📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 哲學的慰藉

哲學的慰藉 第 2 章 第 2/2 段

拉丁文原文.11 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 2:31–2:41(全章共 41 節)

← 第 1 章第 3 章 →
← 上一段
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
2:31
Agit enim cuiusque rei natura quod proprium est nec contrariarum rerum miscetur effectibus et ultro quae sunt auersa depellit. Atqui nec opes inexpletam restinguere auaritiam queunt nec potestas sui compotem fecerit quem uitiosae libidines insolubilibus adstrictum retinent catenis, et collata improbis dignitas non modo non efficit dignos, sed prodit potius et ostentat indignos. Cur ita prouenit? Gaudetis enim res sese aliter habentes falsis compellare nominibus quae facile ipsarum rerum redarguuntur effectu; itaque nec illae diuitiae nec illa potentia nec haec dignitas iure appellari potest. Postremo idem de tota concludere fortuna licet in qua nihil expetendum, nihil natiuae bonitatis inesse manifestum est, quae nec se bonis semper adiungit et bonos quibus fuerit adiuncta non efficit.
因為各物的本性行其所固有的,不與相反之物的果效混雜,且自發地驅走與它相違之物。然而,財富既不能止熄無饜的貪婪,權勢也不能使一個被敗壞情慾以無解之鏈捆鎖之人作自己的主;授予惡人的尊榮,不僅不使他們配得,反倒揭發、暴露他們不配。為何竟如此呢?因為你們喜歡以虛假之名稱呼那本不如此之物——這些名稱輕易就被事物本身的果效所駁倒。因此,那財富、那權勢、這尊榮,都不能被正當地如此稱呼。末了,論到整個命運也可作同樣的結論:其中顯然毫無可羨慕、毫無天生善性之物,它既不總與善人相聯,也不使凡與它相聯之人成為善的。
For the nature of each thing does what is proper to it, nor is it mingled with the effects of contrary things, and of its own accord it drives off what is averse to it. And yet neither can riches quench insatiable avarice, nor will power make master of himself one whom vicious lusts hold bound with indissoluble chains; and dignity conferred on the wicked not only does not make them worthy, but rather betrays and exposes them as unworthy. Why does it so come about? Because you take delight in calling things, which are otherwise, by false names — names which are easily refuted by the very effect of the things themselves. And so neither those riches, nor that power, nor this dignity can rightly be so called. Finally, the same may be concluded concerning Fortune as a whole, in which it is manifest that there is nothing to be desired, nothing of native goodness, which neither always joins itself to the good, nor makes good those to whom it has been joined.
2:32
Nouimus quantas dederit ruinas Vrbe flammata patribusque caesis Fratre qui quondam ferus interempto Matris effuso maduit cruore Corpus et uisu gelidum pererrans Ora non tinxit lacrimis, sed esse Censor extincti potuit decoris. Hic tamen sceptro populos regebat Quos uidet condens radios sub undas Phoebus extremo ueniens ab ortu, Quos premunt septem gelidi triones, Quos Notus sicco uiolentus aestu Torret ardentes recoquens harenas. Celsa num tandem ualuit potestas Vertere praui rabiem Neronis? Heu grauem sortem, quotiens iniquus Additur saeuo gladius ueneno! Tum ego: Scis, inquam, ipsa minimum nobis ambitionem mortalium rerum fuisse dominatam. Sed materiam gerendis rebus optauimus quo ne uirtus tacita consenesceret. Et illa:
我們知道他釀成了何等的毀滅,使羅馬城陷於火焰、元老遭屠戮——這人,這兇殘者,從前在謀殺了自己的兄弟之後,渾身被他母親傾流的血所浸透,又在她那看來冰冷的屍身上巡視,竟不以淚水沾濕自己的臉,反能作那已熄滅之美貌的評鑑者。然而這人卻以王杖統管萬民,就是太陽從最遙遠的東方而來、把光芒沉入波濤之下時所俯視的萬民——是大熊座那七顆寒星所逼壓的,是南風以其乾熱兇暴炙烤、烤焦灼熱沙地之處的萬民。那麼,那至高的權勢,究竟能否扭轉乖戾尼祿的瘋狂?唉,那沉重的命分啊,每逢不義的刀劍加在兇殘的毒藥之上!於是我說:「你自己知道,」我說,「對必死之物的野心在我身上所握的權柄極其微小。我所渴望的,乃是行事的材料,免得德行在緘默中衰老。」她說:
We know how great were the ruins he wrought, with the City in flames and the senators slain — he who, savage, once, when his brother had been murdered, was drenched with his mother's outpoured blood, and, ranging over her body, cold to the sight, did not wet his face with tears, but could be a critic of beauty now extinguished. Yet this man ruled with his scepter the peoples whom Phoebus beholds as he sinks his rays beneath the waves, coming from the farthest dawn — whom the seven chill stars of the Plough press hard, whom the South Wind, violent with its dry heat, scorches, baking the burning sands. Could exalted power, then, at last avail to turn the madness of perverse Nero? Alas, the grievous lot, as often as the unjust sword is added to savage poison! Then I: 'You know yourself,' I said, 'that ambition for mortal things has held the least dominion over me. But I desired material for the doing of deeds, lest virtue should grow old in silence.' And she:
2:33
Atqui hoc unum est quod praestantes quidem natura mentes sed nondum ad extremam manum uirtutum perfectione perductas allicere possit, gloriae scilicet cupido et optimorum in rem publicam fama meritorum; quae quam sit exilis et totius uacua ponderis, sic considera. Omnem terrae ambitum, sicuti astrologicis demonstrationibus accepisti, ad caeli spatium puncti constat obtinere rationem, id est ut, si ad caelestis globi magnitudinem conferatur, nihil spatii prorsus habere iudicetur. Huius igitur tam exiguae in mundo regionis quarta fere portio est, sicut Ptolomaeo probante didicisti, quae nobis cognitis animantibus incolatur Huic quartae, si quantum maria paludesque premunt quantumque siti uasta regio distenditur cogitatione subtraxeris, uix angustissima inhabitandi hominibus area relinquetur.
然而有一樣東西,能吸引那些本性卓越、卻尚未被引導至德行最終完美的心靈——那就是對榮耀的渴望,以及因對國家立下卓越功勳而得的名聲。但你且思想這是何等微薄、何等毫無分量。整個大地的範圍,正如你從天文學的論證所學到的,相對於天空的廣袤,所佔的不過是一個點的比例;也就是說,若與天球的巨大相比,它被判定為毫無廣延可言。而在世界這如此微小的區域中,正如你從托勒密的權威所學到的,僅約四分之一是為我們所知的生物所居住。若你在思想中從這四分之一裡,減去海洋與沼澤所佔據的、以及乾旱荒蕪之地所延展的,那麼留給人類居住的,幾乎只剩最狹窄的一塊地方。
And yet there is one thing that can allure minds which are by nature excellent but not yet brought to the final perfection of the virtues — namely the desire of glory and the renown of outstanding services to the commonwealth. But consider how slight a thing this is and how empty of all weight. The whole compass of the earth, as you have learned from the demonstrations of astronomy, holds, in relation to the expanse of the heavens, the ratio of a mere point; that is, if it be compared to the magnitude of the celestial sphere, it is judged to have no extent at all. And of this so very tiny region of the world, only about a fourth part, as you have learned on the authority of Ptolemy, is inhabited by living creatures known to us. If from this fourth part you subtract in thought all that seas and marshes press down and all that the vast region parched with drought stretches over, scarcely the most narrow space is left for human habitation.
2:34
In hoc igitur minimo puncti quodam puncto circumsaepti atque conclusi de peruulganda fama, de proferendo nomine cogitatis? Aut quid habeat amplum magnificumque gloria tam angustis exiguisque limitibus artata? Adde quod hoc ipsum breuis habitaculi saeptum plures incolunt nationes lingua, moribus, totius uitae ratione distantes, ad quas tum difficultate itinerum tum loquendi diuersitate tum commercii insolentia non modo fama hominum singulorum sed ne urbium quidem peruenire queat. Aetate denique Marci Tullii, sicut ipse quodam loco significat, nondum Caucasum montem Romanae rei publicae fama transcenderat, et erat tunc adulta Parthis etiam ceterisque id locorum gentibus formidolosa. Videsne igitur quam sit angusta, quam compressa gloria quam dilatare ac propagare laboratis?
那麼,你既被圍困、被囚禁在這點中之點的極小空間裡,竟還思想要傳揚你的名聲、宣揚你的名字嗎?或者,被局限在如此狹窄微薄的界限之內的榮耀,又有甚麼宏大壯麗可言?還要加上一點:就連這小小居所的範圍之內,也住著許多在語言、風俗、整個生活方式上彼此不同的民族——對這些民族而言,無論是因路途艱難、語言互異,還是因往來稀少,不僅個別之人的名聲,就連城邦的名聲也無法傳達到。最後,在馬庫斯·圖利烏斯的時代,正如他自己在某處所指出的,羅馬國的名聲尚未越過高加索山,雖然那時它已然壯大,連帕提亞人及那些地區的其他民族都對它畏懼。那麼你是否看見,你所竭力傳揚、擴展的榮耀,是何等狹窄、何等局促?
Hemmed in then and shut up within this smallest point of a point, do you think about spreading your fame and making your name known? Or what is there grand and magnificent in a glory cramped within such narrow and meager bounds? Add to this that within this very enclosure of a tiny dwelling-place there live many nations differing in language, in customs, in their whole way of life — nations to which, whether by the difficulty of travel, or by diversity of speech, or by the rarity of commerce, not only the fame of individual men but not even that of cities can reach. In the age of Marcus Tullius, finally, as he himself indicates in a certain passage, the fame of the Roman commonwealth had not yet crossed Mount Caucasus, though it was by then full-grown and dreaded even by the Parthians and the other peoples of those regions. Do you see then how narrow, how confined is that glory which you labor to spread abroad and propagate?
2:35
An ubi Romani nominis transire fama nequit, Romani hominis gloria progredietur? Quid quod diuersarum gentium mores inter se atque instituta discordant, ut quod apud alios laude apud alios supplicio dignum iudicetur. Quo fit ut si quem famae praedicatio delectat, huic in plurimos populos nomen proferre nullo modo conducat. Erit igitur peruagata inter suos gloria quisque contentus et intra unius gentis terminos praeclara illa famae inmortalitas coartabitur. Sed quam multos clarissimos suis temporibus uiros scriptorum inops deleuit obliuio! Quamquam quid ipsa scripta proficiant, quae cum suis auctoribus premit longior atque obscura uetustas? Vos uero inmortalitatem uobis propagare uidemini, cum futuri famam temporis cogitatis. Quod si aeternitatis infinita spatia pertractes, quid habes quod de nominis tui diuturnitate laeteris?
或者,在羅馬之名的聲望都無法越過的地方,一個羅馬人的榮耀豈能前進?再者,不同民族的風俗與制度彼此相違,以致在某些人中被判為當受讚揚的,在另一些人中卻被判為當受刑罰。由此可見,倘若有人以宣揚自己的名聲為樂,把名字傳到許多民族中對他毫無益處。所以各人只能滿足於在自己人中間傳揚的榮耀,而那名聲輝煌的不朽,將被局限在單一民族的疆界之內。然而有多少在自己時代極為顯赫的人物,因缺乏作者記載而被遺忘所抹去!再說,著作本身又有何用?它們連同其作者,一同被更久遠、更模糊的歲月所掩埋。你們卻自以為在為自己謀求不朽,當你們想著將來時代的名聲。但你若細想永恆那無垠的廣袤,你的名字縱然長久存留,又有甚麼可叫你歡欣的呢?
Or where the fame of the Roman name cannot pass, will the glory of a Roman man advance? What of the fact that the customs and institutions of different peoples disagree among themselves, so that what among some is judged worthy of praise, among others is judged worthy of punishment? Hence it comes about that, if any man delights in the proclaiming of his fame, it in no way profits him to carry his name to many peoples. So each will be content with a glory spread abroad among his own, and that splendid immortality of fame will be confined within the borders of a single nation. But how many men, most illustrious in their own times, has the forgetfulness caused by the lack of writers blotted out! And yet what do writings themselves avail, which, together with their authors, a more lengthy and obscure antiquity buries? But you indeed seem to yourselves to procure immortality when you think of the fame of time to come. Yet if you ponder the boundless spaces of eternity, what have you to rejoice over in the long endurance of your name?
2:36
Vnius etenim mora momenti, si decem milibus conferatur annis, quoniam utrumque spatium definitum est, minimam, licet, habet tamen aliquam portionem. At hic ipse numerus annorum eiusque quamlibet multiplex ad interminabilem diuturnitatem ne comparari quidem potest. Etenim finitis ad se inuicem fuerit quaedam, infiniti uero atque finiti nulla umquam poterit esse collatio. Ita fit ut quamlibet prolixi temporis fama, si cum inexhausta aeternitate cogitetur, non parua sed plane nulla esse uideatur. Vos autem nisi ad populares auras inanesque rumores recte facere nescitis et relicta conscientiae uirtutisque praestantia de alienis praemia sermunculis postulatis. Accipe in huiusmodi arrogantiae leuitate quam festiue aliquis inluserit.
因為一瞬間的時間,若與一萬年相比,由於兩段時間都是有限的,固然只佔極小的比例,卻仍佔有某種比例。但這年數,無論被乘以多少倍,都絕無法與無盡的綿延相比。因為有限之物彼此之間尚可有某種比較,但無限與有限之間卻永遠不可能有任何比較。由此可見,無論多麼漫長的時間所帶來的名聲,若與那不竭的永恆相比,就顯得不只是微小,而是全然虛無。然而你們,若不是為了博得眾人的氣息與空洞的傳言,竟不知如何行善,反而捨棄了良心與德行的卓越,從別人閒言碎語中索取你們的賞報。且聽某人是何等詼諧地嘲笑這種傲慢的輕浮。
For the duration of a single moment, if it be compared with ten thousand years, since both spans are finite, holds — granted, a very small one, yet still some — proportion. But this very number of years, however many times multiplied, can in no way even be compared with endless duration. For there can be some comparison of finite things one with another, but of the infinite and the finite there can never be any comparison at all. Thus it comes about that the fame of however prolonged a time, if it be set against inexhaustible eternity, will seem to be not small but plainly nothing. But you, unless to win popular breath and empty rumors, know not how to do right, and abandoning the excellence of conscience and virtue, you demand your rewards from the idle chatter of others. Hear how wittily a certain man once mocked the frivolity of such arrogance.
2:37
Nam cum quidam adortus esset hominem contumeliis, qui non ad uerae uirtutis usum sed ad superbam gloriam falsum sibi philosophi nomen induerat, adiecissetque iam se sciturum, an ille philosophus esset, si quidem illatas iniurias leniter patienterque tolerasset, ille patientiam paulisper adsumpsit acceptaque contumelia uelut insultans: 'Iam tandem,' inquit, 'intellegis me esse philosophum?' Tum ille nimium mordaciter: 'Intellexeram,' inquit, ' si tacuisses.' Quid autem est quod ad praecipuos uiros, de his enim sermo est, qui uirtute gloriam petunt, quid, inquam, est quod ad hos de fama post resolutum morte suprema corpus attineat? Nam si, quod nostrae rationes credi uetant, toti moriuntur homines, nulla est omnino gloria, eum is cuius ea esse dicitur non exstet omnino.
因為有一人曾用辱罵攻擊另一人,那人並非為著真德行的緣故,乃是為了驕傲炫耀榮耀,給自己冠上了哲學家的虛名;攻擊者又補充說,他現在就能知道對方是否是哲學家——只要對方溫和而忍耐地承受所加給他的傷害。那人便忍耐了片刻,後來彷彿因所受的侮辱而得意,說:「如今你終於明白我是哲學家了吧?」於是另一人極為尖刻地回答說:「我本會明白的,只要你閉口不言。」然而,對那些卓越之人——我們所談論的正是這等人,就是藉德行尋求榮耀的人——對他們而言,在身體因死亡的末刻而消解之後,名聲又與他們何干?因為,倘若(這是我們的推理禁止我們相信的)人是完全死去的,那就根本沒有榮耀可言,因為那被說擁有榮耀的人已全然不存在了。
For when a certain man had assailed with insults one who had put on the false name of a philosopher not for the use of true virtue but for proud display of glory, and had added that he would now know whether the other was a philosopher, if indeed he should bear the injuries inflicted gently and patiently — the man assumed patience for a little while, and as if exulting in the insult he had received, said: «Now at last do you understand that I am a philosopher?» Then the other said, all too bitingly: «I would have understood it, if you had kept silent.» But what is it that concerns those eminent men — for it is of these we speak, who seek glory through virtue — what, I say, is there for them in fame after the body has been dissolved by death's last hour? For if, as our reasonings forbid us to believe, men die wholly, there is no glory at all, since he to whom it is said to belong has no existence whatever.
2:38
Sin uero bene sibi mens conscia terreno carcere resoluta caelum libera petit, nonne omne terrenum negotium spernat quae se caelo fruens terrenis gaudet exemptam? Quicumque solam mente praecipiti petit Summumque credit gloriam, Late patentes aetheris cernat plagas Artumque terrarum situm. Breuem replere non ualentis ambitum Pudebit aucti nominis. Quid o superbi colla mortali iugo Frustra, leuare gestiunt? Licet remotos fama per populos means Diffusa linguas explicet Et magna titulis fulgeat claris domus, Mors spernit altam gloriam, Inuoluit humile pariter et celsum caput Aequatque summis infima. Vbi nunc fidelis ossa Fabricii manent, Quid Brutus aut rigidus Cato? Signat superstes fama tenuis pauculis Inane nomen litteris. Sed quod decora nouimus uocabula, Num scire consumptos datur? Iacetis ergo prorsus ignorabiles Nec fama notos efficit.
但那深知自身價值的心靈,當它從塵世的牢獄中得釋,自由地尋求天界時,豈不要藐視一切屬地的事務,並且因享受天界而以自己為脫離塵世之物嗎?凡以倉促的心專求榮耀,並以之為至善的人,且讓他觀看以太那廣袤的疆域,與大地那狹窄的處所。他必因自己膨脹的名聲而羞愧,因為它連那短小的範圍都填不滿。驕傲的人哪,你們為何徒然渴望從必死的軛下抬起頸項?縱然名聲傳遍遠方的萬民,使眾口傳揚,縱然顯赫的宅第因輝煌的封號而閃耀,死亡卻藐視崇高的榮耀,將卑微與尊貴的頭一同裹去,使至卑的與至高的相等。如今忠信的法布里奇烏斯的骸骨在何處安息?布魯圖斯或剛毅的加圖又算甚麼?一點殘存的微弱名聲,用寥寥數字標記他們空洞的名字。但我們縱然知道他們高貴的名字,難道因此就得以認識那些死者嗎?你們躺臥在那裡,全然無人知曉,名聲也不能叫人認得你們。
But if the mind, well aware of its own worth, when released from its earthly prison freely seeks heaven, will it not despise every earthly business, and rejoicing in the enjoyment of heaven, count itself exempt from earthly things? Whoever with headlong mind seeks glory alone and counts it the supreme good, let him behold the wide-spreading tracts of the ether and the narrow situation of the lands. He will be ashamed of his swollen name, since it cannot fill even that brief compass. Why, O proud men, do you vainly long to lift your necks from the mortal yoke? Though fame, passing through distant peoples, should unfold their tongues, and a great house should shine with illustrious titles, Death scorns lofty glory, and wraps alike the lowly and the lofty head, and makes the lowest equal to the highest. Where now rest the bones of faithful Fabricius? What is Brutus, or stern Cato? A scant surviving fame marks their empty name with a few letters. But because we know their noble names, are we thereby granted to know the dead? You lie, then, utterly unknown, nor does fame make you known.
2:39
Quod si putatis longius uitam trahi Mortalis aura nominis, Cum sera uobis rapiet hoc etiam dies, Iam uos secunda mors manet. Sed ne me inexorabile contra fortunam gerere bellum putes, est aliquando eum de hominibus illa, fallax illa nihil, bene mereatur, tum scilicet cum se aperit, cum frontem detegit moresque profitetur Nondum forte quid loquar intellegis. Mirum est quod dicere gestio, coque sententiam uerbis explicare uix queo. Etenim plus hominibus reor aduersam quam prosperam prodesse fortunam. Illa enim semper specie felicitatis cum uidetur blanda, mentitur; haec semper uera est, cum se instabilem mutatione demonstrat. Illa fallit, haec instruit, illa mendacium specie bonorum mentes fruentium ligat, haec cognitione fragilis felicitatis absoluit.
但你若以為,必死之名的氣息能延長生命,那麼當那遲來的一天連這名聲也要從你奪去時,第二次的死亡便已等候著你。然而,免得你以為我與命運進行著毫不留情的戰爭——那騙人的、其實虛無的命運,有時也對人有益,就是當她顯露自己、揭開她的面容、表明她的本性之時。或許你還不明白我所要說的。我急切要說的,是一件奇妙的事,我幾乎無法用言語表達我的意思。因為我認為,逆境的命運比順境的命運更使人得益。順境命運總以幸福的外貌,在她看似諂媚之時欺哄人;逆境命運卻總是真實的,因她藉著變化顯明自己的反覆無常。前者欺騙人,後者教導人;前者以美善的外貌用謊言捆綁享受她之人的心,後者卻藉著對脆弱幸福的認識使人得釋放。
But if you think that life is prolonged by the mortal breath of a name, when at last the late day shall snatch even this away from you, then a second death already awaits you. But lest you think that I wage an inexorable war against Fortune, there is a time when she, that deceiver, who is nothing, deserves well of men — namely when she discloses herself, when she lays bare her face and avows her ways. Perhaps you do not yet understand what I am about to say. It is a wondrous thing I am eager to declare, and I can scarcely unfold my meaning in words. For I deem that adverse Fortune profits men more than prosperous. For the latter, always with the appearance of happiness, when she seems caressing, lies; the former is always true, when she shows herself unstable by her changing. The one deceives, the other instructs; the one binds the minds of those who enjoy her with a lying appearance of good things, the other sets them free by the knowledge of fragile happiness.
2:40
Itaque illam uideas uentosam, fluentem suique semper ignaram, hanc sobriam succinctamque et ipsius aduersitatis exercitatione prudentem. Postremo felix a uero bono deuios blanditiis trahit, aduersa plerumque ad uera bona reduces unco retrahit. An hoc inter minima aestimandum putas quod amicorum tibi fidelium mentes haec aspera, haec horribilis fortuna detexit, haec tibi certos sodalium uultus ambiguosque secreuit, discedens suos abstulit, tuos reliquit? Quanti hoc integer, ut uidebaris tibi fortunatus, emisses! Nunc et amissas opes querere; quod pretiosissimum diuitiarum genus est amicos inuenisti.
如此你便可看見:一個是飄忽不定、流動不居、且永遠不認識自己的,另一個卻是清醒、束緊、並因逆境的操練而成為審慎的。最後,順境以其諂媚把人引離真善;逆境卻多半像用鉤子把人拉回真善。又或者,你以為這該算作最微小的好處嗎——就是這粗糲、這可怖的命運,為你揭露了你忠信朋友的心思?她為你把同伴中可靠的面孔與可疑的分別出來;她離去之時,帶走了屬她的,留下了屬你的。當你完好無損、自以為幸運之時,你願出何等的代價來換取這事!如今你哀嘆失去的財富;你卻尋得了朋友,那是最寶貴的一類財富。
And so you may see the one windy, flowing, and ever ignorant of herself, but the other sober, well-girded, and made prudent by the very exercise of adversity. Finally, prosperity by her blandishments draws men astray from the true good; adversity for the most part draws them back as with a hook to the true good. Or do you think this should be reckoned among the least of benefits, that this rough, this dreadful Fortune has uncovered for you the minds of your faithful friends? She has sorted out for you the sure faces of your comrades from the doubtful; departing, she has taken away her own and left you yours. At what price, while you were intact and seemed to yourself fortunate, would you have bought this! Now you complain of riches lost; you have found friends, which are the most precious kind of riches.
2:41
Quod mundus stabili fide Concordes uariat uices, Quod pugnantia semina Foedus perpetuum tenent, Quod Phoebus roseum diem Curru prouehit aureo, Vt quas duxerit Hesperos Phoebe noctibus imperet, Vt fluctus auidum mare Certo fine coerceat, Ne terris liceat uagis Latos tendere terminos. Hanc rerum seriem ligat Terras ac pelagus regens Et caelo imperitans amor. Hic si frena remiserit, Quidquid nunc amat inuicem Bellum continuo geret Et quam nunc socia fide Pulchris motibus incitant, Certent soluere machinam. Hic sancto populos quoque Iunctos foedere continet, Hic et coniugii sacrum Castis nectit amoribus, Hic fidis etiam sua Dictat iura sodalibus. O felix hominum genus, Si uestros animos amor Quo caelum regitur regat.
宇宙以堅定不移的信實使其和諧的更替變化;相互爭戰的元素持守永久的盟約;福玻斯駕著金車帶出玫瑰色的白晝,使福柏在夜間統管赫斯佩魯斯所引入的時辰;貪婪的大海將其波濤約束在固定的界限之內,免得遊蕩的陸地得以放寬其疆界——這一切事物的次序,都被那愛緊緊束結,這愛治理陸地與海洋,並統管諸天。倘若這愛鬆開韁繩,凡如今彼此相愛的萬物便要立即爭戰,並要竭力拆毀那如今牠們以友好的信實藉其美好運行所推動的機器。這愛也使各民族藉聖約結連,使婚姻的神聖以貞潔的愛繫結,並向忠信的同伴頒定其律法。人類何等有福,倘若那治理諸天的愛能治理你們的心思!
That the world with steadfast faith varies its harmonious changes; that the warring seeds keep a perpetual covenant; that Phoebus brings forth the rosy day in his golden chariot, so that Phoebe may rule by night over the hours that Hesperus has led in; that the greedy sea confines its waves within a fixed bound, lest it be permitted to the wandering lands to stretch broad their borders — this whole series of things is bound fast by love, which rules the lands and the sea and governs the heaven. If love should slacken the reins, all things that now love one another would straightway wage war, and would strive to break in pieces the engine which now in friendly faith they drive on by their fair movements. This love also holds nations joined by a holy covenant, this binds the sacred bond of marriage with chaste loves, this too dictates its laws to faithful comrades. O happy race of men, if the love by which heaven is ruled should rule your minds!
← 上一段
← 第 1 章第 3 章 →
12345

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。