That the Holy Spirit is the bestower of heavenly graces and the dispenser of sanctifications, the very meaning of His name attests. But His magnificence was manifested even in the Old Testament. For there His grace was granted to none save certain particular ones, that is, to the patriarchs and likewise to the prophets and to the holy and the elect, so that through the very perfection of the gifts I might understand the dignity of the Giver. But as far as is most manifestly discerned in the holy Scriptures, the Father works some things by Himself, others in a special way through the Son, others through the Holy Spirit, though under the privilege of a common power. What we are seems properly to be referred to the Father, in whom, as the Apostle said, 'we live and move and are.'
But that we are capable of reason and wisdom and justice is assigned in a special way to Him who is reason and wisdom and justice, that is, to the Son. But that, being called, we are regenerated, and, being regenerated, are renewed, and, being renewed, are sanctified — through the divine oracles this is plainly ascribed to the Person of the Holy Spirit. But the sacred page speaks these things under the distinction of the undivided Trinity in such a way that, however much a diversity of work may appear in the several Persons, yet there remains in the three a unity of will.
Therefore both the Gentiles and the catechumens partake of the dispensation of the Father and of the Son; but of the sanctification and infusion of the Holy Spirit not easily, unless they have already obtained baptism, been purified and made spiritual — the apostolic ones too, and the apostles, and those prepared with their whole spirit for martyrdom. And amid these things, shall He still be judged by the impious to be a creature, He who, among the individual Trinity, obtains for the ordering of human salvation each of the more magnificent and more perfect gifts? But perhaps you say: The Holy Spirit is greater, whose works are greater and more noble. It is not so.
For it is the custom of the Trinity that, to whichever Person it commits the office of administering a matter, to that same Person it ascribes the effect when it is accomplished; and so the work may perhaps be diverse, but the purpose is common. And if in the several Persons there is a special deed, there remains in the three a general counsel; and therefore, although they have in operation a distinct task, yet they hold in the ordering one consent. After the Lord's ascension, to heap up and fulfill His benefits, the Holy Spirit is described as having descended; of whom the Saviour Himself speaks through the Gospel of John: 'That Spirit of truth, whom the Father will send in my name.' 'The Father will send,' He says, 'in my name' — plainly of the Trinity.
Of what creature have we ever read or heard this said — that it came into this world in the name of God? He, then, of whom Christ the Lord God says, 'Unless I go, the Paraclete will not come to you,' is without doubt God, who is appointed in the place of God to confirm the gifts of God. In these two sentences, under the distinction of the Trinity, the Person also of the Holy Spirit is absolutely declared. Not without reason, therefore, is this also referred to the equality of the Godhead — that, as the Son, so also the Holy Spirit is called in the Scriptures the Paraclete. And whence shall we be able to prove this? Assuredly from the authority of the Apostle John, when he says:
'If any of us,' he says, 'shall sin, we have a Paraclete with the Father, Jesus Christ, and He is the propitiation for our sins.' 'Paraclete,' that is, 'advocate,' which looks to the Person of the Son; or else 'consoler,' which pertains to the Holy Spirit — a single expression of the Greek tongue signifies both. In the Gospel of John we have: 'And I,' He says, 'will ask the Father, and He will give you another Paraclete.' 'Another Paraclete,' that is, of like power, of equal glory, and of the same nature. And 'another Paraclete':
if you suppose the Holy Spirit to be one of the creatures, it is unworthy that, when the same descends, a creature should confirm the benefits which the Creator conferred, and that, as though the power of the Maker had been ineffectual, the effect of an unfinished work should — however excellent the creature — nevertheless be reserved to the creature. You, then, revile the Holy Spirit with the reproach of being a creature, to whom the Son of God, by a divine testimony, made Himself equal out of His own oracle. And 'another Paraclete': by this twofold understanding recognize both the distinction of Person and the equality of substance. Here perhaps you might object:
For this reason Christ seems to have put himself on a level with the Holy Spirit under the title of Paraclete—the Spirit who is, forsooth, held to be the material of God's work and a thing made—because Jesus himself is proved to have been created from Mary. But this argument is as faithless as it is feeble. For if you suppose that Christ was likened to the Paraclete in respect of his manhood, not even this accords with the truth. For, being made a little lower than the angels and made one of us, he could not be compared with that first and heavenly and (as you assert) more excellent creature. But if Christ spoke this according to the form of God, it is certain that the thing made ought by no means to be set on a par with its Maker. And thus, if a man equates himself with this more excellent creature, it is the pride of a lesser being; if God does so, it is the wronging of a greater.
Since, therefore, this comparison is seen not to hold within the condition of a creature, it remains that both be believed to be God, and that an equality of divinity be reciprocally compared between them. For when the Saviour speaks through John: 'And I will ask the Father, and he shall give you another Paraclete, the Spirit of truth, whom this world cannot receive'—he who can be given to the whole world is manifestly the God of the world. Here too recognize a threefold Trinity. There is the Father, who is shown to be asked; the Son, who is understood to be about to ask; the Holy Spirit, who is promised as one to be sent by the Father. Note that the person of the Holy Spirit is not, as you assert, associated with kindred creatures, but in all things is joined to the Trinity in works and made equal in powers. XI.
THAT IN THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES THE ATTESTATION OF THE TRINITY IS REPEATED, WHERE CHRIST ALSO, AGAINST THE NOVATIANS, IS ASSERTED TO HAVE BEEN SENT TO GRANT REPENTANCE. In the Acts of the Apostles Peter, discoursing of the Lord Jesus, speaks thus: 'Being therefore exalted by the right hand of God, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he hath poured forth this which you see and hear.' In 'the right hand' the Son is designated, in 'God' the Father, in the property of his own name the Holy Spirit. And in what follows we read: 'Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God raised from the dead, by this doth this man stand here before you whole.' Behold here too the distinction of the Trinity expressed.
Peter, bearing the Holy Spirit within himself, speaks of the Son dying in the flesh and of the Father raising him up. There likewise it is repeated by an apostolic oracle: 'And now, O Lord,' he says, 'behold their threatenings,' and: 'They were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and spoke the word of God with confidence.' Note that in this passage too the Holy Spirit is contained within the Trinity. In the prayer the Father is entreated, in the word of God the Son is acknowledged, in the steadfastness of the apostles the fire of the Holy Spirit works. 'They were all filled with the Holy Spirit.' It belongs to manifest majesty to be able to pour itself into many at once by the subtlety of an incorporeal divinity, and to remain entire without diminishment. Again, when the apostles had said of Jesus:
'Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be Prince and Saviour, to give repentance to Israel and remission of sins. And we,' he says, 'are witnesses of these things, and the Holy Spirit, whom God hath given to all that obey him.' Understand here, under the order of the Trinity, that not only to proclaim but to grant repentance the Son is appointed by the Father, and that to those who obey there is poured in the Holy Spirit, who rewards their obedience. Stephen, in the moment of his passion, is filled with the Holy Spirit, and to him, the gates of righteousness being unlocked, the Son is revealed at the Father's right hand, even as he himself, filled with the Holy Spirit, declares: 'Behold, I see the heavens opened, and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God.'
See how under a spectacle of the Trinity he brought forth the gifts of his passion. Peter addresses Cornelius the centurion, saying: 'Jesus of Nazareth, how God anointed him with the Holy Spirit.' 'God anointed'—that is, power filled him, blessing poured itself in, divinity penetrated. 'How God anointed him with the Holy Spirit.' Three here evidently exist through their own properties: the gift, the giver, the one gifted; the anointing, the anointed, the ointment—just as in another place the divine word says: 'God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness.' In the manhood assumed, God is anointed and God anoints, and under the descent of the heavenly dove the power of the Father is acknowledged.
It is not lawful that the Holy Spirit, by whom Christ the Son of Man—already full of the Son of God—is filled, should be believed to be anything other than God. For if he were a creature, how could he penetrate an incorporeal nature that penetrates all things? For the Trinity contains itself, as we have it: 'I in the Father, and the Father in me,' and again: 'The Spirit searcheth even the deep things of God,' likewise: 'the Spirit, who proceedeth from the Father.' Unless this Holy Spirit were of the Father, and dwelt poured naturally into the inmost being of the Father, he could not proceed from the Father. But you ask whether the Spirit always proceeds from the Father. He is always with him, always from him, as heat from fire; so without interruption he is brought forth, in such wise that he knows how to go forth but not how to be separated.
For if the procession of the Holy Spirit were not everlasting, his substance would appear to be local. If an incorporeal brightness, self-containing, does not penetrate one into the other without any mingling of itself, then divinity will be confounded with clay. For mingling takes away the property of the threefold essence, whereas mutual infusion shows a distinct essence, which may be seen as a mean between substance and persons. To the substance belongs that which subsists; to the persons belongs that which each singly subsists as its own. Paul addresses his disciples, saying: 'I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God.'
'Take heed to yourselves and to all the flock, in which the Holy Spirit hath placed you as bishops to rule the Church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.' How clearly is the whole Trinity designated in its own persons! He proclaims the counsel of God the Father; he affirms that the bishops were ordained by the Holy Spirit; he shows also that Christ is God, with whose blood the Church was purchased. To the Romans likewise the Trinity is set forth under the property of names: 'But if the Spirit of him who raised up Jesus Christ dwell in you, he who raised up Jesus from the dead shall quicken also your mortal bodies, because of his Spirit that dwelleth in you.'
The Father raises, the Son is raised, and because of the indwelling Spirit life is promised to the mortal bodies that are to be raised again. And in what follows: 'But you are not in the flesh, but in the spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. But if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.' When he says the Spirit of God, and consequently the Spirit of Christ, note that here he designates the person of Christ under the appellation of God.
Or if here he signifies, under the appellation of God, the Father whose Spirit he is, then behold, this Holy Spirit, through the unity of substance, is declared to be the Spirit both of the Father and of the Son, and is rightly discerned to proceed from both, and is perceived to have a distinct person within the bond of the Trinity; and he who has not the Holy Spirit is shown not to have Christ either. The Holy Spirit therefore is God, and by his denial Christ too is denied; and because he said, 'No man cometh to the Father but by me,' whoever is void of the Holy Spirit is not Christ's, and has lost the way by which one arrives at the Father. XII. THAT IT IS PROPER TO GOD TO SANCTIFY A CREATURE. To the Corinthians, first epistle:
'And such indeed some of you were; but you are washed, but you are sanctified, but you are justified in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God.' Behold, here too, under 'our God'—that is, under the commemoration of the Father—the Holy Spirit sanctifies the faithful of Corinth, with Christ working together. No creature whatsoever can sanctify another: the bestowal of sanctification is the bounty of majesty alone. In this passage, 'in the name of Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God,' acknowledge three persons. To the Corinthians, second epistle: 'The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and the communion of the Holy Spirit be with you all'—the grace of Christ, the love of God, the communion of the Holy Spirit: he evidently expressed three persons.
Again, to the Corinthians, second epistle: 'Now he who confirmeth us with you in Christ, and who hath anointed us, is God; and who hath sealed us and given the pledge of the Spirit in our hearts.' See the unity of the undivided Trinity in its works. The Father confirms and seals us through Christ, and, being about to give himself, he already gives in the present, through himself, the Holy Spirit as a pledge. In earthly affairs the sum of earnest-money is a certain portion of the contract for which it stands surety, whereas the reckoning of a pledge exceeds the value of the thing for which it seems to be deposited. But here, since a pledge cannot be preferred to majesty, it must needs be made equal to it. For things perfect cannot be surpassed; therefore, on his own behalf, the Father grants the pledge of the Holy Spirit.
Let nothing therefore be thought half-full in the Holy Spirit, since he is compared to fullness. For he who is given in the stead of God, in the place of a pledge, may not be believed to be anything other than God. Again, to Titus: 'He saved us by the laver of regeneration and renewal of the Holy Spirit, whom he hath poured forth upon us abundantly through Jesus Christ.' Behold, here too, under a manifest Trinity, the Father through the Son pours out an abundance of the Holy Spirit; and—what is most of all to be noted—he ascribes to the Holy Spirit himself the power of regeneration and renewal. Peter also, in his epistle, sets forth the Trinity inseparable in its persons, saying:
'According to the foreknowledge of God the Father, unto sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: grace unto you and peace be multiplied.' In the foreknowledge, the Father; in the sanctification, the Holy Spirit; in the sprinkling of the blood, Christ is shown forth. XIII. THAT THE HOLY SPIRIT IS NOT LOCAL. Let us demonstrate from his powers and works that the Holy Spirit is God. Every creature, just as it is subject to the beginnings of time, so also knows itself to be local, circumscribed by fixed spaces and bounds. The Holy Spirit is confined within no limits as though he were a thing made; he must needs be held to be God by reason of the very freedom of his diffused majesty. It is the word of the Lord Saviour to the apostles:
'The Father,' he says, 'will give you the Spirit of truth, that he may abide with you for ever.' If he were local and yet abode perpetually in them, then surely he could not be elsewhere. Let us see whether his nature is determined by local limits. The Lord says to the apostles: 'You shall receive the power of the Holy Spirit coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem and in all Judaea and Samaria and unto the uttermost part of the earth.' After his ascension the Holy Spirit came upon them, and there appeared to them parted tongues as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. Let us see why first of all the blessings of diverse tongues are bestowed—doubtless that they might be made fit for the instruction of believing peoples.
But as to its being recorded that it sat upon each one, the reason is this: that it might be understood that through the many he was not divided, but remained whole in each single one—as is the custom with fire. For kindled fire has this nature, as we know: that however many gaze upon it, however many upon a crest of purple splendour, it imparts to that many the enjoyment of its own light, and grants to that many the ministry of its own gift, and yet no less remains in its own integrity. So the power of the Holy Spirit, however much it flows out, however much the grace of divine bounty overflows into many, just as it is proved to admit no measure, so it feels no expenditure. Perceive God from the worthiness of his works.
The apostles, full of the Holy Spirit, about to dispense the treasures of salvation through all the world, carry this heavenly gift about within themselves, and transfer it to others by the laying on of hands. The gain of the receiver is wrought without loss to the giver: to those who believe it is delivered whole, and it is possessed whole by those who deliver it; by its infusion the whole world is filled; without diminution it is enlarged, without division it is dispersed.
In that most sacred night of regeneration especially, from east to west, from the rising of the sun even to its setting, from the north and from the sea, everywhere the same Spirit, one and full, works; through all things he is believed to be present by invocation, is felt by blessing; countless multitudes are washed in one baptism, and, as the Apostle said, are made to drink of one Spirit, and are reborn into the one bosom of him who adopts them. And therefore God says: 'In those days I will pour forth of my Spirit upon all flesh' (note that he said, 'I will pour forth of my Spirit'), and he did not say, 'I will pour forth my Spirit'—that is: 'I will dispense only so much of him as the world can receive.'
You see that he goes forth from the Father, yet is not separated from the Father; he is sent forth and not lost; he is poured out and retained; and in the very fact that he is read to be 'poured out,' the greatness of his fullness is declared. The book of Genesis, at the very opening of the sacred volume, testifies: 'And the Spirit of the Lord was borne over the waters.' 'He was borne,' it says, 'over the waters.' The very word seems to assign the abundance of one filling all things and the eminence of one holding dominion. The prophet likewise celebrates this magnificence of his, circumscribed by no spaces of place, with a like attestation, saying: 'Whither shall I go from thy Spirit?'
That is: where shall I hide myself from the sight of him whom I doubt not to be present through all things, that is, both within and without; whose eye, penetrating the depths, I dread within the secret of my breast; to whose presence I know that all things which he founded are subject; of whom, since he is a consuming fire, I clearly understand what is said: 'Nor is there any that can hide himself from his heat'—whose unspeakable greatness enters, fills, and exceeds the depths of the underworld, the diffusion of the floods, the expanse of the lands, the heights of the heavens. He is said to be sent by the Father and the Son, and to proceed from their substance, and is discerned to work one work with them; and therefore the Son says of him: 'the Paraclete, who proceedeth from the Father.'
He did not say 'is created by the Father,' but 'proceeds from the Father'—that is, out of the fellowship of the Father's power and out of the property of his nature. But from the very expression, when he is said to proceed from the Father, it is shown that he has no beginning apart from the Father. And what is it that the Son is said to be born of God the Father, while the Holy Spirit is signified to proceed? If you ask what difference there is between the one born and the one proceeding, the difference is plainly this: that the one is born of one, the other goes forth from both. Therefore, that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father shows in him three prerogatives of deity—namely, that he is proved to subsist in his own person, and to abide without any interval of time, and altogether to exist out of the substance of the Father.
Therefore, when he is said to proceed, by the very property of the word he is known to be circumscribed by no laws of time, but to be without beginning and end. And because we read: 'I am who I am,' and: 'He who is hath sent me,' the word 'proceeds' likewise indicates this. For 'to be' and 'to proceed' are the expression of one and the same eternity. Therefore that very procession, touching neither a first nor a last, is understood to be subject to no beginning or term. Let us not then believe him to be local because we perceive from the reading that he is sent by the Father; for of the Father and the Son too we read that, by a kind of motion as it were, they descend and come. Let us see where. 'I,' he says, 'and my Father will come, and will make our abode with him.'
And again, when the giants strove to raise up a tower into heaven, the person of the Father declares: 'Come, let us go down and confound their tongues.' Here, therefore, through the sounds of our words, the effectings of things are shown forth to our senses. But local motion the divine power does not suffer, which neither comes by an advancing course nor departs by a receding lapse. For he who exceeds all things, whither does he withdraw? Of the Holy Spirit we have learned from the sacred reading: 'And the Church had peace throughout all Judaea, walking in the fear of God, and was filled with the consolation of the Holy Spirit.'
And how, amid all this, does anyone presume to assert him to be a local creature, who is proved to fill a Church of infinite multitude—so that it is manifest that what the Apostle says pertains to him: 'the Father of mercies and the God of all consolation'? We have in the psalm: 'The stream of the river maketh glad the city of God.' What is this stream of the river? That one, doubtless, of whom the Lord says through John: 'He who believeth in me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water.' This the Lord Jesus says of the Spirit, whom they that believed in him were to receive. See the magnificence of majesty. Thus he is bestowed upon the Church of God on earth, in such wise that he yet makes glad the city of God in the heavens.
2:71
ciuitatemdei, idestregnorumcaelestiumciues, supernaemilitiaepopulos, principatus, potestatesacdominationesineffabilibusgaudiisproconscientiaaeternaebeatitudinisinrigatetubertatelaetitiaeexundantiusinebriat, concentumcaeliinexultationetorrentesuaesanctificationisexsuscitat. sihaectantaperaliquamcreaturamdonariopinaris, diuinaepotentiaepropriumnihilrelinquis. sihaec, inquam, peraliquamdonariaestimascreaturam, inangelorumetarchangelorumtendisiniuriam, quibustantaettaliatribuiperconseruiaestimaslargitionem. CAPITULALIBRISECUNDI. I. Quianullacreaturarationabiliscognataecreaturaepossitinfundi. II.
The city of God—that is, the citizens of the heavenly kingdoms, the peoples of the supernal host, the principalities, powers, and dominions—he waters with unspeakable joys according to their consciousness of eternal blessedness, and inebriates them yet more overflowingly with the abundance of gladness, and stirs up the harmony of heaven in a rushing torrent of exultation of his own sanctification. If you suppose that such and so great things are bestowed through some creature, you leave nothing proper to the divine power. If, I say, you reckon that these things are bestowed through some creature, you tend toward the wronging of angels and archangels, to whom you reckon that such and so great things are granted through the bounty of a fellow-servant. THE CHAPTERS OF THE SECOND BOOK. I. That no rational creature can be poured into a kindred creature. II.
2:72
Utrumiuxtaimperitorumopinionemspiritussanctussicutfiliusincarnatussit, quiaetipseinMariamsuperuenit, antantumfiliusdeuirginenatussit. III. ObiectioMacedonii, quaimpiespiritumsanctumexcellentioremadseritcreaturam. IIII. Macedoniusdualitatemadserensnegatspiritumsanctumpropriamhaberepersonam. V. Obiectio, quodsermoille, quemlegimus: nisiquisrenatusfueritexaquaetspiritu, aquampariteretspiritumsanctumcreaturamessetestatur. VI. Ubiquaeritur, utrumspiritussanctiappellatiocognomenputeturannomen. VII. Quodspiritussanctusprophetasspecialiterimplereetdeuscredipariteretuocarieuidentibustestimoniisadprobetur. VIII.
Whether, according to the opinion of the unlearned, the Holy Spirit was incarnate like the Son—since he too came upon Mary—or whether only the Son was born of the Virgin. III. The objection of Macedonius, whereby he impiously asserts the Holy Spirit to be a more excellent creature. IV. Macedonius, asserting a duality, denies that the Holy Spirit has his own proper person. V. The objection that the saying which we read, 'Unless a man be born again of water and the Spirit,' testifies that water and the Holy Spirit alike are a creature. VI. Wherein it is asked whether the appellation of the Holy Spirit is to be thought a surname or a name. VII. That the Holy Spirit is proved by evident testimonies to fill the prophets especially, and alike to be believed and called God. VIII.
2:73
Ubitemplumdeitemplumessesanctispiritusdemonstratur*. VIIII. UbicontraNouatianosdeusgentibuspaenitentiamaduitamdedit, quiutiquedeusspiritussanctusesseperipsumordinemlectionisostenditur. X. UbiadCorinthiosprimaspiritussanctusdeusesseuirtutumdistributionibusdeclaratur. XI. Aduertendum, quodsicutunumdeumitaunumdicitspiritumsanctum, quoddeplebeiacreaturauel, quoddiuidatsingulisproutuult, dicinullomodopossit. XII. Ubieos, quispiritussanctitemplumeffectisunt, itadicitproficeredebere, utdeumportareincorporemereantur. LIBERSECUNDUSQVIANULLACREATURARATIONABILISCOGNATAECREATURAEPOSSITINFUNDI.
Wherein it is shown that the temple of God is the temple of the Holy Spirit. IX. Wherein, against the Novatians, God granted repentance unto life to the Gentiles—who, forsooth, is shown to be God the Holy Spirit by the very order of the reading. X. Wherein, in the first epistle to the Corinthians, the Holy Spirit is declared to be God by the distributions of powers. XI. It is to be observed that just as he speaks of one God, so he speaks of one Holy Spirit—which could in no way be said of a common creature, or of one who 'divideth to each severally as he will.' XII. Wherein he says that those who have been made a temple of the Holy Spirit ought so to advance that they may deserve to bear God in their body. SECOND BOOK. THAT NO RATIONAL CREATURE CAN BE POURED INTO A KINDRED CREATURE.
We read concerning the abundant outpouring of the Holy Spirit: 'And Jesus, full of the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan.' Who, then, save one who was of the same fullness, could fill him who fills all things? Of the apostles the divine word relates: 'And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and spoke the word of God with confidence,' and a little after: 'because upon the nations the grace of the Holy Spirit was poured out.' He is declared to fill whole nations, and is discerned to remain inexhaustible and full within himself. If the Holy Spirit is created, of what angel or archangel was it ever read that, received within, he poured himself into any soul?
Tell me, if you have ever read of any power or virtue among creatures that fills and possesses many at once, and—what is greater—remains undiminished and undivided. It is impossible for a spiritual and rational creature ever to be able to be poured into a nature kindred to itself. Thus a material thing knows not how to penetrate a material substance. God alone, in whom the Holy Spirit too is understood—simple, subtle, and pure—glides into a work whether angelic or human by the power of an incorporeal divinity; and he alone, the penetrator of his own work, enters the hidden things of the human heart. But any heavenly creature whatsoever cannot so pour into or fill a man as to be able to know the secrets of human thought.
And therefore we read of God alone: 'who alone knowest the hearts of men,' and again: 'for he himself knoweth the secrets of the heart.' If to know the secrets of man is proper to divinity, how much more is it a mark of the highest majesty in the person of the Holy Spirit to search the deep things of God. To the Author alone is this prerogative owed—to be able to enter the secret of consciences. Soul indeed may be joined to soul, or angel to angel, but cannot be poured in, because such kinds of creatures are capable only of the Holy Spirit, that is, of God alone; because they are the vessels of their own potter, and can be filled only by him by whom they were made out of nothing, and without whom they are perceived to be empty.
Thus the substance of the soul, being as it were a corporeal matter, knows not how to be poured wholly into another rational creature. For compared with the grossness of the outer man, the soul may be called incorporeal; but referred to its Author, to whom its matter is comprehensible and its make palpable, by whom it can be shut up and bound within the body and consigned to perpetual fire—as we read, 'that they go into everlasting fire, which is prepared for the devil and his angels'—to this Author, undoubtedly, by the right of a maker, it is corporeal. But perhaps you will say: it is manifest that even the importunate violence of demons frequently pours itself into the men whom it has received to be tempted. It is not so.