📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集

文集 第 7 章 第 1/12 段

拉丁文原文.37 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 7:1–7:37(全章共 440 節)

← 第 6 章
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
7:1
LIBER PRIMUS. De unita Trinitate deitatis. Interrogatio : Tu unus Deus Pater, unigenitus Deus Filius, Deus Spiritus sanctus,quia unam deitatem nobis declarasti, et sacrosanctæ solius divinitatis indivisam gloriam revelasti, et perfectam gloriam Trinitatis tuæ, sempiteruamque plenitudinem demonstrasti, ideo optimum duxi ut tua veritas patefacta claresceret, et haereticorum detecta caecitas innotesceret. Prop­ ter quod subito in æmulationem accensus est animus meus, et exarsit sicut ignis rutilans in densas arborum silvas.
第一卷。論神性合一的三位一體。問:祢,獨一的神——父,獨生的神——子,神——聖靈,既向我們宣告了獨一的神性,又啟示了那至聖、惟一之神性不可分割的榮耀,並顯明了祢三位一體的完全榮耀與永恆的豐盛,因此我認為最好是讓祢的真理得以彰顯而發光,並使異端被揭露的瞎眼為人所知。為此我的心忽然燃起了熱忱,如熊熊烈火燒入茂密的樹林。
BOOK ONE. On the United Trinity of the Godhead. Question: Thou, one God the Father, only-begotten God the Son, God the Holy Spirit, since Thou hast declared to us one Godhead, and hast revealed the undivided glory of the all-holy and sole divinity, and hast shown forth the perfect glory of Thy Trinity and the everlasting fullness, therefore I have judged it best that Thy truth, being laid open, should shine forth, and that the unveiled blindness of the heretics should become known. For which reason my spirit was suddenly kindled in zeal, and blazed like a glowing fire into the dense forests of trees.
7:2
Unde quia multi te:taverunt ad 199 stylum luminis viam demonstrare justitiae , et nobis placuit per anfractus angustiæ ejus irer diri­ gere, et latam et spatiosam viam primum fugere, quis non cupiat, detersa antiquitus cal gine, per aquam vitæ renovari , et post steriles et jejunas sili­ quas panem vitae edere, et, omissa voragine poculi venenosi, calicem salutaris accipere, et, prostrata idolorum profana cultura, Deum vcrum agnoscere creatorem, et in unum, spreta inveterati sibilatione serpentis , bymnum Deo suaviter decantare , et tan­ dem, refutatis squamosi draconis uberibus, ex evan­ gelicis præceptis melle et lacte putari , et rursus per immortalitatem resumptam angelos apostatas judi­ care , et pot terrenum hominem cœlestibus regnis et sublimibus in Jerusalem mancipari ?
因此,既然許多人都執起筆來,要將公義之道指明為光明之道,又既然我們樂意循它狹窄小徑的曲折前行,並首先避開那寬闊廣大之路——誰不渴望:當古時的幽暗被抹去,藉生命的水得以更新,在那貧瘠枯乾的豆莢之後得吃生命的糧,又拋棄那毒杯的漩渦,領受救恩的杯,又使偶像污穢的崇拜傾倒,認識真神——造物主,又輕看那積習已久之蛇的嘶聲,合一地向神甜美地唱詩,最終拒絕那鱗甲之龍的乳房,從福音的訓誨得以蜜與奶餵養,又藉著重得的不朽去審判背道的天使,並使屬地之人歸入天上的國度與耶路撒冷的崇高之境呢?
Wherefore, since many have laid claim to the pen, to point out the way of justice as the way of light, and since it has pleased us to direct our journey through the windings of its narrow path, and first to flee the broad and spacious way — who would not desire, the ancient gloom being wiped away, to be renewed through the water of life, and after the barren and meager husks to eat the bread of life, and, the whirlpool of the venomous cup being forsaken, to receive the cup of salvation, and, the profane worship of idols being laid low, to acknowledge the true God the Creator, and, the hiss of the inveterate serpent being scorned, sweetly to chant a hymn unto God in one, and at last, the dugs of the scaly dragon being refused, to be fed with honey and milk from the evangelical precepts, and again through immortality resumed to judge the apostate angels, and that earthly man should be assigned to the heavenly kingdoms and to the heights in Jerusalem?
7:3
Rogo, quæ et quanta est hæc in Deo humanitatis dilectio, qui tanta praemia credentibus pollicetur? Quis non omni avidi­ tate festinet de gravi somno exsurgere, et clarissi­ mam lucem cum infinita admiratione conspicere ? Quam cupio non ad pupillam oculorum obtutibus os- tendere, sed religiosis fratribus in arcano cordis se­ creto recondere. In quo non ambitiosi voluminis con­ feci cumulum, ne plus verba exaggerarem quam sensum investigantibus intimarem; sed breviter ex parte secundum promissionem infinita comprehendi, et humili sermone sublimia indicavi.
我問,神對人類這份愛何等之大、何等之深啊,祂竟向信的人應許如此大的賞賜!誰不會以全副的渴慕急忙從沉睡中起來,以無盡的驚歎仰望那至明之光呢?我所渴望的,並非用肉眼的瞳孔藉著注視去顯明這光,乃是要在心中隱秘的內室為敬虔的弟兄們珍藏它。在這書中,我並未堆砌一卷誇耀之作,免得我所堆積的言詞多過我向尋求者所傳達的意思;乃是按我的應許,簡短地、部分地涵蓋了無盡之事,並以卑微的言辭指明了崇高之事。
I ask, what and how great is this love of humanity in God, who promises such great rewards to those who believe? Who would not with all eagerness hasten to rise up from heavy sleep, and to behold the most brilliant light with infinite admiration? Which light I desire to show, not to the pupils of the eyes by mere gazing, but to lay up for religious brethren in the secret hidden recess of the heart. In which I have not made up a heap of an ostentatious volume, lest I should pile up words more than I conveyed meaning to those who search; but briefly, in part, according to my promise, I have comprehended infinite things, and in humble speech have pointed out sublime ones.
7:4
Unde totum ibi est plenum, ubi nibii est minus, imo penitus totum videtur ignorare, qui huic plenitudini divinae Trini­ talis aliquid voluerit derogarc, dum de te magis sen­ serim, quam proprie aliquid de meo dixerim. Nun­ quid totum secundum professionem rcguhe credi te tantum persimisisti, et nullo omnimodo menlali ser­ mone deliniri voluisti? Nunquid quia per fidem credi te permisisti, et deitatem divinitatis tuæ immensæ apud nos ut enarremus jussisti? Nunquid quia a no­ bis sentiris proprie, et dicendo definiris? Absit, dum Deus tu tibi tantum solus proprie es agnitus.
因此那裡的一切都是豐滿的,那裡毫無欠缺;不如說,凡想從這神聖三位一體的豐盛中減損甚麼的人,反倒顯出他對全體全然無知,因為我所思想到的關於祢的,多過我本己所說出的任何話。難道祢只許自己單按信仰準則的認信而被人相信,全然不願以心智的言語被描繪嗎?難道祢既許自己藉信心被相信,便吩咐我們在我們中間述說祢那無量神性的神格嗎?難道祢既被我們本己地領會,便也藉言說而被界定嗎?斷乎不然,因為祢,神啊,惟有祢自己才本己地認識祢自己。
Wherefore everything there is full, where nothing is lacking; nay rather, he seems utterly to be ignorant of the whole, who should wish to detract anything from this fullness of the divine Trinity, since I have thought more concerning Thee than I have said anything properly of my own. Hast Thou perhaps permitted Thyself to be believed wholly according to the profession of the rule alone, and willed in no way at all to be delineated by mental speech? Hast Thou perhaps, because Thou hast permitted Thyself to be believed through faith, commanded that we should set forth among us the deity of Thy immense divinity? Hast Thou perhaps, because Thou art perceived by us properly, also defined by being spoken? Far be it, since Thou, God, art properly known only to Thyself alone.
7:5
Propter quod supplex impensissime obsecro tuæ tranquillis­ sin x Trinitatis gloriam, ut perducas me ad statum perfectum fidei, confessionis meæ verba promentem. Si cœlum vel coeli non suffiiciunt ad prodendam su­ blimis 200 magnitudinis tune laudem ; si non satia­ twr oculus ad videndum, aut auris ad audiendum opera magnificentiæ tuæ, unde sufficit parvitas mea geminas in confessione referre tibi maximas gratias ? Adeo veniam postulo, ne forte curn praesumptionis dicta assumpsero, tuæ majestati videar aliquid dcro­ gare.
為此,我謙卑地懇求祢那至為安寧之三位一體的榮耀,求祢領我進入信仰的完全境地,使我得以說出我認信的言語。倘若天,或諸天之天,尚不足以述說祢崇高之偉大的讚美;倘若眼看,看不飽足,耳聽,聽不滿足祢宏偉的作為——我這渺小之人又怎能足以在認信中向祢獻上雙倍至大的感謝呢?因此我求祢赦免,免得我擔起這狂妄的言詞時,似乎從祢的威嚴中減損了甚麼。
For which reason as a suppliant I most earnestly entreat the glory of Thy most tranquil Trinity, that Thou wouldst lead me to the perfect state of faith, as I bring forth the words of my confession. If heaven, or the heaven of heavens, does not suffice to set forth the praise of Thy sublime greatness; if the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear with hearing the works of Thy magnificence — whence does my littleness suffice to render to Thee in confession twofold and greatest thanks? Therefore I beg pardon, lest perhaps, when I have taken up the words of presumption, I should seem to detract something from Thy majesty.
7:6
Sed prostratus jaceo ante tuæ sublimitatis glo­ riæ sedem, ut permittas me de plenitudine thesauri tui legis fontem bibere, et de quatuor exuberantibus fluminibus aquam vitæ haurire. Ex quibus confidenter hæreticorum blasphemias per auctoritatem regulæ præscribamus, et catholicorum a sempitermo vitæ Spiritu, velut de nectaris fonte corda sitientium irri­ gemus. Haec est, inquam, materiæ formula in colli­ sione hæreticorum , et haec est tituli victoria in abso­ lutione catholicorum, quam significat principale man- datum Dei : Euntes baptizate omnes gentes in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti (Matth. XXVIII, 19) ?
但我俯伏在祢崇高榮耀的寶座前,求祢容我從祢律法之寶庫的豐盛中如從泉源般暢飲,並從那四道滿溢的河流汲取生命的水。求祢使我們從這些泉源,憑著準則的權柄,篤定地駁斥異端的褻瀆,又用那永活生命的靈,如從甘露的泉源般滋潤口渴之大公信徒的心。我說,這就是與異端爭戰時的論題範式,這就是釋放大公信徒時的標題之勝利,正是神那首要的誡命所指明的:「你們去,奉父、子、聖靈的名給萬民施洗」(太二八19)。
But prostrate I lie before the throne of the glory of Thy sublimity, that Thou mayest permit me to drink from the fullness of the treasury of Thy law as from a fountain, and to draw the water of life from the four overflowing rivers. From which let us confidently prescribe against the blasphemies of the heretics by the authority of the rule, and let us water the hearts of the thirsting catholics from the everlasting Spirit of life, as from a fountain of nectar. This, I say, is the formula of the matter in the conflict with the heretics, and this is the victory of the title in the absolution of the catholics, which the chief commandment of God signifies: 'Go, baptize all nations in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit' (Matt. XXVIII, 19).
7:7
Audi in hoc admirabile ac regale decretum, in quo omne sacramentum in deitate Trinitatis uniter con­ tinetur. Quia dixit in nomine, evidenler unam deita­ tem in Trinitate consistere declaravit. Et quod pro­ secutus est, Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti, per singula nomina singulas personas inessc destinxit. Hæreticus. Sane, ut prius mihi summatim de unito deitatis nomine multifarie dictum ad interrogata exponas, postulo, et sic de nominibus personarum in prosequendo distinguas. Interrogatio. Cur unita est deitas? Responsio. Quia nulla est in hac plenitudine Trini­ tatis ambiguitas. Interrogatio. Cur unus est Deus Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus sanctus ? Responsio.
你要從這話中聽見那可欽佩、尊貴的諭旨,在其中一切奧秘都合一地包含於三位一體的神格中。因祂說「奉……的名」,便顯然宣告獨一的神性存立於三位一體之中。而祂接著所說的——「父、子、聖靈的」——便分別指出各個位格存在於各個名稱中。異端者:誠然,我請求你先就那合一的神性之名(這名是多方面被述說的)扼要地向我闡明,以回答我所問的;然後在往下進行時再就諸位格之名加以區別。問:神性為何是合一的?答:因為在三位一體這豐盛中毫無含糊之處。問:父、子、聖靈為何是一位神?答。
Hear in this the admirable and royal decree, in which every sacrament is contained unitedly in the deity of the Trinity. Because He said 'in the name,' He evidently declared one deity to subsist in the Trinity. And what He went on to say — 'of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit' — He distinguished single persons to be in single names. Heretic: Truly, I request that you first expound to me summarily concerning the united name of deity, manifoldly spoken, in answer to what I have asked; and then in proceeding distinguish concerning the names of the persons. Question: Why is the deity united? Answer: Because there is no ambiguity in this fullness of the Trinity. Question: Why is the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit one God? Answer.
7:8
Unus ubi dixisti, ad unitum nomen deitatis tu ipse retulisti nomina ea quae in personis distinxisti. Interrogatio. Cur solus Deus? Responsio. Utique quia sola dcitas in Trinitate consistit, ideo solus Deus. Interrogatio. Cur omnipotens Deus? Responsio. Manifeste, quoniam omnipotens est ipsa dcitas Trinitatis. Interrogat o. Cur unus verus Deus? Responsio. Procul dubio dum una vera sit natura Trinitatis, propterea unus est verus Deus. Interrogatio. Cur unus bonus est Deus? Responsio. Quatenus nulla diversitas dispar rst in una substantia divinæ Trinitatis, ac per hoc unus 201 bonus est Deus. Interrogatio. Cur summus Deus? Responsio. Quoniam hæc eadem ipsa summa est substantia Trinitatis.
你說「一位」之處,你自己已把那你在諸位格中所區別的名稱歸於那合一的神性之名。問:祂為何是惟一的神?答:必然因為惟一的神性存立於三位一體之中,所以祂是惟一的神。問:祂為何是全能的神?答:顯然因為三位一體之神性本身就是全能的。問:祂為何是獨一的真神?答:毫無疑問,既然三位一體乃是同一真實的本性,所以祂是獨一的真神。問:祂為何是獨一的善神?答:因為在神聖三位一體同一的本體中沒有任何不相等的差異,藉此祂便是獨一的善神。問:祂為何是至高的神?答:因為這同一位正是三位一體至高的本體。
Where thou saidst 'one,' thou thyself didst refer to the united name of deity those names which thou didst distinguish in the persons. Question: Why is He the sole God? Answer: Assuredly because the sole deity subsists in the Trinity, therefore He is the sole God. Question: Why is He omnipotent God? Answer: Manifestly, because the very deity of the Trinity is omnipotent. Question: Why is He one true God? Answer: Without doubt, since there is one true nature of the Trinity, therefore He is one true God. Question: Why is He one good God? Answer: Inasmuch as there is no diversity unequal in the one substance of the divine Trinity, and through this He is one good God. Question: Why is He the most high God? Answer: Because this very same is the highest substance of the Trinity.
7:9
Interrogatio. Cur unus est Dominus? Responsio. Memento unitam esse dominatione in natura sempiternæ Trinitatis, et ideo unus Dominus. Interrogatio. Cur una est imago invisibilis Trini­ tatis? Responsio. Quia una eademque deitas est in ima­ gine veritatis. Interrogatio. Cur unus est spiritus Deus ? Responsio. Nonne una est natura deitatis Spiritus sancti, quæ in Patre, et Filio, et in sese consistens est ? Ideo unus est Spiritus unius Trinitatis, quia una est sempilerna in hac ipsa Trinitate plenitudo divi­ nitatis. Interrogatio. Cur æqualis est una Trinitas' Responsio. Quia et sempiterna est in ipsa Trinitate deitas.
問:祂為何是獨一的主?答:要記得那主權在永恆三位一體的本性中乃是合一的,所以祂是獨一的主。問:那不可見之三位一體的形象為何是一個?答:因為同一的神性存在於真理的形象中。問:神為何是獨一的靈?答:聖靈之神性的本性豈不是一個嗎——這本性存立於父裡面、子裡面,並在它自己裡面?所以那獨一三位一體的靈是一個,因為在這同一三位一體中有獨一永恆的神性之豐盛。問:那獨一的三位一體為何是同等的?答:因為神性在三位一體本身中也是永恆的。
Question: Why is He one Lord? Answer: Remember that the dominion is united in the nature of the everlasting Trinity, and therefore He is one Lord. Question: Why is there one image of the invisible Trinity? Answer: Because one and the same deity is in the image of truth. Question: Why is God one Spirit? Answer: Is not the nature of the deity of the Holy Spirit one, which subsists in the Father, and in the Son, and in itself? Therefore there is one Spirit of the one Trinity, because there is one everlasting fullness of divinity in this very Trinity. Question: Why is the one Trinity equal? Answer: Because the deity is also everlasting in the Trinity itself.
7:10
Rogo, non animadvertis omnes pene hæreses in hoc titulo unitam deitatem Patris, et Filii, et Spi­ ritus sancti blasphemare, dum haec quæ superius uni­ ter in Trinitate sunt dicta ad unam personam Patris illi tantummodo conferant ? Qua de re. strenue nobis laborandum est, imo adversus tot sectarum congres­ siones atrociler cum infinita sollicitudine dimican­ dum, ut penitus discussa, hæreticorum caligine, lux evangelicæ cognitionis patefacta clar scat, et b'a- sphemantium detecta cæcitas innotescat. Undc nobis paulisper pro examinatione superiora retexenda sunt, ut legentibus vel investigantibus veritatem omnis ad liquidum scrupulus infidelitatis de arcano pectoris auferatur.
我問你,你豈未看出:幾乎一切異端都在這標題下褻瀆父、子、聖靈合一的神性,因他們把上文合一地論到三位一體的事,僅僅歸於父這獨一的位格嗎?為此緣故,我們必須奮力勞苦——不如說,必須以無盡的關切猛烈地對抗如此眾多派系的聚集——好叫異端的幽暗被徹底驅散,使福音知識之光得以彰顯而發光,並使褻瀆者被揭露的瞎眼為人所知。因此,為了察驗,前面的話須由我們稍加重述,好叫那些閱讀或探求真理的人,胸中隱秘之處一切不信的疑慮都能被徹底除淨。
I ask, dost thou not observe that almost all the heresies blaspheme in this title the united deity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, while they refer those things which above were spoken unitedly of the Trinity to the one person of the Father alone? On which account we must strenuously labor — nay, against so many assemblies of sects must fiercely contend with infinite solicitude — that, the gloom of the heretics being thoroughly dispelled, the light of the evangelical knowledge, laid open, may shine forth, and the unveiled blindness of the blasphemers may become known. Wherefore the foregoing things must be reviewed by us a little while for examination, so that for those who read or search out the truth, every scruple of unbelief may be utterly removed from the secret of the breast.
7:11
Præterea duntaxat de sacrosancto unito nomine Trini­ tatis. Ergo ubi unum Deum mcmini, non ad unam tan­ tummodo personam Patris hæc in dicendo taxavi, dum Filium de una Patris esse plenitudine deitatis et Spiritum sanctum non negavi. Et solum Deum uhi memoravi, non ad solam personam Patris haec, ut dicam verius, indicavi , quia Filium et Spiritum san­ ctum de hac ipsa so'a substantia divinitatis Patris esse non negavi. Similiter omnipotentem Deum, sive verum Deum, vel bonum Deum, aut summum Deum, seu unum Spiritum sanctum, de quo summatim paulo ante narravi, 202 nonne haec cuncta vocabula ad unitam divinitatem Patris, et Filii, et sancti Spiritus declaravi?
再者,這僅僅是論到三位一體那至聖、合一之名。所以,當我提及獨一的神時,我在言說中並未把它局限於父這獨一的位格,因我並未否認子是出於父之神性的同一豐盛,聖靈亦然。當我提及惟一的神時,更確切地說,我並未把它指作父這惟一的位格,因我並未否認子與聖靈是出於父之神性的這同一惟一本體。同樣,那全能的神,或真神,或善神,或至高的神,或獨一的聖靈——就是我稍前扼要敘述過的——我豈不是宣告這一切稱呼都歸於父、子、聖靈合一的神性嗎?
Moreover, only concerning the all-holy united name of the Trinity. Therefore, where I mentioned one God, I did not in speaking restrict this to the one person of the Father alone, since I did not deny that the Son is of the one fullness of the Father's deity, and the Holy Spirit likewise. And where I mentioned the sole God, I did not, to speak more truly, indicate this of the sole person of the Father, because I did not deny that the Son and the Holy Spirit are of this very sole substance of the Father's divinity. Likewise the omnipotent God, or the true God, or the good God, or the most high God, or the one Holy Spirit, of which I narrated summarily a little before — did I not declare all these terms to belong to the united divinity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit?
7:12
Unde quamvis in hoc loco copiosae sint significationes dictæ, tamen ad unitam divinitatem Trinitatis evidentius sunt approbatae. Nam unitas, non ut hæretici suis oppressi blasphemiis dicere saepe consueverunt in voluntale esse, non in deitate : quod absit, dum unitas non in voluntate tantum sit, sed imo in deitate. Ac per hoc unitas haec, ut certus sis, non in concordia tantum est, sed realiter, imo sub­ stantialiter constat in natura divinitatis. Ergo postulo a te, qui legis hanc istius scripturæ meæ fidei catho­ licae professionem, ne bic superflua vel profusa verba perquiras ;
因此,雖然在此處所說的含義甚為豐富,它們卻更明顯地被認可為指向三位一體那合一的神性。因為那合一並非如異端——他們被自己的褻瀆所轄制——常慣於說的那樣,是在意志中而不在神性中;這斷不可在我們中間,因為那合一不僅在意志中,反倒在神性中。藉此,好叫你確知:這合一不僅在和諧中,乃是真實地、不如說本質地存立於神性的本性中。因此我求你這讀我這篇大公信仰認信文字的人,不要在此尋求多餘或繁冗的言詞;
Wherefore, although in this place the significations spoken are copious, yet they are more evidently approved as referring to the united divinity of the Trinity. For the unity is not, as the heretics, oppressed by their blasphemies, have often been wont to say, in the will and not in the deity — which be far from us, since the unity is not in the will only, but rather in the deity. And through this, that thou mayest be certain, this unity is not in concord only, but really, nay substantially, it stands firm in the nature of the divinity. Therefore I beg of thee, who readest this profession of my catholic faith in this writing, that thou seek not here for superfluous or profuse words;
7:13
sed strictim, capaciter, imo spiritaliter cum summo studio dicta, ad stylum sacrae Scripturae conferas, et secundum regulae sequitatem justitia moderante perpendas. Unde jam accipe non diserta, sed fortia ; neque terrena figmenta, sed vera coelestia documenta ; neque philosophorum haeretica prava commenta, sed perfecta apostolica arcana sacramen­ la; ncque grammatica, quae superflua est doctrinæ sapientia, sed ex evangelicis Scripturis super nel et favum dulciora et mcliora divina praecepta. Disce itaque quia in hoc sophistæ hujus mundi stulti vel muti facti sunt, quoniam sapientiam veram non co­ gnoverunt, et ideo reprobi facti sunt.
乃要簡潔地、寬廣地、不如說屬靈地,以至高的熱忱,把所說的話比照神聖經文的體裁,並按準則的一貫性、以公義為節度去衡量。因此如今你要領受那不華麗卻有力的話;不是屬地的虛構,乃是真實天上的明證;不是哲學家異端而敗壞的杜撰,乃是完全的、使徒的奧秘;不是文法(那是教義上多餘的智慧),乃是那比蜜與蜂房更甘甜、更美好的、從福音經文而出的神聖訓誨。所以你要知道,這世上的詭辯家在此事上已成了愚拙的,不如說成了啞口的,因為他們不認識真智慧,所以成了被棄絕的。
but compactly, capaciously, nay spiritually, with the highest zeal, refer the things said to the style of sacred Scripture, and weigh them according to the consistency of the rule, with justice moderating. Wherefore now receive things not eloquent but strong; not earthly figments but true heavenly documents; not the heretical and depraved fabrications of the philosophers, but the perfect apostolic hidden mysteries; not grammar, which is a superfluous wisdom of doctrine, but, sweeter and better than honey and the honeycomb, the divine precepts from the evangelical Scriptures. Learn therefore that in this the sophists of this world have been made foolish, or rather dumb, because they did not know the true wisdom, and therefore have been made reprobate.
7:14
Itaque inter­ rogantis atque solventis accipe personam, quæ exigit sibi fieri satisfactionem. Interrogatio. Cur Pater spiritus dicimur, et Filius spiritus nuncupatur, et Spiritus sanctus spiritus ap­ pellatur? Responsio. Perfecte ad hæc respondetur pro loco interroganti. An ignoras quia Pater unus Deus est, et Filius unus Deus est, et Spiritus sanctus unus Deus est? Nonne unus Deus est, dum unitum nomen est in natura usiae Sic et unus Spiritus est, quia unita est deitas ejusdem. Nam si tu per singula no­ mina personarum unitum nomen Spiritus ter desi­ gnasti, nunquid tres Spiritus dicere oportet? Absit.
於是請領受那既發問又解答之人的角色,他要求人向他作出滿意的答覆。問:為何父被稱為靈,子被稱為靈,聖靈也被稱為靈呢?答:對此處發問之人,這些事已得到完美的回答。你豈不知父是一位神,子是一位神,聖靈是一位神嗎?祂豈不是一位神嗎——既然這名在本質(usia)的本性中乃是合一的?照樣,靈也是一位,因為同一位的神性是合一的。因為你若藉著諸位格各自的名稱三次指稱那合一的「靈」之名,難道就當說有三個靈嗎?斷乎不可。
And so receive the person of the one questioning and resolving, who demands that satisfaction be made to him. Question: Why are we called Father-Spirit, and is the Son named Spirit, and is the Holy Spirit called Spirit? Answer: It is perfectly answered to these things for him who questions in this place. Dost thou not know that the Father is one God, and the Son is one God, and the Holy Spirit is one God? Is He not one God, since the name is united in the nature of the essence (usia)? So too there is one Spirit, because the deity of the same is united. For if thou hast through the single names of the persons designated the united name of Spirit three times, must one therefore say three Spirits? Far be it.
7:15
Quod si hoc poterat dici, tale erat, ut et hoc in con­ fessione deberet introduci, tres deos in plurali numero nuncupari: ut jam non esset in his personis una 203 natura divinitatis, sed unusquisque in propria vel diversa natura sua consisteret ; quod absit. Interea rursus eadem repeto, et ad tua dicta verba comparo, ct sensum intellectus mei tibi refero. Pater unus Deus cst. et Filius unigenitus Deus est, et Spiritus sanctus unitus in Patre et Filio Deus est. Nonne quia unitatis nomen, id est deitatis, per singulas personas ter designavi, ideo tres deos potero confiteri? Absit. Unde quamvis triplex sit dictum, unum tamen tenet in deitate Trinitatis nominis indicium.
但這話若能成立,那就會是這樣:連這也當被引入認信中,即當以複數稱有三位神:以致在這些位格中便不再有同一的神性之本性,反倒各自存立於其自己的或不同的本性中;這斷不可在我們中間。如今我再次重述同樣的話,比照你所說的言詞,並把我所理解的意思呈給你。父是一位神,子是獨生的神,聖靈在父與子裡面合一,也是神。豈不是這樣嗎:因我藉著各個位格三次指稱了那合一之名(即神性之名),我便能認信三位神嗎?斷乎不可。因此,這話雖是三重的,卻仍在三位一體的神性中持守那名稱的同一指示。
But if this could be said, it would be such that this too ought to be introduced into the confession, that three gods be named in the plural number: so that there would no longer be in these persons one nature of divinity, but each one would subsist in his own or diverse nature; which be far from us. Meanwhile I again repeat the same things, and compare them to thy spoken words, and refer to thee the meaning of my understanding. The Father is one God, and the Son is the only-begotten God, and the Holy Spirit, united in the Father and the Son, is God. Is it not so that, because I have three times designated the name of unity, that is, of deity, through the single persons, I shall therefore be able to confess three gods? Far be it. Wherefore, although the saying is threefold, it nevertheless holds one indication of the name in the deity of the Trinity.
7:16
Interim vel in hoc titulo animadverte dicentem : Ego sum Deus Abraham, Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob (Exod. III, 6). Nunquid in hoc dicto tres deos designavit, eo quod unum nomen ter indicavit ? Absit. Idcirco nos qui fidem evangelicam atque apostolicam Patrum tene­ mus, nec tres deos, nec tres dominos, nec tres spi­ ritus, vel caetera hujuscemodi pluralitatis dicta nec tenemus, nec in corde nostro suscipimus : præsertim cum nos unitatem deitatis uniter, non pluraliter in Trinitate consistere sciamus. Propter quod non de- bemus tres naturas in his personis contra jus evan­ gelicæ censuræ profiteri, cum sit unus Pater Deus, et unigenitus sit Filius Deus, et ingenitus sit Spiritus sanctus Deus.
與此同時,就連在這稱呼中也當留意那位說話者:「我是亞伯拉罕的神,是以撒的神,是雅各的神」(出三6)。難道祂在這話中因三次提到同一名稱,就指出了三位神嗎?絕非如此。因此,我們持守列祖福音與使徒信仰的人,既不持守、也不在心中接受三位神、三位主、三位靈,或其他諸如此類複數的說法;尤其因為我們知道,神性的合一是在三位一體中合一地、而非複數地存立。為此,我們不可違背福音準繩的權柄,在這幾位格中宣認三種本性,因為父是獨一的神,獨生子是神,非受生的聖靈也是神。
Meanwhile, even in this title observe Him who says: 'I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob' (Exod. 3:6). Did He in this saying designate three gods, in that He named one name three times? God forbid. Therefore we who hold the evangelical and apostolic faith of the Fathers neither hold nor receive in our heart three gods, nor three lords, nor three spirits, nor other such utterances of plurality; especially since we know that the unity of the Godhead subsists in the Trinity unitedly, not in plurality. Wherefore we ought not to profess three natures in these Persons against the rule of the evangelical judgment, since the Father is one God, and the only-begotten Son is God, and the unbegotten Holy Spirit is God.
7:17
Ideo unus est Deus, quia unita est dei­ tas, si ut per singulas personas scriptum est: et quia nullus Deus nisi unus. Velut hoc : Audi, Israel, Do­ minu. Deus tuus, Deus unus esl (Deut. VI, 4); sive hoc : Ego Dominus Deus extendi cœlum solus, et soli­ davi terram (Isai. XLIV, 24). Sed et hoc : Unus enim Deus (I Tim. n, 5); aut hoc : Mediator autem unius non est, Deus autem unus est (Gal. III, 20). Nec non : Vade retro, Satana ; scriptum est : Dominum Deum tuum adorabis et illi soli servies (Matth. IV, 10). Nam et hoc : Ex Spiritu qui nascitur, Spiritus est; et alio in loco: Hcec omnia operatur unus atque idem Spiritus, diriMens singulis prout vult ; sive hoc :
因此神是獨一的,因為神性是合一的,正如藉著每一位格所記載的那樣;又因為除了一位以外,並沒有別的神。例如這話:「以色列啊,你要聽,耶和華你的神是獨一的神」(申六4);或這話:「我耶和華獨自鋪張諸天,親自堅立大地」(賽四十四24)。還有這話:「神只有一位」(提前二5);或這話:「中保並非為一方作的,神卻是一位」(加三20)。又如:「撒但,退去吧!因為經上記著說,當拜主你的神,單要事奉祂」(太四10)。又有這話:「從聖靈生的就是靈」;另一處又說:「這一切都是這位獨一的同一聖靈所運行,隨己意分給各人」;或這話:
Therefore God is one, because the Godhead is one, even as it is written through each of the Persons; and because there is no God but one. As this: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord thy God is one God' (Deut. 6:4); or this: 'I the Lord God have stretched out the heaven alone, and made firm the earth' (Isa. 44:24). And also this: 'For there is one God' (1 Tim. 2:5); or this: 'Now a mediator is not of one, but God is one' (Gal. 3:20). And likewise: 'Get thee behind me, Satan; for it is written, Thou shalt adore the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve' (Matt. 4:10). For also this: 'That which is born of the Spirit is spirit'; and in another place: 'All these things one and the same Spirit worketh, dividing to every one according as He will'; or this:
7:18
Servare unita­ tem Spiritus in vinculo pacis : unum corpus et unus Spiritus. Sed et hoc : Omnes unum Spiritum potavimus. Memento unitum divinitatis nt men esse in singulis personis. Interrogatio. Ut hæc dicta de auctoritatis jure adhuc mihi confirmes, postu o. Responsio. Ignoras scriptum esse, Intelligentibus legem loquor (Rom. v!!, 1). Itaque 204 qui aures habent ad audiendum audiant quid Spiritus per hi­ storiographum Moysem in toto pene libro Geneseos Ecclesiis testetur : intelligant Deum dixisse, et Deum fecisse, et Deum adfuissc, vel benedixisse ea. Idem et divit ibi : Faciamus hom nem ad imaginem et similitu­ dinem nostram (Cen. I, 26), et sic prosecutus est:
「用和平的聯索保守聖靈所賜合而為一的心:身體只有一個,聖靈只有一個。」還有這話:「我們都飲於一位聖靈。」要記得,神性合一之名是在每一位格之中。問:我請你再以權柄的根據向我證實這些話。答:你豈不知經上記著說:「我對明白律法的人說話」(羅七1)嗎?所以凡有耳可聽的,就應當聽聖靈藉史家摩西在幾乎整卷創世記中向眾教會所作的見證:要明白是神說了,是神造了,是神在場,並賜福於這些受造之物。同一位在那裡又說:「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人」(創一26),接著又說:
'To keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace: one body and one Spirit.' And also this: 'We have all drunk of one Spirit.' Remember that the united name of the Godhead is in each of the Persons. Question. I ask that you yet further confirm to me these sayings by the warrant of authority. Answer. Do you not know that it is written, 'I speak to them that know the law' (Rom. 7:1)? Therefore let those who have ears to hear, hear what the Spirit, through the historian Moses, testifies to the Churches in almost the whole book of Genesis: let them understand that God spoke, and God made, and God was present, and blessed these things. The same also said there: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness' (Gen. 1:26), and thus He continued:
7:19
Fecit Deus hominem, ad imaginem Dei fecit illum, masculum feminam fecit eos, et benedixit eos, dicens: Cr scite et multiplicamini, et replete terram (Ibid., 27, 28). Interrogatio. Quas tandem cst causa unum dixisse faciamuS, et unum fecisse, et unum dicenti et facienti interfuisse, et bona facta vidisse et benedixisse dum faciamus unius tantum solitarii persona non sit, sed facientis unitcr cum eo, et ad imaginem Dei ipsius t antum persona sit, sed et videntis et benedicentis una cum eo sit. Responsio. Non libi videtur, quoniam per tacita nomina personarum, quamvis paulisper, deitatis uni­ tum operantis nomen est insinuatum?
「神造了人,照著神的形像造他,造男造女,又賜福給他們說:要生養眾多,遍滿地面」(同上27、28節)。問:那麼,為何是一位說「我們要造」,又是一位造了,又有一位與那說話並動工者同在,看見所造之物為美好,並賜了福——既然「我們要造」並非僅指一位孤獨者的位格,而是指與祂一同動工者的位格;「照著神的形像」也不僅是祂一位的位格,而是與祂一同觀看並賜福者的位格?答:在你看來,豈不是藉著那些未明言的位格之名——雖只是略微地——已暗示出那動工之神性合一之名了嗎?
'God made man; to the image of God He made him; male and female He made them, and He blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth' (ibid. 27,28). Question. What then is the reason that One said 'Let us make,' and One made, and One was present with Him who spoke and made, and saw the good things made and blessed them — since the 'Let us make' is not the person of one solitary being alone, but of one making together with Him, and the 'to the image of God' is not His person alone, but also of one seeing and blessing together with Him? Answer. Does it not seem to you that, through the unspoken names of the Persons — even if but briefly — the united name of the working Godhead is intimated?
7:20
Utique, quia non significavit, Pater dixit, ct Filius fecit, et Spiritus sanctus benedixit; sed breviter prosecutus est : Et dixit Deus, et fecit Deus, et vidit Deus omnia quæ facta erant, et benedixit illa, dicens, Crescite et mul­ tiplicamini, et replete terram (Gen. I, 28). Vides quia nemo ad semetipsum dicit, fiat, sed ad facientem : et nemo qui facit, ad suam personam loquitur, et fecit. Et quis de se indicat, et vidit, et benedixit? Nam verbo tenus si una esset persona dicenti ,et facientis, et benedicentis, sic intimasset fecisse se opus suum, et dixi, et feci, et bcnedixi. Dum scriptum sit : Verbo Domini cœli firmati sunt, et spiritu oris ejus omnis virtus eorum (Psal. XXXII, 6).
誠然,因為經文並未指明「父說了,子造了,聖靈賜福」,而是簡短地接著說:「神說了,神造了,神看一切所造的,並賜福給它們說:要生養眾多,遍滿地面」(創一28)。你看,沒有人對自己說「願這成就」,而是對動工者說;也沒有動工者對自己的位格說「祂造了」。又有誰論到自己說「祂看見了,祂賜福了」?因為嚴格說來,若說話者、動工者、賜福者只是一個位格,祂就會這樣表明祂造了自己的工,說「我說了,我造了,我賜福了」。然而經上記著說:「諸天藉耶和華的話而堅立,萬象藉祂口中的氣而成」(詩三十二6)。
Indeed, because it did not specify 'the Father said, and the Son made, and the Holy Spirit blessed,' but briefly continued: 'And God said, and God made, and God saw all the things that were made, and He blessed them, saying, Increase and multiply, and fill the earth' (Gen. 1:28). You see that no one says to himself, 'Let it be made,' but to one who makes; and no one who makes speaks to his own person, 'and He made.' And who declares of himself, 'and He saw, and He blessed'? For, to speak strictly, if it were one person of the speaker, and of the maker, and of the blesser, He would so have intimated that He made His own work, saying 'I said, and I made, and I blessed.' Whereas it is written: 'By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and by the spirit of His mouth all their power' (Ps. 32:6).
7:21
Utique Verbum Filium indicavit: Dominum autem Patrem ejus dcsi- gnavit, et Spiritum oris ejus, Spiritum sanctum dixit. Vides in his personis unitum esse nomen Trinitatis in natura? Psalmographo quoque approbante : Pro­ pterea unxit te Deus, Deus tuus (Psal. XLIV, 8). Ecce Deum et Deum : non tamen pluraliter invenies dictum fuisse in his personis d< os : nec non Do­ minum de Domino, Patrem de Filio audi atte­ stantem per Osee prophetam, Salvabo eos in Domino, Deo ipsorum (Osee I, 7). Sed et hoc scriptum 205 est de unito nomine divinitatis : Et pluit Dominus a Domino (Gen. xix, 24). Vel hoc exemplum accipe ad Jacob dicentis in libro Genescos :
誠然,祂以「話語」指出了子;以「主」指出了祂的父,以「祂口中的氣」稱呼了聖靈。你看見在這幾位格中,三位一體之名在本性上是合一的嗎?詩人也予以印證:「所以神,就是你的神,用膏膏你」(詩四十四8)。看哪,神與神:然而你不會發現在這幾位格中以複數說「諸神」。同樣,主出於主,父出於子——你聽藉先知何西阿所作的見證:「我必在耶和華他們的神裡拯救他們」(何一7)。又有這話論到神性合一之名而記著說:「耶和華從耶和華那裡降下」(創十九24)。或請領受創世記中祂對雅各所說的這例子:
Indeed by 'the Word' He indicated the Son; by 'the Lord' He designated His Father, and by 'the spirit of His mouth' He named the Holy Spirit. Do you see that in these Persons the name of the Trinity is united in nature? The Psalmist also confirming it: 'Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee' (Ps. 44:8). Behold, God and God: yet you will not find it said in these Persons in the plural, 'gods.' Likewise, Lord from Lord, Father from Son — hear it attested through the prophet Hosea: 'I will save them in the Lord their God' (Hos. 1:7). And also this is written concerning the united name of the Godhead: 'And the Lord rained from the Lord' (Gen. 19:24). Or take this example of Him speaking to Jacob in the book of Genesis:
7:22
Surge et ascende in locum Bethel, et habita ibi, et fac ibi alture Deo, illi qui apparuit tibi cum fugeres a facie fratris tui (Gen. XXXV, 1). Et in libro Psalmorum cautum in­ venimus : Dixit Dominus Domino meo, Sede ad dexte- ram meam, donec ponam inimicos tuos scabellum pedum tuorum (Psal. CIX, 1). Sed et sanctus Isaias indicat: Sic dicit Dominus Christo meo, cui tenui dexteram, ut obaudiant eum omnes gentes (Isai. XLV, 1), etc. Unus tamen Dens quia unita est dominatio in natura sem­ piterna : sicut et de persona sancti Spiritus Vas cle- ctionis breviter absolvit dicens : Idem Spiritus idem et Dominus, idem et Deus, qui operatur omnia in om­ nibus (I Cor. XII, 11).
「起來,上伯特利去,住在那裡,在那裡為神築一座壇,就是當你逃避你哥哥的時候向你顯現的那位」(創三十五1)。詩篇中我們也讀到記著說:「耶和華對我主說:你坐在我的右邊,等我使你的仇敵作你的腳凳」(詩一〇九1)。聖以賽亞也指明說:「主對我的受膏者如此說,我曾扶持他的右手,使萬國都順服他」(賽四十五1)等等。然而神是獨一的,因為在永恆的本性中主權是合一的:正如那揀選的器皿論到聖靈的位格時也簡短地斷言說:「同一位聖靈也是同一位主,也是同一位神,在眾人裡面運行一切」(林前十二11)。
'Arise and go up to the place Bethel, and dwell there, and make there an altar to God, to Him who appeared to thee when thou didst flee from the face of thy brother' (Gen. 35:1). And in the book of Psalms we find recorded: 'The Lord said to my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool' (Ps. 109:1). And holy Isaiah also declares: 'Thus saith the Lord to my Christ, whose right hand I have held, that all the nations may obey Him' (Isa. 45:1), and so forth. Yet God is one, because the dominion is one in the eternal nature: as also concerning the person of the Holy Spirit the Vessel of Election briefly concluded, saying: 'The same Spirit is also the same Lord, the same also God, who worketh all things in all' (1 Cor. 12:11).
7:23
Et alio in loco idem ipse repe­ tit : Quia Dominus eat Spiritus : ubi autem Spiritus Domini, ibi libertas (11 Cor. III, 17). Vel accipe in persona Patris in Evangelio ad Samaritanam dictum fuisse, quia Deus Spiritus est (Joan. IV, 24). Nam et de persona Filii Jeremias receptissimus prophetarum testatur : Spiritus faciei nostræ Christus Dominus (Thren. IV, 20). Sive hoc : Quia misit Deus spiritum Filii sui in corda nostra, clamantem Abba pater (Gal. IV, 6). De Spiritu autem principali Filius indicat : Spiritus ubi vult spirat, et vocem ejus audis, el nescis unde veniat, vel quo eat. Sic est omnis qui nascitur ex aqua et Spiritu sancto (Joan. III, 8).
在另一處同一位又重述說:「主就是那靈;主的靈在哪裡,那裡就得以自由」(林後三17)。或請領受在福音書中,論到父的位格,對撒瑪利亞婦人所說的話,即「神是個靈」(約四24)。因為論到子的位格,眾先知中最受敬重的耶利米也作見證說:「我們鼻中的氣,就是主基督」(哀四20)。或這話:「神就差遣祂兒子的靈進入我們的心,呼叫阿爸,父」(加四6)。論到那本源之靈,子也指明說:「風隨己意而吹,你聽見風的響聲,卻不曉得從哪裡來,往哪裡去。凡從水和聖靈生的,也都是如此」(約三8)。
And in another place the same one repeats: 'For the Lord is a Spirit; and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty' (2 Cor. 3:17). Or take that it was said, in the person of the Father, in the Gospel to the Samaritan woman, that 'God is a Spirit' (John 4:24). For also concerning the person of the Son, Jeremiah, most accepted of the prophets, testifies: 'The Spirit of our countenance, Christ the Lord' (Lam. 4:20). Or this: 'Because God hath sent the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying, Abba, Father' (Gal. 4:6). And concerning the principal Spirit the Son declares: 'The Spirit breatheth where He will, and thou hearest His voice, but knowest not whence He cometh or whither He goeth. So is every one that is born of water and the Holy Spirit' (John 3:8).
7:24
Ergo ut compen­ diu Scripturae sensum de natura divinæ Trinitatis uniter dicentis colligas : Vivit Dominus, et benedictus Deus meus, et exaltetur Deus salutis meæ (Psal. XVII, 47). Vides per singulas significationes unitum nomen deitatis ter indicatum : hoc esi, Deus, Deus, ei Deus : non tamen deos. Vel per eumdem dictum accipe : Immola Deo sacrificium laudis, et redde Altissimo vota tua. Et invoca me in die tribulationis tuæ, et eripiam te, et glorificabis me (Psal. XLIX, 14). Uiique si una esset , tantummodo in hoc exemplo fixa persona, debuerat haec sine aliqua distinctione in prosequendo Laxare, dicens : Vivit Dominus, qui est benediclus. Sed cum dicit:
因此,為使你能簡要地領會聖經合一地論及神聖三位一體之本性的意思:「耶和華是永生的,我的神是應當稱頌的,願拯救我的神被尊崇」(詩十七47)。你看,藉著每一表述,神性合一之名被三次指出:即神、神、又神——卻不是諸神。或請領受同一位詩人所說的話:「你要以感謝為祭獻給神,又要向至高者還你的願。並要在患難之日求告我,我必搭救你,你也要榮耀我」(詩四十九14)。誠然,若在此例中只有一個固定的位格,他本應毫無分別地接續說:「耶和華是永生的,祂是應當稱頌的」。但當他說:
Therefore, that you may gather in brief the sense of Scripture speaking unitedly of the nature of the divine Trinity: 'The Lord liveth, and blessed be my God, and let the God of my salvation be exalted' (Ps. 17:47). You see that through each expression the united name of the Godhead is indicated three times: that is, God, God, and God — yet not gods. Or take what is said by the same Psalmist: 'Offer to God the sacrifice of praise, and pay thy vows to the Most High. And call upon me in the day of thy tribulation, and I will deliver thee, and thou shalt glorify me' (Ps. 49:14). Indeed, if there were only one fixed person in this example, he ought to have let these words flow without any distinction in proceeding, saying: 'The Lord liveth, who is blessed.' But when he says:
7:25
Vivit Dominus, et benedictus Deus meus, et exal­ tetur Deus salutis meæ (Psal. XVII, 47), itane non uniter in his personis est nomen divinitatis Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti in omnibus declaratum ? 206 id est Deus, et Deus, et Deus : sicut alio in loco cautum est de unito nomine dominationis : Afferte Domino patriæ gentium, afferte Domino glo­ riam et honorem, afferte gloriam nomini ejus (Psal. xcv, 7). Quia si una esset tantummodo persona glo­ riam sic dcbucrat intimare : Adferte Domino patriæ gentium, afferte ei gloriam et honorem, afferte glo- riam nomini ejus. Quid amplius? Nunquid adhuc nobis ad patefaciendam veritatem argumenta sunt necessaria?
「耶和華是永生的,我的神是應當稱頌的,願拯救我的神被尊崇」(詩十七47)——父、子、聖靈神性之名,豈不是這樣在凡事上於這幾位格中合一地宣告了嗎?即神、又神、又神:正如另一處論到主權合一之名而記著說:「列邦的萬族啊,你們要將榮耀、能力歸給耶和華,要將榮耀歸給耶和華的名」(詩九十五7)。因為若只有一個位格,他本應這樣表達榮耀:「列邦的萬族啊,你們要將榮耀、能力歸給耶和華,將榮耀歸給祂的名」。還要再多說什麼呢?難道為彰明真理,我們還需要更多論證嗎?
'The Lord liveth, and blessed be my God, and let the God of my salvation be exalted' (Ps. 17:47) — is not the name of the divinity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit thus declared unitedly in these Persons in all things? that is, God, and God, and God: as in another place it is recorded concerning the united name of dominion: 'Bring to the Lord, O ye families of the nations, bring to the Lord glory and honour, bring glory to His name' (Ps. 95:7). For if there were only one person, he ought to have expressed the glory thus: 'Bring to the Lord, O ye families of the nations, bring to Him glory and honour, bring glory to His name.' What more? Are arguments still necessary to us for making the truth plain?
7:26
Nunquid gentes quibus introimus janu;e credentibus ad vitam aeternam patens est , in unam tantummodo personam Patris baptizantur ? et non in tres, quorum nomina hæc sunt in personis distincta, Patris, et Filii, et sancti Spiritus, quibus est una na­ tura divinitatis, sicut scriptum est, Euntes baptizate amnes gentes in nomine, et sic prosecutus est, Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti (Matth. XXVIII, 19). Unde in his personis per omnia in deitate divinitatis unitum nomen est, et per ipsa nomina Trinitatis tantum per­ sonæ distinctæ sunt. Sed et Apostolus ad haec testa­ tur : Servare unitatem Spiritus in vinculo pacis. Unum corpus, et unus Spiritus;
那些蒙開門得入永生的信者所屬的列邦,難道只受洗歸入父這一個位格嗎?而非歸入三位——他們在位格上的名是這樣有分別的,即父、子、聖靈——他們有同一個神性的本性,正如經上記著說:「你們要去,奉名給萬民施洗」,接著又說,「父、子、聖靈的名」(太二十八19)。因此,在這幾位格中,此名在神性的本體上凡事都是合一的,唯藉三位一體之諸名才使各位格有所分別。使徒也對此作見證說:「用和平的聯索保守聖靈所賜合而為一的心。身體只有一個,聖靈只有一個;」
Are the nations, for whom the gate stands open to those who believe unto eternal life, baptized into the one person of the Father only? and not into three, whose names are thus distinct in the Persons — of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit — to whom there is one nature of the Godhead, as it is written: 'Going, baptize all nations in the name,' and thus He continued, 'of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit' (Matt. 28:19). Hence in these Persons the name is in all things united in the deity of the Godhead, and by the very names of the Trinity only the Persons are distinguished. But the Apostle also testifies to this: 'To keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace. One body, and one Spirit;'
7:27
sicut et vocati estis in una spe vocationis vestræ (Ephes. IV, 3). Vides servandum esse unitum Spiritum, in unum corpus Ecclesiae, in vinculo pacis, quod est in confessiene salutis? Aut nunquid unitatis naturae nomen Spiritus in una tan­ tummodo persona ejusdem dici potest, dum unitatis naturæ nomen in trihus his personis in baptismo vitam cre lentibus tribuat ? In qua spe omnes nos vo­ cati sunius. Quæ spes fidei nostræ hæc est, ut hi ba­ ptismo unitum divinitatis nomen prius confitearis, ut remissam peccatorum in bis personis consequi me­ rearis.
「正如你們蒙召,是在所蒙之恩召的同一個指望裡」(弗四3–4)。你看見那合一的聖靈是當被保守的,使之歸入教會的同一個身體,存於和平的聯索中,這聯索就在於救恩的承認嗎?再者,這同一位聖靈本性合一之名,豈能只在其一個位格中被稱說,既然這本性合一之名在洗禮中藉這三位格把生命賜給信者?我們眾人都是在這指望裡蒙召的。我們信心的這指望就是:你在洗禮中先承認神性合一之名,好叫你配得在這幾位格裡蒙赦罪。
'even as you are called in one hope of your calling' (Eph. 4:3-4). Do you see that the united Spirit is to be kept, into the one body of the Church, in the bond of peace, which consists in the confession of salvation? Or can the name of the Spirit's unity of nature be spoken of in only one person of that same Spirit, when the name of unity of nature bestows life in baptism upon believers in these three Persons? In which hope we are all called. And this hope of our faith is this: that in baptism you first confess the united name of the Godhead, that you may merit to obtain remission of sins in these Persons.
7:28
Ergo quamvis iu superioribus exemplis Scri­ pturarum tacita sint nomina personarum, tamen uni­ tum nomen divinitatis per omnia tibi est in his demonstratum; sicut et in hoc exemplo veritatis, in quo nomina personarum evidenter sunt ostensa, et unitum nomen divinitatis clause est declaratum, di­ cente Joanne evangelista in Epistola sua : Tres sunt qui testimonium dicunt in cœlo, Pater, et Verbum, et Spiritus , et in Christo Jesu unum sunt (I Joan. v, 7) ; non tamen unus est, 207 quia non est in his una persona. Nam unum quod dixit de utrisque, quid aliud intelligitur, quam quod Deus Pater divinitatis natura, idem ipse dicatur et Dominus, idem ipse sit et Spi­ ritus;
因此,雖然在上述聖經的例子中,諸位格之名未經明言,然而神性合一之名仍在其中凡事上向你顯明了;正如在這真理的例子中,諸位格之名被清楚顯示,而神性合一之名也被緊密地宣告,福音書作者約翰在他的書信中說:「在天上作見證的有三:父、道、聖靈,而在基督耶穌裡,這三乃是一」(約壹五7);然而並未說「祂是一位」,因為在這幾位中並非一個位格。因為當經文論到這三位說「一」時,所要明白的,豈不正是:父神按神性的本性,祂自己也被稱為主,祂自己也是靈;
Therefore, although in the foregoing examples of the Scriptures the names of the Persons are unspoken, nevertheless the united name of the Godhead is demonstrated to you in all of them; as also in this example of truth, in which the names of the Persons are clearly shown, and the united name of the Godhead is closely declared, John the Evangelist saying in his Epistle: 'There are three who bear witness in heaven, the Father, and the Word, and the Spirit, and in Christ Jesus they are one' (1 John 5:7); yet it does not say 'He is one,' because there is not in these one person. For when it says 'one' concerning all of them, what else is understood than that God the Father, by the nature of the Godhead, is Himself also called Lord, and is Himself also Spirit;
7:29
et Filius Deus, idemque sit in divinitate et Dominus, idemque sit in deitate et Spiritus; sed et Spiritus Parachtus Deus idemque sit et Dominus in natura deitatis, idem sit et spiritus? Vides qua in deitate et in substantia plenitudinis per omnia unum sunt, et in nominibus personarum tres sunt? N um quod tres sunt, quid aliud sentitur fuisse quam Pater verus, unus, vel solus qui genuit idem non sit qui et unigenitus ab ipso est; et Filius unus qui non ge­ nuit sicut ipse a Patre genitus, Pater non sit; et hic Spiritus sanemus qui nec Pater nec Filius est?
子也是神,這同一位在神性裡也是主,這同一位在神格裡也是靈;同樣,那保惠師之靈也是神,這同一位在神格的本性裡也是主,這同一位也是靈嗎?你看見他們在神格中、在豐滿的本體中凡事都是一,而在諸位格之名中卻是三嗎?因為論到他們是三,所要明白的,豈不正是:那位真實、獨一、唯一生子的父,並不就是那由祂而生的獨生者;那位並未生子、反而自己由父所生的獨一之子,並不就是父;而這位聖靈,既不是父也不是子?
and the Son is God, and the same is also Lord in the divinity, and the same is also Spirit in the deity; and likewise the Spirit, the Paraclete, is God, and the same is also Lord in the nature of the deity, and the same is also Spirit? Do you see how in the deity and in the substance of fullness they are in all things one, and in the names of the Persons they are three? For as to their being three, what else is understood to have been meant than that the Father — true, one, or alone — who begot, is not the same as He who is the only-begotten from Him; and the Son, the one who did not beget but Himself was begotten of the Father, is not the Father; and this Holy Spirit, who is neither Father nor Son?
7:30
Præ­ terea qui nec genuit, necgenitus est, cum alius sit in persona qui genuit, et alius sit in persona qui uni­ genitus ab ipso est, et alius adæque in persona, ut dixi secundum divinam Scripturam, qui nec Pater, nec Filius est, hic est Spiritus sanctus, sed plane de unita natura est. Ideo in deitate unita unitum divini­ tatis nomen est. Sicut in claritate evangelicæ Scri­ pturae de Spiritu Paraclilo Filius testaLur, dicens : De Patre procedit (Joan. xv, 26). Et sic prosecutus est: Et de meo accipiet (Joan. xvi, 14).
再者,又有那位既未生人也未被生者,因為生子者在位格上是一位,那由祂而出的獨生者在位格上是另一位,還有同樣在位格上是另一位的——正如我按神聖的聖經所說——既不是父也不是子者:這就是聖靈;但顯然祂是出於那合一的本性。因此,在合一的神格中有神性合一之名。正如在福音聖經的明晰之言中,子論到那保惠師之靈作見證說:「祂從父出來」(約十五26)。接著又說:「祂要從我領受」(約十六14)。
Moreover, there is He who neither begot nor was begotten, since one in person is He who begot, and another in person is He who is the only-begotten from Him, and another likewise in person — as I have said according to divine Scripture — who is neither Father nor Son: this is the Holy Spirit; but plainly He is of the united nature. Therefore in the united deity there is the united name of the Godhead. So in the clarity of the evangelical Scripture the Son testifies concerning the Spirit, the Paraclete, saying: 'He proceedeth from the Father' (John 15:26). And thus He continued: 'And He shall receive of mine' (John 16:14).
7:31
Et ideo ubi personae requiruntur, propria nomina per hæc distin­ guuntur , ubi autem Deitas poscitur, unitum nomen indicatur , quoniam sumus ad nomina personarum pluraliter dictum demonstratur. Ac per hoc in dei­ taLe divinitatis unita unum sunt, et in nominibus per­ sonarum tres sunt: unde tres unum sunt, sive unam tres sunt. Sane ut omnem scrupulum legentibus am­ putemus, adhuc breviter dilucidabo, multifarie appro­ bans hoc unitatis nomen esse verissimum Trinitatis, quae tamen refertur ad multifariam sapientiam Dei, quae uniter in Patre, et Filio , et Spiritu sancto con­ sistit;
因此,凡尋求諸位格之處,便藉這些位格之名分別出各自的本名;但凡需要神格之處,便指明那合一之名,因為凡關乎諸位格之名的,顯然是以複數來說的。藉此,在神性合一的神格中他們是一,在諸位格之名中他們是三:故此三者為一,或一者為三。誠然,為要替讀者除去一切疑慮,我還要簡短地予以闡明,多方證明這合一之名最真實地屬於三位一體,而這合一之名又歸於神那多方的智慧,這智慧合一地存於父、子、聖靈之中;
And therefore, where the Persons are sought, the proper names are distinguished by these; but where the Deity is required, the united name is indicated, since what pertains to the names of the Persons is shown to be spoken in the plural. And through this, in the united deity of the Godhead they are one, and in the names of the Persons they are three: hence the three are one, or the one are three. Indeed, that we may cut away every scruple from readers, I will yet briefly clarify, proving in manifold ways that this name of unity is most truly of the Trinity, which nevertheless is referred to the manifold wisdom of God, which subsists unitedly in the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit;
7:32
de qua si significes sapientiam deitatis et dei­ tatem sapientiæ, nonne b:rc ipsa est unitas sapientiæ, quæ et divinitas Trinitatis' Ergo ut compendio hæc assignemus, sive sapientias gloria, sive deitas gloriae, aut summitas, aut dominatio, aut dignitas, aut cari­ tas, aut 208 majestis, aut imperium, aut potestas, aut sempiternitas nominetur, nonne haec multifarie quamvis sint dicta, tamen ad unitam deitatem incom­ parabilem Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti uniter sunt declarata? Aut putas quot significationes dicun­ tur ad gloriam deitatis, totidemque sint et species diversitatis? Absit , dum hæc universa ad unitam substantiam dicta referuntur.
論到這智慧,你若稱說神格的智慧與智慧的神格,這豈不正是智慧的合一,亦即三位一體的神性嗎?因此,為要簡要地說明這些,無論被稱為智慧的榮耀,或榮耀的神格,或至高,或主權,或尊嚴,或愛,或威嚴,或統治,或權能,或永恆——這些雖以多方說出,豈不仍是合一地宣告於父、子、聖靈那無可比擬之獨一神格嗎?你莫非以為,論到神格之榮耀有多少種表述,就有多少種相異之類別?絕非如此,因為這一切都歸於那同一個本體而說。
Concerning which, if you signify the wisdom of the deity and the deity of the wisdom, is not this very thing the unity of wisdom, which is also the divinity of the Trinity? Therefore, that we may assign these things in brief, whether it be named the glory of wisdom, or the deity of glory, or sublimity, or dominion, or dignity, or charity, or majesty, or empire, or power, or eternity — are not these, though spoken in manifold ways, yet declared unitedly of the one incomparable deity of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit? Or do you think that however many expressions are spoken concerning the glory of the deity, there are just as many kinds of diversity? God forbid, since all these are referred as spoken of the one substance.
7:33
Nam si haec una atque eadem ipsa est multiplex præsaga sapientia Patris, et Filii et Spiritus sancti, quae est una virtus, sive una forma magnitudinis, sive una majestas, s ve una da­ ritas, quae in hanc unitam deitatem plenitudinis se­ cundum Scripturae regulam in hoc loco collecta repe­ riuntur; nunquid sic in eadem deitate Trinitatis potest adversus Scripturas referri, ut tres sapientias, aut tres virtutes, aut tres imagines, aut tres substan­ tias, aut clanitates , aut tres plenitudines divinitatis, vel caetera hujuscemodi pluraliter Ariomanitarum more dicamus? Absit.
因為這同一位若是父、子、聖靈那多方而先知般的智慧,這智慧是同一個能力,或同一個浩大之形態,或同一個威嚴,或同一個榮光——這一切按聖經的準則都在此處匯聚於這豐滿的獨一神格中——那麼在這同一個三位一體的神格中,豈能違背聖經而主張,要我們效法亞流派的狂人,以複數說有三種智慧,或三種能力,或三種形像,或三種本體,或數種榮光,或三種神性的豐滿,或其他諸如此類的事呢?絕非如此。
For if this one and the same is the manifold foreknowing wisdom of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, which is one power, or one form of greatness, or one majesty, or one brightness — all of which are found gathered, according to the rule of Scripture, in this place into this one deity of fullness — can it then, in the same deity of the Trinity, be alleged against the Scriptures that we should speak in the plural, after the manner of the Arian madmen, of three wisdoms, or three powers, or three images, or three substances, or several brightnesses, or three fullnesses of the Godhead, or other such things? God forbid.
7:34
Sicut tu, Osi, jam in aetate prolixa, qui non per rudimenta in synodo Sirmiensi Catholicæ auctor fuisti, ubi fidem tuam, quam in Nicæa conscripseras, irritam fecisti, dum regiae pote­ stati famulareris. Præterca qui morti esses perquam vicinus, sic in laqueum voraginis baratri incidisti, ut excederes tanquam mortuus a cordc , ut diceres : Quis ignorat Patrem majorem esse honore, dignitate, claritate et majestate ? Quasi duæ vel certe tres essent clarilates, aut majestates in siHgu is his personis Patris, et Filii ct Spiritus sancti. Quod absit.
就如你,何西烏,年事已高——你並非生手,卻在西爾米烏會議上成了謬道的倡議者,在那裡,你為討好王權,竟使你在尼西亞親手寫定的信仰歸於無效。再者,你既已瀕臨死亡,竟如此墮入深淵陷阱的羅網,以致心如死人般出離本心,竟說:「誰不知道父在尊榮、尊嚴、榮光與威嚴上是更大的呢?」——彷彿在父、子、聖靈這幾位格中,每一位都有兩種、甚至三種榮光或威嚴。這是斷不可有的。
Such as you, Hosius, already far advanced in age — you who, no novice, became a sponsor of unsound doctrine at the synod of Sirmium, where you made void your faith, which you had set down in writing at Nicaea, while you served the royal power. Moreover, when you were very near to death, you fell so into the snare of the chasm of the abyss that you departed as one dead in heart, so as to say: 'Who does not know that the Father is greater in honour, dignity, brightness, and majesty?' — as though there were two, or indeed three, brightnesses or majesties in each of these Persons of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Which God forbid.
7:35
Nam si bxc eorum sic se blasphemia, ita ut aiunt, haberet, quare jam non tres deos plura'i numero nuncupant, ac publica voce circa proprias vel diversas substan­ tias suas pollicentur? Quod absit. Dum perfecte uni­ tum nomen divinit atis, multifarie quamvis dictum, uniter in Trinitate consistat. Interrogatio. Sed ut breviter hæc ipsa dicta de auctoritate per singulas personas uniter ac commu­ niter mihi ostendas postulo. Responsio. Audi uniter in Trinitate dictum : Sa­ piens est Deus, et fortis et magnus, qui jubet soli, et non oritur; qui sidera conclusit, et extendit cœlum quemadmodum pellem ;
因為他們這褻瀆若真如他們所說那樣,為何如今不以複數稱說三位神,並公開出聲承認他們各自的或相異的本體呢?這是斷不可有的。其實神性那完全合一之名,雖以多方說出,仍合一地存於三位一體之中。問:但我請你藉每一位格,簡短地、合一而共通地向我顯明這些論及權柄的話。答:請聽那合一地論及三位一體所說的:「神有智慧,有大能,又為大,祂吩咐日頭就不出來;祂封閉眾星,又如鋪幔子般鋪張諸天;」
For if this blasphemy of theirs were so, as they say, why do they not now name three gods in plural number, and with public voice make promise concerning their own or diverse substances? Which God forbid. Whereas the perfectly united name of the Godhead, though spoken in manifold ways, subsists unitedly in the Trinity. Question. But I ask that you show me these very sayings concerning authority briefly, unitedly and in common, through each of the Persons. Answer. Hear what is said unitedly of the Trinity: 'God is wise, and strong, and great, who commands the sun, and it rises not; who has shut up the stars, and has stretched out the heaven like a skin;'
7:36
qui ambulat super mare tan­ quam super 209 aridam, qui facit magnalia, et quæ investigari non possunt (Jub. IX, 4, 7, 8, 10). Et quæ in Salomone ait: Deus sapientia sua fundavit terram, paravit autem cœlos prudentia (Prov. in, 19). Vel hoc Apostolum agnosce dicentem : Christum Dei virtutem et Dei sapientiam (/ Cor. I, 24). Sed et ipse tursus ait: Ut habitet in me virtus Christi (II Cor. III, 9). Et in psalamographo scriptum est: Ambulabunt de virtute in virtutem (Psal. LXXXIII, 8). Non tamen pluraliter sa­ pientias aut virtutes in his personis esse significavit, sicut idem ipse repetit : Dominus Deus virtutum no­ biscum (Psal. XLV, 8). Sed et hoc :
「祂行走海面如行乾地,行大事,並那不可測度之事」(伯九4、7、8、10)。又有祂在所羅門書中所說的:「耶和華以智慧立地,以聰明定天」(箴三19)。或請認出使徒所說的這話:「基督乃是神的能力、神的智慧」(林前一24)。他自己又說:「好叫基督的能力住在我裡面」(林後十二9)。詩人也記著說:「他們行走,力上加力」(詩八十三8)。然而他並未表示在這幾位格中有複數的智慧或能力,正如這同一位所重述的:「萬軍之神耶和華與我們同在」(詩四十五8)。還有這話:
'who walks upon the sea as upon dry land, who does great things, and things that cannot be searched out' (Job 9:4,7,8,10). And what He says in Solomon: 'God by His wisdom founded the earth, and prepared the heavens by His prudence' (Prov. 3:19). Or recognize the Apostle saying this: 'Christ, the power of God and the wisdom of God' (1 Cor. 1:24). And he himself again says: 'That the power of Christ may dwell in me' (2 Cor. 12:9). And in the psalmist it is written: 'They shall go from power to power' (Ps. 83:8). Yet he did not signify that there are wisdoms or powers in the plural in these Persons, as the same one repeats: 'The Lord God of powers is with us' (Ps. 45:8). And also this:
7:37
Laudate eum in firmamento virtutis ejus (Psal. CL, 1). Et in alio loco : In lumine tuo videbimus lumen (Psal. XXXV, 10 . Nam et de persona Spiritus sancti Salomon in Proverbiis eadem ait : Lux Domini spiritus hominum, qui scru­ tatur interiora cordis (Prov. XX, 27). Vel hoc : Vt Pater Deus Domini nostri Jesu Christi, Pater claritatis, det vobis spiritum sapientiæ et revelationis (Ephes. I. 17). Et alio in loco sic cautum invenimus : Sed accipietis virtutem supervenientem Spiritum sanctum in vobis (Act. I, 8). Sive huc per sanctum Michæam, ipsum Dominum Patrem accipe protestantem : Nisi ego ad­ impleam virtutem in Spiritu meo sancto, et judicio, et potestate (Michæ III, 8).
「要在祂能力的穹蒼上讚美祂」(詩一五〇1)。另一處說:「在你的光中,我們必得見光」(詩三十五10)。因為論到聖靈的位格,所羅門在箴言中也說同樣的話:「人的靈是耶和華的燈,鑒察人的心腹」(箴二十27)。或這話:「願我們主耶穌基督的神,榮耀的父,將那智慧和啟示的靈賜給你們」(弗一17)。另一處我們也讀到這樣記著:「但聖靈降臨在你們身上,你們就必領受能力」(徒一8)。或在這裡,請藉聖彌迦領會主父自己宣告說:「我倒滿有能力,藉著我的聖靈,並有公平和勇力」(彌三8)。
'Praise Him in the firmament of His power' (Ps. 150:1). And in another place: 'In Thy light we shall see light' (Ps. 35:10). For also concerning the person of the Holy Spirit, Solomon in Proverbs says the same: 'The light of the Lord is the spirit of men, which searches the inner parts of the heart' (Prov. 20:27). Or this: 'That the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory, may give you the spirit of wisdom and of revelation' (Eph. 1:17). And in another place we find it thus recorded: 'But you shall receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you' (Acts 1:8). Or here, through holy Micah, understand the Lord the Father Himself declaring: 'Unless I fill up the power in my Holy Spirit, and in judgment, and in might' (Micah 3:8).
下一段 →
← 第 6 章
1234567

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。