📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 雜記與文集

雜記與文集 第 16 章 第 2/4 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 16:39–16:76(全章共 121 節)

← 第 15 章第 17 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
16:39
illud autem quod in euangelio legitur, post huius lucis occasum abrahae sinibus egentem lazarum fuisse susceptum, diuitem uero flammis adurentibus aestuantem guttam postulasse unde eius temperaretur incendium, ideo intellegitur positum ut humani generis rerum ruinosa praesumptio quid formidare debuisset agnosceret. Ceterum nec ille lingua locutus est quam constat esse corpoream, nec ille digitos habuit unde cadentibus guttis incendium diuitis temperare potuisset. Nam et reliqua in hunc modum suscipienda sunt quae lectione simili continentur. Parum est enim quod de creatura ista memorantur ad consuetudinem humani generis instruendam.
但福音書中所讀到的——這光(生命)落下之後,貧乏的拉撒路被接入亞伯拉罕的懷裡,而那財主在炙烤的火焰中焚燒煎熬,乞求一滴水好叫他被火所灼的得以稍緩——當理解為如此記述,是要使人類對萬事傾覆性的自負,認清自己本當畏懼之事。然而,那貧乏者並未用舌頭說話(舌頭確是有形的),那財主也沒有手指,藉以用落下的水滴緩解他的焚燒。因為類似經文所含的其餘之事,也當以這種方式來領受。因為這些關於此受造之物的記述,乃是為要教導人類的習性,這原是小事。
But that which is read in the Gospel—that after the setting of this light, Lazarus in his want was received into the bosom of Abraham, but the rich man, burning and boiling in the scorching flames, begged for a drop whereby his burning might be tempered—is to be understood as set down so that the ruinous presumption of the human race regarding things might recognize what it ought to have dreaded. But neither did that one speak with a tongue, which is established to be corporeal, nor did this one have fingers whereby he might have tempered the rich man's burning with falling drops. For the other things contained in like reading are to be received in this manner. For it is a small matter that these things are recorded of this creature for the instruction of the custom of the human race.
16:40
Ipsum quoque auctorem impassibilem, immutabilem, perenniter uno modo manentem, furere legimus, dormitare frequenter audiuimus, non quod talia possint Domino conuenire, sed ut res aliquae ex humana consuetudine facilius compendiosiusque noscantur. Sic animas, nobis informes, formas legimus frequenter accipere. Solet etiam aliquos permouere si anima non habeat quantitatem, dum eam constet intra corpus hominis contineri; sed si definitionem ueracissimam quantitatis reuocemus in medium, quae res singulas breuiter semper absoluit, facile nobis probata ueritas elucescit. Sic enim arithmetici eam compendiosa ueritate describunt:
我們也讀到那位作者自己——祂是不受苦的、不變的、永遠存於一個樣式中——竟「發烈怒」,又常聽說祂「打盹」;這並非說這樣的事能合於主,而是要使某些事更容易、更簡便地藉人的習性被認識。如此,我們讀到對我們而言本是無形的靈魂,常領受形態。此外,若說靈魂沒有量度,卻又確定它被包含於人的身體之內,這也常使某些人困惑;但我們若把那總能簡短地解決個別事物、最為真確的「量度」定義重新提出,被證實的真理便輕易地為我們閃現。因為算術家以簡明的真理如此描述它:「
We read also that the Author Himself—impassible, immutable, abiding perpetually in one mode—rages, and we have often heard that He slumbers; not that such things can befit the Lord, but that some things may more easily and compendiously be known from human custom. So we read that souls, formless to us, frequently take on forms. It is also wont to disturb some, if the soul has no quantity, since it is established to be contained within the body of man; but if we recall to the midst the most truthful definition of quantity, which always briefly resolves single things, the proved truth easily shines forth for us. For thus the arithmeticians describe it with compendious truth:
16:41
omnis quantitas aut de continuatis constat ut arbor, homo, et mons, aut de disiunctis ut chorus, populus, uel aceruus, et his similia. Sed cum anima neque de continuatis, neque de disiunctis sit, quia corpus non est, clarum est eam quantitatem penitus non habere, sed ubicumque est, nec formam recipit nec habere nobis dicenda est aliquam quantitatem. Creatori tamen circumstantias earum et quantitates patere posse credendum est, quia omnia sub mensura, numero, et pondere creauit, et ipsi soli sunt nota uere, qui fecit ea, qui mira potentia ipsas quoque cogitationes nostras quasi res uisibiles intuetur, qui innocentis sanguinem audit clamantem; ad postremum, qui nouit omnia et antequam fiant.
凡量度,若非由連續之物構成,如樹、人、山,便由分離之物構成,如歌隊、民眾或一堆,及類此者。」但靈魂既不屬連續之物,也不屬分離之物,因為它不是身體,便顯然全然沒有量度;而無論它在何處,既不領受形態,也不該被我們說成具有任何量度。然而當信:它們的種種境況與量度能向造物主敞開,因為祂是按尺度、數目與重量造了萬物,而它們唯獨真正被那造它們者所知——祂以奇妙的能力,連我們的思想也彷彿可見之物般地察看,祂垂聽無辜者之血的呼喊;末了,祂在萬事尚未發生之先便已盡知。
every quantity consists either of continuous things, as a tree, a man, a mountain, or of disjoined things, as a chorus, a people, or a heap, and the like. But since the soul is neither of continuous nor of disjoined things, because it is not a body, it is clear that it has no quantity at all; but wherever it is, it neither receives form nor is to be said by us to have any quantity. Yet it is to be believed that their circumstances and quantities can lie open to the Creator, because He created all things by measure, number, and weight, and they are truly known to Him alone who made them—who by His marvellous power beholds even our very thoughts as if they were visible things, who hears the blood of the innocent crying out; and finally, who knows all things even before they come to be.
16:42
Tempus est uenire ad uirtutes morales quae sunt ambiendae diuitiae et reuera pretiosus census animarum, quas graeci aretas uocant, quibus contra immunditiam corporalem suam nititur bona conscientia uindicare puritatem. Primum aduersum praua uel iniqua iustitiae munimen obiectum est cuius, ut ueteres definire uoluerunt, talis noscitur esse complexio. Iustitia est habitus animi, pro communi utilitate seruatus, suam cuique tribuens dignitatem. Contra confusa et incerta prudentia utiliter adhibetur. Prudentia uero est rerum bonarum et malarum uerax scientia. Contra aduersa uel prospera remedialis opponitur fortitudo.
如今該談到道德的諸德了,它們是當追求的財富,實乃靈魂寶貴的資產,希臘人稱之為 aretai(諸德),良善的良心藉此抵擋身體的污穢,以維護自身的純潔。首先,抵擋邪僻或不義之事,設立了公義的壁壘,其界說正如古人所願界定的,被認為是如此:公義是一種心智的習性,為共同的益處而保守,把各人應得的尊嚴分給各人。抵擋混亂與不定之事,明智被有益地施用。而明智是對善惡之事真確的知識。抵擋逆境或順境,剛毅被立為良方。
It is time to come to the moral virtues, which are riches to be sought after and truly the precious wealth of souls, which the Greeks call aretai, by which a good conscience strives against bodily uncleanness to vindicate its own purity. First, against the depraved or the iniquitous, the bulwark of justice is set in opposition, whose framework, as the ancients wished to define it, is known to be such. Justice is a habit of mind, preserved for the common benefit, assigning to each his own dignity. Against confused and uncertain things, prudence is usefully applied. But prudence is the true knowledge of good and evil things. Against adverse or prosperous things, fortitude is set as a remedy.
16:43
Fortitudo autem est considerata periculorum susceptio et laborum firma perpessio. Contra delectationes igitur illicitas et uoluptates feruidas moderatrix nobis temperantia suffragatur. Temperantia quippe est aduersus libidinem atque alios non rectos impetus animi firma et moderata dominatio. His igitur munitionibus diuina opitulatione concessis, uelut quadruplici thorace circumdata, in hoc mundo mortifero salus animae custoditur nec potest a uitiis adiri quae tanta meruit tuitione uallari. Sed hoc uirtutum quadripertitum decus trina (ut ita dixerim) parte completur. Prima est contemplatio quae aciem nostrae mentis extendit ad res subtilissimas intuendas.
但剛毅是對危險經過審度的承擔,以及對勞苦堅定的忍受。因此,抵擋非法的歡愉與熾烈的逸樂,節制——我們的女主宰——前來相助。節制實是對情慾與心中其餘不正當衝動堅定而有節度的掌管。那麼,藉著神的幫助所賜的這些防禦,彷彿被四重的護心鎧所環繞,靈魂的救恩便在這帶來死亡的世界中受到守護,而那已配得以如此巨大的防衛築牆環護的靈魂,便不能被諸惡所侵近。但這四重的諸德之華美,乃藉(可以說是)三重的部分而臻於完全。第一是默觀,它把我們心智的銳鋒延伸出去,以察看至為精微之事。
But fortitude is the considered undertaking of dangers and the firm endurance of labours. Against unlawful delights, therefore, and fervid pleasures, temperance, our governess, comes to our aid. Temperance indeed is the firm and moderate mastery over lust and the other not-right impulses of the mind. By these fortifications, then, granted by divine help, girt about as it were with a fourfold breastplate, the salvation of the soul is guarded in this death-bearing world, nor can it be approached by vices, which has merited to be walled with so great a defence. But this fourfold ornament of the virtues is completed by a threefold part (so to speak). The first is contemplation, which extends the keen edge of our mind to behold the subtlest things.
16:44
Secunda, iudicialis quae discretionem boni malique rationabili aestimatione pertractat. Tertia, memoria, cum res inspectae atque deliberatae in animi penetrabilibus fida commendatione reponuntur ut, quasi in quodam conceptaculo, suscipiamus quae frequenti meditatione combibimus. Vestiaria nostra, cum fuerint plena, nihil capiunt; hoc thesaurarium non grauatur oneratum sed, cum multa condiderit, sciendi desiderio plus requirit. Tetigimus supradictas partes quasi harmoniam tricordem: tali enim numero delectatur anima; ipso noscitur gaudere diuinitas. Solent commouere aliqui subtilissimas quaestiones, dicentes:
第二是判斷的能力,它以理性的估量處理善惡的分辨。第三是記憶,乃當察看並斟酌過的事物,藉著忠實的託付被存放於心智的內室深處,好使我們彷彿在某種容器中,承接那因頻繁默想而吸飲之物。我們的衣櫥一旦裝滿,便再容不下甚麼;這寶庫卻不因被裝載而受累,反而當它存放了眾多之物後,因求知的渴望而需要更多。我們已觸及前述各部分,如同三弦的和聲:因為靈魂以這樣的數目為樂;神性也被認為以此歡喜。有些人慣於提出至為精微的問題,說:「
The second is judicial, which handles the discernment of good and evil by rational estimation. The third is memory, when things inspected and deliberated are stored up in the inner recesses of the mind by faithful commendation, so that, as in a kind of receptacle, we may take in what we drink down by frequent meditation. Our wardrobes, when they have been filled, hold nothing; this treasury is not burdened by being loaded, but, when it has stored away many things, by the desire of knowing requires the more. We have touched the aforesaid parts as a three-stringed harmony: for in such a number the soul delights; in it the Divinity is known to rejoice. Some are wont to raise most subtle questions, saying:
16:45
si diuinitas perfectas et rationabiles animas creat, cur aut posito sensu uiuunt infantes aut iuuenes inueniuntur excordes? sed quis non intendat animas paruulorum imbecillitate corporis nec officia sensuum nec ministeria posse explicare membrorum? ut si ignem angusto uase concludas, altum, ut illius moris est, nequit appetere, quia eum artissimum obstaculum constat operire. Tunc enim unicuique rei facultas sua uidetur suppetere, cum illi nihil contrarium praeualet impedire.
神性若創造完全而理性的靈魂,為何嬰孩活著時感覺幾乎尚未具備,又為何有些少年被發現是愚鈍的呢?」但誰不會想到:小兒的靈魂因身體的軟弱,既不能施展諸感官的職能,也不能施展諸肢體的功用呢?就如你若把火封閉於狹窄的器皿中,它便不能照其本性向高處上騰,因為有一極為緊密的障礙立著遮蓋它。因為唯有當沒有任何相反之物得以攔阻時,各物的能力才顯得足以為用。
if the Divinity creates perfect and rational souls, why do infants live with sense scarcely placed in them, or why are youths found to be witless? But who would not consider that the souls of little ones, by the weakness of the body, can explicate neither the offices of the senses nor the ministries of the members? as, if you shut up fire in a narrow vessel, it cannot, as is its manner, seek the heights, because a most close obstacle is established to cover it. For then the faculty of each thing seems to suffice for it, when nothing contrary prevails to impede it.
16:46
Sic stultis iuuenibus obuiat quod aut imparilitate partium aut crassitudine humorum materni uteri uitio suscepto, anima inepta nimis habitatione deprimitur et uim suam exercere non praeualet, inconuenientis domicilii sede praepedita; quod stultis accidere hodieque conspicimus quos graeci niniones uocant. Nam ut de usuali quoque dicamus euentu, quam multi morbis accidentibus aut onerato cerebro aut praecordiorum stupore confusi acumen solitae sapientiae perdiderunt. Quanti etiam momentanea laesione mutati sunt?
愚鈍的年輕人便是如此遭遇:無論是因肢體的不勻稱,或是因體液的濃稠,自母胎之缺陷承受了瑕疵,靈魂便因過於不適的居所而受壓抑,無法施展其本有的能力,被不相宜的住所所阻礙;這種情形我們至今仍見於愚人身上,希臘人稱之為「niniones」(白癡)。因為若也談論日常常見之事:當疾病臨到時,有多少人或因腦部過度負擔、或因內臟麻木而陷於昏亂,喪失了其慣有智慧的敏銳?又有多少人因一時的損傷而改變了呢?
Thus there befalls foolish young men this: that whether through a disproportion of parts or through a thickness of humours, a defect having been contracted from the fault of the maternal womb, the soul, hampered by too unfit a dwelling, is weighed down and cannot exercise its own power, being obstructed by the seat of an unsuitable abode. This we see happening even today to the foolish, whom the Greeks call 'niniones.' For to speak also of a common occurrence: how many, when illnesses come upon them, whether through an overburdened brain or through a numbness of the inward parts, have, being confounded, lost the keenness of their accustomed wisdom? How many, indeed, have been altered by a momentary injury?
16:47
nam et ipse qui celeberrime sapiens habetur, copioso prandio refertus, quam facile in crapulam dilapsus obtunditur, ut uirum illum prudentissime disserentem difficile uel uiuum credas quem se nec mouere posse conspicias. Vnum tamen certissime scio, sapientes nimis felicissimos fieri qui misericordia Domini a talibus aduersitatibus redduntur alieni. Forte sint et aliae causae quae rationabili animae ad motus proprios explicandos aduersum ire uideantur. Ceterum animae nec crescunt cum paruulis nec fatuis aliae uaria discretione tribuuntur, sed sicut immortalitatem iugiter sumunt, ita et rationales esse generaliter sentiuntur. Paruulis enim ratio crescit longa meditatione, non anima.
因為即便是那被視為以智慧著稱的人,當他飽食盛宴、輕易地陷入醉酒時,也會變得遲鈍,以致你幾乎不信他還活著——更難相信他就是那位方才極為審慎地論說的人——當你看見他連動彈都不能。然而有一件事我最確信:那些蒙主憐憫、得以脫離此類逆境的智者是極其有福的。或許還有其他原因,似乎妨礙理性靈魂展開其固有的活動。此外,靈魂並不隨幼兒一同成長,也不會以某種不同的分配把各異的靈魂賦予愚人;正如靈魂持續地領受不朽,照樣也普遍被視為是理性的。因為在幼兒身上,乃是理性藉長久的思索而增長,並非靈魂。
For even he who is reputed most renowned for wisdom, when stuffed with a sumptuous meal, how easily, sliding into drunkenness, is he dulled, so that you would scarcely believe him alive—much less the man who but lately discoursed most prudently—when you see him unable even to move himself. Yet one thing I know most certainly: that the wise are made exceedingly blessed who, by the mercy of the Lord, are rendered strangers to such adversities. Perhaps there are also other causes which seem to go against the rational soul in unfolding its proper motions. For the rest, souls neither grow with little children, nor are different souls assigned to fools by some varied distribution; but just as they continually receive immortality, so too they are generally held to be rational. For in little children it is the reason that grows by long reflection, not the soul.
16:48
Nunc ad reliqua currente ordine transeamus. Virtutes animae naturales quinquepertitas ueteres esse uoluerunt. Prima est in utraque parte sensibilis quae nobis tribuit intellegentiae sensum per quam omnia incorporalia uaria imaginatione sentimus. Facit etiam corporales uigere sensus, id est, uisum, auditum, gustum, odoratum, et tactum quo dura et mollia, lenia asperaque sentimus. Secunda, imperatiua quae iubet organis corporalibus motus diuersos quos implere decreuerit, hoc est, transferri de loco ad locum, uoces edere, membra curuare. Haec exempli causa posuimus ut in his similia dixisse uideamur.
如今讓我們按次序進到其餘的事項。古人認為靈魂的自然能力分為五部分。第一是感覺能力,存在於兩部分中,它賦予我們悟性的感知,藉此我們以各樣的想像感知一切無形之物。它也使肉體的感官活躍,即視覺、聽覺、味覺、嗅覺與觸覺,藉觸覺我們感知硬與軟、滑與粗。第二是命令能力,它命令肉體的器官執行它所決意完成的各樣動作,即從一處移至另一處、發出聲音、彎曲肢體。我們以此為例列出這些,使我們在此被看為已論及了類似的事。
Now let us pass on in due order to the remaining matters. The ancients held that the natural powers of the soul are fivefold. The first is the sensitive, present in both parts, which bestows on us the sense of understanding, by which we perceive all incorporeal things through varied imagination. It also makes the bodily senses vigorous—that is, sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch, by which we perceive things hard and soft, smooth and rough. The second is the imperative, which commands the bodily organs to perform the various motions it has decreed to be carried out—that is, to be moved from place to place, to utter sounds, to bend the limbs. These things we have set down by way of example, that in these we may be seen to have spoken of like matters.
16:49
Tertiam, principalem, cum ab omni actu remoti, in otium reponimur et, corporalibus sensibus quietis, profundius aliquid firmiusque tractamus. Hinc est quod aetate maturi melius sapere iudicantur quia, senescentibus membris et corporalibus sensibus mollitis, pro maxima parte in consilium transeunt. Vbi dum mens amplius occupatur, robustior uirtute adunationis efficitur, sed iterum desipiunt, cum nimia debilitate deponuntur, quoniam datum est animabus ad tempus suorum sequi corporum necessitates. Quartam, uitalem, id est, calorem animi naturalem, qui nobis propter suum feruorem moderandum aut auras aetherias hauriendo atque reddendo uitam tribuit et salutem.
第三是主導能力:當我們從一切活動中退出、置身於安閒,而肉體的感官安息時,我們便能更深刻、更穩固地探討某些事物。因此,年歲成熟的人被判為理解得更好,因為當他們的肢體衰老、肉體的感官變得遲緩時,他們大半轉向了思慮。在此,當心思愈被佔據時,它便在凝聚之力上變得愈強;但他們又會喪失神智,當他們因過度的衰弱而被擊倒時,因為靈魂被賦予暫時順從其肉體的必需。第四是生命能力,即靈魂的自然之熱,它憑其須加節制的熱力,或藉吸入並呼出以太的氣息,賜給我們生命與健康。
The third, the principal power: when, withdrawn from all activity, we are set at leisure and, the bodily senses being at rest, we treat something more profoundly and more firmly. Hence it is that those mature in age are judged to understand better, because, as their limbs grow old and their bodily senses are softened, they pass for the most part into counsel. Here, while the mind is the more occupied, it becomes the stronger in the power of concentration; but again they lose their wits when they are laid low by excessive weakness, since it has been granted to souls to follow, for a time, the necessities of their bodies. The fourth, the vital power—that is, the natural heat of the soul, which, by reason of its fervour that must be tempered, or by drawing in and giving back the airs of the ether, grants us life and health.
16:50
Quintam, delectationem, hoc est appetitum boni malique quem sub iucunditate animus concupiscit. Ecce iterum quadripertita subdiuisione ad sustentationem corporis explicandam pars ista refunditur. Prima est attractiua, rapiens de naturali quod sibi necessarium sentit. Secunda, detentoria, assumpta retinens donec ex his utilis decoctio procuretur. Tertia, translatiua quae accepta in aliud conuertit atque transponit. Quarta, expellitiua quae, ut natura fiat libera, sibi nocitura depellit. Soluimus, ut datum est, quasi alium nodum, inclinauimus uelut sextum collem, ut, difficultatis cacumine deplanato, inoffense ad reliqua gradiamur.
第五是愉悅,即對善與惡的慾望,靈魂在愉快的形式下渴求它。看哪,這一部分又因四重的細分而為了維持身體而展開。第一是吸取能力,從本性中攫取它所感知為自身所需之物。第二是保留能力,留住所取之物,直到從中產生有用的消化。第三是轉化能力,將所領受的轉變並移置為別物。第四是排出能力,它驅逐那會傷害自身之物,使本性得以自由。如蒙允許,我們已解開了彷彿另一個結;我們已壓平了彷彿第六座山丘,使困難的頂峰被夷平後,我們得以無阻地進到其餘之事。
The fifth, delight—that is, the appetite for good and evil, which the soul desires under the form of pleasantness. Behold, again, this part is dispersed by a fourfold subdivision for the purpose of sustaining the body. The first is the attractive, seizing from nature what it perceives to be necessary to itself. The second, the retentive, holding fast what it has taken until from these a useful concoction is brought about. The third, the transformative, which converts and transposes what has been received into something else. The fourth, the expulsive, which drives off from itself, that nature may become free, the things that would harm it. We have loosed, as was granted, as it were another knot; we have bent down, as it were, a sixth hill, that, the summit of difficulty being leveled, we may proceed unhindered to the rest.
16:51
Nunc ad originem animae quoniam difficultatibus plena est cautissime ueniamus. Legimus in conditione rerum mox de limo terrae corpus effectum est, et statim Dominum insufflasse factumque esse adam in animam uiuentem. Insufflauit enim dictum est ad exprimendam operis dignitatem, ut agnosceretur aliquid eximium quod eius ore prolatum est. Ceterum hoc significat insufflatio eius quod mandatum et iussio. Nam insufflare quemadmodum potest qui neque spiritum resoluit neque buccas habet quae constat esse corporea? hoc nonnulli secuti dixerunt, mox ut semen humanum coagulatum fuerit in uitalem substantiam, ilico creatas animas corporibus dari discretas atque perfectas.
如今讓我們極其謹慎地來到靈魂的起源,因為它充滿了難題。我們讀到,在萬物受造之時,身體立即由地上的泥土被造成,主即刻吹了氣,亞當便成了有生命的靈(活的靈魂)。經上說祂「吹了氣」,是為了表明這工作的尊貴,使人認出有某種非凡之物乃由祂的口所發出。然而祂的「吹氣」所表明的,無非是祂的命令與吩咐。因為那既不釋放氣息、又沒有臉頰(這些公認是屬肉體的)的,怎能吹氣呢?有些人循此而說:人的種子一旦凝結為具生命的實質,靈魂便立即被造出,分別而完整地賜給身體。
Now let us come most cautiously to the origin of the soul, since it is full of difficulties. We read that in the creation of things the body was forthwith made from the slime of the earth, and that straightway the Lord breathed in, and Adam was made into a living soul. For it is said that He 'breathed in' to express the dignity of the work, that something extraordinary might be recognized which was brought forth by His mouth. Yet His 'breathing in' signifies nothing other than His command and His bidding. For how can He breathe in who neither releases breath nor has cheeks, which are agreed to be corporeal? Following this, some have said that as soon as the human seed has been coagulated into a vital substance, souls are at once created and given to the bodies, distinct and complete.
16:52
Medendi autem artifices quadragesimo die humanum ac mortale pecus animam dicunt accipere, cum se in utero matris coeperit commouere. Opinione quoque fertur aliquorum quod creator ille potentissimus, sicut de corpore nostro semen carnis educit, ita et de animae qualitate animam nouam posse generari, quatenus originalis illius peccati, quod catholica confitetur ecclesia, per traducem delicti rea possit ostendi, nisi dono fuerit baptismatis absoluta. Nam quemadmodum infans qui peccandi non habet uotum, reus debeat ullatenus inueniri, nisi aliqua ratione in ipsa origine animarum culpa uideatur esse transfusa?
但精於醫術的人說,人這必死的受造物在第四十日領受靈魂,那時它開始在母腹中動。也有人意見傳述:那位至大能的造物主,正如祂從我們的身體引出肉體的種子,照樣也能從靈魂的性質生出新的靈魂——以致那大公教會所承認的原罪,能藉著過犯的傳遞而被顯為有罪,除非已藉洗禮的恩賜得了赦免。因為一個尚無犯罪意願的嬰孩,怎會被判為有任何罪呢,除非按某種道理,罪過被看為在靈魂的起源本身中已被傳輸了?
But those skilled in the art of healing say that the human and mortal creature receives a soul on the fortieth day, when it begins to move itself in the mother's womb. It is also reported, by the opinion of certain men, that that most powerful Creator, just as from our body He brings forth the seed of the flesh, so too from the quality of the soul a new soul can be generated—insofar as the creature can be shown guilty of that original sin which the Catholic Church confesses, through the transmission of the offense, unless it has been absolved by the gift of baptism. For how should an infant, who has no will to sin, be found in any way guilty, unless by some reasoning guilt is seen to have been poured over into the very origin of souls?
16:53
unde pater augustinus, religiosissima dubitatione laudandus, nihil temere dicit esse firmandum, sed in ipsius esse secreto sicut et alia multa sunt quae nosse non potest nostra mediocritas. Hoc autem ueraciter fixeque credendum est, et Deum animas creare et occulta quadam ratione iustissime illis imputare quod primi hominis peccato tenentur obnoxiae. Melius est enim in tam occultis causis confiteri ignorantiam quam periculosam assumere fortassis audaciam, cum dicat apostolus: quis enim cognouit sensum Domini aut quis eius consiliarius fuit? et iterum: ex parte scimus et ex parte prophetamus.
因此,那因其極虔敬之疑慮而當受稱讚的奧古斯丁教父說,不可輕率地肯定任何事,而是要相信這在於主自己的奧秘中,正如還有許多其他事是我們這微小之輩所不能知曉的。然而這必須真實而堅定地相信:神創造靈魂,且祂藉某種隱密的道理至公義地將此歸於靈魂,即它們因第一個人的罪而被定為有責。因為在如此隱密的緣由中,承認無知勝過或許要冒險逞膽,因使徒說:「誰知道主的心?誰作過祂的謀士呢?」又說:「我們知道的有限,先知所講的也有限。」
Hence father Augustine, to be praised for his most reverent doubting, says that nothing should be rashly affirmed, but that it lies in His secret, just as there are many other things which our mediocrity cannot know. Yet this must be believed truly and steadfastly: both that God creates souls, and that by some hidden reason He most justly imputes to them that they are held liable by the sin of the first man. For it is better, in causes so hidden, to confess ignorance than perhaps to assume a dangerous boldness, since the Apostle says: 'For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been His counselor?' And again: 'We know in part, and we prophesy in part.'
16:54
Sed quoniam in hunc locum tenor nos disputationis adduxit ut animas reas per traducem peccati generaliter esse diceremus, conuenit animam Christi Domini in medium deducere ne quis calumniosa intentione peruersus simili eam putet condicione constrictam. Audiamus igitur originem eius sanctae mariae semper uirgini digno praecone fuisse prophetatam. Ait angelus: spiritus sanctus superueniet in te et uirtus altissimi obumbrabit tibi. Propterea quod nascetur ex te sanctum uocabitur filius Dei. Quis, rogo, in hac maiestate nascendi aut originalis peccati credat esse culpam aut profanam aliquam carnis suspicetur offensam? absque peccato sine dubio uenit qui erat omnium peccata soluturus.
但既然我們討論的脈絡已把我們引到此處——我們說靈魂普遍因罪的傳遞而有罪——那麼把基督我主的靈魂引入論述之中便是合宜的,免得有人被誹謗的意圖所敗壞,以為祂也受同樣的境況所束縛。那麼讓我們聽,祂的起源乃藉一位配得的傳報者向永遠童貞的聖瑪利亞作了預言。天使說:「聖靈要臨到你身上,至高者的能力要蔭庇你。因此所要生的聖者必稱為神的兒子。」我問,在這誕生的威嚴中,誰會相信其中有原罪的罪過,或會疑心有任何肉體的瀆犯之過呢?那位將要解除眾人罪孽的,毫無疑問乃是無罪而來的。
But since the thread of our discussion has led us to this point—that we should say souls are generally guilty through the transmission of sin—it is fitting to bring forward into the midst the soul of Christ the Lord, lest anyone, perverted by a slanderous intent, should think it bound by a like condition. Let us hear, then, that His origin was prophesied to holy Mary, ever-virgin, by a worthy herald. The angel says: 'The Holy Spirit shall come upon you, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you. Therefore that which shall be born of you shall be called holy, the Son of God.' Who, I ask, in this majesty of birth, would believe there to be the guilt of original sin, or would suspect any profane offense of the flesh? Without doubt He came without sin, who was about to loose the sins of all.
16:55
Conceptus mystico inspiramine, natus ex uirgine, nihil de adam traxit qui ut malum adae uinceretur aduenit. Funis ille longissimus quo nos ligabamur abruptus est. Torrens qui nos rapiebat ibi siccatus est. Iura sua mors perdidit, dum condicio nostra uitam redemptoris accepit. Nam primus homo posteris transmisit exitium; ueniens Christus Dominus credentibus contulit regna caelorum. Per istum enim reparat amissum statum qui per illum perdiderat meritum. Natus in gloria, conuersatus sine macula, quid potuit de illo trahere quem contraria uenit actione destruere? sanctae origini uita sancta respondit. Qui sine peccato est genitus, nulla est mundi labe superatus.
祂藉奧秘的吹氣受孕,由童貞女所生,從亞當一無所取——祂來正是為要勝過亞當的惡。那捆綁我們的最長繩索已被折斷。那捲走我們的急流已在此被乾涸。死亡喪失了它的權柄,當我們的境況領受了救贖主的生命之時。因為第一個人把毀滅傳給了他的後裔;基督我主來到,將天國賜給信徒。因為藉著祂,那原本因那人而喪失了功德的,如今得以恢復失去的境地。祂生於榮耀,活而無瑕,祂能從那位——祂正是來以相反的作為毀滅他——身上取得什麼呢?聖潔的生命回應了聖潔的起源。那無罪而被生的,未被世上任何污點所勝過。
Conceived by a mystical inbreathing, born of a virgin, He drew nothing from Adam, He who came that the evil of Adam might be overcome. That longest rope by which we were bound has been broken. The torrent that was sweeping us away has there been dried up. Death lost its rights, when our condition received the life of the Redeemer. For the first man transmitted destruction to his posterity; Christ the Lord, coming, conferred the kingdom of heaven upon believers. For through Him He restores the lost state who through that other one had lost his merit. Born in glory, having lived without stain, what could He draw from that one whom He came by a contrary action to destroy? To a holy origin a holy life responded. He who was begotten without sin was overcome by no defilement of the world.
16:56
Suscepit uerum hominem natura, non uitiis. Respuit quod protoplastus deliquit et assumpsit hominem purissimum quem creauit, non peccatum suscipiens, sed carnem peccati sine aliqua iniuria pollutionis assumens. Suauis quidem nimium mihi facta digressio est, dum suspiciones improbas amouere contendo, sed dum ad aliud tendimus, hinc dicere multa non possumus. Restat nunc ut ordinem et propositum persequentes de sede animae dicere debeamus. Quidam sedem animae, quamuis sit corpore toto diffusa, in corde esse uoluerunt, dicentes quod ibi purissimus sanguis et uitalis spiritus continetur ut inde etiam cogitationes siue malas siue bonas exire confirment;
本性、而非罪惡,承受了真正的人。祂棄絕了那受造之初的人所違犯的,而取了祂所造的至純之人——並非領受罪,而是承受了罪身的形狀,卻沒有任何沾染的損傷。當我努力除去那些惡毒的疑慮時,這段離題之論對我實在變得極其甜美;但既然我們正趨向另一議題,便不能在此多言。如今所餘的是,我們循著次序與本意,當論及靈魂的座位。有些人認為靈魂的座位在心臟,雖然它瀰漫於全身,他們說那裡藏有最純的血與生命之靈,因此他們肯定思想——無論善惡——也是由此發出的;
Nature, not vices, took up the true man. He rejected what the first-formed man transgressed in, and assumed the most pure man whom He had created—not receiving sin, but taking on the flesh of sin without any injury of pollution. Sweet indeed, exceedingly, has this digression become to me, while I strive to remove wicked suspicions; but while we tend toward another matter, we cannot say many things here. It now remains that, pursuing the order and our purpose, we ought to speak of the seat of the soul. Some have held the seat of the soul to be in the heart, though it is diffused through the whole body, saying that there the purest blood and the vital spirit are contained, so that they affirm that thence also thoughts, whether evil or good, go forth;
16:57
quod animae uirtutem operari posse non dubium est. Plurimi autem in capite insidere manifestant, si fas est cum reuerentia tamen dicere, ad similitudinem aliquam diuinitatis, quae licet omnia ineffabili substantia sua repleat, scriptura tamen caelos insidere confirmat. Dignum enim fuit ut arcem peteret quae se nouerat caelesti operatione sublimen et tali loco prae ceteris uersari unde reliqua membra debuissent competenti regimine gubernari. Nam et ipsa figura capitis sphaeroides pulcherrima est in qua sibi immortalis atque rationalis anima dignam faceret mansionem. Certe corporalia uideamus.
且毫無疑問,靈魂能在那裡施展其能力。但極多人主張它居於頭部——若蒙允許這樣說,仍須帶著敬畏——按某種與神性相似之處而言,那神性雖以其不可言喻的實質充滿萬有,聖經卻肯定它居住於諸天。因為這乃是合宜的:那知道自己藉天上的作為而崇高的靈魂,理當尋求那城堡,且當居於高過其餘之處,從那裡其餘的肢體理當以相稱的治理受管轄。因為頭部本身的形狀,呈球形,是極為美麗的,不朽而理性的靈魂可在其中為自己造一配得的居所。我們確要來考察屬身體之物。
and there is no doubt that the soul can effect its power there. But very many declare that it resides in the head—if it is permitted to say so, yet with reverence—after some likeness of the divinity, which, though it fills all things with its ineffable substance, Scripture nevertheless affirms to dwell in the heavens. For it was worthy that she should seek the citadel, who knew herself to be sublime by a heavenly working, and that she should dwell in such a place above the rest, from whence the remaining members ought to be governed by a fitting rule. For the very shape of the head, spheroid, is most beautiful, in which the immortal and rational soul might make for itself a worthy dwelling. Let us, to be sure, consider bodily things.
16:58
Ignis iste mortalis semper tendit ad summum et quod habet subtilissimam naturam ad superiora sine dubitatione festinat. Sunt et aliqua huius credulitatis indicia. Nam cum medendi peritissimi testam capitis humani grauissima percussione confractam in soliditatem pristinam reuocare contendunt, membranam qua teneritudo cerebri communitur, cum a sanguinea faece detergere cupiunt, frequenter attingunt. Quae statim ut tacta fuerit, in tantum stuporem homo peruenit ut uel percussus alibi grauiter sentire non possit. Sed mox iterum ut se manus a cerebri impressione suspenderit, ad intellectum consuetudinarium redit, uocem sensumque recipiens, quid de ipso iam agatur agnoscit.
這必死之火總是趨向高處,凡具有極精微之性質者,無疑都急趨於上界。對此信念也有某些證據。因為當那些最精於醫術的人,努力把因極重一擊而碎裂的人頭骨殼恢復到原先的完整時,當他們想要把覆蓋腦部柔軟之處的薄膜從血污中拭淨時,常會觸及它。一旦它被觸及,那人便陷入如此的麻木,以致即便在別處被重擊也感覺不到。但隨後,當手再次從對腦的壓迫上抬起時,他便恢復其慣常的悟性,重得聲音與知覺,並認出此刻正對自己所行之事。
This mortal fire ever tends toward the heights, and that which has a most subtle nature hastens without doubt to the upper regions. There are also certain proofs of this belief. For when those most skilled in healing strive to restore to its former soundness the shell of the human skull, shattered by a most grievous blow, they frequently touch the membrane by which the tenderness of the brain is protected, when they desire to wipe it clean of bloody dregs. As soon as it is touched, the man comes into such a stupor that, even if struck severely elsewhere, he cannot feel it. But soon, as the hand lifts itself again from the pressure on the brain, he returns to his accustomed understanding, recovering voice and sensation, and recognizes what is now being done to himself.
16:59
Quod in aliis quoque membris non probatur accidere, quamuis immanium uulnerum foueis excauentur. Additur etiam quod et sano corpori ad hanc rem pertinentia non minima signa proueniunt. Nam cum fuerit aliquis nimia indignatione flammatus animumque suum aestu cogitationis accenderit, non fluctu uiscerum, non pectoris commotione uexatur, sed statim capitis dolore percutitur ut illic uideatur anima fatigationis signa reliquisse ubi magna uisa est uirtute contendere. Ibi etiam fieri absolute sentimus animae nostrae quosdam fluctus, quosdam impetus grandiores, ut ante oculos nostros ueniant quae absentia nullus ignorat.
在其他肢體上卻不曾證明發生這種情形,即便它們被巨大傷口的坑窪所挖空。此外還可加上:甚至對健康的身體,與此事相關的也有不小的徵象。因為當有人被過度的憤慨所激燃、以思想之熱點燃其心時,他並不因內臟的翻騰、也不因胸膛的震動而受困擾,卻立即被頭痛所擊,以致靈魂彷彿在那裡——在它被看為以大能力奮力之處——留下了其疲乏的徵象。在那裡我們也確實感知到我們靈魂的某些洶湧、某些更大的衝動,以致那些不在眼前、卻無人不知之事,臨到我們眼前。
This is not proven to happen in the other members, even though they be hollowed out with the pits of enormous wounds. It is added, moreover, that even to a sound body there come, pertaining to this matter, no small signs. For when someone has been inflamed with excessive indignation and has kindled his mind with the heat of thought, he is not troubled by a surging of the inward parts, nor by a commotion of the breast, but is straightway struck with pain of the head, so that there the soul seems to have left signs of its fatigue, where it was seen to strive with great power. There too we absolutely perceive certain surges of our soul, certain greater impulses, so that things which, being absent, no one is ignorant of, come before our eyes.
16:60
Tendimus quidem uigorem animi in diuersas partes multasque regiones et phantastica imaginatione ad capitis nostri iudicium perducitur quod per diuersas mundi partes cognoscitur exquisitum. Denique oculos nostros defigimus omnino cogitantes, aurium sensus obstruitur, gustus cessat, nares uacant, lingua non habet uocem, et multis modis per talia signa cognoscitur anima in suis quodammodo cubiculis occupata. Haec ergo, ut putatur, in edito constituta quasi pro tribunali sedens, appetitorum suorum noscitur esse moderatrix, boni malique iudex, ambigua discernens, noxia respuens, cum tamen ei gratia diuinitatis infulserit.
我們確實把心思的活力導向不同的方位與許多區域,並藉奇妙的想像被引至我們頭部的審判座,那座位被認出曾透過世界的各個部分探求事物。最後,當我們全然沉思時,便全然定睛凝視,耳的知覺被堵塞,味覺停止,鼻孔空閒,舌頭發不出聲音;以多種方式,藉這些徵象,靈魂被認出彷彿正忙於它自己的內室。那麼這靈魂,如所推想的,設於高處,彷彿坐在審判台上,被認出是其慾望的女管理者、善惡的審判者,分辨曖昧之事、棄絕有害之事——然而前提是神性的恩典已照耀在它身上。
We do indeed direct the vigor of the mind into diverse quarters and many regions, and by fantastic imagination it is led to the judgment-seat of our head, which is recognized as having sought out things through the diverse parts of the world. Finally, when we are deep in thought, we fix our eyes altogether, the sense of the ears is stopped up, taste ceases, the nostrils are idle, the tongue has no voice; and in many ways, by such signs, the soul is recognized to be occupied, as it were, in its own chambers. This soul, then, as is supposed, set on high as though sitting upon a tribunal, is known to be the governess of its desires, the judge of good and evil, discerning ambiguous things, rejecting harmful ones—provided, however, that the grace of the divinity has shone upon it.
16:61
Fuit quidem in primo homine beatitudo naturalis, arbitrii liberi potens et inuiolata sententia, sed infelici transgressione deceptus, diabolica fraude perdens quod posteris traditurus acceperat, ad nos transmittere non potuit quod amisit. Inde propagatus interitus, inde humani generis nutrita defectio, inde ignorantia rationi contraria, inde noxiae curae, inde paenitenda consilia, inde obscurata cognitio, turpe desiderium, iustitiae neglectus; inde mille criminum lapsus et plura nobis cum pecoribus communia quae diuinitas fecerat esse discreta.
在第一個人裡確實有一種本性的福樂,擁有自由意志與不可侵犯的判斷力;但他被一場不幸的違誡所欺騙,藉魔鬼的詭詐喪失了他所領受、本要傳給後裔之物,便不能把他所失去的傳給我們。由此而來繁衍的滅亡,由此而養成人類的墮落,由此而有違背理性的無知,由此而有有害的憂慮,由此而有當悔的計謀,由此而有昏暗的認知、卑下的慾望、對公義的忽視;由此而有千百種陷入罪行的墮落,以及許多我們與牲畜共有之事——這些原本是神性使之有別的。
There was indeed in the first man a natural blessedness, possessed of free will and an inviolate judgment; but, deceived by an unhappy transgression, losing through diabolical fraud what he had received to hand on to posterity, he could not transmit to us what he had lost. Thence came propagated destruction, thence the nourished decline of the human race, thence ignorance contrary to reason, thence harmful cares, thence counsels to be repented of, thence darkened knowledge, base desire, neglect of justice; thence a thousand falls into crimes, and many things common to us with the beasts, which the divinity had made to be distinct.
16:62
Praenuntiat enim, pro dolor, nobis solis discessio serenitatis aduentum, futuras tempestates uentorum commotione dinoscimus, uenturam saeculis ubertatem temporum ratione colligimus, laetitiam nobis interdum ignari animi praesagatione promittimus; sed quid tale ignorare potuisset anima, si eius fuisset dignitas custodita? depressa est iuste ad ignorantiam quae scire uoluit contumaciter uetita. Modo enim signis aut coniecturis sapit aliqua quae sine labore nosse potuit uniuersa. Illud tamen, sancta conuersatione purgata, diuinitatis auxilio recepit quod insidiis decipientis perdidit; illuminata uidet a creatore quae fuscata non potest a semetipsa cognoscere.
因為——可嘆哪!——單是太陽的退去便向我們預示晴朗的到來;藉風的騷動我們辨識將臨的暴風雨;藉理性我們推算諸世代將臨之季節的豐饒;有時藉一無知之心的預感,我們向自己應許歡欣。但靈魂若曾保全其尊貴,它本能對怎樣的事一無所知呢?它公正地被壓入無知——它曾頑固地想要知道那被禁之事。因為如今它藉徵兆或推測而知曉某些事,那些它本能毫不費力地全部知曉之事。然而那因聖潔行事而潔淨之物,它藉神性的幫助重得了它因欺哄者的詭計所失去的;蒙了光照,它從其創造者看見那它在昏暗中憑自身所不能認知的。
For—alas the grief!—the departure of the sun alone foretells to us the coming of fair weather; by the commotion of the winds we discern coming storms; by reason we gather the coming abundance of seasons for the ages; sometimes, by the foreboding of an unknowing mind, we promise ourselves gladness. But what such thing could the soul have been ignorant of, if its dignity had been preserved? Justly has it been pressed down into ignorance, it which willfully wished to know things forbidden. For now it knows certain things by signs or conjectures, things which it could have known, all of them, without labor. Yet that thing, purified by holy conduct, it recovers by the help of the divinity, which it lost by the snares of the deceiver; illumined, it sees from its Creator what, darkened, it cannot know of itself.
16:63
Narrata sunt de anima quanta probantur esse concessa, sed conuenit ut et de eius templo dicamus, quoniam illa imago Dei non patitur ut corpori deformi coniuncta esse uideatur. Procerum animal et in effigiem pulcherrimae speculationis erectum ad res supernas et rationabiles intuendas, cuius harmoniaca dispositio ingentia nobis sacramenta declarat. Imprimis caput nostrum sex ossibus compaginatum in similitudinem caelestis sphaerae rotundae concauitatis formatum est, ut senarium illum perfectissimum numerum sedes nostri cerebri, in cuius organo sapimus, contineret.
已經述說了那證明賜予靈魂之物何等之大;但我們也合宜要論及它的殿,因為那神的形像不容自己被看為與一個畸形的身體相連。一個高聳的活物,被舉起成為最美麗之沉思的樣式,以仰望屬天而理性之事,其和諧的安排向我們宣告偉大的奧秘。首先,我們的頭由六塊骨頭接合,按天上球體的樣式,被造成圓形的凹面,使我們腦部的座位——我們在其器官中有悟性——得以包含那最完全之數,即六。
It has been related how great are the things proven to have been granted to the soul; but it is fitting that we also speak of its temple, since that image of God does not suffer to be seen joined to a deformed body. A tall creature, raised up into the likeness of most beautiful contemplation, to behold things supernal and rational, whose harmonious arrangement declares to us mighty mysteries. First of all, our head, framed of six bones in the likeness of the heavenly sphere, is fashioned with a round concavity, so that the seat of our brain—in whose organ we have understanding—might contain that most perfect number, six.
16:64
Hinc oculi, quasi sacrorum testamentorum pulcherrima duo uolumina, collocantur ad quorum similitudinem omnia nobis combinata descendunt, ut aures, nares, labra, bracchia, latera, crura, tibiae, pedes. In hac enim mystica dualitate compago totius corporis continetur, et sicut illa testamenta ad unum respiciunt, unum sapiunt, ita haec officia in unam se conuenientiam operationemque coniungunt. Sed licet haec parilitas pulcherrima se distributione consociet et alterutrum sibi mutuetur ornatum, sunt etiam singularia in medio constituta ne in unam partem praeiudicialiter uergentia alteram competenti decore nudarent:
由此眼睛被安置,彷彿聖約之最美麗的兩卷書;按其樣式,我們身上的一切都成對地下降組合:如耳、鼻孔、唇、臂、兩脅、腿、脛、足。因為在這奧秘的成雙之中,包含著全身的構架;正如那兩約朝向一個、領悟一個,照樣這些功能也彼此聯合為一個和諧與運作。但雖然這最美麗的對稱藉分配而彼此聯結、互借彼此的裝飾,卻也有獨一之物設於中間,免得它們偏向一側而有失公允,使另一側被剝去其相稱的優雅:
Hence the eyes, like two most beautiful volumes of the sacred testaments, are placed; after whose likeness all things in us descend combined in pairs: as ears, nostrils, lips, arms, sides, legs, shins, feet. For in this mystical duality the framework of the whole body is contained; and just as those testaments look toward one, savor of one, so these offices join themselves together into one harmony and operation. But although this most beautiful symmetry associates itself by distribution and lends to each other their mutual adornment, there are also single things set in the middle, lest, inclining prejudicially to one side, they should strip the other of its fitting grace:
16:65
nasus, os, guttur, pectus, umbilicus, et genitalium uirga descendens, quae laudabilia et honora monstrantur quando in medio locata consistunt. Capiti autem nostro, quod sensus capit uniuersos, recte ceruix quasi quaedam columna supponitur, docens nos religionem sanctam in unam fidei consistere ualidissimam firmitatem. Lingua quoque, uocis nostrae decentissimum plectrum, data est ad sermonum nostrorum conuenientiam temperandam ut nos articulata uerba ab animalium confusione distinguerent.
即鼻、口、喉、胸、肚臍,以及下垂的生殖之器,當它們置於中央時,便被顯為可讚而尊貴。但對於我們那承受一切感官的頭,頸項被合宜地置於其下,彷彿一根柱子,教導我們聖潔的信仰在於信德的一個至堅之穩固。舌頭也是,我們聲音最合宜的撥子,被賜下以調節我們言語的適切,使有節的話語把我們與動物的混亂區分開來。
the nose, the mouth, the throat, the breast, the navel, and the descending rod of the genitals, which are shown to be praiseworthy and honorable when they stand placed in the middle. But to our head, which receives all the senses, the neck is rightly set under as a kind of pillar, teaching us that holy religion consists in one most strong firmness of faith. The tongue too, the most fitting plectrum of our voice, was given to temper the fitness of our words, so that articulate words might distinguish us from the confusion of the animals.
16:66
Nec illud uideatur incassum quod uni gutturi duae seruiunt digestiones, scilicet ut omnis intellectus prudentis animae, quasi cibus acceptus et rationis calore decoctus, per gemina testamentorum itinera competentibus tractatibus explicetur. Et quoniam neque cornu neque dente neque fuga, sicut alia animalia, corporis humani forma se praeualet uindicare, robustus illi thorax bracchiaque concessa sunt ut illatam iniuriam manu defenderet et obiectu pectoris quasi quodam clipeo uindicaret. Genitalia uero nostra in magnum mysterium quis dubitet attributa?
那一個喉嚨竟有兩條消化之道服事它,這也不該看為徒然——即一切審慎靈魂的悟性,彷彿領受並經理性之熱所煮熟的食物,得以藉兩約的雙重路徑在合宜的論述中展開。又因為人體的形狀不能像其他動物那樣藉角、藉齒、或藉逃跑來自衛,便賜給它強健的胸膛與臂膀,使它能以手抵擋所受的侵害,並藉胸膛的遮擋彷彿以某種盾牌來護衛自己。但誰會懷疑我們的生殖器被指派擔負一大奧秘呢?
Nor should it seem in vain that two digestions serve the one throat—namely, that all the understanding of the prudent soul, like food received and cooked by the heat of reason, might be unfolded through the twin paths of the testaments in fitting treatises. And since the form of the human body cannot defend itself either by horn, by tooth, or by flight, as do other animals, a sturdy chest and arms were granted to it, that it might ward off injury inflicted with the hand, and protect itself by the interposition of the breast as by a kind of shield. But who would doubt that our genitals were assigned to a great mystery?
16:67
unde, praestante Deo, hominis reparatio fecunda procedit, unde mortales nesciunt habere defectum, quando personis pereuntibus genus noscitur posse seruare continuum. Decorum membrum si non fuisset turpi libidine sordidatum. Quid enim illo pretiosius esset, si inde humanum genus sine culpa descenderet? sic omnia praeconialia creata sunt, si peccatis polluentibus non redderentur obscena. Hoc autem corpus animatum quinque sensibus administratur ac regitur, qui, licet sint communes cum beluis, a nobis tamen rationabili iudicio melius distinguuntur atque complentur. Primus eorum uisus est qui aere illuminato colores respicit corporales et in eis suas proprietates agnoscit.
由此,藉神的賜予,人豐盛的更新得以進行;由此,必死之人不知有缺乏,因為當個別的人逝去時,這族類仍被認為能持續延存。它本會是一個俊美的肢體,若不曾被卑下的情慾所玷污。因為若人類無罪地由它而下,還有什麼比它更寶貴呢?如此一切都被造成可堪宣揚的,若不曾被那玷污的罪所變為猥褻。但這有生命的身體乃由五官所管理治理,這五官雖與牲畜共有,卻藉理性的判斷在我們身上得到更佳的區分與成全。其中第一是視覺,當空氣被照亮時,它觀看屬身體的顏色,並在其中認出它們固有的性質。
Whence, by God's bestowal, the fruitful renewal of man proceeds; whence mortals know no failing, since, while individual persons perish, the race is known to be able to be preserved continuous. A comely member it would be, had it not been defiled by base lust. For what would be more precious than it, if from it the human race descended without fault? Thus all things were created worthy of proclamation, were they not rendered obscene by polluting sins. But this animated body is administered and ruled by five senses, which, though they are common with the beasts, are nevertheless better distinguished and fulfilled by us through rational judgment. The first of them is sight, which, the air being illumined, beholds bodily colors and recognizes in them their proper qualities.
16:68
Aspectus enim est, ut ueteres definire maluerunt, uis animae spiritalis, egrediens per oculi pupillam, res non adeo longinquas attingens, sed ad quas potuerit peruenire diiudicans, illud uidens ad quod destinatur ut uideat. Nam si de interioribus suis oculi uiderent, et se ipsos sine dubitatione conspicerent. Hoc etiam pater sensit augustinus. Secundus auditus est qui concauis ac cocleatis auribus sonos accipit, aeris uerberationes concrepantes, ratione diiudicans quid sit auditum. Tertius odoratus est qui diuersos odores assumens, uim redolentium corporum, quasi quodam inuisibili fumo naribus suscepto, competenti aspiratione perpendit.
因為視覺,如古人所偏好的定義,乃是屬靈靈魂的一種能力,藉眼睛的瞳孔發出,所及之物並不甚遙遠,卻能判別它所能達到的,看見它被指派去看之物。因為眼睛若能看見其自身的內部,無疑也會看見它們自己。這也是奧古斯丁教父所領會的。第二是聽覺,它藉中空螺旋的雙耳領受聲音,即空氣回響的撞擊,憑理性判別所聽見的是什麼。第三是嗅覺,它吸入各樣氣味,以合宜的吸氣衡量芳香之物的力量——彷彿藉某種不可見的煙被吸入鼻孔。
For sight, as the ancients preferred to define it, is a power of the spiritual soul, going forth through the pupil of the eye, reaching things not so very distant, but judging those to which it can attain, seeing that for which it is appointed to see. For if the eyes could see of their own interior parts, they would without doubt also behold themselves. This too father Augustine perceived. The second is hearing, which by the hollow and spiral ears receives sounds, the resounding strikings of the air, judging by reason what has been heard. The third is smell, which, taking in diverse odors, weighs the power of fragrant bodies—as by a kind of invisible smoke received into the nostrils—by a fitting inhalation.
16:69
Quartus est gustus quo multarum rerum saporem palati diiudicatione cognoscimus. Quintus est tactus qui etiam cunctis membris communiter noscitur attributus. Elegantior nobis in manibus est quae singulariter datae sunt ad multas cogitationes nostras communiter explicandas. Altera enim per illas euenit firmiorque memoria; nam quod obliuisci possumus istis scribentibus sine labore retinemus. Haec sunt diuersarum artium opifices et paene totius nostrae operationis effectus. Nam quid prodesset sensum aliqua facienda concipere, si haec laboriosa manus non probaretur implere?
第四是味覺,藉它我們透過上顎的判別認出許多事物的滋味。第五是觸覺,它被認為也共同地分配於一切肢體。對我們更為精巧的,是在雙手中的觸覺,雙手被獨特地賜下,以共同地展開我們的許多思想。因為藉著它們,那另一種更穩固的記憶得以產生;因為那我們可能忘記的,藉這些為我們書寫之手,我們便毫不費力地存留。這雙手是各樣技藝的工匠,也幾乎是我們一切作為的成就。因為若這勞苦的手不被證明能成就所構想之事,那麼感官構想當行之事,又有何益處呢?
The fourth is taste, by which we recognize the savor of many things through the judgment of the palate. The fifth is touch, which is known to be assigned in common to all the members as well. More elegant for us is that which is in the hands, which were given uniquely to unfold in common our many thoughts. For through them comes the other and firmer memory; for what we can forget, we retain without labor by these writing for us. These are the craftsmen of the diverse arts and the effecting of almost all our operation. For what would it profit the sense to conceive things to be done, if this laborious hand were not proven to fulfill them?
16:70
nec illud arbitror praetereundum quod pedes nostri manusque denaria digitorum quantitate formantur ut cursus uitae nostrae atque operatio sacramenta caelestis decalogi contineret ne praeter legem Domini aut cogitare aliquid aut agere deberemus. Facies ipsa quemadmodum prudentiae suae patefacit indicia? in effigiem nostram exeunt occultae cogitationes et ex hac parte cognoscitur qualis intus animus uoluntasque uersetur. Vultus siquidem noster, qui a uoluntate nominatur, speculum quoddam est animae suae et quod substantialiter non cernitur per eius habitum euidentissime declaratur. Quanta possint de eius membris reliquis dici?
我也不認為這該被略過:我們的腳與手都按十的數目以指頭形成,使我們生命的歷程與工作得以包含天上十誡的聖事,免得我們在主的律法之外有任何思想或行為。臉本身——它何等顯露其審慎的徵象!隱藏的思想顯現在我們的面容上,由此可認出內裡攪動的是怎樣的心思與意志。我們的面容(拉丁文 vultus 由意志 voluntas 得名)確是其靈魂的某種鏡子,那實質上看不見的,藉它的神態被極明顯地表明出來。關於它其餘的部分,又能說多少呢?
Nor do I think this should be passed over: that our feet and hands are formed with the tenfold number of fingers and toes, so that the course of our life and our work might contain the sacraments of the heavenly Decalogue, lest beyond the law of the Lord we should either think or do anything. The face itself—how it lays open the signs of its prudence! Into our countenance go forth hidden thoughts, and from this side it is recognized what manner of mind and will is stirring within. Indeed our countenance, which takes its name from the will, is a kind of mirror of its own soul, and what is not substantially discerned is most evidently declared through its bearing. How many things could be said of its remaining members?
16:71
cur triginta duobus dentibus gingiuarum nostrarum ordo clauatus est? quare ceruix nostra septem nodis spina uiginti tribus spondulis colligetur? costae uiginti quattuor radiis pro uiscerum defensione flectantur ne teneritudo illa interaneorum importuna facillime laederetur iniuria. Nerui quam congrua dispersione corpus omne contineant! quomodo uenae nutribili sanguine competenter irrigent membra? quemadmodum ossa nos medullata corroborent? cur unguibus nostris commune sit iugiter crescere cum capillis? quam decore, quam utiliter, carnes nostras uestiat cutis ut nec humor internus turpiter defluat nec pulchritudo colori subducta uenustate dispereat!
為何我們牙齦的排列鑲嵌著三十二顆牙齒?為何我們的頸由七個節相連,脊柱由二十三節椎骨相連?為何肋骨以二十四根弧條彎曲,為要護衛內臟,免得那臟腑的柔嫩極易被不時的侵害所傷?筋以何等合宜的分布把全身連結!血管何等適切地以滋養的血灌溉肢體!充滿骨髓的骨頭何等地堅固我們!為何我們的指甲與頭髮一樣有共同地不斷生長的特性?皮膚何等得體、何等有益地包覆我們的肉,使內裡的液體不致羞愧地流出,膚色之美也不致被奪去其姿色而消失!
Why is the row of our gums studded with thirty-two teeth? Why is our neck bound by seven knots, and the spine by twenty-three vertebrae? Why do the ribs bend in twenty-four spokes for the defense of the inward parts, lest that tenderness of the entrails be most easily harmed by importunate injury? With how fitting a dispersion do the sinews hold together the whole body! How do the veins suitably irrigate the members with nourishing blood! How do the marrow-filled bones strengthen us! Why is it common to our nails to grow continually together with the hair? How becomingly, how usefully, does the skin clothe our flesh, that neither the inner moisture should shamefully flow out, nor the beauty of complexion, its comeliness withdrawn, should perish!
16:72
Sed cum membra singula diuersa corpori praebere uideantur officia, aliudque nobis sublime, aliud mediocre, aliud sit in ultimo constitutum, in tantam complexionis gratiam conuenerunt ut omnia sint necessaria, omnia probentur accomoda, sicut apostolus ait, cum ecclesiam Dei studio caritatis adunaret: non potest dicere oculus manui: non es mihi necessaria. Aut iterum caput pedibus: non desidero operam uestram. Sed multo magis quae uidentur membra corporis infirmiora esse, necessaria sunt, et quae putamus ignobiliora esse corporis, his honorem abundantiorem circumdamus. Deus enim ita temperauit corpus atque distribuit ut membra se mutuis adiutoriis indigerent.
但雖然個別的肢體似乎向身體提供各樣不同的功能——一個對我們是崇高的,一個是中等的,一個則設於最末之位——它們卻聯合成如此偉大的結合之恩,以致全都是必需的,全都被證明是合宜的,正如使徒在以愛心的熱忱聯合神的教會時所說:「眼不能對手說:我用不著你。頭也不能對腳說:我用不著你。不但如此,身上肢體人以為軟弱的,更是不可少的;身上肢體我們看為不體面的,越發給它加上體面。因為神配搭並分配這身子,叫肢體彼此互相照應。」
But although the individual members seem to furnish diverse offices to the body—one being sublime to us, another middling, another set in the lowest place—they have come together into so great a grace of conjunction that all are necessary, all are proven suitable, just as the Apostle says, when he was uniting the Church of God by the zeal of charity: 'The eye cannot say to the hand: I have no need of you. Or again the head to the feet: I do not desire your service. But much rather those members of the body which seem to be weaker are necessary; and those which we think to be the less honorable parts of the body, on these we bestow more abundant honor. For God has so tempered and distributed the body that the members should need one another's mutual help.'
16:73
Sed hoc propter nimiam prolixitatem in summam dictum abunde sufficiat, nullum corporale animal in tantam mysteriorum significationem fuisse formatum. Debuit enim consilio summo fieri quod uidebatur rationabili animae coniungi. O summi opificis creatura mirabilis quae sic humani corporis lineamenta disposuit ut si primi hominis non esset peccatis grauantibus onerata, magnis muneribus non fuisset exuta. Qualia enim meruit tunc libera habere quae nunc tot bona noscitur retinere damnata?
但因其過於冗長,這簡略所言便已足夠充分:沒有任何屬身體的活物被造成具有如此偉大的奧秘之意涵。因為那看為合宜與理性靈魂相連之物,理當由至高的智慧所造。哦,至高造物主奇妙的受造物,祂如此安排人體的脈絡,以致它若不曾被第一個人的罪所累、所壓,便不會被剝去它偉大的恩賜!因為它在自由之時本配得擁有怎樣之物,既然它如今被定罪,竟仍被認為在如此眾多的美善中保有這些呢?
But let this, said summarily on account of its excessive length, suffice abundantly: that no bodily creature was formed unto so great a signification of mysteries. For that which seemed fit to be joined to a rational soul ought to have been made by the highest counsel. O wondrous creature of the supreme Maker, who so arranged the lineaments of the human body that, had it not been burdened and weighed down by the sins of the first man, it would not have been stripped of its great gifts! For what manner of things did it deserve to have then, when free, which now, condemned, it is known to retain among so many goods?
16:74
uerum ista caro, quamuis diuersis uitiis appetatur, multisque uulneribus lacerata subiaceat, ipsa tamen est quae caeleste psalterium canit, quae gloriosos martyres facit, quae conditorem suum uisitata promeruit, quae ipsam quoque uitalem crucem sancti redemptoris accepit; merito iam spiritalis futura creditur quando et hic mortalis tanto munere perfuncta gloriatur. Sic enim ista magna quidem natura sed originali delicto peccatis cotidianis obnoxia, ieiuniis, elemosinis, assiduisque orationibus diuina se suffragatione componit, sic emundatis sordibus peccatorum, lucidam praeparat mentem ut suum suscipere mereatur auctorem, fidei templum quae se criminibus non concessit hospitio.
然而這肉體,雖被各樣罪惡所攻擊、被許多傷口所撕裂而臣服,卻正是那歌唱屬天詩篇之物,是那造就榮耀殉道者之物,是那蒙眷顧而配得其創造主之物,是那甚至領受了聖救贖主賜生命之十字架本身之物;它如今理當被信為將成為屬靈的,因為甚至在此地、作為必死之物,它仍以曾履行如此偉大之職分而誇耀。因為這偉大的本性確是如此,卻因原初的過犯而易陷於每日的罪,它藉禁食、施捨與不懈的禱告,靠神聖的扶助使自己整飭;如此,當罪的污穢被洗淨後,它預備一個明亮的心思,使它可配得領受其自己的創造者——成為信德之殿,那殿不曾給罪行容留之所。
Yet this flesh, although it is assailed by diverse vices and lies subject, mangled by many wounds, is nevertheless the very thing that sings the heavenly psaltery, that makes glorious martyrs, that, being visited, merited its own Creator, that received even the life-giving cross itself of the holy Redeemer; deservedly is it now believed to be destined to be spiritual, since even here, mortal, it glories in having performed so great an office. For thus this great nature indeed, but, by reason of the original offense, liable to daily sins, by fastings, almsgivings, and assiduous prayers composes itself with divine support; thus, the filth of sins cleansed away, it prepares a luminous mind, that it may merit to receive its own Author—a temple of faith, which has not granted to crimes a lodging.
16:75
Credo diuina miseratione prouisum ut corpus subderet animae, animam sibi, totumque salutariter ad Deum respiceret creatorem. Peractis his quae dicenda fuerunt, congruum uidetur de animarum signis indiciisque disserere, quia licet earum substantia una esse uideatur longe tamen disparibus qualitatibus segregantur. Ac primum dicam quemadmodum malorum hominum consuetudo moresque declarentur, quatenus quos interius uidere non possumus, quibusdam indiciis extrinsecus approbemus.
我相信,這乃是出於神聖憐憫所安排的:身體當順服靈魂,靈魂當順服祂,而全人都當有益地仰望神——它的創造者。既已論完當說之事,便似乎合宜要論及靈魂的徵象與標記,因為它們的實質雖似乎是一,卻被遠不相等的性質所區分。我要先說,惡人的習性與品格如何被顯明,以致那些我們不能看見其內裡的人,我們可藉某些外在的標記來判斷。
I believe it was provided by divine compassion that the body should be subjected to the soul, the soul to Him, and that the whole should look salutarily toward God its Creator. These things having been carried through which had to be said, it seems fitting to discourse on the signs and indications of souls, because, although their substance may seem to be one, they are nevertheless separated by far unequal qualities. And first I shall say how the habit and character of evil men are made manifest, insofar as those whom we cannot see within, we may judge by certain outward indications.
16:76
Omnes igitur animae sine recta fide teterrimae sunt, ut philosophorum quae non creatoris legem sed humanum potius sequuntur errorem, et quamuis doctores uideantur esse moralium et se disciplinarum cotibus nitantur abstergere, superstitionis tamen aerugines non declinant. Qualis enim dementia est illum colere quo melior est et credere praestare posse qui sibi non praeualet subuenire? nihil enim cuiquam prodest uitasse noxias cupiditates, eneruatam non amasse luxuriam, deceptricem fugisse fallaciam, alienum se a terrenis uitiis effecisse, quia necesse est laboret incassum qui remuneratorem bonorum omnium sibi reddit infensum. Cuius enim praeceptis oboediet, si latorem legis ignoret?
因此,凡沒有正信的靈魂都是極其污穢的——如哲學家的靈魂,他們所跟從的並非創造者的律法,而是人的謬誤;他們雖似乎是道德的教師、努力在學科的礪石上磨淨自己,卻仍不脫迷信的鏽蝕。因為去敬拜那比自己更卑下的,並相信那連自救都不能的能施予幫助,這是何等的瘋狂?因為避開了有害的慾望、不曾愛慕那使人萎靡的奢逸、逃離了欺人的虛謊、使自己與屬地之罪惡為陌路——這對人毫無益處,因為那使一切美善之賞賜者與自己為敵的,必然徒勞辛苦。因為他若不認得頒律者,又要順從誰的誡命呢?
All souls, therefore, without right faith are most foul—as those of the philosophers, who follow not the law of the Creator but rather human error; and although they may seem to be teachers of morals and strive to scrub themselves clean upon the whetstones of the disciplines, they nevertheless do not escape the rust of superstition. For what madness is it to worship that than which one is better, and to believe that he can grant aid who cannot prevail to come to his own help? For it profits no one anything to have avoided harmful desires, not to have loved enervating luxury, to have fled deceiving falsehood, to have made oneself a stranger to earthly vices—because he who renders the Rewarder of all good things hostile to himself must needs labor in vain. For whose precepts will he obey, if he is ignorant of the Giver of the law?
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 15 章第 17 章 →
1234567891011121314151617

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。