuncta conplectitur. Alioquin mutabilis est Deus credendus, si ei successiones temporum adscribuntur. 6.1b. Si semper aliqua essent cum Deo tempora, non esset tempus, sed esset aeternitas, nec mutarentur tempora, sed starent. 6.2-3.
但全能者在成全中被尋見,乃在將來祂要面對面地向每一位蒙揀選的人顯現,使他們得以觀想那形象本身,就是他們如今竭力想要把握其足跡的那位——也就是他們所謂藉著鏡子所見的那位。其餘的也照樣。論不可將時間的更替歸於上帝。神聖的永恆先於一切時間,在上帝裡面既無過去、現在,也無將來,而是萬物都被說成在祂裡面是現在的,因為祂以自己的永恆包羅萬有。不然,若把時間的更替歸於祂,就必須相信上帝是可變的。倘若總有某些時間與上帝同在,那就不是時間,而是永恆了;那些時間也不會變動,而是靜止不動。
But the Almighty is found in perfection when in the future He shall be presented face to face to each of the elect, that they may contemplate that very form whose footprints they now strive to grasp — that is, Him whom they are said to see through a mirror. So too the rest. That no succession of times is ascribed to God. Divine eternity precedes all times, nor is anything past, present, or future believed to be in God, but all things are said to be present in Him, because by His eternity He embraces all things. Otherwise God must be believed changeable, if successions of times are ascribed to Him. If there were always some times together with God, it would not be time but eternity, nor would the times change, but they would stand still.
21:19
Praesens, praeteritum et futurum nostrum est habere, non Domini: uerbi causa, dicimus pro praesens: "teneo codicem", pro praeterito "tenui", pro futuro "tenebo". Vniuersitatem uero Deus tenet, et pro tenuit et tenebit "tenet" dicitur. - Sed nec ipsorum angelorum decessio accessioue est temporum. Nam duas esse in creaturis res quarum uicissitudo temporum non ualet: angelis scilicet propter quod incommutabili inhaerent Creatori, siue materiae illius informi: priusquam ex ea omnia ista quae temporaliter iam uoluuntur formarentur, nec ipsi utique ualebat tempus. Tempus igitur non ad eas creaturas quae supra caelos sunt, sed ad eas quae sub caelo sunt pertinere:
現在、過去、將來是屬於我們的,不屬於主:例如,論現在我們說「我拿著書卷」,論過去說「我拿過」,論將來說「我要拿」。但上帝掌握全體;對於「祂拿過」和「祂要拿」,都說「祂掌握」。就是天使自己也沒有時間的離去或增添。因為受造物中有兩樣是時間的更替所不能左右的:一是天使,因為他們緊依那不變的造物主;二是那無形的原質,在如今隨時間流轉的萬物尚未從其中被造成之先——時間對它也毫無權能。所以時間不屬於那些在諸天之上的受造物,而屬於那些在天以下的受造物:
Present, past, and future are ours to have, not the Lord's: for example, for the present we say 'I hold the book,' for the past 'I held,' for the future 'I shall hold.' But God holds the whole; and for 'He held' and 'He shall hold' it is said 'He holds.' Nor is there any departure or accession of times even for the angels themselves. For there are two things among creatures over which the vicissitude of times has no power: namely the angels, because they cleave to the unchangeable Creator; and that formless matter, before all these things which now roll on in time were formed out of it — over this too time had no power. Time, therefore, pertains not to those creatures which are above the heavens, but to those which are beneath the heaven:
21:20
non enim angelis accedunt tempora uel succedunt, sed nobis qui sub caelo uersamur in hoc infirmo mundo. VII. De temporibus. 7.1. Nulla ante principium mundi fuisse tempora, quia, dum sit ipsud tempus creatura, in principio tamen mundi factum esse credendum est. Ideo ergo principium dicitur, quod ex ipso coepit rerum uniuersarum exordium. 7.2. Nullum spatium corporaliter habent tempora, quia ante abscedunt paene quam ueniant. Ideoque in rebus nullus status est temporum, quia celeri creaturae motu mutantur.
因為時間並不臨到天使,也不為他們相繼更替,而是臨到我們這些在天以下、住在這衰弱世界中的人。論時間。在世界起初之先並無時間,因為時間本身既是受造物,就當相信它是在世界起初被造的。所以稱為「起初」,因為萬物的開端由此起始。時間沒有形體上的延展,因為它們幾乎在來到之前就已退去。因此事物中並無固定不變的時間狀態,因為它們隨著受造物迅疾的運動而變化。
for times do not accede to the angels nor succeed one another for them, but to us who dwell beneath the heaven in this weak world. Concerning times. There were no times before the beginning of the world, because, since time itself is a creature, it must nevertheless be believed to have been made in the beginning of the world. It is therefore called 'the beginning,' because from it the origin of all things took its start. Times have no bodily extension, because they retreat almost before they come. And therefore there is no fixed state of times in things, because by the swift motion of the creature they are changed.
21:21
Nec centum anni unum tempus est, nec unus annus unum tempus est, nec unus mensis unum tempus est, nec dies, nec hora, quia dum haec omnia particulis accedunt suis et decedunt, quomodo unum dicendum est quod non simul est? 7.3. Vtrum sit praeteritum futurumue tempus sicut praesens, et si est, scire oportet ubi est. Sed aduerte quod cuncta, et futura et praeterita et praesentia, in animo sunt potius requirenda. 7.4. Tria ista, praeterita, praesentia et futura, in animo tantum inueniri: praeterita reminiscendo, praesentia contuendo, futura expectando. Speramus igitur aduenientia, intuemur praesentia, recolimus transeuntia. Haec non ita in Deum sunt, cuius simul omnia adsunt. VIII. De mundo.
百年不是一個時間,一年也不是一個時間,一月也不是一個時間,一日、一時也不是;既然這一切都藉其細分而來去,那不能同時存在的,怎能稱為一個呢?過去或將來的時間是否像現在一樣存在,若存在,就當知道它在何處。但要留意,一切——將來、過去和現在——毋寧當在心裡尋求。這三者,過去、現在和將來,只在心裡尋見:過去藉記憶,現在藉觀看,將來藉期待。所以我們盼望那將來之事,觀看那現在之事,追想那已過之事。這些在上帝裡面卻不是如此,因為萬物在祂裡面都是同時現在的。論世界。
A hundred years is not one time, nor is one year one time, nor is one month one time, nor a day, nor an hour, since, while all these come and go by their particles, how can that be called one which does not exist all at once? Whether there be a past or future time as there is a present, and if there be, one ought to know where it is. But observe that all things — future, past, and present — are rather to be sought in the mind. These three, past, present, and future, are found only in the mind: the past by remembering, the present by beholding, the future by expecting. We hope, therefore, for things coming, we behold things present, we recollect things passing. These are not so in God, to whom all things are present at once. Concerning the world.
21:22
8.1. Mundus ex rebus uisibilibus, sed tamen inuestigabilibus constat. Homo autem ex rerum uniuersitate conpositus, alter in breui quodammodo creatus est mundus. 8.2. Ratio mundi de uno consideranda est homine. Nam sicut per dimensiones aetatum ad finem homo uergitur, ita et mundus per hoc quod distenditur tempore, deficit, quia unde homo atque mundus crescere uidetur, inde uterque minuitur. 8.3. Frustra dicitur per tanta retro tempora Deo uacanti noua pro mundo faciendo orta fuisse cogitatio, quando in suo maneret aeterno consilio huius mundi constructio, nec tempus ante principium, sed aeternitas fuerit. Tempus uero a substitutione creaturae, non creatura coepit a tempore. 8.4.
世界由可見卻不可測度之物構成。至於人,是由萬物的全體所組成,可說是被造成另一個縮小的世界。世界的道理當從單一的人去思量。因為正如人藉著歲月的度量趨向其終局,世界也藉著在時間中的延展而衰減;因為人與世界看似在何處增長,二者也就在何處減損。有人枉然地說,在如此漫長的往昔之後,那本安閒的上帝忽起造世的新念頭——其實這世界的建構一直存於祂永恆的旨意中,在起初之先並無時間,惟有永恆。時間確是從受造物的設立而始的;受造物並非從時間而始。
The world consists of things visible, yet unsearchable. But man, composed from the whole of things, was created as it were another world in miniature. The plan of the world is to be considered from a single man. For just as through the dimensions of ages man inclines toward his end, so also the world, by that which is stretched out in time, declines; for whence man and the world seem to grow, thence each of them is diminished. In vain is it said that after so many ages past a new thought arose in God, who had been at leisure, of making the world — since the construction of this world remained in His eternal counsel, and there was no time before the beginning, but eternity. Time indeed began from the substituting of the creature; the creature did not begin from time.
21:23
Quidam aiunt: "Quid faciebat Deus antequam caelum faceret? Cur noua uoluntas in Deo ut mundum conderet orta est?". Sed noua in Deo uoluntas exorta non est, quia etsi in re mundus non erat, in aeterna tamen ratione et consilio semper erat. 8.5. Dicunt quidam quia subito uoluit Deus facere mundum, quod ante non fecit, uoluntatem Dei inmutari arbitrantes, qui aliquando uoluit quod aliquando non uoluit. Quibus respondendum est: "uoluntas Dei Deus est, quia non ipse aliud est, aliud uoluntas eius, sed hoc est illi uelle quod ipse est, et quod ipse est utique aeternus et incommutabilis est. " Hoc est ergo uoluntas eius. 8.6.
有人說:「上帝造天以先在作甚麼?為何上帝裡面興起要創立世界的新意志?」但上帝裡面並未興起新的意志,因為世界雖在事實上尚不存在,卻在祂永恆的理性與旨意中一直存在。有人說上帝忽然願意造世界,就是祂先前未曾造的,以為上帝的意志有改變——像一個此時願意、彼時卻不願意的人。當如此回答他們:「上帝的意志就是上帝,因為並非祂是一物、祂的意志是另一物;乃是祂的意願就是祂自己本身,而祂自己本身必定是永恆不變的。」這就是祂的意志。
Certain men say: 'What was God doing before He made heaven? Why did a new will arise in God to found the world?' But no new will arose in God, because, although the world did not exist in fact, yet in His eternal reason and counsel it always existed. Some say that God suddenly willed to make the world, which He had not made before, thinking that the will of God is changed — as one who at one time willed what at another time he willed not. To whom it must be answered: 'The will of God is God, because His will is not one thing and He another; but to will is for Him the very thing that He Himself is, and what He Himself is, is surely eternal and unchangeable.' This, then, is His will.
21:24
Materies, ex qua formatus est mundus, origine non tempore res a se factas praecessit, ut sonus cantum. Prior enim est sonus cantu, quia suauitas cantilenae ad sonum uocis, non sonus pertinet ad suauitatem. Ac per hoc utrumque simul sunt, sed ille ad quem pertinet cantus prior est, id est sonus. 8.7. Materia ex qua caelum terraque formata est, ideo informis uocata est, quia nondum ex ea formata erant quae formari restabant. Verum ipsa materia ex nihilo facta erat. 8.8. Aliud est aliquid fieri posse, aliud fieri necesse esse. Fieri necesse est quod Deus naturis inseruit; fieri autem posse est quod extra cursum inditum naturarum Creator ut faceret, quandoque uoluit, reseruauit. 8.9.
世界所由成形的原質,在來源上而非時間上先於由它所造之物,如聲音先於歌曲。因為聲音先於歌曲,乃因旋律的悅耳屬於嗓音的聲響,而非聲響屬於那悅耳。因此二者同時並存,但那歌曲所屬的在先,就是聲音。天地所由成形的原質稱為「無形」,因為那尚待成形之物還未從它成形。但這原質本身是從無中造出的。「某物能夠成就」是一回事,「某物必然成就」又是另一回事。上帝植入諸性中的乃必然成就;至於造物主保留、待祂願意時在諸性所定的常軌之外要成就的,則是能夠成就的。
The matter from which the world was formed preceded the things made from it in origin, not in time, as sound precedes song. For sound is prior to song, because the sweetness of the melody belongs to the sound of the voice, not the sound to the sweetness. And by this both exist together, but that to which the song belongs is prior — that is, the sound. The matter from which heaven and earth were formed is called 'formless' because there had not yet been formed from it the things which remained to be formed. But this matter itself had been made from nothing. It is one thing for something to be able to come to be, another for it to be necessary that it come to be. It is necessary that come to be which God has implanted in natures; but it is able to come to be that which the Creator reserved to make, whenever He should will, outside the appointed course of natures.
21:25
Non ex hoc substantiam habere credendae sunt tenebrae, quia dicit Dominus per prophetam: Ego, Dominus, formans lucem et creans tenebras. Sed quia angelica natura, quae non est praeuaricata, lux dicitur, illa autem quae praeuaricata est, tenebrarum nomine nuncupatur. Vnde et in principio lux a tenebris diuiditur. Sed quia et hos et illos Deus creauit, inde formans lucem et creans tenebras; uerumtamen bonos angelos non tantum creans, sed etiam formans; malos uero creans tantum, non formans. Hoc et de hominibus bonis malisque accipiendum est. 8.10.
不可因為主藉先知說「我耶和華造光又造暗」,就相信黑暗有本體。乃是因為那未曾悖逆的天使本性被稱為光,而那悖逆了的則以黑暗之名相稱。因此在起初光就與暗分開。但因上帝造了這些也造了那些,故說「造光又造暗」;然而善的天使祂不僅創造,也加以塑成;惡的祂只創造,卻不塑成。這也當用於善人與惡人身上。
Darkness is not therefore to be believed to have substance because the Lord says through the prophet: 'I, the Lord, forming light and creating darkness.' But because the angelic nature which did not transgress is called light, while that which transgressed is named by the name of darkness. Hence also in the beginning light is divided from darkness. But because God created both these and those, therefore He is 'forming light and creating darkness'; yet the good angels He not only creates but also forms; the evil ones He only creates, does not form. This is also to be understood of good and evil men.
21:26
Post adnumeratam caeli terraeque creaturam, ideo nominatur in Genesi Spiritus Sanctus, ut, quia superferri eum dici oportebat, ante illa nominarentur quorum Creator Spiritus Sanctus superferri diceretur. Quod et apostolus indicat, dum supereminentem uiam caritatis demonstrat. 8.11 .Ideo superferri aquis Sanctus dicitur Spiritus quia donum est Dei, in quo subsistentes requiescimus, atque protegendo nos superfertur nobis. 8.12. Vnaquaeque natura suo pondere nititur. Ignis autem et oleum merito superiora semper appetunt, quia per ipsorum figuram superferri uniuersae creaturae Spiritus Sanctus probatur. 8.13. Dies prior factus angeli sunt.
在數點了天地的受造物之後,聖靈才在《創世記》中被題名,好使——因為當說祂運行在上——先題那些聖靈作為其造物主被說成運行其上之物。這也是使徒所指明的,當他顯示那更超越的愛之道路時。所以聖靈被說成運行在水面上,因為祂是上帝的恩賜,我們安居其中得享安息,祂也藉著保護我們而運行在我們之上。每一本性都憑自身的重量而趨向。但火與油理當總是向上求,因為藉它們的表徵,聖靈被證明運行在全受造之上。首先所造之日就是眾天使。
After the creature of heaven and earth has been enumerated, the Holy Spirit is then named in Genesis, so that, because it was fitting to say that He was borne above, those things should first be named above which the Holy Spirit their Creator was said to be borne. This the Apostle also indicates when he shows the surpassing way of charity. Therefore the Holy Spirit is said to be borne above the waters because He is the gift of God, in whom, abiding, we find rest, and by protecting us He is borne above us. Each nature strives by its own weight. But fire and oil rightly always seek the higher places, because by their figure the Holy Spirit is proved to be borne above the whole creation. The first day made were the angels.
21:27
Quorum propter uni-tatem insinuandam non dies primus, sed dies dictus est unus. Et idcirco ipse repetitur semper in exsecutione creaturae. Qui dies, hoc est natura angelorum, quando creaturam ipsam contemplabatur, quodam modo uesperescebat. Non autem permanendo in eius creaturae contuitu, sed laudem eius ad Deum referens eamque melius in diuina ratione conspiciens, continuo mane fiebat. Si uero permaneret neglecto Creatore in creaturae aspectu, iam non uespera, sed nox utique fieret. 8.14. Dum se creatura melius in Deo quam in se ipsa nouerit, ipsa sui cognitio, quae maior in Deo est, dies et lux dicitur.
為表明他們的合一,就不稱「第一日」,而稱「一日」。因此在創造的施行中它總是被重述。這「日」,就是天使的本性,當它觀想受造物本身時,某種意義上就漸近黃昏。但它不停留在對那受造物的凝視,卻將對它的讚美歸於上帝、並在神聖的理性中更美好地觀看它時,隨即便成了早晨。但它若忽略造物主,停留在對受造物的凝望中,那時就不是黃昏,而必成了黑夜。當受造物在上帝裡面比在自身裡面更認識自己時,那在上帝裡面更大的自我認識,就稱為晝與光。
For the sake of intimating their unity, it was called not 'the first day' but 'day one.' And therefore it is always repeated in the carrying out of the creation. This day — that is, the nature of the angels — when it contemplated the creature itself, in a certain manner grew toward evening. But not remaining in the contemplation of that creature, and referring its praise to God and beholding it better in the divine reason, it straightway became morning. But if it had remained, neglecting the Creator, in the beholding of the creature, then it would have become not evening but surely night. When the creature knows itself better in God than in itself, that very self-knowledge, which is greater in God, is called day and light.
21:28
Cognitio uero sua in seipsa, ad conpensationem cognitionis illius quae est in Deo, quia longe inferior est, uespera nominatur. Ideoque post uesperam mane fiebat, quia, dum suam in se cognitionem sibi satisfacere non agnosceret, ut se plenius nosse potuisset, ad Deum sese referebat creatura in quo se dies agnoscendo melius fieret. 8.15. Non sic quemadmodum nos transitorie dicimus "fiat aliquid" sic Deus dixitfiat caelum in principio. Illud enim sempiterne in Verbo unico dictum est. Si transitorie dictum est a Deofiat, erat utique creatura aliqua unde iam talis fieret uox.
但它對自身在自身內的認識,與那在上帝裡面的認識相比——因為遠為低下——便稱為黃昏。因此黃昏之後成了早晨,因為受造物既認出它在自身內的認識不能使自己滿足,為要能更完全地認識自己,就將自己歸向上帝,在祂裡面藉著認識而更美好地成為晝。上帝說「願天在起初被造」,並不像我們短暫地說「願某物被造」。因為那是在惟一的道中永恆地說出的。若「願它被造」是被上帝短暫地說出的,那必已有某受造物,可從中發出這樣的聲音。
But its knowledge of itself in itself, in comparison with that knowledge which is in God — because it is far inferior — is named evening. And therefore after evening it became morning, because, when the creature recognized that its knowledge in itself could not satisfy it, that it might be able to know itself more fully, it referred itself to God, in whom, by knowing, it might better become day. God did not say 'let heaven be made in the beginning' as we transitorily say 'let something be made.' For that was said eternally in the one Word. If it had been said transitorily by God, 'let it be made,' there would surely have been some creature from which such an utterance might already be produced.
21:29
Sed quia, antequam diceretfiat, nulla extitit creatura, ipsud fiat quod dictum est, in aeternitate Verbi, non in uocis sono enuntiatum est. 8.16. Non septies a Deo uisa septiesque laudata est creatura, quae antequam fieret, perfecte ab illo est uisa; sed dum nos singula uidentes laudamus, tamquam ipse uideat laudetque per nos, sicut illud: Non estis uos qui loquimini, sed Spiritus Patris uestri. Proinde, sicut ipse per nos loquitur, ita uidet et laudat per nos, sed per se perenniter ac sempiterne uidet, per nos uero temporaliter. 8.17.
但因在祂說「願它被造」之先並無受造物存在,那被說出的「願它被造」乃是在道的永恆中發出的,而非在聲音的響聲中。受造物並非被上帝看了七次、讚了七次——那在受造之先就已被祂完全看見的受造物;而是當我們看見每一件事物並讚美它時,彷彿祂藉我們自己看見並讚美,正如那句話:「說話的不是你們,乃是你們父的靈。」照樣,正如祂藉我們說話,祂也藉我們看見並讚美;但祂藉自己則永久永恆地看見,藉我們則在時間中看見。
But because, before He said 'let it be made,' no creature existed, that very 'let it be made' which was spoken was uttered in the eternity of the Word, not in the sound of a voice. The creature was not seen by God seven times and praised seven times — the creature which, before it was made, was perfectly seen by Him; but while we, seeing each single thing, praise it, as though He Himself saw and praised through us, as in that saying: 'It is not you who speak, but the Spirit of your Father.' Accordingly, just as He speaks through us, so He sees and praises through us; but through Himself He sees perpetually and eternally, whereas through us He sees temporally.
21:30
Adtende uniuersaliter creaturam in principium ualde bonam uocari, singulariter uero tantum bonam, quia et membra corporis cum sint singula bona, maius tamen bonum faciunt, dum singula omnia ualde bonum corpus efficiunt. 8.18. Decor elementorum omnium in pulchro et apto consistit. Sed pulchrum esse quod per seipsum est pulchrum, ut homo ex anima et membris omnibus constans. Aptum uero esse ut uestimentum et uictum. Ideoque hominem dici pulchrum ad se, quia non uestimento et uictui est homo necessarius, sed ista homini. Ideo autem illa apta, quia non sibi sicut homo pulchra, aut ad se, sed ad aliud, id est ad hominem adcommodata, non sibimet necessaria.
要注意,受造物作為整體被稱為「甚好」,而單獨則只稱「好」;因為就是身體的肢體,雖各自是好的,然而當眾肢體合起來組成甚好的身體時,卻造成更大的好。萬物元素的美觀在於「美」與「合宜」。但那本身即美的才是美,如人由靈魂與全部肢體所組成。至於合宜的,則如衣服與食物。因此人被稱為在自身內是美的,因為人並非為衣服和食物所必需,乃是這些為人所必需。但那些是合宜的,因為它們不像人那樣為自身而美,也不為自身,乃為別的——就是為配合人而設,並非為自身所必需。
Note that the creation as a whole is called 'very good,' but singly only 'good'; because even the members of the body, though they are singly good, yet make a greater good when all the several members together make up a very good body. The comeliness of all the elements consists in the beautiful and the fitting. But that is beautiful which is beautiful through itself, as man consisting of soul and all his members. That is fitting, however, like clothing and food. And therefore man is called beautiful in himself, because man is not necessary to clothing and food, but these to man. But those things are fitting, because they are not beautiful for themselves, as man is, nor for themselves, but for another — that is, adapted to man, not necessary for themselves.
21:31
Hoc et de ceteris elementorum naturis dicendum. 8.19. Cuncta quae sunt et facta sunt, mira ualde sunt, sed consuetudine uiluerunt. Ideoque sic diuina scrutare opera, ut semper ea cogites inmensa. 9.6. Fecit Deus omnia ualde bona. Nihil ergo natura malum, quando et ipsa quae in creaturis uidentur esse poenalia, si bene utantur et bona et prospera sunt, si male utantur noceant. Ita ergo pendenda est creatura ex nostro usu non bono, non ex sua natura ualde bona. VIIII. Unde malum. 9.1. Malum a diabolo non est creatum, sed inuentum, et ideo nihil est malum, quia sine Deo factum est nihil. Deus autem malum non fecit.
這對元素的其他本性也當如此說。凡存在並被造的一切都極其奇妙,卻因習以為常而顯得低賤。因此你要如此察究神聖的作為,使你常思想它們為浩大無窮。上帝造萬物甚好。所以沒有一物本性是惡的,因為就是那些在受造物中看似有刑罰性的東西,若善用便是好的、有益的;若惡用便有害。所以受造物當按我們不善的用法來衡量,而非按其甚好的本性。惡從何來。惡不是魔鬼所創造的,而是牠所發明的;因此惡本是虛無,因為離了上帝就一無所成。而上帝並未造惡。
This is also to be said of the other natures of the elements. All things that are and have been made are exceedingly wondrous, but by familiarity they have grown cheap. And therefore search the divine works in such a way that you may always ponder them as immense. God made all things very good. Nothing therefore is by nature evil, since even those things which seem to be penal in creatures, if they are well used, are good and prosperous; if ill used, they harm. So then the creature is to be weighed by our non-good usage, not by its own nature, which is very good. Whence comes evil. Evil was not created by the devil but invented, and therefore evil is nothing, because without God nothing was made. But God did not make evil.
21:32
Non quia alicubi aut aliquando erat malum unde fieret diabolus malus, sed quia uitium est, dum esset angelus bonus, superbiendo effectus est malus, et ideo recte dicitur ab eo inuentum malum. 9.2a. Nullam esse naturam mali, quia natura omnis aut incommutabilis ut Deus est, aut commutabilis ut creatura est. Malum uero ideo natura nulla est, quia accedendo in bonam naturam efficit eam uitiosam. Quae, dum discedit, natura manet, et malum quod inerat nusquam est. 9.2b. Ex eo quod uitium nocet naturae, agnoscitur uitium natura non esse, quia nihil quod naturale est nocet. 9.3.
並非在某處或某時有一種惡,可使魔鬼因之變惡,而是因為惡乃是一種缺欠:牠原是善的天使,卻因驕傲而變成惡的,因此正可說惡是牠所發明的。惡並無本性,因為凡本性不是不變的(如上帝),就是可變的(如受造物)。惡之所以並非本性,乃因它加於善的本性上,就使那本性敗壞。當它離去時,本性依然存留,而先前在其中的惡便無處可尋。從缺欠有害於本性這事,就認出缺欠並非本性,因為凡屬本性的都不致有害。
Not that somewhere or at some time there was an evil from which the devil might be made evil, but because it is a defect: while he was a good angel, by pride he was made evil, and therefore evil is rightly said to have been invented by him. There is no nature of evil, because every nature is either unchangeable, as God is, or changeable, as the creature is. But evil is therefore no nature, because by acceding to a good nature it makes it vicious. And when it departs, the nature remains, and the evil which was in it is nowhere. From the fact that a defect harms a nature, it is recognized that a defect is not a nature, because nothing which is natural harms.
21:33
Dum natura bona damnatur propter uoluntatem malam, ipsa mala uoluntas testis est naturae bonae, quae in tanto testatur eam esse bonam, ut illam Deus pro malo non relinquat inultam. 9.4. Creditur ab hereticis mentem a Deo, uitia a diabolo fuisse creata. Inde et ab ipsis duae naturae bona et mala putantur. Sed uitia natura non sunt, et dum uere a diabolo sint, non tamen creata sunt. 9.5. Quamobcausam permiserit Deus mali oboriri statum, nisi ut ex contrariis malis bonae naturae decor emineret? Modus iste etiam in uerbis esse conperitur. Qui modus antitheta dicitur, quod latine oppositum, uel contrapositum nominatur, et fit pulchra elocutio quando mox contraria prosperis proferuntur.
當善的本性因惡的意志而受定罪時,那惡的意志本身正是善本性的見證,它如此證明那本性是善的,以致上帝不撇下它、不因它的惡而不予報應。異端者相信心智是上帝所造,惡習是魔鬼所造。因此他們也假設有善惡兩種本性。但惡習並非本性,它們雖確是出於魔鬼,卻並非被造的。上帝為何緣故容許惡的境況興起,豈不是為要藉相反的諸惡使善本性的美觀更加顯明?這種方式甚至在言辭中也可尋見。這種方式稱為「對偶」,拉丁文名為「相對」或「相反並列」;當相反之事隨即與順遂之事並列陳明時,就成了優美的言辭。
When a good nature is condemned on account of an evil will, that very evil will is a witness to the good nature, which it so far testifies to be good that God does not leave it unavenged for its evil. It is believed by heretics that the mind was created by God, the vices by the devil. Hence by them also two natures, good and evil, are supposed. But vices are not natures, and though they be truly from the devil, yet they were not created. For what cause did God permit the state of evil to arise, except that from contrary evils the comeliness of good natures might stand out? This mode is found even in words. This mode is called antithesis, which in Latin is named 'the opposed' or 'the contraposed,' and a beautiful speech is made when contraries are presently set forth alongside things favorable.
21:34
Ita in rebus permixtum est malum, ut naturae bonum ad conparationem excelleret mali. 9.6. [Fecit Deus omnia ualde bona. Nihil ergo natura malum, quando et ipsa quae in creaturis uidentur esse poenalia, si bene utantur et bona et prospera sunt; si male utantur, noceant. Ita ergo pendenda est creatura ex nostro usu non bono, non ex sua natura ualde bona. ] 9.7. Si radas supercilium hominis, paruam rem demis, sed totius corporis ingeris foeditatem. Ita et in uniuersitate creaturae: si extremum uermiculum natura malum dixeris, uniuersae creaturae iniuriam facis. 9.8. Cuncta mala per peccatum primi hominis pro poena sunt translata in uniuersum genus humanum.
惡如此摻雜於萬物中,使本性的善藉相比而勝過惡。上帝造萬物甚好。所以沒有一物本性是惡的,因為就是那些在受造物中看似有刑罰性的東西,若善用便是好的、有益的;若惡用便有害。所以受造物當按我們不善的用法來衡量,而非按其甚好的本性。你若剃去人的一道眉毛,所取去的雖是小事,卻使全身增添醜陋。全受造之物也是如此:你若說那最小的小蟲本性是惡的,就是對全受造之物加以侮慢。一切諸惡都藉頭一個人的罪,作為刑罰,轉加於全人類。
So evil is intermingled in things, that the good of nature might, by comparison, excel evil. God made all things very good. Nothing therefore is by nature evil, since even those very things which seem to be penal in creatures, if they are well used, are good and prosperous; if ill used, they harm. So then the creature is to be weighed by our non-good usage, not by its own nature, which is very good. If you shave off a man's eyebrow, you take away a small thing, but you bring foulness upon the whole body. So too in the whole of creation: if you call the least little worm evil by nature, you do injury to the whole creation. All evils have been transferred, as a penalty, through the sin of the first man upon the whole human race.
21:35
Proinde quaecumque uidentur mala, partim nobis saeuiunt origine, partim culpa. 9.9a. Mala dicunt multa in creaturis peruersi, ut ignem quia urit, ut ferrum quia occidit, ut feram quia mordit. Sedcommoda ipsorum non intendens homo, accusat in illis quod sibi debet potius inputari. Cuiusque pro peccato ista effecta sunt noxia, quae illi omni ex parte fuerant ante peccatum subiecta. 9.9b. Nostro uitio, non sua natura, nobis mala sunt ea quae nobis nocent. Nam lux, dum sit bona, infirmis oculis noxia est, et tunc oculorum uitium, non lucis est. Sic et cetera. 9.10.
因此,凡看似為惡之物,一部分因來源向我們發威,一部分因過犯。乖僻的人稱受造物中許多東西為惡,如火因它焚燒,鐵因它殺人,野獸因它咬人。但人不留意它們的益處,反在其中控告那本該歸咎於自己的。這些東西是因各人的罪才變得有害的,它們在犯罪之前原是各方面都服在人之下的。那些有害於我們之物,乃是因我們自己的過犯、而非因它們的本性,才成了我們的禍害。因為光雖是好的,卻有害於軟弱的眼睛;那時是眼睛的缺陷,而非光的缺陷。其餘的也照樣。
Accordingly, whatever things seem to be evils rage against us partly by origin, partly by fault. The perverse call many things in creatures evil, as fire because it burns, iron because it kills, a wild beast because it bites. But man, not attending to their benefits, accuses in them what ought rather to be imputed to himself. For each man's sin these things were made harmful, which had been subject to him in every part before sin. By our own fault, not by their nature, those things are evils to us which harm us. For light, though it be good, is harmful to weak eyes; and then it is the defect of the eyes, not of the light. So too the rest.
21:36
Cum creaturarum stimulis et elementorum aduersitatibus homo uerberatur, peccati hoc exigere poenam, ut Deo superbiens homo ea quae infra ipso sunt patiatur aduersa. Vnde et in sapientia legitur pro Deo: Pugnauit cum eo orbis terrarum contra insensatos. Merito ergo peccatorum hoc actum est ut naturaliter prospera mutentur homini in aduersis. Vnde et Salomon: Creatura exardescit in tormentum aduersus iniustos et lenior est ad benefaciendum his qui in Deum confidunt. 9.11. Non erit caro subiecta animae, nec uitia rationi, si animus non est subditus Conditori. Tunc autem recte subiciuntur nobis omnia quae sub nos sunt, si nos subicimur ei a quo nobis illa subiecta sunt.
當人被受造物的刺棒與元素的逆境所鞭打時,這正是索取罪的刑罰:使那向上帝驕傲的人,反受那在他之下之物的逆待。因此《智慧書》中也代上帝說:「全地與祂一同攻擊那些無知的人。」所以理當為著罪的緣故如此成就:使本性順遂之物為人變作逆境。因此所羅門說:「受造物燃起,成為刑罰攻擊不義的人,卻對那些信靠上帝的人更溫和地行善。」肉體若不服靈魂,惡習若不服理性,是因心智不服它的創造主。惟有當我們服在那使萬物服我們的主之下時,凡在我們之下之物才正確地服在我們之下。
When man is scourged by the goads of creatures and the adversities of the elements, this exacts the penalty of sin: that man, being proud toward God, should suffer as adverse those things which are beneath himself. Hence also in Wisdom it is read on God's behalf: 'The world fought with Him against the senseless.' Rightly, therefore, it was brought about, for sins, that things naturally prosperous should be changed for man into adversities. Hence Solomon: 'The creature blazes into torment against the unjust, and is gentler to do good to those who trust in God.' The flesh will not be subject to the soul, nor the vices to reason, if the mind is not subject to its Maker. But then are all things rightly made subject to us which are beneath us, if we are made subject to Him by whom those things were made subject to us.
21:37
Nam et quae uidentur esstsubiecta ei qui Deo subiectus non est, ille potius subicitui eis, qui suam uoluntatem subiugat amori earum quae sib subiecta existimat. X. De angelis. 10.1. Angelorum nomen officii est, non naturae, nam secundum naturam spiritus nuncupantur. Quando enim de caelis ad adnuntiandum hominibus mittuntur, ex ipsa ad nuntiatione angeli nominantur. Natura enim spiritus sunt. Tunc autem angeli uocantur quando mittuntur. 10.2. Natura angelorum mutabilis est quia inest illis mu tabilitas in natura, sed facit eos incorruptos caritas sempi terna. Gratia, non natura esse incommutabiles angelos Nam si natura incommutabiles essent, diabolus non utique cecidisset.
因為就是那些看似服在不服上帝之人之下的東西——那將自己的意志臣服於他所以為服在自己之下之物的愛的人,反倒服在它們之下。論天使。「天使」之名是職分之名,非本性之名;因為按本性他們稱為靈。當他們從諸天被差往向人傳報時,就從這傳報得名為「天使」。按本性他們是靈,但當被差遣時就稱為天使。天使的本性是可變的,因為可變性按本性存於他們裡面;然而永恆的愛使他們不朽壞。天使之所以不變,是憑恩典,非憑本性。因為他們若按本性不變,魔鬼必不至墜落。
For even those things which seem subject to him who is not subject to God — he rather is made subject to them, who subjugates his own will to the love of those things which he supposes to be subject to himself. Concerning the angels. The name 'angel' is of office, not of nature; for according to nature they are called spirits. For when they are sent from the heavens to announce things to men, from that very announcing they are named 'angels.' By nature they are spirits, but they are called angels when they are sent. The nature of the angels is changeable, because changeability is in them by nature; but eternal charity makes them incorrupt. It is by grace, not by nature, that the angels are unchangeable. For if they were by nature unchangeable, the devil surely would not have fallen.
21:38
Mutabilitatem itaque naturae suffragat in illis contemplatio Creatoris. Inde et priuatus est apostata angelus, dum fortitudinem suam non a Deo, sed a se uolui custodire. 10.3. Ante omnem creaturam angeli facti sunt, dum dictum est: Fiat lux. De ipsis enim dicit scriptura: Prior omnium creata est sapientia. Lux enim dicuntur participando lucis aeternae. Sapientia uero dicuntur genitae inhaerendo sapientiae. Et dum sint mutabiles natura, non tamen sinit eos contemplatio mutari diuina. 10.4. Ante omnem creationem mundi creati sunt angeli et ante omnem creationem angelorum diabolus conditus est, sicut scriptum est: Ipse est principium uiarum Dei.
所以對造物主的觀想在他們裡面救助了本性的可變性。那背道的天使也因此被剝奪了它,因他願意不從上帝、而從自己守住自己的力量。在一切受造之先天使被造,就是那說「要有光」之時。因為經上論到他們說:「智慧在萬物之先被造。」他們稱為「光」,是因分享那永恆的光;稱為「智慧」,是因緊依智慧而被生。他們雖按本性可變,然而神聖的觀想卻不容他們改變。在世界一切受造之先天使被造,在天使一切受造之先魔鬼被立,正如經上所寫:「牠是上帝道路的起頭。」
The contemplation of the Creator therefore comes to the aid of the changeableness of nature in them. And thence the apostate angel was deprived of it, since he willed to guard his strength not from God but from himself. Before all creation the angels were made, when it was said: 'Let there be light.' For of them Scripture says: 'Wisdom was created before all things.' They are called 'light' by participating in the eternal light; and they are called 'wisdom' as begotten by cleaving to Wisdom. And though they are by nature changeable, yet the divine contemplation does not allow them to be changed. Before all creation of the world the angels were created, and before all creation of the angels the devil was founded, as it is written: 'He is the beginning of the ways of God.'
下一段 →
← 第 20 章第 22 章 →
123456789101112131415161718192021222324

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。