📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 反亞流神學文集

反亞流神學文集 第 11 章 第 1/5 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 11:1–11:38(全章共 157 節)

← 第 10 章第 12 章 →
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
11:1
500•PBOLOGUS. — i. Epistolam, fili Petre, tuae caritatis accepi, in qua te signiticasti velle Hieroso­ lymam pergere, et poposcisti te litteris nostris instrui quam debeas in illis partibus verB fidei regulam te­ nere b, ut nullus tibi possit sensus hæreticæ subre­ pere falsitatis e. Gaudeo quidem quod pro fide vera sine ullo perfidise vitio custodienda sollicitudinem geris, sine qua nulla potest prodesse, imo nec esse, conversio. Apostolica quippe dicit auctoritas quia sine fide impossibile eat placere Deo (Hebr. XI, 6). Fides est namque bonorum omnium fundamentum d. Fides est humanæ salutis initium e. Sine hac f nemo ad filiorum Dei numerum potest pertinere R :
序言——一、彼得吾兒,我已收到你出於愛心的書信,其中你表明願往耶路撒冷去,並請求我以書信教導你:在那些地方你當持守何種真信仰的準則,好使異端虛謊之見解無從潛入你心。我實在歡喜,因你如此殷勤地守護真信仰,不沾任何背信之惡——沒有這信仰,任何歸正都無益,甚至不能成立。因為使徒的權威說:「人非有信,就不能得神的喜悅」(來十一6)。因為信德是一切美善的根基。信德是人類救恩的開端。沒有這信德,無人能列入神兒女的數目:
PROLOGUE. — 1. I have received the letter of your charity, my son Peter, in which you signified that you wished to journey to Jerusalem, and asked to be instructed by our writings as to what rule of the true faith you ought to hold in those parts, so that no sense of heretical falsehood might be able to creep upon you. I rejoice indeed that you bear such solicitude for guarding the true faith without any vice of perfidy, without which no conversion can profit, nay, cannot even exist. For the apostolic authority says that 'without faith it is impossible to please God' (Heb. 11:6). For faith is the foundation of all good things. Faith is the beginning of human salvation. Without it no one can belong to the number of the sons of God:
11:2
quia sine ipsa nec in hoc sæculo quisquam 501 justifica­ tionis consequitur gratiam, nec in futuro vitam pos­ sidebit aeternam; et si quis hic non ambulaverit per fidem, non perveniet ad speciem. Sine lide omnis labor hominis vacuus est. Tale quippe est, ut sine vera fide quisque velit Deo per contemptum saeculi placere h ; quale si quisquam (al. quispiam) tendens ad patriam, in qua se scit beate esse victurum, re­ linquat itineris rectitudinem, et improvidus sectetur errorem, quo non ad beatam civitatem perveniat, sed in præcipitium cadat; ubi non gaudium perve­ nienti detur, sed cadenti interitus inferatur. 2.
因為沒有這信德,無人在今世能得著稱義的恩典,也無人在來世能承受永生;人若在此不憑信心而行,就不能達到面對面的見(榮景)。沒有信德,人的一切勞苦都是虛空。因為這就好比:若有人沒有真信仰,卻想藉輕看世界來討神喜悅;正如有人朝著他所知自己將在其中蒙福而活的故鄉行進,卻離棄正直的道路,因不謹慎而追隨迷途,因此不能到達那蒙福之城,反倒墜入深坑;在那裏,抵達者得不著喜樂,墜落者反被帶入滅亡。二、
for without it no one in this world attains the grace of justification, nor in the world to come shall possess eternal life; and if anyone here does not walk by faith, he will not arrive at the sight [of God]. Without faith all the labor of man is empty. For it is just as if, without true faith, someone should wish to please God through contempt of the world: like someone who, journeying toward the homeland in which he knows he will live blessedly, abandons the straightness of the road and, being improvident, pursues the wandering path, by which he arrives not at the blessed city but falls into a precipice; where not joy is given to one arriving, but destruction is brought upon one falling. 2.
11:3
Verumtamen ut de fide sufficiens sermo proma- tur, nec temporis suffragatur spatium, quia celeriter nostrum cupis habere responsum, et tam magnum est hujus disputationis opus, ut magnis vix possit impleri i sermonibus. Neque enim poposcisti sic te debere de fide instrui, ut unam quamlibet haeresim designares i, contra quam specialiter nostræ dispu­ tationis vigilaret intentio :
然而,要就信仰發出足夠的論述,時間的長度並不允許,因為你急切盼望得著我們的答覆,而這討論的工作又如此浩大,即使以冗長的論述也難以完成。因為你並沒有要求以這樣的方式受教於信仰:即指定某一特定異端,好叫我們討論的用心特別針對它而警醒守望:
Nevertheless, that a sufficient discourse on faith may be brought forth, neither does the span of time favor it, since you desire quickly to have our answer, and so great is the work of this discussion that it can scarcely be fulfilled even by lengthy discourses. For you have not asked that you ought to be instructed on faith in such a way as to designate any one particular heresy, against which the intent of our discussion should specially keep watch:
11:4
sed cum indefinite defini­ tionem fidei petis, eamque cupis etiam sub brevitate concludi, vides procul dubio quam sit nobis impos­ sibile ut rem tantam in brevi plene comprehenda­ mus, cui sufficientes esse non possumus, etiamsi tan­ tum spatium temporis et tale nobis esset ingenium, ut multa volumina de hoc quod a nobis expetis fa­ cere valeremus (al. valeamus). Sed quia Deus prope eat omnibus invocantibus eum in veritate (Psal. CXLIV, 18), qui verbum consummans et brevians fecit super terram (Rom. IX, 28), spero quia, sicut tibi dedit hujus fidei sanctam sollicitudinem, sic etiam mihi, ut tuo tam bono tamque laudabili serviam desiderio, sufficientem tribuet facultatem :
但既然你不加限定地求信仰的定義,又願它簡短地作結,你無疑看出:要我們在簡短中充分理解如此浩大之事乃是何等不可能——縱使我們有如此長的時間、如此的才智,能就你所求於我們的寫成許多卷書,我們也力有未逮。但既然神與一切誠心求告祂的人相近(詩一四五18),祂在地上「成就了所定的,而且必速速地成就」(羅九28),我盼望:正如祂已賜你這對信仰聖潔的殷勤,照樣祂也必賜我足夠的能力,來成全你這美好而可讚的心願:
but since you ask indefinitely for a definition of the faith, and desire it also to be concluded in brevity, you see beyond doubt how impossible it is for us to comprehend so great a matter fully in brief, for which we are not sufficient, even if we had so great a span of time and such genius that we could make many volumes on that which you require of us. But since God is near to all who call upon him in truth (Ps. 144:18), who making a full end and shortening [his word] has made it upon the earth (Rom. 9:28), I hope that, just as he has given you this holy solicitude for the faith, so also he will grant to me sufficient ability to serve your so good and so laudable desire:
11:5
ut etsi non potuero (al. potero) cuncta dicere, ex quibus omnis error hæreticus possit agnosci, et agnitus vel convinci va­ leat vel vitari, tamen in nomine atque adjutorio san­ ctæ Trinitatis, quæ unus solus verus et bonus est Deus, ea dicam in quibus saltem magna ex parte rationem catholicx fidei constet sine aliqua erroris caligine contineri. Quibus retentis, poteris etiam illa deprehendere atque fugere, quae etsi in hoc opere non videntur speciali disputatione convinci, tamen ex iis quæ hic generaliter atque absolute ponentur, appareat (al. apparent) illa quæ inlideles homines a auribus volunt (al.
這樣,縱使我不能說出使一切異端謬誤得以被認出、被認出後或被駁倒或被躲避的每一件事,然而,奉那獨一、獨有、真實而善良之神——聖三位一體——的名並靠其幫助,我要說出那些至少在大部分上足以確立大公信仰之理、毫無謬誤之霧的事。持守了這些,你也就能察覺並躲避那些事——它們縱使在本著作中未見以專門辯論加以駁倒,然而從此處所普遍而絕對陳明的事看來,便可顯出那些不信的人所願(或慣於)
so that even if I shall not be able to say all things by which every heretical error may be recognized, and, once recognized, may be either refuted or avoided, nevertheless, in the name and with the help of the holy Trinity, which is the one, sole, true, and good God, I shall say those things in which, at least in great part, it may be established that the reason of the catholic faith is contained without any fog of error. And these things being retained, you will also be able to detect and flee those which, even if in this work they are not seen to be refuted by special disputation, nevertheless from those things which here are set down generally and absolutely, may appear to be what unfaithful men wish (or are wont)
11:6
solent) insusurrare fidelium, non regula divinæ veritatis tradita, sed nequitia hu­ mani erroris inventa. CAPIJT I. — 3. Quocunque igitur loco fueris consti­ tutus, quia, secundum regulam nostri Salvatoris im­ perio promulgatam, nosti te in uno Patris b et Filii et Spiritus sancti nomine baptizatum, principaliter atque iudubitanter toto corde retine, Patrem Deum, et Filium Deum, et Spiritum sanctum Deum, id est sanctam atque ineffabilem Trinitatem unum esse na­ turaliter Deum, de quo in Deuteronomio dicitur: Audi, Israel, Dominus Deus tuus Deus (al. Dominus) unus est (Deut. VI, 4). Et, Dominum 502 Deum tuum adorabis, et illi soli servies (Ibid., 13).
向信徒耳中低語的——這些並非按神真理的準則所傳授,乃是人謬誤之惡所杜撰的。第一章——三、所以,無論你被安置在何處,既然按我們救主之命所頒的準則,你知道自己是奉父、子、聖靈的獨一之名受了洗,就當首要地、毫不懷疑地、全心持守:父是神,子是神,聖靈是神,就是說:那聖潔而不可言喻的三位一體按本性乃是獨一的神;論到祂,申命記說:「以色列啊,你要聽!耶和華我們神是獨一的主」(申六4)。又說:「你要敬拜主你的神,單要事奉祂」(同上13)。
to whisper into the ears of the faithful, [things] not handed down by the rule of divine truth, but invented by the wickedness of human error. CHAPTER I. — 3. In whatever place, therefore, you shall be set, since, according to the rule promulgated by the command of our Savior, you know that you have been baptized in the one name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, hold principally and without doubt, with all your heart, that the Father is God, and the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, that is, that the holy and ineffable Trinity is by nature one God; concerning whom it is said in Deuteronomy: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord your God is one God (or, one Lord)' (Deut. 6:4). And, 'You shall adore the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve' (Ibid., 13).
11:7
Verumtamen quia istum unum Deum, qui solus est verus natura­ liter Deus, non Patrem solum, neque Filium solum, neque solum Spiritum sanctum, sed simul Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum esse diximus, caven­ dum est ne sicut Patrem et Filium et Spiritum san­ ctum unum Deum esse, quantum ad naturalem attinet unitatem c, veraciter dicimus, sic eum qui Pater est, eumdem vel Filium, vel Spiritum sanctum; aut eum qui Filius est, sive Patrem, sive Spiritum sanctum; aut eum qui Spiritus sanctus proprie in confessione hujus Trinilatis dicitur vel Patrem vel Filium per­ sonaliter dicere sive credere, quod omnino nefas est, audeamus. 4.
然而,既然我們已說:這獨一的神——祂獨自按本性是真神——並非單是父,也非單是子,也非單是聖靈,乃是同時為父、為子、為聖靈,就必須謹慎:不要像我們就本性的合一而真實地說父、子、聖靈是獨一之神那樣,竟敢說(這乃是絕對的褻瀆)那位為父者就是那為子或為聖靈者;或那位為子者就是父或聖靈;或那位在承認此三位一體時被恰當地稱為聖靈者,按位格竟是父或是子。四、
Nevertheless, since we have said that this one God, who alone is by nature the true God, is not the Father alone, nor the Son alone, nor the Holy Spirit alone, but at once the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, care must be taken lest, just as we truly say that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one God, as regards natural unity, so we should dare to say—which is altogether wicked—that he who is the Father is the same as either the Son or the Holy Spirit; or that he who is the Son is either the Father or the Holy Spirit; or that he who is properly called the Holy Spirit in the confession of this Trinity is personally either the Father or the Son. 4.
11:8
Fides enim quam sancti patriarchæ atque pro­ phetæ ante incarnationem Filii Dei divinitus acce­ perunt, quam etiam sancti apostoli ab ipso Domino in carne posito audierunt, et, Spiritus sancti magi­ sterio instructi, non solum sermone prædicaverunt, verum etiam ad instructionem saluberrimam poste­ rorum scriptis suis inditam reliquerunt, unum Deum praedicat Trinitatem, id est Patrem et Filium et Spi­ ritum sanctum. Sed Trinilas vera non esset, si una eademque persona dicerelur Pater et Filius et Spiri­ tus sanctus. Si enim sicut est Patris et Filii et Spi- ritus sancti una substantia, sic esset una persona, nihil omnino esset in quo veraciter Trinitas dicere­ tur.
因為那信仰——聖祖與眾先知在神子成肉身之前從神所領受的,聖使徒也從那降在肉身中的主親自聽見的,並蒙聖靈的教訓所指教、不僅以言語宣講、且為使後人得最有益的教誨而載於其著作中留傳下來的——宣講獨一的神乃是三位一體,就是父、子、聖靈。但若同一位格被稱為父、子、聖靈,那就不會有真正的三位一體了。因為若像父、子、聖靈的本質是一那樣,位格也是一,那就絕無任何可真正稱為三位一體之處了。
For the faith which the holy patriarchs and prophets received divinely before the incarnation of the Son of God, which also the holy apostles heard from the Lord himself set in the flesh, and, instructed by the teaching of the Holy Spirit, not only preached by word but also left behind, embodied in their writings, for the most salutary instruction of posterity, preaches that one God is a Trinity, that is, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. But there would not be a true Trinity if one and the same person were called Father and Son and Holy Spirit. For if, just as the substance of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit is one, so there were one person, there would be absolutely nothing in which a Trinity could truly be spoken of.
11:9
Rursus Trinitas quidem vera esset d, sed unus Deus Trinitas ipsa non esset, si quemadmodum Pater et Filius et Spiritus sanctus personarum sunt ab in­ vicem proprietate distincti, sic fuissent naturarum quoque diversitate discreti. Sed quia in illo uno vero Deo Trinitate, non solum quod unus Deus est, sed etiam quod Trinitas est, naturaliter verum est, pro­ pterea ipse verus Deus in personis Trinitas est, et in una natura unus est e. Per hanc unitatem natura­ lem totus Pater in Filio et Spirito sancto est, et totus Filius in Patre et Spiritu sancto est, totusque Spiritus sanctus in Palre et. Filio est. Nullus horum extra quemlibet ipsorum est (I Sent., dist. 19, cap. Et inde) :
再者,若像父、子、聖靈以位格的特性彼此區別那樣,牠們也以本性的殊異而分隔,那就確有一真三位一體,但這三位一體卻不是獨一的神了。但既然在那獨一真神——三位一體——之中,不僅祂是獨一之神,而且祂是三位一體,都是按本性而真確的,所以那同一真神在位格上是三位一體,在獨一本性中是一。藉這本性的合一,全備的父在子與聖靈之中,全備的子在父與聖靈之中,全備的聖靈也在父與子之中。三者中無一在彼此之外(《語錄》卷一,第19題,「由此」章):
Again, there would indeed be a true Trinity, but that Trinity would not be one God, if, just as the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are distinguished from one another by the property of persons, so they had also been separated by a diversity of natures. But because in that one true God, the Trinity, not only that he is one God, but also that he is a Trinity, is naturally true, therefore that same true God is a Trinity in persons, and in one nature is one. Through this natural unity the whole Father is in the Son and the Holy Spirit, and the whole Son is in the Father and the Holy Spirit, and the whole Holy Spirit is in the Father and the Son. None of these is outside any of themselves (1 Sent., dist. 19, chap. 'Et inde'):
11:10
quia nemo alium aut præcedit æternitate, aut excedit magnitudine, aut superat potestate. Quia nec Filio nec Spiritu sancto, quantum ad natune divinæ unitatem pertinet, aut anterior f, aut major Pater est (Ibidem, cap. Nunc postquam); nec Filii æternitas atque immensitas, velut anterior aut major, Spiritus sancti seternitatem immensitatemque aut præcedere aut excedere naturaliter potest. Sicut ergo nec Filius posterior aut minor est Patre, ita nec Spi­ ritus sanctus posterior aut minor est Filio. Æter­ num quippe et sine initio est, quod Filius de Patris natura natus exstitit g; et aeternum ac sine initio est, quod Spiritus sanctus de natura Patris Filiique procedit.
因為無一在永恆上先於另一,也無一在偉大上超過,或在權能上勝過另一。因為就神性之合一而論,父並不先於、也不大於子或聖靈(同前,「今既」章);子的永恆與無限,也不能像更先或更大那樣,按本性先於或超過聖靈的永恆與無限。所以,正如子不後於也不小於父,聖靈也照樣不後於也不小於子。因為子由父的本性而生,這是永恆而無始的;聖靈由父與子的本性而發出,這也是永恆而無始的。
for no one either precedes another in eternity, or exceeds [another] in magnitude, or surpasses [another] in power. For as regards the unity of the divine nature, the Father is neither prior to, nor greater than, the Son or the Holy Spirit (Ibidem, chap. 'Nunc postquam'); nor can the eternity and immensity of the Son, as though prior or greater, either precede or exceed by nature the eternity and immensity of the Holy Spirit. As therefore neither is the Son posterior to or less than the Father, so neither is the Holy Spirit posterior to or less than the Son. For it is eternal and without beginning, that the Son came forth born of the nature of the Father; and it is eternal and without beginning, that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the nature of the Father and the Son.
11:11
Ob hoc ergo tres unum recte credimus et dicimus Deum, quia una prorsus 503 æternitas, una immensitas, una naturaliter trium est divinitas personarum. 5. Teneamus igitur Patrem et Filium et Spiritum sanctum unum esse naturaliter Deum; neque ta­ men ipsum Patrem esse qui Filius est, neque Filium ipsum esse qui Pater est, nec Spiritum sanctum ipsum esse qui Pater aut Filius est (I Sent., dist. 2, cap. Omnes autem catholici). Una enim est Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti essenlia, quam Græci οὐσίαν vocant, in qua non est aliud Pater, et aliud Filius, et aliud Spiritus sanctus, quamvis personaliter sit alius Pater, alius Filius, alius Spiritus sanctus.
所以,正因如此,我們才正確地相信並宣稱:三者乃是獨一的神,因為三位格的永恆完全是一,無限是一,按本性神性也是一。五、所以,讓我們持守:父、子、聖靈按本性乃是獨一的神;然而那為父者並非那為子者,那為子者並非那為父者,那為聖靈者也並非那為父或為子者(《語錄》卷一,第2題,「凡大公信徒」章)。因為父、子、聖靈的本質是一,希臘人稱之為 ousia(本體),在此本質中,父、子、聖靈並無彼此之別,雖然按位格父是一,子是另一,聖靈又是另一。
For this reason, therefore, we rightly believe and say that the three are one God, because there is altogether one eternity, one immensity, and by nature one divinity of the three persons. 5. Let us hold, therefore, that the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are by nature one God; yet that the Father is not the same who is the Son, nor is the Son the same who is the Father, nor is the Holy Spirit the same who is the Father or the Son (1 Sent., dist. 2, chap. 'Omnes autem catholici'). For there is one essence of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, which the Greeks call ousia, in which the Father is not one thing, and the Son another, and the Holy Spirit another, although personally the Father is one, the Son another, the Holy Spirit another.
11:12
Quod nobis maxime in ipso sanctarum Scripturarum demonstra­ tur initio, ubi Deus dicit : Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram (Genes. I, 26). Cum enim singulari numero dicit imaginem, ostendit unam naturam esse, ad cuius imaginem homo fieret. Cum vero dicit pluraliter, nostram, ostendit eumdem Deum, ad cujus imaginem homo fiebat, non unam esse personam. Si enim in illa una natura h Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti una esset persona, non di­ ceretur, ad imaginem nostram, sed, ad imaginem meam; nec dixisset faciamus, sed, faciam. Si vero in illis tribus personis tres essent intelligendæ vel credendæ substantiae, non diceretur, ad imaginem nostram, sed, ad imagines nostras :
這一點主要在聖經的起頭便向我們顯明,那裏神說:「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人」(創一26)。因為當祂用單數說「形像」時,就顯明只有一種本性,人是照著這本性的形像被造的。但當祂用複數說「我們的」時,就顯明那位造人所依其形像的同一位神並非單一位格。因為若在父、子、聖靈那獨一的本性中只有一位格,就不會說「照著我們的形像」,乃會說「照著我的形像」;也不會說「我們要造」,乃會說「我要造」。但若在那三位格中當理解或相信有三種本質,就不會說「照著我們的形像」,乃會說「照著我們眾多的形像」:
This is chiefly shown to us at the very beginning of the holy Scriptures, where God says: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness' (Gen. 1:26). For when he says 'image' in the singular number, he shows that there is one nature, to whose image man was to be made. But when he says in the plural, 'our,' he shows that the same God, to whose image man was being made, is not one person. For if in that one nature of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit there were one person, it would not be said, 'to our image,' but 'to my image'; nor would he have said 'let us make,' but 'let me make.' But if in those three persons three substances were to be understood or believed, it would not be said, 'to our image,' but 'to our images':
11:13
una enim imago trium naturarum inæqualium esse non posset. Sed dum ad unam imaginem unius Dei homo factus dici­ tur, una sanctæ Trinitatis essentialiter divinilas inti­ matur. Deinde (al. Denique) et paulo post pro eo quod Deus superius dixerat : Faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram, sic hominem fa­ ctum Scriptura narravit, ut diceret: Et fecit Deus hominem : ad imaginem Dei fecit eum (Genes. i, 27). 6. Hanc Trinitatem personarum atque unitatem naturae propheta Isaias revelatam esse sibi non ta­ cuit a, cum se dicit Seraphin vidisse clamantia : San­ ctus, sanctus, sanctus Dominus Deus sabaoth (Isa. Vi, 3). Ubi prorsus in eo quod dicitur tertio Sancius, personarum Trinitatem;
因為三種不相等之本性的獨一形像是不可能存在的。但既然說人是照著獨一之神的獨一形像被造的,聖三位一體的神性就本質上被表明為一。接著,並在稍後,代替神在上面所說的「我們要照著我們的形像、按著我們的樣式造人」,聖經如此記述人被造,說:「神就造人,乃是照著神的形像造他」(創一27)。六、這位格的三位一體與本性的合一,先知以賽亞並未緘默不言,說這曾向他啟示,那時他說看見撒拉弗呼喊:「聖哉,聖哉,聖哉,萬軍之耶和華神」(賽六3)。在此,正是在那三次說「聖哉」之處,〔我們認出〕位格的三位一體;
for one image of three unequal natures could not exist. But since man is said to have been made according to the one image of the one God, the divinity of the holy Trinity is essentially intimated as one. Then, and a little after, in place of that which God had said above: 'Let us make man to our image and likeness,' Scripture thus narrated man as made, so that it said: 'And God made man: to the image of God he made him' (Gen. 1:27). 6. This Trinity of persons and unity of nature the prophet Isaiah did not keep silent as having been revealed to him, when he says that he saw the Seraphim crying out: 'Holy, holy, holy is the Lord God of hosts' (Isa. 6:3). Where indeed, in that it is said three times 'Holy,' [we recognize] the Trinity of persons;
11:14
in eo vero quod dicitur se­ mel Dominus Deus sabaoth, divinae naturae cognosei­ mus unitatem. In illa igitur sancta Trinitate, qua ideo a nobis repetitur b, ut vestro cordi c tenacius infigatur, unus est Pater d, qui solus essentialiter de seipso unum Filium genuit; et unus Filius, qui de uno Patre solus est essentialiter natus (al. genitus); et unus Spiritus sanctus, qui solus essentialiter de Patre Filioque procedit. Hoc autem tolum una per­ gona non posset, id est et gignere se, et nasci de se, et procedere de se. Quia igitur aliud est genuisse quam natum esse, aliudque est procedere (al.
但在那一次說「萬軍之耶和華神」之處,我們認出神性的合一。所以在那聖三位一體中——我們之所以重述,是為叫它更牢固地印在你心中——有一位父,祂獨自從自己本質地生了一位子;有一位子,祂獨自本質地由一位父而生;有一位聖靈,祂獨自本質地由父與子而發出。但這全備的一位格不能行這一切,就是既生自己、又由自己而生、又由自己而發出。因此,既然「生了」不同於「被生」,「發出」(或「已發出」)
but in that it is said once 'the Lord God of hosts,' we recognize the unity of the divine nature. In that holy Trinity, therefore, which is repeated by us for this reason, that it may be more tenaciously fixed in your heart, there is one Father, who alone essentially begot from himself one Son; and one Son, who alone was essentially born (or begotten) of one Father; and one Holy Spirit, who alone essentially proceeds from the Father and the Son. But this whole one person could not [do], that is, both to beget itself, and to be born of itself, and to proceed from itself. Since, therefore, to have begotten is other than to have been born, and to proceed (or to have proceeded)
11:15
pro­ cessisse) quam genuisse vel natum esse, manifestum est quoniain alius est Pater, alius Filius, alius Spiri­ tus sanctus. Trinitas itaque ad personas Patris et Filii et Spiritus sancti refertur, unitas ad naturam. CAP. II. Humanitas Christi. — 7. Sicut ergo, se­ cundum illam divinitatem qua unum sunt Pater 504 et Filius et Spiritus sanctus, neque Patrem na­ tum credimus, neque Spiritum sanctum, sed solum Filium : sic etiam secundum carnem solum Filium natum catholica fides et credit et prædicat. Neque enim in illa Trinitate proprium esset solius Patris quod non est natus ipse, sed unum e Filium genuit;
又不同於「生了」或「被生」,就顯而易見:父是一,子是另一,聖靈是另一。所以,「三位一體」是指父、子、聖靈的位格;「合一」是指本性。第二章 基督的人性——七、所以,正如按那使父、子、聖靈為一的神性,我們相信父並未被生,聖靈也未被生,惟獨子被生:照樣按肉體,大公信仰也相信並宣講惟獨子被生。因為在那三位一體中,「自己未被生、卻生了那獨一之子」並非單屬父所有;
is other than to have begotten or to have been born, it is manifest that the Father is one, the Son another, the Holy Spirit another. The Trinity, therefore, refers to the persons of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit; the unity, to the nature. CHAPTER II. The Humanity of Christ. — 7. As therefore, according to that divinity by which the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit are one, we believe that neither the Father was born, nor the Holy Spirit, but the Son alone: so also, according to the flesh, the catholic faith both believes and preaches that the Son alone was born. For neither in that Trinity would it be proper to the Father alone that he himself was not born, but begot the one Son;
11:16
neque proprium solius Filii, quod non genuit ipse, sed solus de Patris essentia natus est; neque pro­ prium Spiritus sancti, quod nec natus est ipse, nec genuit, sed solus de Patre Filioque procedit f; si secundum divinam quidem naturam Deus Pater de nullo nasceretur Deo, secundum carnem tamen ipse nasceretur de (al. ex) virgine. Si enim Pater de vir­ gine nasceretur, una persona esset Pater et Filius : ipsa autem una persona, pro eo quod non de Deo, sed tantum de virgine nasceretur, non Dei Filius, sed tantum hominis filius veraciter diceretur; nec ipse Dei Filius diceret g : Sic Deus dilexit mundum, ut Filium suum unigenitum daret (Joan. III, 6); et iterum :
「自己未生、卻獨自由父的本質而生」也非單屬子所有;「自己既未被生、也未生、卻獨自由父與子而發出」也非單屬聖靈所有——倘若按神性父神雖非由任何神而生,卻按肉體親自由童女而生的話。因為若父由童女而生,父與子便成了一位格:而那同一位格,既是由童女而非由神而生,就會被真實地稱為不是神的兒子,乃只是人的兒子;那神的兒子也就不會說:「神愛世人,甚至將祂的獨生子賜給他們」(約三16);又說:
nor would it be proper to the Son alone that he himself did not beget, but was born alone of the essence of the Father; nor would it be proper to the Holy Spirit that he himself was neither born nor begot, but alone proceeds from the Father and the Son; if, according to the divine nature indeed, God the Father were born of no God, yet according to the flesh he himself were born of a virgin. For if the Father were born of a virgin, the Father and the Son would be one person: and that same one person, inasmuch as it would be born not of God, but only of a virgin, would truly be called not the Son of God, but only the son of man; nor would the very Son of God say: 'For God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son' (John 3:16); and again:
11:17
Non enim misit Deus Filium suum in mun­ dum ut judicet mundum, sed ut salvetur mundus per ipsum (Ibid., 17). Nec beatus dixisset Joannes : Qui diligit genitorem, diligit et eum qui natus est ex eo (1 Joan. v, 1); nec ipse Filius dixisset: Pater meus usque medo operatur, et ego operor (Joan, v, 17). Ipse enim qui Filius dicilur, si idem esset et Pater, non veraciter Dei Filius diceretur, quia non de Deo, sed de sola virgine nasceretur. Ad extremum vero nec ipse Pater de coelo testaretur, et suum corporali voce filium demonstraret, dicens: Hic est Filius meus dilectus, in quo mihi bene complacui h (Matth. III, 17). Apostolus quoque Paulus non dixisset de Deo Patre:
「因為神差祂的兒子降世,不是要定世人的罪,乃是要叫世人因祂得救」(同上17)。蒙福的約翰也就不會說:「凡愛生他之父的,也必愛從父而生的」(約壹五1);聖子自己也就不會說:「我父作事直到如今,我也作事」(約五17)。因為那被稱為子的,若也就是那父,就不會被真實地稱為神的兒子,因為祂是由童女而非由神而生。到末了,父自己也就不會從天上作見證,以有形的聲音指明祂自己的兒子,說:「這是我的愛子,我所喜悅的」(太三17)。使徒保羅論到父神也就不會說:
'For God did not send his Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through him' (Ibid., 17). Nor would blessed John have said: 'He who loves the begetter loves also him who is born of him' (1 John 5:1); nor would the Son himself have said: 'My Father works until now, and I work' (John 5:17). For he who is called the Son, if he were also the same as the Father, would not truly be called the Son of God, because he would be born not of God, but only of a virgin. And at the last, the Father himself would not testify from heaven and point out his own Son with a bodily voice, saying: 'This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased' (Matt. 3:17). Nor would the Apostle Paul have said concerning God the Father:
11:18
Qui proprio Filio suo non pepercit i, sed pro nobis omnibus tradidit illum (Rom. VIII, 52). 8. Sed quoniam ista omnia et divinitus ad nostram doctrinam dicta sunt, et quia divina dicta sunt i, utique vera sunt, verum est quod fides catholica prædicat, et secundum divinitatem de Patre natum esse solum Filium æternum cum Patre, immortalem, impassibilem, atque incommutabilem Deum; et se­ cundum carnem non Patrem, sed unigenitum ejus Filium, salva æternitate sua k, temporaliter natum, salva impassibilitate sua passum, salva immortalitate sua mortuum, salva incommutabilitate sua, qua (al. quia) Deus verus et vita aeterna est, veraciLer susci­ tatum.
「神既不愛惜自己的兒子,為我們眾人捨了」(羅八32)。八、但既然這一切都是為我們的教訓、出於神而說的,又因是出於神而說的,就必定是真的,那麼大公信仰所宣講的便是真確的:即按神性,惟獨子由父而生,與父同永,是不死、不受苦、不改變的神;而按肉體,並非父,乃是祂的獨生子,在保全其永恆的同時按時候而生,在保全其不受苦的同時受了苦,在保全其不朽的同時死了,在保全其不變的同時——祂藉此為真神並永生——真實地復活了。
'Who did not spare his own Son, but delivered him up for us all' (Rom. 8:32). 8. But since all these things have both been spoken divinely for our instruction, and, because they have been divinely spoken, are certainly true, that is true which the catholic faith preaches: that according to the divinity the Son alone was born of the Father, eternal with the Father, immortal, impassible, and immutable God; and that according to the flesh not the Father, but his only-begotten Son, his eternity being preserved, was born in time; his impassibility being preserved, suffered; his immortality being preserved, died; his immutability being preserved—by which he is true God and eternal life—was truly raised up.
11:19
Qui totum habet commune cum Patre quod æternus naturaliter sine initio habuit, et nihil habet commune cum Patre eorum quæ in suam personam temporaliter atque humiliter ille aeternus atque ex­ celsus accepit 1. 505 9. Rursus si non ille qui proprius alque unigenitus Dei Patris Filius est, sed Spiritus sanctus nasceretur ex virgine, non ipsum Filium qui factus est ex muliere, factus sub lege, natum de Spiritu sancto ex Maria Virgine, in symbolo acceptum, et corde ad justitiam crederet, et ore ad salutem sancta confiteretur Ecclesia.
祂與父共有一切那些祂作為本性上永恆、無始者所擁有之物;而在那些永恆至高者於時間中、於謙卑中領受入自己位格的事上,祂與父並無共有之處。九、再者,若非那位作為父獨有且獨生之子者,而是聖靈由童貞女而生,那麼聖教會就不會心裡相信以致於義、口裡承認以致於得救,去信認那位由女子所生、生在律法以下、由聖靈藉童貞瑪利亞所生、並在信經中所領受的聖子。
He has everything in common with the Father which, being naturally eternal, He possessed without beginning; and He has nothing in common with the Father among those things which that eternal and exalted One received into His own person in time and in lowliness. 9. Again, if it were not He who is the proper and only-begotten Son of God the Father, but rather the Holy Spirit, who was born of the Virgin, then the holy Church would not believe in her heart unto righteousness, nor confess with her mouth unto salvation, that very Son who was made of a woman, made under the law, born of the Holy Spirit from the Virgin Mary, received in the Creed.
11:20
Sed et si ipse Spiritus sanctus, qui Patris et Filii Spiritus est, formam servi accipe­ ret, non ipse Spiritus sanctus super seipsum hominem factum in columbæ specie cœlitus adveniret. 10. Pater igitur Deus de nullo genitus Deo, semel de sua natura sine initio genuit Filium Deum sibi aequalem 111, et eadem qua ipse naturaliter aeternus est divinitate coxternum. Sed idem Dei Filius cum sit Deus æternus et verus n, et cum Patre secundum divinitatem naturaliter unus Deus, secundum hoc quod dicit : Ego et Pater unum sumus (Joan. x, 30), idem pro nobis est homo factus verus et plenus. In eo verus, quia veram habet Deus ille a humanam naturam;
然而,若那作為父與子之靈的聖靈自身取了僕人的形像,那麼聖靈自身就不會從天上以鴿子的形狀降臨在祂自己所造成為人的那一位之上。十、所以父神,非由任何神所生,曾一次從自己的本性無始地生了子神,與自己同等,並在祂本性上永恆的同一神性中同永恆。但這位神之子既是永恆真實的神,並按神性與父本性上為一神——照祂所說的:「我與父原為一」(約十30)——這同一位卻為我們成了真實而完全的人。在祂裡面是真實的,因為那位神擁有真實的人性;
But also, if the Holy Spirit Himself, who is the Spirit of the Father and of the Son, had taken the form of a servant, then the Holy Spirit Himself would not have descended from heaven in the form of a dove upon that Man whom He Himself had made. 10. Therefore God the Father, begotten of no God, once from His own nature begot without beginning the Son, God equal to Himself, and co-eternal in that same divinity by which He Himself is naturally eternal. But this same Son of God, though He is eternal and true God, and with the Father according to divinity naturally one God—according to that which He says: 'I and the Father are one' (John 10:30)—the same One for our sake was made a true and complete man. In Him true, because that God possesses a true human nature;
11:21
in eo vero plenus, quia et carnem huma­ nam suscepit, et animam rationalem. Idem tamen Unigenitus Deus secundo b natus est, semel ex Pa­ ire, semel ex matre : natus est enim de Patre Deus Verbum, natus est de matre Verbum caro factum. 11. Unus igitur est atque idem Deus Dei Filius natus ante saecula, et natus in sæculo; et utraque nativitas unius est Filii Dei : divina, secundum quam creator in forma Dei coæternus Patri Deus est;
並在祂裡面是完全的,因為祂取了人的肉體,又取了理性的靈魂。然而這同一位獨生的神卻第二次被生:一次由父,一次由母;因為神——道,是由父所生;道成了肉身,是由母所生。十一、所以有一位又是同一位神,即神之子,在諸世代之前被生,又在世代之中被生;這兩種降生都屬於這一位神之子:那神性的降生,照此祂作為造物主,以神的形像,是與父同永恆的神;
and in Him complete, because He took on both human flesh and a rational soul. Yet the same only-begotten God was born a second time: once of the Father, once of the mother; for God the Word was born of the Father, and the Word made flesh was born of the mother. 11. Therefore there is one and the same God, the Son of God, born before the ages and born in time; and both nativities belong to the one Son of God: the divine, according to which as Creator, in the form of God, He is God co-eternal with the Father;
11:22
hu­ mana, secundum quam semetipsum exinaniens, et formam seni accipiens, non solum in conceptu ma­ terni uteri semetipsum, dum homo Meret, eadem ser­ vilis formæ susceptione formavit, verum etiam de eodem matris utero c idem Deus homo factus exivit, et in cruce idem Deus homo factus pependit d, et in sepulcro c idem Deus homo actus jacuit, et ab iBeris idem Deus homo factus tertio die resurrexit; sed in sepulcro secundum solam carnem idem Deus jacuit, et in infernum secundum solam animam descendit. Qua de inferis ad carnem, die tertia, revertente f, idem Deus secundum carnem qua (al. quæ) in sepul­ cro jacuit, de sepulcro resurrexit;
那人性的降生,照此祂虛己、取了僕人的形像,不僅在母腹的受孕中,藉著這同一僕人形像的取用,當祂成為人時,塑造了自己,而且這同一位成了人的神從祂母親的同一子宮中出來,這同一位成了人的神懸掛在十字架上,這同一位成了人的神躺臥在墳墓中,這同一位成了人的神在第三日從死裡復活;然而在墳墓中,這同一位神僅按肉體躺臥,並僅按靈魂降到陰間。當祂在第三日從死裡回到肉體時,這同一位神按那躺臥在墳墓中的肉體,從墳墓中復活了;
the human, according to which, emptying Himself and taking the form of a servant, He not only formed Himself in the conception of the maternal womb by that same assumption of the servile form, while He became man, but also the same God made man went forth from that same womb of His mother, and the same God made man hung upon the cross, and the same God made man lay in the tomb, and the same God made man rose again from the dead on the third day; yet in the tomb the same God lay according to the flesh alone, and He descended into hell according to the soul alone. When He returned from the dead to the flesh on the third day, the same God, according to the flesh which lay in the tomb, rose again from the tomb;
11:23
et quadragesimo post resurrectionem die, idem Deus homo factus in coelum ascendens, in dextera Dei sedit R, inde in iine sæculi ad judicandos vivos mortuosque ven­ turus. 12. Verbum ergo caro factum unus est Filius Dei Dominus h Jesus Christus, mediator Dei et hominum. Idcirco autem mediator, quia idem Deus atque horno vcrus, habens cum Patre unam divinitatis naturam, et humanitatis unam cum matre substantiam; habens ex nobis usque ad mortem iniquitatis nostræ pœmam; habens incommutabilem de Deo Patre 1 justitiam; propter iniquitatem nostram 506 temporaliter mor­ tuus, propter justitiam suam, et ipse semper vivus, et immortalitatem mortalibus largiturus.
並在復活後第四十日,這同一位成了人的神升到天上,坐在神的右邊,將來要在世代的末了從那裡降臨,審判活人與死人。十二、所以道成肉身乃是那一位神之子,主耶穌基督,神與人之間的中保。祂之所以為中保,是因為祂同時是這同一位真神又是真人,與父共有一個神性的本性,與母共有一個人性的實體;從我們領受了直到死的、我們罪孽的刑罰;從父神有著不變的公義;為我們的罪孽在時間中死去,為祂自己的公義而祂自己永遠活著,並將把不朽賜給必死之人。
and on the fortieth day after the resurrection, the same God made man, ascending into heaven, sat at the right hand of God, and from thence He will come at the end of the age to judge the living and the dead. 12. Therefore the Word made flesh is the one Son of God, the Lord Jesus Christ, the Mediator between God and men. And He is Mediator because He is at once the same true God and man, having with the Father one nature of divinity, and with the mother one substance of humanity; having from us, even unto death, the penalty of our iniquity; having from God the Father unchangeable righteousness; for the sake of our iniquity dying in time, but for the sake of His own righteousness Himself ever living, and about to bestow immortality upon mortals.
11:24
Qui perfec­ tam quidem humanitatem suam in ipsa divinitatis suæ perfectione servavit; veritatem vero mortalita­ tis suæ j, per susceptionem mortis, veritate atque incommutabilitate suæ immortalitatis absorbuit, 13. Hoc est quod testatur beatus Petrus, quia Christus deglutivit mortem, ut vitæ æternæ hæredes efficeremur (I Petr. III, 22). Beatus quoque Paulus docet quod Christus mortem deglutierit, illuminave rit autem vitam et incorruptionem (II Tim. i, 10). Christus ergo mortem gustavit, quia verus homo est; idemque mortem deglutivit, quia verus Deus est. Idem quippe, sicut dicit Apostolus, mortuus est k ex infirmitate, sea vivit ex virtute Dei (II Cor. XIII, 4):
祂在自己神性的完全中保守了祂完全的人性;然而祂必死性的真實,藉著接受死亡,被祂不朽性的真實與不變吞滅了。十三、這正是聖彼得所見證的,即基督吞滅了死亡,使我們得以成為永生的後嗣(參彼前三22)。聖保羅也教導說,基督吞滅了死亡,並將生命與不朽彰顯出來(提後一10)。所以基督嘗了死味,因為祂是真人;這同一位又吞滅了死亡,因為祂是真神。因為這同一位,正如使徒所說,「祂因軟弱被釘十字架,卻因神的大能仍然活著」(林後十三4):
He preserved His perfect humanity in the very perfection of His divinity; yet the reality of His mortality, through the acceptance of death, He swallowed up by the reality and unchangeableness of His immortality. 13. This is what blessed Peter attests, that Christ swallowed up death, so that we might be made heirs of eternal life (cf. 1 Pet. 3:22). Blessed Paul also teaches that Christ swallowed up death, and brought to light life and incorruption (2 Tim. 1:10). Christ therefore tasted death, because He is true man; and the same One swallowed up death, because He is true God. For the same One, as the Apostle says, 'was crucified through weakness, yet lives by the power of God' (2 Cor. 13:4):
11:25
unus atque idem, qui secundum prophetiam beali David 1, et homo factus est in Sion, et ipse fundavit eam Altissimus (Psal. LXXXVI, 5). ii. Itaque nec divinitas Christi aliena est a natura Patris, secundum id quod in principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus, erat Verbum. Hoc erat in principio apud Deum. Omnia per ipsum facta 'unt, et sine ipso factum est nihil (Joan. I, 1); nec humanitas ejus aliena est a natura matris, secundum id quod Verbum caro factum eat, et habitavit in nobis (Ibid., 14). Illa enim natura quae semper genita ma­ net ex Patre, naturam nostram sine peccato susce­ pit, ut nasceretur ex virgine.
同一位又是同一位,照著蒙福的大衛的預言,既在錫安成了人,又是祂自己——至高者——建立了她(詩八七5)。因此,基督的神性並非與父的本性相異,照著這話所說:「太初有道,道與神同在,道就是神。這道太初與神同在。萬物是藉著祂造的,凡被造的沒有一樣不是藉著祂造的」(約一1-3);祂的人性也並非與母的本性相異,照著這話所說:「道成了肉身,住在我們中間」(同上14)。因為那始終由父所生的本性,取了我們無罪的本性,使祂得以由童貞女而生。
one and the same, who according to the prophecy of blessed David both was made man in Zion, and He Himself, the Most High, founded her (Ps. 87:5). Thus neither is the divinity of Christ foreign to the nature of the Father, according to that which says, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The same was in the beginning with God. All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made' (John 1:1-3); nor is His humanity foreign to the nature of the mother, according to that which says, 'The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us' (ibid., 14). For that nature which always remains begotten of the Father took on our nature without sin, that He might be born of a virgin.
11:26
Neque enini natura æterna atque divina temporaliter coneipi et tempora­ liter nasci ex natura humana ullatenus posset, nisi secundum susceptionem veritatis humanæ veram temporaliter conceptionem atque nativitatem ineffabi­ lis in se divinitas accepisset. Sic est Deus æternus ac verus m, veraciter secundum tempus et conceptus et natus ex virgine. Dum enim venit plenitudo temporis, misit Deus Fillium suum factum (al. nutum) ex muliere, factum sub lege, ut eos qui sub lege erant redineret, ut adoptionem filiorum a reciperemus (Galat. IV, 4), illo scilicet Deo facto naturaliter lilio hominis, qui unus est naturaliter Filius Dei Patris. Hoc utique ioannes evangelista confirmans, postquam dixit.
因為永恆而神聖的本性,斷不可能在時間中受孕、在時間中由人性而生,除非那不可言喻的神性,按著取用真實人性,在自身中領受了時間中真實的受孕與降生。這樣,永恆真實的神,才照著時間真實地由童貞女受孕並被生。因為及至時候滿足,神就差遣祂的兒子,為女子所生,且生在律法以下,要把律法以下的人贖出來,好叫我們得著兒子的名分(加四4-5)——就是那位本性上成了人子的神,祂本性上乃是父神獨一的兒子。這一點約翰福音的作者確實加以證實,當他說了:
For an eternal and divine nature could in no way be conceived in time and born in time from a human nature, unless the ineffable divinity had, according to the assumption of true humanity, received in itself a true conception and nativity in time. Thus God, eternal and true, was truly both conceived and born of a virgin according to time. For when the fullness of time came, God sent His Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons (Gal. 4:4-5)—namely, that God who was naturally made the Son of man, who is naturally the one Son of God the Father. This indeed the Evangelist John confirms, when, after he had said,
11:27
Et Verbum caro factum est, et habitavit in nobis (Joan. I, 14), subsequenter ait, Et vidimus gloriam ejus, alo riam quasi Unigeniti a Patre plenum gratiæ et veri­ tatis (Ibidem). Sic ille omnium spirituum omniumque corporum, id est omnium naturarum creater ct Do­ minus, creavit virginem, creandus ex virgine.; et cujus ipse factor est, matrem sibi fecit, quando (al. quomodo) de ejus carne concipiendus atque paricn­ dus veram materiam (al. naturam) carnis Deus im­ mensus ac sempiternus accepit: ut et secundum ve­ ritatem formae servilis Deus homo misericorditer fieret, et secundum formam Dei, naturali veritate (al. virtute) idem Deus homo permanens non ea­ reret. 15.
「道成了肉身,住在我們中間」(約一14)之後,隨即又說:「我們也見過祂的榮光,正是父獨生子的榮光,充充滿滿地有恩典有真理」(同上)。這樣,祂——一切靈與一切身體,就是一切本性的創造者與主——造了那童貞女,而祂自己將要由那童貞女被造;祂為自己使那位祂所造之人成為母親,當那無限而永存的神將要由她的肉體受孕並被生時,領受了肉體真實的質料:使祂既按僕人形像的真實,憐憫地成為人,又按神的形像,仍是同一位神,藉本性的真實不缺那人。十五、
'And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us' (John 1:14), he immediately adds, 'And we beheld His glory, the glory as of the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth' (ibid.). Thus He, the Creator and Lord of all spirits and all bodies, that is, of all natures, created the Virgin, being about to be created from the Virgin; and He made a mother for Himself of her whose maker He is, when, being about to be conceived and brought forth from her flesh, the boundless and everlasting God received the true matter of flesh: so that both according to the reality of the servile form God might mercifully become man, and according to the form of God, remaining the same God, He might not lack that man by natural reality. 15.
11:28
Sic ergo Christum Dei Filium, id est unam ex Trinitate personam 507 Deum verum crede, ut (at. et) divinitatem ejus de natura Patris natam esse non dubites; et sic eum verum hominem crede, ut ejus carnem non cœlestis, non aeriæ, non alterius cujusquam putes esse natum, sed ejus cujus est om< nium hominum caro : id est quam ipse Deus homini primo a de terra plasmavit, et cæteris hominibus plasmat, quos per propagationem ex hominibus creat. Sed licet caro Christi et omnium hominum unius ejusdemque natura sit, hæc tamen quain Deus Ver­ bum ex Maria Virgine sibi unire dignatus est, sine peccato concepta h, sine peccato nata est :
所以你當這樣相信基督——神之子,即三位一體中的一個位格——是真神,以致你毫不懷疑祂的神性是由父的本性所生;並當這樣相信祂是真人,以致你不認為祂的肉體是由天上、由空氣、或由任何別的東西所生,而是由那屬於全人類肉體的所生:就是神親自從地上為第一個人所塑造、又為其餘藉著繁衍從人而造之人所塑造的肉體。但雖然基督的肉體與眾人的肉體是同一本性,然而這由神——道甘願從童貞瑪利亞聯於自己的肉體,卻是無罪地受孕、無罪地被生:
Thus therefore believe that Christ, the Son of God, that is, one Person of the Trinity, is true God, so that you do not doubt that His divinity was born of the nature of the Father; and thus believe Him to be true man, so that you do not think His flesh to be born of heaven, or of air, or of any other thing, but of that whose flesh belongs to all men: that is, the flesh which God Himself formed from the earth for the first man, and forms for the rest of men, whom He creates by propagation from men. But although the flesh of Christ and of all men is of one and the same nature, yet this flesh, which God the Word deigned to unite to Himself from the Virgin Mary, was conceived without sin and born without sin:
11:29
ut pole secundum quam Deus æternus et juslus misericordi­ ter, et conceptus, et natus est, et Dominus gloriæ cruciiixus est. 16. Libido concubitus. — Quibus autem verbis explicabitur carnis illius excellentia singularis, cujns divina est ex ipsa sui conceptione c persona, cujus origo nativitatis insolita, qua sic Verbum caro factum est, ut una persona esset cum carne sua Unigenitus ac sempiternus Deus, ipsa suæ carnis conceptione conceptus. Istam vero cæterorum. hominum carnem per humanum certum est nasci concubitum, viro seminante, femina vero concipiente atque pariente.
使祂正照著這肉體,永恆而公義的神憐憫地既受孕又被生,並使榮耀的主被釘十字架。十六、交合的情慾。——但要用甚麼言語才能說明那肉體獨特的卓越呢?其位格自受孕之時起就是神聖的,其降生的源起是異乎尋常的,藉此道成了肉身,以致獨生而永存的神與祂自己的肉體成為一個位格,藉著祂肉體的受孕而受孕。至於其他人的肉體,則確實是藉著人的交合而生,男人播種,女人受孕並生產。
so that, precisely according to it, the eternal and just God was mercifully both conceived and born, and the Lord of glory was crucified. 16. The desire of intercourse. — But with what words shall be explained the singular excellence of that flesh, whose person is divine from its very conception, whose origin of nativity is unwonted, whereby the Word was so made flesh that the Only-begotten and everlasting God was one Person with His own flesh, being conceived by the very conception of His flesh? But that flesh of other men is certainly born through human intercourse, the man sowing the seed, the woman conceiving and bearing.
11:30
Et quia dum sibi invicem vir mulierque miscentur ut filios generent, sine libidine non est parentum concubitus, ob hoc filiorum ex eorum carne nascen­ tium non potest sine peccato esse conceptus, ubi peccatum in parvulos non transmittit propagatio, sed libido ; nec fecunditas naturæ humanae facit homines cum peccato nasci, sed foeditas libidinis, quam ho­ mines habent ex illius primi juslissima condemna­ tione peccati. Ideo beatus David, quamvis de legitimo nasceretur justoque conjugio, in quo scilicet nec in­ fidelitatis culpa , nec fornicationis macula poterat in­ veniri :
又因為當男女彼此結合以生育兒女時,父母的交合並非沒有情慾,為此緣故,由他們肉體所生兒女的受孕就不能沒有罪,因為並非繁衍、而是情慾將罪傳給嬰孩;使人帶著罪而生的,並非人性的多產,而是情慾的污穢,這情慾是人從那第一宗罪最公義的定罪中所承受的。所以蒙福的大衛,雖然生於合法而正當的婚姻,其中確實找不到不忠的過犯,也找不到淫亂的污點:
And because, when man and woman join together to beget children, the intercourse of the parents is not without lust, for this reason the conception of the children born of their flesh cannot be without sin, since it is not propagation but lust that transmits sin to little ones; nor does the fecundity of human nature cause men to be born with sin, but the foulness of lust, which men have from the most just condemnation of that first sin. Therefore blessed David, although he was born of a lawful and just marriage, in which indeed no fault of infidelity nor stain of fornication could be found:
11:31
propter originale tamen peccatum, quo na­ turaliter obstricti sunt filii iræ, non solum impiorum filii, sed omnes etiam qui de justorum sanctificata carne nascuntur, exclamat et dicit : Ecce enim in iniquitatibus conceptus sum, et in delictis peperit me d mater mea (Psal. L, 7). Sanctus etiam Job dicit, mundum a sorde non esse hominem, nec si unius diei sit vita ejus super terram (Job XIV, 4, sec. LXX). 17. Dei ergo Filius unigenitus, qui est in sinu Pa­ tris, ut carnem hominis animamque mundaret, sus­ ceptione carnis atque animæ rationalis incarnatus est; et qui cst Deus verus, homo verus factus est, non ut alter Deus esset alter homo; sed idem Deus, idem homo.
然而因著原罪,忿怒之子因它而在本性上被捆綁——不僅是不敬虔者的兒女,也包括一切由義人已成聖之肉體所生的人——他就呼喊說:「看哪,我是在罪孽裡生的,在罪中我母親懷了我」(詩五一5)。聖約伯也說,人不能潔淨脫離污穢,即使他在地上的生命只有一日(伯十四4,按七十士譯本)。十七、所以那在父懷裡的神之獨生子,為要潔淨人的肉體與靈魂,就藉著取用肉體與理性的靈魂而成為肉身;那位真神成了真人,並非一位是神、另一位是人,而是同一位是神、同一位是人。
yet on account of original sin, by which the children of wrath are naturally bound—not only the children of the impious, but also all who are born of the sanctified flesh of the just—he cries out and says: 'Behold, I was conceived in iniquities, and in sins did my mother bear me' (Ps. 51:5). Holy Job also says that man is not clean from filth, not even if his life upon earth be of one day (Job 14:4, according to the Septuagint). 17. The only-begotten Son of God, therefore, who is in the bosom of the Father, in order to cleanse the flesh and soul of man, was incarnate by the assumption of flesh and a rational soul; and He who is true God became true man, not that one should be God and another man, but the same God, the same man.
11:32
Qui ut illud peccatum quod in concubitu mortalis carnis generatio humana contraxit auferret, conceptus est novo more, Dens incarnatus in matre virgine, sine coitu viri, sine libidine concipientis vir­ ginis : ut per Deum hominem, quem absque libidine conceptum inviolatus edidit virginis uterus, ablue­ retur peccatum quod nascentes trahunt omnes ho­ mines : quibus in corpore mortis hujus talis est nas­ cendi conditio, ut matres eorum fecunditatis opus implere non possint, nisi prius virginitatem carnis amiserint.
為要除去人類在必死肉體的交合中所沾染的那罪,祂以新奇的方式受孕,成為肉身的神在童貞的母親裡面,不藉男人的結合,也沒有受孕童貞女的情慾:好叫藉著那位神而人者——祂是那未受玷污的童貞女子宮所生、無情慾而受孕的——除去那眾人出生時所承受的罪;這些人在這死亡的身體中,其出生的條件乃是如此,以致他們的母親若不先失去肉體的童貞,便不能完成生育之工。
In order to take away that sin which the human race contracted in the intercourse of mortal flesh, He was conceived in a new manner, God incarnate in a virgin mother, without the union of a man, without the lust of the conceiving virgin: so that through the God-man, whom the inviolate womb of the virgin brought forth conceived without lust, might be washed away the sin which all men draw at birth—men for whom, in the body of this death, such is the condition of being born, that their mothers cannot fulfill the work of fecundity unless they first lose the virginity of the flesh.
11:33
Solus igitur abstulit peccatum conceptio­ nis 508 atque nativitatis humanæ Deus Unigenitus, qui dum conciperetur veritatem carnis accepit ex virgine, et cum nasceretur integritatem virginitatis servavit in matre. Ista causa est qua Deus factus est filius virginis Mariæ, et Maria virgo facta est mater Unigeniti Dei : ut quem Pater genuit ex æternitate, ipsum virgo conceptum proferret in tempore : illa utique virgo, quam Deus, qui de ea fuerat nascilurus, ita singulari gratia prævenit atque replevit, ut ipsum haberet ventris sui fructum, quem ex initio habet universitas Dominum :
所以惟有那位獨生的神除去了人受孕與降生的罪,祂在受孕時從童貞女領受了肉體的真實,在降生時又在母親裡面保守了童貞的完整。這就是為何神成了童貞瑪利亞的兒子,而童貞女瑪利亞成了獨生之神的母親:使那位父從永恆所生的,童貞女得以在時間中將祂受孕而生下——正是那位童貞女,那位將要由她所生的神,以獨特的恩典如此先臨並充滿她,使她所懷胎中的果子,正是普世從起初以來所奉為主的那一位:
The only-begotten God alone, therefore, took away the sin of human conception and nativity, who, while being conceived, received the reality of flesh from the virgin, and while being born, preserved the integrity of virginity in the mother. This is the reason why God became the son of the Virgin Mary, and Mary the virgin became the mother of the only-begotten God: so that Him whom the Father begot from eternity, the virgin might bring forth conceived in time—that virgin, indeed, whom God, who was to be born of her, so anticipated and filled with singular grace, that she might have as the fruit of her womb Him whom the whole universe has as its Lord from the beginning:
11:34
et ipsum sibi videret nascendi solemnitate subditum, quem in unitate paternæ sub­ stantiae non solum hnmana, sed etiam angelica crea­ tura cognoscit et adorat Altissimum. 18. Sic ergo peccatum et poena peccati, quae per scelus corruptae mulieris intravit in mundum, per inviolatæ virginis partum aufertur a mundo e. Et quia in conditione generis humani per mulierem quae de solo viro facta est, contigit ut mortis vinculo te­ neremur obstricti, hoc in redemptione humani ge­ neris divina bonitas egit, ut per virum qui de sola muliere i natus est, vita hominibus redderetur. Illic humanam naturam nequissima deceptione sibi diabo­ lui in peccati similitudinem sociavit;
她並看見那位藉降生之隆重而順服於她的,正是在父性實體的合一中,不僅人類、連天使受造之物都承認並敬拜為至高者的那一位。十八、所以罪與罪的刑罰,既藉一個敗壞女子的罪行進入世界,也就藉一位未受玷污童貞女的生產從世界被除去。又因為在人類的境況中,藉著一個單由男人所造的女人,以致我們被死亡的鎖鍊所捆綁,神的良善便在人類的救贖中成就了這事,即藉著一位單由女人所生的男人,使生命歸還給人。在那裡,魔鬼以其最邪惡的詭詐,把人性以罪的樣式聯於自己;
and she saw Him subject to herself by the solemn manner of being born, whom in the unity of the paternal substance not only human but also angelic creation acknowledges and adores as the Most High. 18. Thus therefore sin and the penalty of sin, which entered into the world through the crime of a corrupted woman, is taken away from the world through the childbearing of an inviolate virgin. And because in the condition of the human race it came about, through a woman who was made from a man alone, that we were held bound by the bond of death, this the divine goodness wrought in the redemption of the human race, that through a man who was born of a woman alone, life might be restored to men. There the devil, by his most wicked deception, associated human nature to himself in the likeness of sin;
11:35
hic Deus hu­ manam naturam in unitatem personx suscepit. Ibi femina decepta est, ut fieret filia diaboli : hic virgo gratia repleta est, ut fieret mater summi atque in­ commutabilis Unigeniti Dei. Ibi angelus dejectus per superbiam, seductæ mulieris animum obtinuit g ; hic Dens humilians se per misericordiam, incorruptæ virginis uterum ex ea nasciturus implevit. Dei enim Filius Jesus Christus qui in forma Dei erat ( quod nisi ex natura Patris natus esset, esse non posset h), ipse, secundum apostolicam doctrinam, semetipsum exinanivit formam servi accipiens (Philip. II, 7).
在這裡神卻把人性取入祂位格的合一之中。在那裡女人受了欺騙,以致成了魔鬼的女兒;在這裡童貞女得了恩典的充滿,以致成了至高不變之獨生神的母親。在那裡天使因驕傲被摔下,攫取了受誘惑女人的心思;在這裡神因憐憫而自卑,將要由她而生,充滿了那未受玷污童貞女的子宮。因為神之子耶穌基督,本有神的形像(若非由父的本性所生,祂便不能如此),祂自己按著使徒的教導,「反倒虛己,取了僕人的形像」(腓二7)。
here God took up human nature into the unity of His Person. There the woman was deceived, that she might become a daughter of the devil; here the virgin was filled with grace, that she might become the mother of the most high and unchangeable only-begotten God. There the angel, cast down through pride, gained possession of the mind of the seduced woman; here God, humbling Himself through mercy, being about to be born of her, filled the womb of the incorrupt virgin. For the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who was in the form of God (which He could not be unless He were born of the nature of the Father), Himself, according to apostolic teaching, 'emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant' (Phil. 2:7).
11:36
For­ mam ergo servi, id est naturam servi in suam acce­ pit Deus ille personam, atque ita hominum factor in similitudinem hominum factus, habitu est inventus ut homo, ipse humiliavit semelipsum, factus obe­ diens Patri usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis (Ibid., 8). 19. Intente igitur hanc Apostoli sententiam cogita, et in ea cognosces quomodo Dominum Jesum Chri­ stum eumdem Deum atque hominem credas. Nec tamen in eo veritatem utriusque naturæ in una per­ sona, aut conFundas, aut dividas. Cum ergo primum audis de Domino Jesu Christo quia in forma Dei crat, oportet te agnoscere firmissimeque tenere, in illo formae nomine naturalem plenitudinem debere intelligi.
所以那位神將僕人的形像,就是僕人的本性,取入自己的位格,這樣,祂作為人的創造者,成了人的樣式,又有人的樣子,就自己謙卑,順服父以至於死,且死在十字架上(同上8)。十九、所以你當專心思想使徒這句話,你就會在其中學到當如何相信主耶穌基督是這同一位神又是人。然而你不可在祂裡面把兩種本性在一個位格中的真實,或加以混淆,或加以分割。所以當你首先聽見論到主耶穌基督說祂本有神的形像時,你當承認並最堅定地持守,在「形像」這詞中應當理解為本性的豐滿。
The form of a servant, therefore, that is, the nature of a servant, that God took into His own Person, and thus, being the Maker of men, was made in the likeness of men, and being found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself, becoming obedient to the Father even unto death, even the death of the cross (ibid., 8). 19. Ponder therefore attentively this saying of the Apostle, and in it you will learn how you are to believe that the Lord Jesus Christ is the same God and man. Yet do not in Him either confound or divide the reality of both natures in one Person. When therefore you first hear of the Lord Jesus Christ that He was in the form of God, it behooves you to acknowledge and to hold most firmly that in that word 'form' the natural fullness ought to be understood.
11:37
In forma igitur Dei Dominus Jesus Chrislus erat, quia in natura Dei Patris semper erat, de quo natus erat. Unius ergo naturae cum Patre est, æqua- literque cum eo sempiternus atque immensus, .æqua­ liter immortalis et incommutabilis, sequaliter invisi­ bilis et inenarrabilis, æqualiter bonus et justus, æqualiter miserator et misericors, patiens et multum misericors et verax, sequaliter fortis et suavis, æqua- Uter sapiens atque omnipotens. 509 20. Proinde hæc omnia quæ diximus de Fi­ lio Dei, firmissima Me retine, quia (al. qui) hac uti­ que omnia in unitate naturæ habens cum Patre, sine dubio aequalis est Patri. Propter quod et ApostoIus continuo adjungens, ait:
所以主耶穌基督本有神的形像,因為祂始終在那生祂之父神的本性中。所以祂與父同一本性,並與父同等地永存無限、同等地不朽不變、同等地不可見不可言喻、同等地良善公義、同等地慈悲憐憫、忍耐大有慈愛且真實、同等地剛強溫柔、同等地智慧全能。二十、因此,你當最堅定地持守我們論到神之子所說的這一切,因為祂在本性的合一中與父共有這一切,就毫無疑問地與父同等。為此使徒也隨即加上說:
In the form of God, therefore, was the Lord Jesus Christ, because He was always in the nature of God the Father, of whom He was born. Therefore He is of one nature with the Father, and equally with Him everlasting and boundless, equally immortal and unchangeable, equally invisible and inexpressible, equally good and just, equally compassionate and merciful, patient and full of mercy and truthful, equally strong and gentle, equally wise and almighty. 20. Accordingly, retain most firmly all these things which we have said of the Son of God, because, having all these things in unity of nature with the Father, He is without doubt equal to the Father. Wherefore the Apostle also, immediately adding, says:
11:38
Non rapinam arbitratu, est esse se aquulem Deo (Philip. II, 6). Non enim rapinæ (al. rapina) fuit illa Filii cum Patre divinitatis æquali­ tas, sed naturæ (al. natura). Etiam illa quæ consequen­ ter subjungit Apostolus dicens, quia semetipsum exi- nanivit formam servi accipiens, in similitudine hominum factuS, et habitu inventus ut homo; et quia humiliavit semetipsum, factus obediens a usque ad mortem, mor­ tem autem crucis; omnia hæc de illo unigenito Deo Dei Filio, de illo Verbo Deo de quo dicit evange­ lista : In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum (Joan. I, 1); de illa Dei virtute Deique sapientia, de qua Deodicitur: Omnia in sapientia fecisti (Psal.
「祂不以自己與神同等為強奪的」(腓二6)。因為子在神性上與父的那同等,並非出於強奪,而是出於本性。使徒隨後所補述的那些話,說祂「虛己,取了僕人的形像,成為人的樣式,又有人的樣子;並且自己謙卑,順服以至於死,且死在十字架上」——這一切都當論到那位獨生的神、神之子而領受,論到那位是神的道,福音書作者論到祂說:「太初有道,道與神同在,道就是神」(約一1);論到那位神的能力與神的智慧,經上論到神說:「祢用智慧造了萬物」(詩
'He thought it not robbery to be equal with God' (Phil. 2:6). For that equality of the Son with the Father in divinity was not of robbery, but of nature. Also those things which the Apostle consequently subjoins, saying that 'He emptied Himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and found in fashion as a man; and that He humbled Himself, becoming obedient unto death, even the death of the cross'—all these things receive concerning that only-begotten God, the Son of God, concerning that Word who is God, of whom the Evangelist says: 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God' (John 1:1); concerning that Power of God and Wisdom of God, of which it is said to God: 'Thou hast made all things in wisdom' (Ps.
下一段 →
← 第 10 章第 12 章 →
12345678910111213141516

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。