📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集(天主之城·論三位一體等)

文集(天主之城·論三位一體等) 第 10 章 第 3/3 段

拉丁文原文.8 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 10:81–10:88(全章共 88 節)

← 第 9 章第 11 章 →
← 上一段
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
10:81
Si enim sic inmortales, ut tamen a summo Deo factos, et si non per se ipsos, sed ei, a quo facti sunt, adhaerendo beatos esse dicunt: hoc dicunt quod dicimus, quolibet eos nomine appellent. Hanc autem Platonicorum esse sententiam, siue omnium siue meliorum, in eorum litteris inueniri potest. Nam et de ipso nomine, quod huius modi inmortalem beatamque creaturam deos appellant, ideo inter nos et ipsos paene nulla dissensio est, quia et in nostris sacris litteris legitur: Deus deorum dominus locutus est, et alibi: Confitemini deo deorum, et alibi: Rex magnus super omnes deos. Illud autem ubi scriptum est: Terribilis est super omnes deos, cur dictum sit, deinceps ostenditur. Sequitur enim:
因為他們若說:這些之為不朽,乃在於仍是由至高之神所造,並且說牠們之為有福,不是憑自己,而是憑黏附於那造牠們的一位,那麼他們無論以何名稱呼,所說的正是我們所說的。這乃是柏拉圖派——無論全體或較高明者——的見解,這在他們的著作中可以找到。因為連這名稱本身、他們稱這類不朽有福的受造物為神,我們與他們之間也幾乎毫無分歧,因為在我們的聖典中也讀到:「大能者神耶和華已經發言」;又在別處:「你們要稱謝萬神之神」;又在別處:「超乎萬神之上的大君王」。至於經上所寫:「祂在萬神之上是可畏的」,為何這樣說,隨後便顯明。因為接著說:
For if they say that these are immortal in such a way as nonetheless to have been made by the supreme God, and that they are blessed not through themselves, but by adhering to Him by whom they were made, they are saying what we say, by whatever name they call them. That this is the opinion of the Platonists, whether of all or of the better, can be found in their writings. For even concerning the very name, that they call this sort of immortal and blessed creature gods, there is almost no disagreement between us and them, because in our sacred writings too it is read: "The God of gods, the Lord, has spoken"; and elsewhere: "Give thanks to the God of gods"; and elsewhere: "A great King above all gods." But where it is written: "He is terrible above all gods," why it is said is shown thereafter. For it follows:
10:82
Quoniam omnes dii gentium daemonia, Dominus autem caelos fecit. Super omnes ergo deos dixit, sed gentium, id est quos gentes pro diis habent, quae sunt daemonia; ideo terribilis, sub quo terrore Domino dicebant: Venisti perdere nos? Illud uero, ubi dicitur: Deus deorum, non potest intellegi deus daemoniorum; et rex magnus super omnes deos absit ut dicatur rex magnus super omnia daemonia. Sed homines quoque in populo Dei eadem scriptura deos appellat. Ego, inquit, dixi, dii estis et filii Excelsi omnes. Potest itaque intellegi horum deorum deus, qui dictus est deus deorum, et super hos deos rex magnus, qui dictus est rex magnus super omnes deos. Verum tamen cum a nobis quaeritur:
「因為列邦的神都是邪靈,惟獨耶和華創造諸天。」那麼祂說「超乎萬神之上」——但是列邦的神,就是列邦當作神的,牠們乃是邪靈;因此祂是「可畏的」,在這畏懼之下,牠們對主說:「你來滅我們嗎?」而經上所說「萬神之神」,不能理解為「眾邪靈之神」;至於「超乎萬神之上的大君王」,斷不可說成「超乎眾邪靈之上的大君王」。但同一部聖經也稱神子民中的人為神。經上說:「我曾說,你們是神,都是至高者的兒子。」因此可以理解:那被稱為萬神之神的,乃是這些神之神;那被稱為超乎萬神之上的大君王,乃是超乎這些神之上的大君王。然而,當有人問我們:
"For all the gods of the nations are demons, but the Lord made the heavens." "Above all gods," then, He said—but of the nations, that is, those whom the nations hold for gods, which are demons; therefore "terrible," under which terror they said to the Lord: "Art Thou come to destroy us?" But that where it is said: "The God of gods," it cannot be understood as "the God of demons"; and "a great King above all gods"—far be it that it should be said "a great King above all demons." But the same Scripture calls men also in the people of God gods. "I have said," it says, "You are gods, and all of you sons of the Most High." It can therefore be understood as the God of these gods, who is called the God of gods, and above these gods a great King, who is called a great King above all gods. Yet when it is asked of us:
10:83
Si homines dicti sunt dii, quod in populo Dei sunt, quem per angelos uel per homines alloquitur Deus, quanto magis inmortales eo nomine digni sunt, qui ea fruuntur beatitudine, ad quam Deum colendo cupiunt homines peruenire: quid respondebimus nisi non frustra in scripturis sanctis expressius homines nuncupatos deos, quam illos inmortales et beatos, quibus nos aequales futuros in resurrectione promittitur, ne scilicet propter illorum excellentiam aliquem eorum nobis constituere deum infidelis auderet infirmitas? Quod in homine facile est euitare.
若人因在神的子民中——神藉天使或藉人向他們說話——便被稱為神,那麼那些不朽者,既得享人藉敬拜神所渴望達到的福樂,豈不更配得這名稱嗎?——我們當如何回答,豈不是說:聖經中把人比那些不朽有福者更明白地稱為神,並非徒然;我們蒙應許在復活時要與那些不朽者同等,免得因牠們的卓越,不信的軟弱竟膽敢把牠們中的某一位立為我們的神。這一點若對象是人,便容易避免。
If men are called gods, because they are in the people of God, whom God addresses through angels or through men, how much more are the immortals worthy of that name, who enjoy that blessedness to which men, by worshipping God, desire to attain—what shall we answer, save that it was not in vain that in the holy Scriptures men were more expressly named gods than those immortal and blessed beings, to whom we are promised to be equal in the resurrection, lest, forsooth, on account of their excellence, unbelieving weakness should dare to set up any one of them as a god for us? Which in the case of a man is easy to avoid.
10:84
Et euidentius dici debuerunt homines dii in populo Dei, ut certi ac fidentes fierent eum esse Deum suum, qui dictus est deus deorum f quia etsi appellentur dii inmortales illi et beati, qui in caelis sunt, non tamen dicti sunt dii deorum, id est dii hominum in populo Dei constitutorum, quibus dictum est: Ego dixi, dii estis et filii Excelsi omnes. Hinc est quod ait apostolus: Etsi sunt qui dicuntur dii, siue in caelo siue in terra, sicuti sunt dii multi et domini multis nobis tamen unus Deus Pater, ex quo omnia et nos in ipso, et unus Dominus Iesus Christus, per quem omnia et nos per ipsum.
而神子民中的人本當更明白地被稱為神,好叫他們確定並篤信:那被稱為萬神之神的,就是他們的神;因為那些在天上的不朽有福者雖被稱為神,卻仍不被稱為眾神之神,就是那立於神子民中之人的神——經上曾對這些人說:「我曾說,你們是神,你們都是至高者的兒子。」由此,使徒才說:「雖有稱為神的,或在天,或在地,就如那許多的神,許多的主;然而我們只有一位神,就是父,萬物都本於祂,我們也歸於祂;並有一位主,就是耶穌基督,萬物都是藉著祂有的,我們也是藉著祂有的。」
And men in the people of God ought to have been called gods more evidently, that they might become certain and confident that He is their God who is called the God of gods; because, although those immortal and blessed ones who are in the heavens be called gods, they are nevertheless not called gods of gods, that is, gods of men established in the people of God, to whom it was said: "I have said, You are gods and sons of the Most High, all of you." Hence it is that the Apostle says: "For although there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth—as indeed there are many gods and many lords—yet to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things and we in Him, and one Lord Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and we through Him."
10:85
Non multum ergo de nomine disceptandum est, cum res ipsa ita clareat, ut ab scrupulo dubitationis aliena sit.
因此不必多為名稱爭辯,既然這事本身如此明白,毫無疑慮的芥蒂。
There is therefore no need to dispute much about the name, since the matter itself is so clear that it is free from any scruple of doubt.
10:86
Illud uero, quod nos ex eorum inmortalium beatorum numero missos esse angelos dicimus, qui Dei uoluntatem hominibus adnuntiarent, illis autem non placet, quia hoc ministerium non per illos, quos deos appellant, id est inmortales et beatos, sed per daemones fieri credunt, quos inmortales tantum, non etiam beatos audent dicere, aut certe ita inmortales et beatos, ut tamen daemones bonos, non deos sublimiter conlocatos et ab humana contrectatione semotos, quamuis nominis controuersia uideatur, tamen ita detestabile est nomen daemonum, ut hoc modis omnibus a sanctis angelis nos remouere debeamus.
至於我們所說:天使乃是從那不朽有福者之中被差遣,向人宣告神的旨意——這卻不合他們的意,因為他們相信這職事並非藉那些他們稱為神、即不朽有福者所行,乃是藉邪靈所行,他們只敢稱這些邪靈為不朽,不敢稱為有福,或至多稱之為不朽有福、卻仍是善的邪靈,而非崇高安置、與人接觸相隔的神——雖然這似乎是名稱之爭,然而「邪靈」之名如此可憎,以致我們論到聖天使時,理當以一切方法把自己與這名稱隔開。
But as for our saying that angels are sent from that number of the immortal and blessed to announce the will of God to men, while it does not please them—because they believe this ministry is performed not through those whom they call gods, that is, immortal and blessed, but through demons, whom they dare to call only immortal, not also blessed, or at any rate immortal and blessed in such a way as nonetheless to be good demons, not gods loftily placed and removed from human contact—although it may seem a controversy of the name, yet the name of demons is so detestable that we ought by all means to keep ourselves away from it in dealing with the holy angels.
10:87
Nunc ergo ita liber iste claudatur, ut sciamus inmortales et beatos, quodlibet uocentur, qui tamen facti et creati sunt, medios non esse ad inmortalem beatitudinem perducendis mortalibus miseris, a quibus utraque differentia separantur. Qui autem medii sunt communem habendo inmortalitatem cum superioribus, miseriam cum inferioribus, quoniam merito malitiae miseri sunt, beatitudinem, quam non habent, inuidere nobis possunt&gt potius quam praebere. Vnde nihil habent amici daemonum quod nobis dignum adferant, cur eos tamquam adiutores colere debeamus, quos potius ut deceptores uitare debemus.
那麼如今讓本卷這樣結束,使我們知道:那不朽有福者,無論以何名稱之,牠們既是被造成、被創造的,便不是引領可悲必死之人達到不朽福樂的居間者,因為牠們與可悲必死之人有著雙重差異的隔絕。而那些真正的居間者,既與較高者同享不朽、又與較低者同有愁苦,並因惡毒之罪愆而可悲,便寧可嫉妒我們牠們自己所不具的福樂,而不肯施予。因此,邪靈的朋友們毫無配得獻給我們之物,足以叫我們當作幫助者去敬拜牠們;我們倒該把牠們當作欺騙者加以躲避。
Now, then, let this book be closed in such a way that we may know that the immortal and blessed, by whatever name they be called, who nevertheless have been made and created, are not intermediaries for leading wretched mortals to immortal blessedness, from whom they are separated by both differences. But those who are intermediaries, having immortality in common with the higher and misery with the lower, since by the desert of malice they are wretched, can rather envy us the blessedness which they do not possess than furnish it. Whence the friends of the demons have nothing worthy to offer us, why we should worship them as helpers, whom we ought rather to shun as deceivers.
10:88
Quos autem bonos et ideo non solum inmortales, uerum etiam beatos deorum nomine sacris et sacrificiis propter uitam beatam post mortem adipiscendam colendos putant, qualescumque illi sint et quolibet uocabulo digni sint, non eos uelle per tale religionis obsequium nisi unum Deum coli, a quo creati et cuius participatione beati sunt, adiuuante ipso in sequenti libro diligentius disseremus.
但至於那些他們認為善良、因此不僅不朽、更是有福,並主張當以「神」之名、藉聖禮與祭祀敬拜,為要死後得享福樂之生命的——無論牠們屬何等,配得何種稱謂——牠們並不願意藉這樣的宗教敬奉,使人敬拜除那唯一之神以外的任何一位,就是那創造牠們、並使牠們因分有而得福的神;這一點,我們必蒙祂的幫助,在下一卷更詳加論述。
But as for those whom they think good, and therefore not only immortal but also blessed, and to be worshipped under the name of gods with sacred rites and sacrifices for the sake of attaining a blessed life after death—of whatever kind they may be and worthy of whatever appellation—that they do not wish, through such an obeisance of religion, any to be worshipped save the one God, by whom they were created and by participation in whom they are blessed, we shall, with His own help, discuss more diligently in the following book.
← 上一段
← 第 9 章第 11 章 →
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。