📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 駁異教徒

駁異教徒 第 1 章 第 2/4 段

拉丁文原文.40 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 1:41–1:80(全章共 129 節)

第 2 章 →
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
1:41
Deum principem, rerum cunctarum quaecumque sunt dominum, summitatem omnium summorum obtinentem, adorare, obsequio venerabili invocare, in rebus fessis totis, ut ita dixerim, sensibus amplexari, amare, suspicere, execrabilis religio est et infausta, impietatis et sacrilegii plena, caerimonias antiquitus institutas novitatis suae superstitione contaminans? 26.1. Hoccine est quaeso audax illud facinus et inmane, propter quod maximi caelites | f.
去敬拜那位為君王的神——祂是凡存在之萬物的主宰,握有一切至高者中的至高之巔——以可敬的順服呼求祂,在疲憊的境況中,可謂以我們的全部感官擁抱祂,愛祂、仰望祂:這竟是一種可憎而不祥的宗教,充滿不敬虔與褻瀆,以其新奇的迷信玷污了古時所立的祭儀嗎?第二十六章第一節:我問你們,這竟是那大膽而駭人的罪行,以致最偉大的天上諸神
To adore God the Prince, the Lord of all things whatsoever that are, who holds the supreme height of all supreme beings; to invoke Him with venerable submission; in weary circumstances to embrace Him, so to speak, with all our senses; to love Him, to look up to Him — is this an execrable and ill-omened religion, full of impiety and sacrilege, defiling with the superstition of its newness the ceremonies established of old? 26.1. Is this, I ask, that bold and monstrous crime on account of which the greatest heavenly ones
1:42
9 | aculeos in nos intendunt irarum atque indignationum suarum, propter quod vos ipsi, cum libido incesserit saeva, exuitis nos bonis, exterminatis patriis sedibus, inrogatis supplicia capitalia, torquetis, dilaceratis, exuritis et ad extremum nos feris et beluarum laniatibus obiectatis? 2. Quisquis istud in nobis damnat aut in aliqua ducit criminatione ponendum, is aut nomine appellandus est hominis, quamvis ille videatur sibi, aut deus esse credendus est, quamvis ipse se esse mille profiteatur in vatibus? 3.
才向我們射出他們怒氣與憤慨的螫刺;才使你們自己,當殘暴的慾望襲來時,剝奪我們的財物,把我們逐出祖先的家園,施加死刑,加以拷打、撕裂、焚燒,末了還把我們投給野獸、任凶暴的畜類撕咬?第二節:凡在我們身上譴責此事、或視之為可列為罪狀者,他若非該被稱為人之名——儘管他自視為別的——就是必須被信為神,儘管他自己藉千百個先知宣稱自己是神?第三節:
aim at us the stings of their angers and indignations — on account of which you yourselves, when a savage lust has come over you, strip us of our goods, banish us from the seats of our fathers, inflict capital punishments, torture, tear apart, burn us up, and, at the last, cast us to wild beasts and to the manglings of brutes? 2. Whoever condemns this in us, or reckons it to be placed among any accusation, he is either to be called by the name of a man — however much he may seem otherwise to himself — or else must be believed to be a god, however much he himself may profess through a thousand seers that he is one? 3.
1:43
Trophonius nos impios Dodonaeus aut Iuppiter nominat, et ipse dicetur deus atque in ordine conputabitur numinum, qui aut summo servientibus regi crimen impietatis adfingit aut sibi torquetur maiestatem eius cultumque praeponi? 4. Delius Apollo vel Clarius, Didymaeus, Philesius, Pythius et hic habendus divinus est, qui aut summum imperatorem nescit aut ignorat a nobis cotidianis ei precibus supplicari? 5. Qui si pectorum secreta nesciret nec quid in intimis sensibus contineamus agnosceret, summum tamen invocare nos deum et ab eo quod postulamus orare vel auribus potuit scire vel ipsius vocis sono qua utimur in precibus noscitare. 27.1.
多多納的特羅弗尼烏斯,或是朱庇特,稱我們為不敬虔者,而他自己竟也要被稱為神、被算在諸神之列嗎——他要麼把不敬虔之罪加在那些事奉至高君王的人身上,要麼因祂的威嚴與敬拜被高抬過自己而受折磨?第四節:提洛的、克拉洛斯的、狄底瑪的、費勒西烏斯的、皮同的阿波羅也要被視為神明嗎——他要麼不認識那至高的皇帝,要麼不知道我們天天以禱告向祂祈求?第五節:即便他不知我們心中的隱秘、不曉得我們內心深處所懷的是甚麼,他至少也能藉自己的耳朵得知我們呼求至高的神、向祂祈求所求之物,或藉我們禱告時所用聲音的本身音響而察知。第二十七章第一節:
Does the Dodonaean Trophonius or Jupiter name us impious, and is he too to be called a god and reckoned in the order of divine powers — he who either fastens the charge of impiety upon those serving the supreme King, or is himself tortured that His majesty and worship should be preferred to his own? 4. Are the Delian or Clarian, the Didymaean, Philesian, Pythian Apollo also to be held divine — he who either does not know the supreme Emperor, or is ignorant that He is supplicated by us with daily prayers? 5. And if he did not know the secrets of our hearts nor recognize what we hold in our inmost feelings, he could yet, either by his ears know that we invoke the supreme God and pray to Him for what we ask, or by the very sound of the voice which we use in prayers discern it. 27.1.
1:44
Nondum est locus ut explicemus, omnes isti qui nos damnant qui sint vel unde sint, quantum possint vel noverint, cur ad Christi paveant mentionem, discipulos cur eius inimicos habent et invisos; quod tamen humanum pollicentibus sensum una pariter definitione figamus: nihil sumus aliud Christiani nisi magistro Christo summi regis ac principis veneratores; | f. 9b | nihil, si consideres, aliud invenies in ista religione versari. 2.
現在還不是我們解明的時候——即那一切譴責我們者究竟是誰、來自何處,他們能做甚麼、知道甚麼,為何一聽見基督之名便戰慄,為何把祂的門徒視為仇敵而可憎;然而,讓我們為那些應許有人性理解的人,用一句話一同定下這一點:我們基督徒無非是在我們的夫子基督之下,敬拜那至高的君王與元首者;你若細想,在這宗教中你再也找不到別的甚麼牽涉其中。第二節:
It is not yet the place for us to explain who all these are that condemn us, and whence they are, how much they can do or know, why they tremble at the mention of Christ, and why they hold His disciples as foes and hateful; yet let us fix this one thing together in a single definition for those who promise a human understanding: we Christians are nothing else than worshippers of the supreme King and Prince under Christ our Master; nothing else, if you consider it, will you find to be involved in this religion. 2.
1:45
Haec totius summa est actionis, hic propositus terminus divinorum officiorum, hic finis, huic omnes ex more prosternimur, hunc conlatis precibus adoramus, ab hoc iusta et honesta et auditui eius condigna deposcimus, non quo ipse desideret supplices nos esse aut amet substerni tot milium venerationem videre; utilitas haec nostra est et commodi nostri rationem spectans. 3. Nam quia proni ad culpas et ad libidinis varios adpetitus vitio sumus infirmitatis ingenitae, patitur se semper nostris cogitationibus concipi ut, dum illum oramus et mereri eius contendimus munera, accipiamus innocentiae voluntatem et ab omni nos labe delictorum omnium amputatione purgemus. 28.1.
這就是整個行動的總和,這是我們神聖本分所定的目標,這是終極;我們眾人都照習俗俯伏在祂面前,以同心的禱告敬拜祂,向祂祈求公義、正直、配得祂垂聽之事——並非祂自己渴望我們作祈求者,或喜愛看見這許多千萬人的崇敬俯伏於地;這乃是我們的益處,關乎我們自身好處的考量。第三節:因為,由於我們與生俱來之軟弱的過失,我們易於犯過、易於陷入情慾的種種嗜慾,祂便容許自己常被我們的思念所領受,好叫我們在向祂禱告、竭力配得祂恩賜之際,領受歸向純潔無辜的心志,並藉除去我們一切的過犯,潔淨自己脫離每一污穢。第二十八章第一節:
This is the sum of the whole action, this the appointed goal of our divine duties; this the end; before Him we all, according to custom, prostrate ourselves; Him with united prayers we adore; from Him we demand things just and honorable and worthy of His hearing — not that He Himself desires us to be suppliants or loves to see the veneration of so many thousands laid low; this is our advantage, and looks to the account of our own benefit. 3. For because, by the fault of our inborn weakness, we are prone to faults and to the various appetites of lust, He suffers Himself always to be conceived by our thoughts, so that, while we pray to Him and strive to deserve His gifts, we may receive the will to innocence and cleanse ourselves from every stain by the cutting away of all our transgressions. 28.1.
1:46
Quid dicitis, o sacri, quid, divini interpretes iuris? Meliorisne sunt causae, qui Grundulios adorant Lares, [Aios Locutios], Limentinos, quam sumus nos omnes, qui deum colimus rerum patrem atque ab eo deposcimus rebus fessis languentibus que tutamina? 2. Et illi cati, sapientes, prudentissimi vobis videntur nec reprehensionis ullius, qui Faunos, qui Fatuas civitatumque genios, qui Pavores reverentur atque Bellonas, nos hebetes, stolidi, fatui obtunsi pronuntiamur et bruti, qui dedidimus nos deo, cuius nutu et arbitrio omne quod est constat et in essentiae suae perpetuitate defixum est? 3.
神聖之士啊,你們說甚麼?律法的神聖解釋者啊,你們說甚麼?那些敬拜格倫杜利烏斯家神、艾伊·洛庫提伊、界神里門提努斯的人,難道理由比我們眾人更充分嗎——我們敬拜那位神、萬物之父,並向祂祈求對我們疲憊衰弱之事的護佑?第二節:那些敬畏法烏努斯、法圖阿、城邦守護神、崇拜恐懼之神與戰神貝洛娜的人,在你們看來竟是精明、智慧、極其審慎、無可指摘的嗎——而我們卻被斷定為愚鈍、癡呆、蠢笨、遲鈍而粗野,只因我們把自己交給了神——憑祂的頷首與意旨,凡存在之物皆得堅立,牢固地定於其自身本質的永恆之中?第三節:
What do you say, O sacred ones, what, O divine interpreters of the law? Are those of a better cause who adore the Grundulian Lares, the Aii Locutii, the Limentini, than are we all who worship the God, the Father of all things, and demand from Him protection for our weary and languishing affairs? 2. And do those seem to you shrewd, wise, most prudent, and worthy of no reproach who revere the Fauns, the Fatuae, and the geniuses of cities, who reverence the Terrors and the Bellonas — while we are pronounced dull, stupid, foolish, blunted, and brutish, who have given ourselves to God, by whose nod and will everything that is stands firm and is fixed fast in the perpetuity of its own essence? 3.
1:47
Hancine sententiam promitis, hanc legem constituitis, hanc promulgatis ut honoribus adficiatur amplissimis quisquis vestros adoraverit servulos, crucem mereatur extremam | f. 10 | quisquis vobis ipsis dominis supplicarit? 4. In civitatibus maximis atque in potentioribus populis sacra publice fiunt scortis meritoriis quondam atque in volgarem libidinem prostitutis: nullus tumor indignationis in diis est. Templa faelibus, scarabeis et buculis sublimibus sunt elata fastigiis: silent inrisae numinum potestates nec livore afficiuntur ullo, quod sibi comparatas animantium vilium conspiciunt sanctitates. 5.
你們宣告的竟是這樣的判決、確立的竟是這樣的律法、頒布的竟是這樣的法令嗎——凡敬拜你們的小奴僕者當受最豐厚的尊榮,而凡向你們這些主人自己祈求者卻該受十字架的極刑?第四節:在最大的城市、在較強盛的民族中,公開向那些曾被出租、供庸俗淫慾賣淫的娼妓舉行祭儀:諸神心中卻無憤慨的膨脹。神廟以高聳的山牆被高高地築起,獻給貓、甲蟲和母牛:那被嘲弄的神明的權能默然無語,也不因任何嫉妒而動容,儘管他們眼見卑賤牲畜的神聖被抬高到與自己同列。第五節:
Is this the judgment you pronounce, this the law you establish, this you promulgate — that whoever adores your little slaves should be honored with the amplest honors, while whoever has supplicated you yourselves, the masters, should deserve the extreme punishment of the cross? 4. In the greatest cities and among the more powerful peoples, sacred rites are publicly performed to harlots once let out for hire and prostituted to common lust: there is no swelling of indignation in the gods. Temples with lofty gables have been raised on high to cats, to beetles, and to heifers: the derided powers of the divinities are silent, nor are they touched by any envy, because they behold the sanctities of vile animals set on a par with themselves. 5.
1:48
Nobis solis sunt inimici, nobis asperrimi dii hostes, quia patrem veneramur illorum, per quem, si sunt, esse et habere substantiam sui nominis maiestatisque coeperunt, a quo ipsam deitatem, ut ita dicam, sortiti esse sentiunt et in rerum numero recognoscunt, cuius voluntate et arbitrio et interire et solvi nec solvi possunt nec interire? 6. Nam si omnes concedimus unum esse principem solum, quem nulla res alia vetustate temporis antecedat, post illum necesse est cuncta et nata esse et prodita et in sui nom et prodita et in sui nominis prosiluisse naturam. 7. Quod si fixum et ratum est, erit nobis consequens confiteri et deos esse nativos et a principe rerum fonte ortus sui originem ducere.
唯獨向我們,諸神是仇敵;唯獨向我們,諸神是最尖刻的對頭,只因我們敬奉他們的父——若他們果真存在,他們也是藉祂才開始存在、才擁有自身名號與威嚴的實質;可謂正是從祂,他們才感到自己領得了神性,並認出自己在受造之物之列;憑祂的意旨與抉擇,他們既會消亡、也會消解,然而卻既不能被消解、也不能消亡?第六節:因為,若我們眾人都承認只有一位獨一的元首,沒有任何別物在時間的久遠上先於祂,那麼在祂之後,一切必然都是被生出、被產生的,並躍入其自身名號的本性之中。第七節:而若這是確定不易的,我們就必然要承認:連諸神也是被生出的,並從那作為萬物根源的元首那裡引出他們起初的源頭。
To us alone are they hostile, to us are the gods most bitter enemies, because we venerate their Father — through whom, if they exist, they have begun to be and to have the substance of their own name and majesty, from whom, so to speak, they feel that they have obtained their very deity and recognize themselves in the number of created things, by whose will and choice they both perish and are dissolved, and yet can neither be dissolved nor perish? 6. For if we all concede that there is one sole Prince, whom no other thing precedes in the antiquity of time, after Him it must needs be that all things have been both born and brought forth and have leapt forth into the nature of their own name. 7. And if this is fixed and settled, it will be consequent for us to confess that even the gods are born, and that they derive the origin of their beginning from the Prince, the fountain of things.
1:49
Qui si sunt nativi et geniti, et interitionibus utique periculisque vicini. 8. ''At enim esse creduntur immortales, perpetui et nullius umquam participes finis''. - Ergo istud munus dei patris et donum est, ut infinita meruerint idem esse per saecula, cum sint labiles solubilesque natura. 29.1. Atque utinam daretur, in unius speciem contionis toto orbe contracto, oratione hac uti et humani in generis | f. 10b | audientia conlocari. 2. Ergone impiae religionis sumus apud vos rei et, quod caput rerum et columen venerabilibus adimus obsequiis, ut convicio utamur vestro, infausti et athei nuncupamur? 3.
而若他們是被生、被產出的,他們無疑也就近於毀滅與危險。第八節:你們說:「但他們被信為不死的、永存的、不分享任何終結。」——那麼,這正是神父的恩賜與慷慨,使他們配得歷經無盡世代仍是同一,儘管他們本性脆弱易消解。第二十九章第一節:但願能有機會,讓全世界聚成一場集會的模樣,讓我發表這番言辭,置身於全人類的聽聞之中。第二節:那麼,在你們眼中,我們竟是犯了不敬虔宗教之罪嗎?只因我們以可敬的順服親近那萬物的元首與棟樑,就(借用你們自己的辱罵)被稱為不祥者與無神論者嗎?第三節:
And if they are born and begotten, they are assuredly also near to destructions and perils. 8. 'But,' you say, 'they are believed to be immortal, everlasting, and sharing in no end whatever.' — Then this is the gift and bounty of God the Father, that they have merited to be the same throughout unending ages, though by nature they are frail and dissoluble. 29.1. And would that it were granted, with the whole world gathered into the likeness of one assembly, to use this address and to be placed within the hearing of the human race. 2. Are we, then, in your eyes guilty of an impious religion, and, because we approach the Head and pillar of things with venerable submissions, are we called (to use your own reproach) ill-omened and atheists? 3.
1:50
Et quis magis rectius horum feret invidiam nominum, quam qui alium prae hoc deum aut novit aut sciscitatur aut credit? 4. Nonne huic omnes debemus hoc ipsum primum, quod sumus, quod esse homines dicimur, quod ab eo vel missae animae vel lapsae caecitate huius in corporis continemur? non quod incedimus, quod spiramus et vivimus, ab eo ad nos venit vi que ipsa vivendi efficit nos esse et animali agitatione motari? 5. Nonne ab hoc effluunt causae, per quas nostra fulcitur salus variarum munificentia voluptatum? Mundus iste in quo degitis, cuius est aut quis eius vobis attribuit fructum possessionemque retinere? 6.
還有誰比那寧可認識、尋求或信仰某位別的神而非這獨一者的人,更該當承受這些名號的憎惡呢?第四節:我們豈非都虧欠祂這首要之事——即我們得以存在、得以被稱為人、得以被祂維繫在一起,無論作為被差遣而來的靈魂,抑或因這肉身的盲目而墮落的靈魂?我們得以行動、呼吸、存活,豈非都是從祂臨到我們?祂豈非正以那生命的能力,使我們得以存在、被動物性的活動所推動?第五節:那藉種種歡愉之恩澤來扶持我們福祉的諸般緣由,豈非都從祂流出?你們所居的這世界,是屬誰的?又是誰賜你們保有它的享用與佔有?第六節:
And who more rightly shall bear the odium of these names than he who either knows, or seeks after, or believes in some other god in preference to this One? 4. Do we not all owe to Him this very first thing, that we are, that we are called men, that by Him we are held together, whether as souls sent forth or fallen through the blindness of this body? Does it not come to us from Him that we move, that we breathe and live, and by that very power of living does He not bring it about that we exist and are stirred by animal motion? 5. Do not the causes flow from Him by which our welfare is upheld with the bounty of various pleasures? This world in which you live — whose is it, or who has granted you to retain the enjoyment and possession of it? 6.
1:51
quis, ut subiectas res cernere, ut contrectare, ut considerare possetis, publicum istud lumen dedit? quis, ne fixa pigritiae stupore torpescerent elementa vitalia, solis ignes constituit ad rerum incrementa futuros? 7. Solem deum cum esse credatis, conditorem eius opificemque non quaeritis? Luna cum apud vos dea sit, non similiter scire curatis genitor eius et fabricator quis sit? 30.1.
是誰,為使你們能辨識、觸摸、思量那置於下界之物,賜下這公共的光?是誰,唯恐那賦予生命的諸元素在遲鈍的麻木中僵化凍結,設立了太陽的火焰,注定要促成萬物的滋長?第七節:既然你們相信太陽是神,你們豈不追問祂的創立者與製造者?既然月亮在你們中間是女神,你們豈不同樣留心去認識她的生育者與塑造者?第三十章第一節:
Who, that you might discern the things placed beneath, that you might touch and consider them, gave this public light? Who, lest the vital elements should grow numb, fixed fast in the torpor of sluggishness, established the fires of the sun, destined for the increase of things? 7. Since you believe the Sun to be a god, do you not inquire after his Founder and Maker? Since among you the Moon is a goddess, do you not likewise take care to know who is her Begetter and Fashioner? 30.1.
1:52
Nonne cogitatio vos subit considerare, disquirere in cuia possessione versemini, cuia in re sitis, cuius ista sit quam fatigatis terra, cuius aer iste quem vitali reciprocatis spiritu, cuius abutamini fontibus, cuius liquore, quis ventorum disposuerit flamina, quis undosas excogitaverit nubes, quis se| f.11 |minum frugiferas potestates rationum proprietate distinxerit? 2. Apollo vobis pluit, Mercurius vobis pluit, Aesculapius, Hercules aut Diana rationem imbrium tempestatumque finxerunt? et hoc fieri qui potest, cum in mundo profiteamini eos natos certoque tempore sensum adripuisse vitalem? 3.
難道你們心中竟不生念頭,去思量、探究:你們住在誰的產業中、置身於誰的所有物內,你們所耗損的這大地是誰的,你們以維生之氣一呼一吸的這空氣是誰的,你們所用的是誰的泉水、誰的水液,是誰安排了諸風的吹拂,是誰構想了翻湧的雲層,是誰以其各自法度的特性區分了種子那結果的能力?第二節:是阿波羅為你們降雨,還是墨丘利為你們降雨?是阿斯克勒庇俄斯、赫拉克勒斯,還是狄安娜塑造了雨與風暴的規律?既然你們承認他們是在此世界中出生、於某一固定時刻才獲得維生之知覺,這事又怎能發生呢?第三節:
Does not the thought come upon you to consider and inquire in whose possession you dwell, in whose property you are, whose is this earth which you weary, whose is this air which you draw back and forth with your vital breath, whose fountains you use, whose liquid, who has arranged the blasts of the winds, who has devised the billowing clouds, who has distinguished the fruit-bearing powers of the seeds with the proper character of their reckonings? 2. Does Apollo rain for you, does Mercury rain for you; have Aesculapius, Hercules, or Diana fashioned the plan of rains and storms? And how can this be, since you profess that in the world they were born and at a fixed time took up their vital consciousness? 3.
1:53
Si enim temporis antiquitate mundus eos antevenit et, priusquam nati sunt, iam noverat pluvias tempestatesque natura, nullum serius nati pluendi ius habent neque eis inserere rationibus se possunt quas invenerunt hic agi et maiore ab auctore tractari. 31.1. O maxime, o summe rerum invisibilium procreator, o ipse invisus et nullis umquam conprehense naturis, dignus, dignus es vere, si modo te dignum mortali dicendum est ore cui spirans omnis intelligensque natura et habere et agere numquam desinat gratias, cui tota conveniat vita genu nixo procumbere et continuatis precibus supplicare. 2.
因為,若世界在時間的久遠上勝過他們,且在他們出生之前,大自然已然知曉雨與風暴,那麼那些後來出生者就無權降雨,也無法把自己插入那些他們發現早已在此運作、且由一位更偉大的創始者所掌理的體系之中。第三十一章第一節:至大者啊,不可見之萬物的至高創生者啊!祢自身不可見、從未被任何本性所領會!祢實在是配得的、配得的——倘若祢竟該被凡人之口稱為配得——即凡有氣息、有理智的本性,都當永不止息地既懷有、又向祢獻上感謝;全部的生命都當合宜地屈膝俯伏,以不斷的禱告向祢祈求。第二節:
For if the world surpasses them in the antiquity of time, and, before they were born, nature already knew rains and storms, then those born later have no right to make rain, nor can they insert themselves into those systems which they found already at work here and being administered by a greater Author. 31.1. O greatest, O supreme Procreator of things invisible! O Thou Thyself unseen and never comprehended by any natures! Worthy, worthy art Thou in truth — if only Thou must be called worthy by a mortal mouth — that every breathing and intelligent nature should never cease both to hold and to render Thee thanks; to Whom the whole of life should fittingly fall down on bended knee and supplicate with unbroken prayers. 2.
1:54
Prima enim tu causa es, locus rerum ac spatium, fundamentum cunctorum quaecumque sunt, infinitus, ingenitus, inmortalis, perpetuus, solus, quem nulla deliniat forma corporalis, nulla determinat circumscriptio, qualitatis expers, quantitatis, sine situ, motu et habitu, de quo nihil dici et exprimi mortalium potis est significatione verborum, qui ut intellegaris tacendum est atque, ut per umbram te possit errans investigare suspicio, nihil est omnino muttiendum. 3. Da ueniam, rex summe, tuos persequentibus | f. 11b | famulos et - quod tuae benignitatis est proprium - fugientibus ignosce tui nominis et religionis cultum. Non est mirum, si ignoraris: maioris est admirationis, si sciaris;
因為祢是第一因,是萬物的場所與空間,是凡存在之一切的根基——無限、無始、不死、永恆、獨一,無任何形體之形可勾勒祢,無任何界限可框限祢,無性質、無數量、無方位、無運動與姿態;論到祢,凡人無法藉言語的意義說出或表達甚麼;為使祢被領會,就當緘默;為使迷茫的臆測能藉一道陰影追尋祢,論到祢就當毫不出聲。第三節:至高的君王啊,求祢寬恕那逼迫祢僕人的人,並——如祢慈愛之所宜——赦免那逃避敬拜祢之名與宗教的人。祢若不被認識,這並不足為奇;祢若被認識,那才更為奇妙;
For Thou art the First Cause, the place and space of things, the foundation of all things whatsoever that are, infinite, unbegotten, immortal, everlasting, sole, whom no bodily form delineates, whom no circumscription bounds, devoid of quality, of quantity, without place, motion, and disposition, concerning whom nothing can be said or expressed by mortals through the signification of words; who, that Thou mayest be understood, must be kept in silence, and, that erring conjecture may track Thee through a shadow, of whom nothing at all must be muttered. 3. Grant pardon, O supreme King, to those who persecute Thy servants, and — as is proper to Thy kindness — forgive those who flee the worship of Thy name and religion. It is no wonder if Thou art unknown: it is a matter of greater wonder if Thou art known;
1:55
nisi forte audet quisquam - hoc enim furiosae restat insaniae - ambigere, dubitare an sit iste deus an non sit, explorata fidei veritate an rumoris cassi opinatione sit creditus. 4. Audimus enim quosdam philosophandi studio deditos partim ullam negare vim esse divinam, partim an sit cotidie quaerere; alios casibus fortuitis et concursionibus temerariis summam rerum construere atque diversitatis impetu fabricari, cum quibus hoc tempore nullum nobis omnino super tali erit obstinatione certamen. 5. Aiunt enim sana sentientes contradicere rebus stultis stultitiae esse maioris. 32.1.
除非偶有人膽敢——這正是狂亂之瘋病所僅存的——去躊躇懷疑這位神究竟存在與否,究竟祂是憑經考驗的信德之真理而被信仰,抑或憑空洞謠言的臆測而被相信。第四節:因為我們聽說,某些沉迷於哲學研究的人,一部分否認有任何神聖的權能,一部分則天天追問究竟有沒有;另一些人則以偶然的機遇與魯莽的碰撞來構建萬物的總和,藉紛雜的衝動加以捏造——對於他們這般的執拗,此刻我們毫不與之爭辯。第五節:因為凡思慮健全者都說,與愚昧之事爭辯乃是更大愚昧的標記。第三十二章第一節:
unless perchance someone dares — for this is what remains to frenzied madness — to hesitate and doubt whether this God exists or not, and whether He has been believed in through the tested truth of faith or through the opinion of empty rumor. 4. For we hear that certain men, given to the study of philosophizing, partly deny that there is any divine power, partly daily ask whether there is; while others construct the sum of things out of fortuitous chances and rash collisions and fabricate it by the impulse of diversity — with whom at this time we shall have no contest at all over such obstinacy. 5. For those who think soundly say that to contradict foolish things is a mark of greater folly. 32.1.
1:56
Sermo cum his nobis est, qui divinum esse consentientes genus de maioribus dubitant, cum idem esse plebeia atque humiliora fateantur. Quid ergo, res tantas argumentis nitemur atque elaborabimus obtinere? Discedat haec longe atque a nobis procul, procul inquam, ut dicitur, averruncetur amentia. 2. Tam est enim periculosum argumentis adgredi deum principem conprobare quam ratione huiusmodi esse illum velle cognoscere. Nec quicquam refert aut discrepat, utrumne neges illum an asseras atque existere fatearis, cum in eadem culpa sit et adsertio talis rei et abnegatio refutatoris increduli. 33.1. Quisquamne est hominum qui non cum istius principis notione diem primae nativitatis intraverit?
我們的論述是針對那些人的——他們雖同意諸神之族是神聖的,卻對那些更大的神心存疑惑,因他們承認這些神同樣是平庸而較卑微的。那又如何呢?我們難道要靠論證來竭力費心維護如此重大之事嗎?願這遠遠離開我們——我說,遠遠地,如俗語所言,願這瘋狂被驅除。第二節:因為,以論證來著手證明作為元首的神,其危險程度,正如想憑此類推理去認識祂存在一樣。無論你否認祂,抑或斷言並承認祂存在,都毫無差別、毫無出入,因為這樣斷言一事,與一個不信之駁斥者的否認,同落於相同的過失之下。第三十三章第一節:世人中豈有誰,不是懷著對這位元首的觀念而踏入他初生之日的?
Our discourse is with those who, while agreeing that the race of gods is divine, doubt about the greater ones, since they confess that these same are plebeian and of a humbler sort. What then? Shall we strive and labor to maintain matters so great by arguments? Far, far away let this depart from us — far, I say, as the saying goes, let this madness be averted. 2. For it is as dangerous to approach the proving of God the Prince by arguments as it is to wish to know by reasoning of this kind that He exists. Nor does it make any difference or discrepancy whether you deny Him or assert Him and confess that He exists, since both such assertion of a thing and the denial of an incredulous refuter lie under the same fault. 33.1. Is there any of mankind who has not entered the day of his first birth with the notion of this Prince?
1:57
cui non sit ingenitum, non adfixum, immo ipsis | f. 12 | paene in genitalibus matris non inpressum, non insitum esse regem ac dominum cunctorum quaecumque sunt moderatorem? 2. Ipsa denique hiscere si animantia muta potuissent, si in linguarum nostrarum facilitatem solvi, immo si arbores glaebae, saxa, sensu animata vitali, vocis sonitum quirent et verborum articulos integrare, ita non, duce natura et magistra, non incorruptae simplicitatis fide et intellegerent esse deum et cunctorum dominum solum esse clamarent? 34.1.
在誰裡面,這觀念不是與生俱來、不是牢牢貼附的,甚至幾乎在母親的生育之處便印刻、栽植於他——即:有一位君王與主宰,是凡存在之萬物的治理者?第二節:簡言之,那些啞口的生靈若能張口說話,若能被鬆解而具備我們舌頭的靈便——不,即便樹木、土塊、岩石,被賦予生命的知覺,能發出聲音、拼合出言語的音節——難道它們不會以大自然為其嚮導與導師,憑一種未受敗壞的純樸之誠信,既領悟神存在,又高呼唯獨祂是萬物之主嗎?第三十四章第一節:
In whom is it not inborn, not affixed, nay, almost impressed and implanted upon him in the very generative parts of his mother, that there is a King and Lord, the Governor of all things whatsoever that are? 2. In short, if the dumb living creatures themselves could gape open in speech, if they could be loosed into the facility of our tongues — nay, if trees, clods, rocks, animated with vital sense, could produce the sound of a voice and articulate the joints of words — would they not, with nature as their guide and mistress, in the good faith of an uncorrupted simplicity, both understand that God exists and cry out that He alone is Lord of all things? 34.1.
1:58
''Sed frustra, inquit, nos falso et calumnioso incessitis et adpetitis crimine, tamquam eamus infitias esse deum maiorem, cum a nobis et Iuppiter nominetur et optimus habeatur et maximus cumque illi augustissimas sedes et Capitolia constituerimus immania''. 2. - Dissimilia copulare atque in unam speciem cogere inducta confusione conamini. Nam deus omnipotens mente una omnium et communi mortalitatis adsensu neque genitus scitur neque novam in lucem aliquando esse prolatus nec ex aliquo temporis puncto coepisse esse vel saeculo. 3. Ipse est enim fons rerum, sator saeculorum ac temporum. Non enim ipsa per se sunt sed ex eius perpetuitate perpetua et infinita semper continuatione procedunt. 4.
有人說:「但你們是徒然以虛假而毀謗的罪名攻擊我們,彷彿我們竟企圖否認有一位更大的神——既然朱庇特被我們稱名,並被視為至善至大者,且我們為他設立了最莊嚴的殿座與宏偉的卡皮托利神廟。」第二節:——你們企圖把不相類之物耦合起來,並以你們所引入的混淆,硬把它們逼成同一模樣。因為,憑眾人同一的心智、憑全人類共同的同意,那全能的神被公認為:既非被生出,也從未被產入某道新光之中,更不曾從時間或世代的任何一點開始存在。第三節:因為祂自己乃是萬物的根源、諸世代與諸時間的播種者。因為這些並非憑自身而存在,而是從祂的永恆中發出,永恆而無限,以永不間斷的接續而行進。第四節:
'But in vain,' one says, 'do you assail and attack us with a false and slanderous charge, as though we went about to deny that there is a greater God, since by us Jupiter is both named and held to be best and greatest, and since to him we have established most august seats and the immense Capitols.' 2. — You attempt to couple unlike things and to force them, with the confusion you have introduced, into one appearance. For God the Almighty is known, by the one mind of all and by the common assent of mortality, neither to have been begotten nor ever to have been brought forth into a new light, nor to have begun to be from any point of time or age. 3. For He Himself is the fount of things, the sower of ages and of times. For these do not exist of themselves, but from His perpetuity they proceed, perpetual and infinite, in ever-continued succession. 4.
1:59
At vero Iuppiter, ut vos fertis, et patrem habet et matrem, avos, avias, fratres; nunc nuper in utero matris suae formatus, absolutus mensibus et consummatus decem ignotam sibi in lucem sensu inruisse vitali. 5. Ergo, si haec ita sunt, Iuppiter esse deus qui potest, cum illum esse perpetuum constet, perhibeatur alter a vobis | f. 12b | et dies habuisse natales et pavefactus re nova lamentabilem extulisse vagitum? 35.1. Sed sint, ut vultis, unum nec in aliqua vi numinis et maiestate distantes: et quid ergo iniustis persequimini nos odiis? Quid ut ominis pessimi nostri nominis inhorrescitis mentionem, si quem deum colitis, eum et nos?
但朱庇特,據你們所述,既有父有母,有祖父、祖母、兄弟;他不久前才在母胎中成形,足十月而完成,帶著維生的知覺衝入一道他所不識的光。第五節:那麼,若這些事屬實,朱庇特怎能是神呢?既然公認那位神是永恆的,而這一位據你們自己所稱,既有生日,又因新奇的境況受了驚嚇、發出可憐的啼哭?第三十五章第一節:但就照你們所願,讓他們是同一位,在神性與威嚴的任何能力上並無差異罷:那你們為何以不義的仇恨逼迫我們?你們若敬拜的那位神我們也同樣敬拜,你們又為何一聽見我們的名字便如聞最惡之兆而戰慄?
But Jupiter, as you relate, has both a father and a mother, grandfathers, grandmothers, brothers; but lately, formed in the womb of his mother, completed and finished in ten months, he rushed forth with vital sense into a light unknown to him. 5. Therefore, if these things are so, how can Jupiter be a god, since it is agreed that He is everlasting, while the other is alleged by you both to have had a birthday and, terrified by the new circumstance, to have uttered a pitiable wailing? 35.1. But let them be, as you wish, one, and not differing in any force of divine power and majesty: why then do you persecute us with unjust hatreds? Why do you shudder at the mention of our name as of the worst omen, if you worship as a god the very one whom we too worship?
1:60
Aut quid in eadem causa vobis esse contenditis familiares deos, inimicos atque infestissimos nobis? 2. Etenim si una religio est nobis vobisque communis, cessat ira caelestium: sin nobis infesti sint solis, manifestum est nescire et vos et illos deum, quem Iovem non esse ipsis clarum est indignationibus numinum. 36.1. ''Sed non, inquit, idcirco dii vobis infesti sunt, quod omnipotentem colatis deum, sed quod hominem natum et, quod personis infame est vilibus, crucis supplicio interemptum et deum fuisse contenditis et superesse adhuc creditis et cotidianis supplicationibus adoratis''. 2.
又或者,你們為何主張:在同一事由上,諸神對你們友善,卻對我們是仇敵、是最兇惡的對頭?第二節:因為,若我們與你們有一個共同的宗教,天上諸神的怒氣便止息了;但若他們唯獨對我們懷有敵意,那就顯然:無論你們還是他們都不認識神——而從諸神明的憤慨本身就清楚看出,這神並非朱庇特。第三十六章第一節:有人說:「但諸神向你們懷有敵意,並非因你們敬拜那全能的神,而是因你們主張:一個出生了的、且——這對卑賤之人乃是奇恥——被十字架之刑處死的人,竟既是神、又仍然存活;你們相信他至今仍存在,並以每日的祈求敬拜他。」第二節:
Or why do you contend that in the same cause the gods are friendly to you but foes and most hostile to us? 2. For if there is one religion common to us and to you, the wrath of the heavenly ones ceases; but if they are hostile to us alone, it is manifest that both you and they do not know God, whom it is clear, from the very indignations of the divine powers, is not Jupiter. 36.1. 'But,' one says, 'the gods are not on that account hostile to you, because you worship the Almighty God, but because you contend that a man, born and — what is infamous to base persons — slain by the punishment of the cross, both was God and still survives, and you believe that he yet exists and adore him with daily supplications.' 2.
1:61
- Si vobis iucundum est, amici, edissertate, quinam sint hi dii, qui a nobis Christum coli suam credant ad iniuriam pertinere: Ianus Ianiculi conditor et civitatis Saturniae Saturnus auctor; Fenta Fatua, Fauni uxor, Bona Dea quae dicitur sed in vini melior et laudabilior potu; 3. Indigetes illi qui flumen repunt et in alveis Numici cum ranis et pisciculis degunt Aesculapius et Liber pater, Coronide ille natus et ex genitalibus matris alter fulmine praecipitatus; Mercurius utero fusus Maiae et, quod est divinius, candidae; 4. arquitenentes Diana et Apollo, circumlati per fugas matris atque in insulis errantibus Virtuti; Dioneia Venus proles, | f.
——朋友們,若你們樂意,就闡明一下:那些以為基督被我們敬拜乃是損及他們的神,究竟是哪些神——雅努斯,賈尼庫盧姆山的創立者,還是薩圖爾努斯,薩圖爾尼亞城的締造者;芬塔·法圖阿,法烏努斯之妻,被稱為「善女神」,卻在飲酒上更為出色、更堪稱道;第三節:那些沿河爬行、在努米庫斯河的溝渠中與蛙和小魚同住的本土神;阿斯克勒庇俄斯與父神利柏耳,前者由科洛尼斯所生,後者被雷霆從母親的生育之處擊墜;墨丘利,由邁亞的子宮所產——更顯神性的是——由一位白皙者所產;第四節:持弓的狄安娜與阿波羅,隨其母親的逃亡輾轉四方,直到那漂浮不定的「美德」之島;狄俄涅的後裔維納斯,
— If it is agreeable to you, friends, expound who these gods may be who believe that Christ is worshipped by us to their injury: Janus, the founder of the Janiculum, and Saturn, the author of the Saturnian city; Fenta Fatua, the wife of Faunus, who is called the Good Goddess but who was better and more praiseworthy in the drinking of wine; 3. those Indigetes who creep along the river and dwell in the channels of the Numicius among frogs and little fishes; Aesculapius and Father Liber, the one born of Coronis, the other hurled down from the generative parts of his mother by a thunderbolt; Mercury, poured from the womb of Maia and — what is more divine — of a fair one; 4. the bow-bearing Diana and Apollo, carried about through the flights of their mother and to the wandering islands of Virtue; the offspring of Dione, Venus,
1:62
13 | viri materfamilias Troici atque intestini decoris publicatrix; in Trinacriae finibus Ceres nata atque in floribus legendis occupata Proserpina; 5. Thebanus aut Tyrius Hercules, hic in finibus sepultus Hispaniae, flammis alter concrematus Oetaeis; Tyndaridae Castores, equos unus domitare consuetus, alter pugillator bonus et crudo inexuperabilis caestu; Titanes et Bocchores Mauri et ovorum progenies dii Syri; 6. Apis Peloponensi proditus et in Aegypto Serapis nuncupatus; Aethiopicis solibus Isis furva maerens perditum filium et membratim coniugem lancinatum;
一個特洛伊家族之人的母親,也是她自身內室恥辱的張揚者;克瑞斯,生於特里那克里亞境內,還有普洛塞庇娜,正忙於採花;第五節:底比斯的或推羅的赫拉克勒斯,前者葬於西班牙境內,後者在俄塔山的火焰中被焚燒;廷達瑞俄斯之子卡斯托爾兄弟,一個慣於馴馬,另一個是善戰的拳手、以生皮拳套無可匹敵;提坦諸神、摩爾人的博科雷斯,以及卵中所生的敘利亞諸神;第六節:阿庇斯,生於伯羅奔尼撒、在埃及被稱作塞拉庇斯;在埃塞俄比亞的烈日下,黝黑的伊西斯哀悼她失喪的兒子、被肢解得四分五裂的丈夫;
the mother of a Trojan household's man and the publisher of her own inner shame; Ceres, born within the bounds of Trinacria, and Proserpina, occupied in gathering flowers; 5. the Theban or the Tyrian Hercules, the one buried within the bounds of Spain, the other burned up in the Oetaean flames; the Tyndarid Castors, the one accustomed to break in horses, the other a good boxer and unconquerable with the raw gauntlet; the Titans and the Moorish Bocchores and the Syrian gods, offspring of eggs; 6. Apis brought forth in the Peloponnese and named Serapis in Egypt; under Ethiopian suns the swarthy Isis, mourning her lost son and her spouse mangled limb from limb;
1:63
praeterimus et transgredimus Opis suboles regias, quas in libris auctores vestri quae fuerint et quales vobis ediscentibus prodiderunt: 7. hine ergo Christum coli et a nobis accipi et existimari pro numine vulneratis accipiunt auribus, et obliti paulo ante sortis fuerint et condicionis cuius, id quod sibi concessum est inpertiri alteri nolunt? 8. Haec est iustitia caelitum, hoc deorum iudicium sanctum? Nonne istud livoris est atque avaritiae genus, non obtrectatio quaedam sordens, suas eminere tantummodo velle fortunas, aliorum res premiet in contempta humilitate calcari? 37.1. ''Natum hominem colimus''. - Quid enim, vos hominem nullum colitis natum? non unum et alium? non innumeros alios?
我們略過並越過俄普斯的王室後裔——你們的作者在書中把他們是甚麼、屬何等種類,都傳授給你們熟記:第七節:那麼,這些神竟以受傷的耳朵聽聞:基督被我們敬拜、被我們接納並視為神明;他們竟忘了不久前自己是何等身分與境況,卻不肯把賜給自己之物分給別人嗎?第八節:這就是天上諸神的公義嗎?這就是諸神神聖的判決嗎?這豈非一種嫉妒與貪婪、一種卑污的貶損——只願自己的境遇獨獨顯赫,卻要別人的地位被壓下、被踐踏於受輕蔑的卑微之中?第三十七章第一節:「我們敬拜一個出生了的人。」——那又如何?難道你們不敬拜任何出生了的人嗎?不敬拜這一個那一個嗎?不敬拜無數別人嗎?
we pass over and go beyond the royal offspring of Ops, whom your authors in their books have handed down to you as you learn by heart what they were and of what sort: 7. do these, then, receive with wounded ears that Christ is worshipped and taken by us and reckoned as a divine power, and, having forgotten a little before of what lot and condition they were, do they refuse to impart to another that which has been granted to themselves? 8. Is this the justice of the heavenly ones, this the holy judgment of the gods? Is this not a kind of envy and avarice, not a certain sordid disparagement — to wish that their own fortunes alone should stand pre-eminent, and that the estate of others should be pressed down and trampled in despised humility? 37.1. 'We worship a man that was born.' — What then? Do you worship no man that was born? Not one and another? Not countless others?
1:64
quinimmo non omnes, quos iam templis habetis vestris, mortalium sustulistis ex numero et caelo sideribusque donastis? 2. Si enim forte vos fugit, sortis eos humanae et condicionis | f. 13b | fuisse communis, replicate antiquissimas litteras et eorum scripta percurrite qui vetustati vicini sine ullis adsentationibus cuncta veritate in liquida prodiderunt. 3. Iam profecto discetis, quibus singuli patribus, quibus matribus fuerint procreati, qua innati regione, qua gente, quae fecerint egerint pertulerint actitarint, quas in rebus obeundis adversorum senserint secundantiumque fortunas. 4.
不然,你們如今在自己神廟中所有的那些神,豈非都是你們從凡人之列擢升上去、把天與眾星賜給他們的?第二節:因為,倘若你們或許忘了他們原是屬於人的命運、屬於共同的境況,就展開那最古老的記載,通讀那些貼近古代、毫無諂媚地以清晰真相傳述一切者的著作罷。第三節:那時你們必定會得知:他們各自是由何父何母所生、生於何地、屬何種族,做過、行過、忍受過、慣常從事過甚麼,並在辦理其事務時感受過何等逆境與順境的際遇。第四節:
Nay rather, have you not raised up all whom you now have in your temples out of the number of mortals, and bestowed on them heaven and the stars? 2. For if perchance it has escaped you that they were of a human lot and of a common condition, unroll the most ancient records and run through the writings of those who, being near to antiquity, handed down all things in clear truth without any flatteries. 3. Then assuredly you will learn from what fathers, from what mothers each was begotten, in what region born, of what race, what they did, performed, endured, kept busy doing, and what fortunes of adversity and of prosperity they felt in undertaking their affairs. 4.
1:65
Sin autem scientes uteris esse gestatos et frugibus eos victitasse terrenis, nihilominus tamen nobis nati hominis obiectatis cultum, res agitis satis iniustas, ut id in nobis constituatis esse damnabile quod et ipsi vos factitatis, aut quae vobis licere permittitis consimiliter aliis licitum esse nolitis. 38.1. Sed concedamus, interdum manum vestris opinationibus dantes, unum Christum fuisse de nobis, mentis animae corporis fragilitatis et condicionis unius: nonne dignus a nobis est tantorum ob munerum gratiam deus dici deus que sentiri? 2.
但若你們明知他們是被母胎所懷、靠地上果實維生,卻仍向我們投擲「敬拜一個出生了的人」之罪,那你們所行的就夠不公義了——因你們把在我們身上算為該咒詛之事,你們自己也一貫在做;又因你們不願讓別人同樣享有你們容許自己合法去做之事。第三十八章第一節:但就讓我們承認——姑且暫時遷就你們的意見——基督曾是我們中的一員,心智、靈魂、身體具有同樣的脆弱與境況:那麼,因著如此重大恩惠的恩典,祂豈不配被我們稱為神、被我們認作神嗎?第二節:
But if, knowing that they were carried in wombs and lived on the fruits of the earth, you nonetheless cast at us the worship of a born man, you do things sufficiently unjust — in that you establish that to be damnable in us which you yourselves also constantly practice, or in that you are unwilling that it should be permitted to others in like manner what you allow to be lawful for yourselves. 38.1. But let us concede — for the moment lending a hand to your opinions — that Christ was one of us, of a single frailty and condition of mind, soul, and body: is He not worthy, on account of the grace of such great benefits, to be called by us a god and to be perceived as a god? 2.
1:66
Si enim vos Liberum, quod usum reppererit vini, si quod panis, Cererem, si Aesculapium, quod herbarum, si Minervam, quod oleae, si Triptolemum, quod aratri, si denique Herculem, quod feras, quod fures, quod multiplicium capitum superavit conpescuitque natrices, divorum retulistis in censum: 3. honoribus quantis adficiendus est nobis, qui ab erroribus nos magnis insinuata veritate traduxit, qui velut caecos passim ac sine ullo rectore gra| f. l4 |dientes ab deruptis, ab deviis locis planioribus reddidit: 4. qui, quod frugiferum primo atque humano generi salutare, deus monstravit quid sit, quis, quantus et qualis:
因為,你們既把利柏耳列入諸神名冊——因他發現了酒的用途;把克瑞斯列入——因她發現了麵包;把阿斯克勒庇俄斯列入——因草藥;把彌涅耳瓦列入——因橄欖;把特里普托勒摩斯列入——因犁;末了把赫拉克勒斯列入——因他制伏並鎮壓了野獸、盜賊與多頭的水蛇:第三節:那麼,那位藉傳授真理引領我們脫離重大謬誤者,該當受我們何等的尊榮呢——祂把我們這彷彿盲目地四處遊蕩、毫無嚮導者,從斷崖與無路之地帶回較平坦之處:第四節:祂顯明了甚麼是那對人類有益、且從起初便帶來救恩的——神:祂是誰、何等偉大、屬何等性質:
For if you have entered into the register of the gods Liber, because he discovered the use of wine; Ceres, because of that of bread; Aesculapius, because of that of herbs; Minerva, because of that of the olive; Triptolemus, because of that of the plow; and finally Hercules, because he overcame and subdued wild beasts, thieves, and the many-headed water-snakes: 3. with how great honors ought He to be endowed by us who, by imparting the truth, has led us away from great errors; who has restored us — wandering, as it were, blindly here and there and without any guide — from broken and pathless places to more level ground: 4. who has shown what that is which is fruitful and, from the beginning, salutary to the human race — God: who He is, how great, and of what sort:
1:67
qui profundas eius atque inenarrabiles altitudines, quantum nostra quivit mediocritas capere, et intellegere permisit et docuit: 5. qui quo auctore, quo patre mundus iste sit constitutus et conditus, fecit benignissime sciri: qui nativitatis eius exprompsit genus et nullius aliquando cognitione praesumptam materiam illius, unde ignibus solis genitalis fervor adscitur, cur luna semper in motu, isdemne quis creditur an aliis causis lucem semper atque obscuritatem resumens; 6.
祂容許我們得以領會,並教導我們——就我們的平庸所能領受的限度——關於祂那深邃莫測、無法言喻的深奧;第五節:祂極其慈愛地使人得知:這世界是由何等的創始者、何等的父所構成、所奠立;祂陳明了世界誕生的方式,以及它那從未經任何人的知識所推測過的質料——太陽生成之熱是從何處被引向其火焰,月亮為何總在運行,它究竟是憑同樣的還是別的緣由被認為總在恢復光明與幽暗;第六節:
who permitted us both to understand and taught us — so far as our mediocrity was able to grasp — the profound and unutterable depths of Him; 5. who most kindly caused it to be known by what Author, by what Father this world was constituted and founded; who set forth the manner of its birth, and its matter, never before presumed by anyone's knowledge — whence the generative heat of the sun is drawn to its fires, why the moon is always in motion, whether by the same or by other causes it is believed always to resume light and darkness; 6.
1:68
animalium origo quae sit, rationes quas habent semina, quis ipsum finxerit hominem, quis informarit vel ex materiae quo genere constructionem ipsam confirmaverit corporum, quid sit sensus, quid anima, advolaritne ad nos sponte an cum ipsis sata sit et procreata visceribus, mortis particeps degat an inmortalitatis perpetuitate donata sit, qui status nos maneat, cum dissolutis abierimus a membris, visurine nos sumus an memoriam nullam nostri sensus et recordationem habituri; 7. qui adrogantiam constringit nostram et elatas supercilio cervices modum fecit suae infirmitatis agnoscere:
動物的起源是甚麼,種子所具有的原理是甚麼,是誰塑造了人自身,是誰使他成形,或祂是從何等質料確立了身體本身的構造;甚麼是知覺,甚麼是靈魂,靈魂是自願飛臨我們,抑或是與內臟一同被播種、被生育;靈魂是作為死亡的分享者而活,抑或已被賦予不朽的永恆;當我們消解、離開肢體之後,甚麼樣的狀態在等候我們——我們究竟要看見,抑或再無對自身與我們知覺的記憶與回想;第七節:祂約束我們的傲慢,使我們那高揚著自負眉宇的頸項,承認自身軟弱的限度:
what the origin of animals is, what the principles are that the seeds possess, who fashioned man himself, who formed him, or from what kind of matter He confirmed the very construction of bodies; what sense is, what the soul is, whether it flew to us of its own accord or was sown and procreated together with the very inward parts; whether it lives as a partaker of death or has been endowed with the perpetuity of immortality; what state awaits us when, dissolved, we shall have departed from our limbs — whether we are going to see, or shall have no memory and recollection of ourselves and our consciousness; 7. who binds fast our arrogance and has made our necks, lifted up with haughty brow, acknowledge the measure of their own weakness:
1:69
qui animantia monstravit informia nos esse, vanis opinionibus fidere, nihil comprehensum habere, nihil scire et quae nostros | f. 14b | sita sunt ante oculos non videre; 8. qui, quod omnia superavit et transgressum est munera, ab religionibus nos falsis religionem transduxit ad veram: qui ab signis inertibus atque ex vilissimo formatis luto ad sidera sublevavit et caelum et cum domino rerum deo supplicationum fecit verba atque orationum conloquia miscere. 39.1. Venerabar, o caecitas, nuper simulacra modo ex fornacibus prompta, in incudibus deos et ex malleis fabricatos, elephantorum ossa, picturas, veternosis in arboribus taenias;
祂顯明了:我們是毫無定形的生靈,我們信賴虛妄的意見,我們毫無真正領會之物,甚麼也不知道,連擺在我們眼前之物也看不見;第八節:祂——這超越並勝過一切恩賜的——把我們從虛假的宗教引渡到真正的宗教:祂把我們從那些惰性的偶像、從那些以最卑賤的泥土所塑之物,提升到眾星與天上,並使我們得以將祈求的言語、禱告的交談,與那作萬物之主的神相交融。第三十九章第一節:盲目啊,我從前敬奉那些剛從熔爐取出的偶像、鐵砧上的諸神、以鐵錘打造之物、象骨、畫像,以及老樹上纏繫的束帶;
who showed that we are shapeless living creatures, that we trust in vain opinions, that we grasp nothing comprehended, know nothing, and do not see the things that are set before our eyes; 8. who — that which surpassed and went beyond all gifts — led us over from false religions to the true religion: who raised us up from inert signs and things fashioned out of the vilest mud to the stars and heaven, and made us mingle words of supplication and the converse of prayers with God the Lord of things. 39.1. I used to venerate, O blindness, but lately the images just brought forth from furnaces, gods upon the anvils and fabricated out of hammers, the bones of elephants, paintings, and fillets on aged trees;
1:70
si quando conspexeram lubricatum lapidem et ex olivi unguine sordidatum, tamquam inesset vis praesens, adulabar, adfabar et beneficia poscebam nihil sentiente de trunco, et eos ipsos divos, quos esse mihi persuaseram, adficiebam contumeliis gravibus, cum eos esse credebam ligna lapides atque ossa aut in huius modi rerum habitare materia. 2. Nunc doctore tanto in vias veritatis inductus omnia ista quae sint scio, digna de dignis sentio, contumeliam nomini nullam facio divino, et quid cuique debeatur vel personae vel capiti, inconfusis gradibus atque auctoritatibus tribuo. 3.
每當我看見一塊被油膏磨光、又被橄欖油污穢的石頭時,我便諂媚它、對它說話、向它乞求恩惠,彷彿其中有一種現存的能力,其實那不過是一段毫無知覺的木頭;而那些我自己說服自己相信其存在的神明,我卻以嚴厲的辱罵加以冒犯,因為我相信它們不過是木頭、石頭與骨頭,或住在這類物質之中。二、如今,藉著如此偉大的一位導師,被引入真理之路,我明白這一切究竟是甚麼,我以相稱的態度判斷相稱之事,我對神聖的名絕不加以任何冒犯,凡各自當得的——無論是就位格或就其首位——我都按照不混淆的等級與權柄予以歸屬。三、
Whenever I had caught sight of a stone made smooth and grimy with the anointing of oil, I fawned upon it and addressed it, as though a present power dwelt within, and I begged favours from a block that felt nothing; and those very gods, whom I had persuaded myself existed, I assailed with grievous insults, since I believed them to be wood, stones, and bones, or to dwell in matter of that kind. 2. Now, led into the paths of truth by so great a Teacher, I know what all these things are, I judge worthy things of what is worthy, I offer no insult to the divine name, and what is owed to each, whether to person or to head, I assign by unconfused ranks and authorities. 3.
1:71
Ita ergo Christus non habeatur a nobis deus neque omni alioquin qui vel maximus potest excogitari divinitatis adficiatur cultu, a quo iamdudum tanta et accepimus dona viventes et expectamus, dies cum venerit, ampliora? 40.1. ''Sed patibulo adfixus interiit''. - Quid istud ad causam? Neque enim qualitas et deformitas mortis dicta eius immutat aut facta, aut eo minor videbitur disciplinarum eius auctoritas, | f. 15 | quia vinculis corporis non naturali dissolutione digressus est sed vi inlata decessit. 2. Pythagoras Samius suspicione dominationis iniusta vivus concrematus in fano est: numquid ea quae docuit vim propriam perdiderunt, quia non spiritum sponte sed crudelitate adpetitus effudit?
那麼,基督難道就因此不被我們視為神、不配受那至上神性的一切敬拜嗎?——連比祂更偉大的神性都無法設想;而我們早已從祂——並且是在活著的時候——領受了如此大的恩賜,並且盼望當那日子來到時領受更豐盛的。四十·一、「可是祂被釘在十字架上而死了。」——這與問題何干?因為祂死亡的方式與恥辱既不改變祂所說的話、也不改變祂所行的事;祂教訓的權威也不會因此顯得較小,因為祂離開肉體的束縛並非出於自然的分解,而是因外加的暴力而離世。二、薩摩斯的畢達哥拉斯,因被人不公地懷疑圖謀專制,而被活活燒死在一座神廟裡:他所教導的道理難道因為他不是自願、而是遭殘忍暴力奪去性命,就失去了其本身的力量嗎?
Shall Christ then, on this account, not be held by us to be God, nor be honoured with all the worship of that divinity than which nothing greater can even be conceived — He from whom, long since and while yet living, we have received such great gifts, and from whom, when the day shall come, we look for greater still? 40.1. 'But He was fastened to a gibbet and perished.' — What has that to do with the case? For neither the manner nor the disgrace of His death alters His words or His deeds, nor will the authority of His teachings seem the less because He departed from the bonds of the body not by a natural dissolution but withdrew through violence brought upon Him. 2. Pythagoras of Samos was burned alive in a shrine on an unjust suspicion of aiming at tyranny: did the things he taught lose their proper force because he poured out his spirit not willingly but assailed by cruelty?
1:72
3. Similiter Socrates civitatis suae iudicio damnatus capitali adfectus est poena: numquid inrita facta sunt quae sunt ab eo de moribus virtutibus et officiis disputata, quia iniuria expulsus e vita est? 4. Innumerabiles alii gloria et virtute et existimatione pollentes acerbissimarum mortium experti sunt formas, ut Aquilius Trebonius Gegulus: numquid idcirco post vitam iudicati sunt turpes, quia non publica lege fatorum sed mortis asperrimo genere lacerati excruciatique perierunt? 5. Nemo umquam innocens male interemptus infamis est, nec turpitudinis alicuius conmaculatur nota, qui non suo merito poenas graves sed cruciatoris perpetitur saevitatem. 41.1.
三、同樣地,蘇格拉底被自己城邦的判決定了罪,受了死刑:他所論述關於品德、德行與義務的道理,難道因為他被不公地逐出生命之外,就成了虛空嗎?四、還有無數其他在榮譽、德行與聲望上卓越的人,都嘗過最痛苦的各種死法——例如阿奎利烏斯、特雷波尼烏斯、雷古盧斯:他們難道就因此在死後被判為卑劣,因為他們被撕裂、被折磨而死,不是照命運的公法,而是死於最殘酷的死法嗎?五、凡是無辜卻被惡意殺害的人,從不因此蒙羞,也不沾染任何恥辱的印記——他所受的重刑並非出於自己應得,而是出於行刑者的殘暴。四十一·一、
3. In like manner Socrates, condemned by the judgment of his own city, suffered capital punishment: are the things he discoursed upon concerning morals, virtues, and duties made void because he was unjustly driven out of life? 4. Countless others, strong in glory, virtue, and repute, experienced the forms of most bitter deaths — such as Aquilius, Trebonius, Regulus: were they on that account judged base after life, because they perished torn and tortured not by the public law of the fates but by a most cruel kind of death? 5. No innocent man ever slain wickedly is held in ill repute, nor is he stained with the mark of any disgrace who endures grievous penalties not by his own deserving but through the savagery of his tormentor. 41.1.
1:73
Et tamen, o isti, qui hominem nos eolere morte functum ignominiosa ridetis, nonne Liberum et vos patrem membratim ab Titanis dissipatum fanorum consecratione mactatis? 2. non ne Aesculapium medicaminum repertorem, post poenas et supplicia fulminis, custodem nuncupavistis et praesidem sanitatis valetudinis et salutis? 3. nonne ipsum Herculem magnum sacrificiis hostiis et ture invitatis incenso, quem ipsi vos fertis vivum arsisse [post poenas] et concrematum in funestis busticetis? 4. nonne illum Attin Phrygem | f.15b | abscisum et spoliatum viro magnae matris in adytis deum propitium, deum sanctum Gallorum conclamatione testamini? 5.
然而,你們這些嘲笑我們敬拜一位死於恥辱的人的人啊,你們自己豈不是藉著建廟奉祀,把被提坦諸神肢解成碎片的自由之父(利柏爾)奉為神嗎?二、你們豈不是把藥物的發明者埃斯庫拉庇烏斯——在他受了懲罰、遭雷擊之後——稱為健康、安康與平安的守護者與主宰嗎?三、你們豈不是以祭祀、犧牲與焚香邀請那位偉大的赫丘力士嗎?而你們自己卻傳說他〔在受苦之後〕被活活焚燒、在喪葬的火堆上燒盡。四、你們豈不是藉著加利祭司們的高聲呼喊,見證那位被閹割、被奪去男性的弗里吉亞人阿提斯,在大母神的內殿中是施恩的神、聖潔的神嗎?五、
And yet, O you who mock us for worshipping a man who died a disgraceful death, do not you yourselves, by the consecration of shrines, deify Father Liber, torn limb from limb by the Titans? 2. Did you not name Aesculapius, the discoverer of remedies, after the penalties and the punishment of the thunderbolt, the guardian and president of health, well-being, and safety? 3. Do you not invite with sacrifices, victims, and burning incense that very great Hercules, whom you yourselves relate to have been burned alive [after punishments] and consumed on his funeral pyre? 4. Do you not, by the loud acclamation of the Galli, testify that Attis the Phrygian, cut off and robbed of his manhood, is the propitious god, the holy god, in the sanctuaries of the Great Mother? 5.
1:74
nonne ipsum Romulum patrem senatorum manibus dilaceratum centum et Quirinum esse Martium dicitis et sacerdotibus et pulvinaribus honoratis et in aedibus adoratis amplissimis et post haec omnia caelum ascendisse iuratis? 6. Aut igitur ridendi et vos estis, qui homines gravissimis cruciatibus interemptos deos putatis et colitis, aut si certa est ratio cur id vobis faciendum putetis, et nobis permittite scire quibus istud causis rationibusque faciamus. 42.1. ''Natum hominem colitis''. - Etiamsi esset id verum, locis ut in superioribus dictum est, tamen pro multis et tam liberalibus donis quae ab eo profecta in nobis sunt deus dici appellarique deberet. 2.
你們豈不是說羅慕路斯本人——那被元老們親手撕裂的國父——就是奎里努斯、是馬爾斯之子嗎?並以祭司與神榻尊崇他,在最宏偉的殿宇中敬拜他,並在這一切之後起誓說他已升上天界?六、所以,你們也該被人譏笑,因為你們把被最沉重的酷刑殺害的人當作神來敬拜;否則,若你們認為必須如此做確有正當理由,那就也容許我們知道我們是憑甚麼緣由與道理如此行。四十二·一、「你們敬拜一個生下來的人。」——縱使這是真的(正如上文所說),然而因祂所賜給我們如此眾多而慷慨的恩賜,祂理當被稱為、被稱呼為神。二、
Do you not say that Romulus himself, the father torn to pieces by the hands of the senators, is Quirinus and a son of Mars, and honour him with priests and sacred couches, and adore him in the most splendid temples, and after all this swear that he ascended to heaven? 6. Either, therefore, you too are to be laughed at, who count as gods and worship men slain by the most grievous torments; or, if there is a sure reason why you think you must do this, then permit us also to know for what causes and reasons we do the same. 42.1. 'You worship a man that was born.' — Even were this true, as was said in the passages above, yet for the many and so bounteous gifts which have come to us from Him, He ought to be called and named God. 2.
1:75
Cum vero deus sit re certa et sine ullius rei dubitationis ambiguo, infitiaturos arbitramini nos esse, quam maxime illum ab nobis coli et praesidem nostri corporis nuncupari? 3. ''Ergone, inquiet aliquis furens iratus et percitus, deus ille est Christus?''. - Deus, respondebimus, et interiorum potentiarum deus et, quod magis infidos acerbissimis doloribus torqueat, rei maximae causa a summo rege ad nos missus. 4. Postulabit forsitan insanior et furiosior factus, an se ita res habeat, quemadmodum dicimus, comprobari. 5.
然而,既然祂確確實實是神、毫無任何疑問的含糊,你們豈以為我們會否認我們以至高的敬拜來敬拜祂、並稱祂為我們身體的主宰嗎?三、「那麼,」某個狂怒、憤恨而激動的人會說,「那基督就是神嗎?」——我們要回答:「是神,是內在諸能力的神;並且——這更叫不信者受最痛苦的折磨——是為了至大的緣故,由那至高的君王差遣到我們這裡來的。」四、他也許更加瘋狂、更加暴怒,會要求證明事情是否真如我們所說。五、
But since He is God in very truth, and without the ambiguity of any doubt, do you suppose that we would deny that He is worshipped by us in the highest degree and is named the president of our body? 3. 'Then,' some frenzied, angry, and excited man will say, 'is that Christ God?' — 'God,' we shall answer, 'and God of the inner powers, and — what may torment the faithless with most bitter pangs — sent to us for the greatest cause by the supreme King.' 4. He, grown more insane and furious, will perhaps demand that it be proved whether the matter stands as we say. 5.
1:76
- Nulla maior est comprobatio, quam gestarum ab eo fides rerum, quam virtutum novitas, quam omnia vieta decreta dissolutaque fatalia, quae populi gentesque suo geri sub lumine nullo dissentiente viderunt, | f. 16 | quae nec ipsi audent falsitatis arguere, quorum antiquas et patrias leges vanitatis esse plenissimas atque inanissimae superstitionis ostendit. 43.1. Occursurus forsitan rursus est eum aliis multis calumniosis illis et puerilibus vocibus: ''Magus fuit, clandestinis artibus omnia illa perfecit, Aegyptiorum ex adytis angelorum potentium nomina et remotas furatus est disciplinas''. 2. - Quid dicitis, o parvuli, incomperta vobis et nescia temerariae vocis loquacitate garrientes?
——沒有比祂所行之事的可信度更大的證明了,也沒有比祂諸般能力的新奇、比那一切被廢除、被解開的命定諭令更大的證明了——這些是眾民族與列國在祂的光照下、無人異議地親眼看見成就的;連他們自己也不敢指控其為虛假——祂已顯明他們古老而祖傳的律法充滿了空虛與最無益的迷信。四十三·一、他也許又要以那許多毀謗而幼稚的話來反駁我們:「他是個術士;他藉暗中的邪術行了那一切;他從埃及人的內殿盜取了強大天使的名字與隱祕的法術。」二、——你們這些小子啊,你們胡言亂語,以輕率之言喋喋不休地談論你們所不知、所不熟悉之事,究竟在說甚麼?
— There is no greater proof than the trustworthiness of the deeds done by Him, than the newness of His powers, than all those fatal decrees dissolved and undone, which peoples and nations beheld accomplished under His light with none dissenting — which not even they themselves dare to charge with falsity, whose ancient and ancestral laws He showed to be most full of emptiness and of most idle superstition. 43.1. He will perhaps again meet us with those many other slanderous and childish cries: 'He was a magician; He accomplished all those things by secret arts; He stole from the sanctuaries of the Egyptians the names of powerful angels and their recondite disciplines.' 2. — What say you, O little ones, chattering with the garrulity of rash speech about things unknown and unfamiliar to you?
1:77
Ergone illa quae gesta sunt daemonum fuere praestigiae et magicarum artium ludi? 3. Potestis aliquem nobis designare, monstrare ex omnibus illis magis, qui umquam fuere per saecula, consimile aliquid Christo millesima ex parte qui fecerit? Qui sine ulla vi carminum, sine herbarum et graminum sucis, sine ulla aliqua observatione sollicita sacrorum, libaminum, temporum? 4. Non enim urgemus et quaerimus quae sese spondeant facere vel in quibus generibus actum soleat omnis illorum doctrina et experientia contineri. 5.
那麼,那些所行的事乃是邪靈的把戲、邪術的遊戲嗎?三、在歷世歷代所曾有的一切術士當中,你們能指出、能給我們看出哪一個曾做過類似基督的事——哪怕只到千分之一嗎?哪一個是不憑任何咒語的力量、不用草藥的汁液、不謹守任何祭儀、奠祭或時辰所做的呢?四、因為我們並不逼問他們自誇能做甚麼,也不追究他們全部的學問與經驗慣常包含在哪些門類之中。五、
Were then those things which were done the tricks of demons and the sports of magical arts? 3. Can you point out, can you show us from all those magicians who ever existed throughout the ages, one who did anything like Christ, even to a thousandth part? One who did it without any force of incantations, without the juices of herbs and grasses, without any anxious observance of rites, libations, or seasons? 4. For we do not press and inquire what things they promise to do, or in what kinds their whole doctrine and practice is wont to be comprised. 5.
1:78
Quis enim hos nesciat aut inminentia studere praenoscere, quae necessario velint nolint suis ordinationibus veniunt aut mortiferam inmittere quibus libuerit tabem aut familiarium dirumpere caritates aut sine clavibus reserare quae clausa sunt aut ora silentio vincire aut in curriculis equos debilitare incitare tardare aut uxoribus et liberis | f. 16b | alienis, sive illi mares sunt sive feminei generis, inconcessi amoris flammas et furiales immittere cupiditates, aut si utile aliquid videantur audere, non propria vi posse sed eorum quos invocant potestate? 44.1.
因為誰不知道這些人:或者盡力預知那些逼近的事——這些事無論人願不願意,都必按其定序而來;或者向他們所喜歡的人施放致命的敗壞;或者拆散親屬間的情愛;或者不用鑰匙就開啟緊閉之物;或者以沉默封住人的口;或者在賽場上使馬匹衰弱、催促或延緩;或者向陌生人的妻子兒女——無論是男是女——投放禁忌之愛的火焰與瘋狂的情慾;又或者,即便他們看似敢做甚麼有益之事,也不是憑自己的能力,而是憑他們所召請者的能力?四十四·一、
For who does not know that these men either strive to foreknow things impending, which necessarily come by their appointed order whether one will or no; or send deadly wasting upon whomsoever they please; or break asunder the affections of kinsfolk; or unlock without keys the things that are shut; or bind mouths in silence; or in the racecourse weaken, spur on, or hold back the horses; or upon the wives and children of strangers, whether they be male or of the female sex, cast the flames of forbidden love and frenzied lusts; or, if they seem to venture anything useful, do it not by their own power but by the power of those whom they invoke? 44.1.
1:79
Atquin constitit Christum sine ullis adminiculis rerum, sine ullius ritus observatione vel lege omnia illa quae fecit nominis sui possibilitate fecisse 2. et quod proprium consentaneum dignum deo fuerat vero, nihil nocens aut noxium sed opiferum, sed salutare, sed auxiliatibus plenum nobis potestatis munificae liberalitate donasse. 45.1. Quid dicitis o iterum? Ergo ille mortalis aut unus fuit e nobis, cuius imperium, cuius vocem popularibus et cotidianis verbis missam valetudines morbi febres atque alia corporum cruciamenta fugiebant? 2.
然而事實確立:基督沒有任何外物的輔助、沒有謹守任何祭儀或律法,只憑祂自己名字所具的能力,就成就了祂所行的一切事;二、並且——正如對真神所當有、所相稱、所配得的——祂憑其豐盛能力的慷慨大方,賜給我們的沒有任何有害或傷人之物,只有有益、有救、滿有幫助的。四十五·一、你們又說甚麼呢,眾人啊?難道祂是個必死的凡人、是我們中的一員嗎?祂的命令、祂以百姓平常日用的話語所發的聲音一出,各樣疾病、病症、熱病與身體其他折磨就都逃遁了。二、
But it is established that Christ, without any aids of external things, without the observance of any rite or law, accomplished all those works which He did by the mere possibility of His own name; 2. and that — as was proper, fitting, and worthy of the true God — He bestowed on us nothing harmful or hurtful but what was helpful, wholesome, and full of aid, by the munificent generosity of His bounteous power. 45.1. What say you again, O men? Was He then a mortal, or one of us, whose command, whose voice uttered in the common and everyday words of the people, ailments, diseases, fevers, and other torments of the body fled from? 2.
1:80
unus fuit e nobis, cuius praesentiam, cuius visum gens illa nequibat ferre mersorum in visceribus daemonum conterritaque vi nova membrorum possessione cedebat? 3. unus fuit e nobis cuius foedae vitiligines iussioni obtemperabant pulsae statim et concordiam colorum commaculatis visceribus relinquebant? 4. unus fuit e nobis, cuius ex levi tactu stabant profluvia sanguinis et inmoderatos cohibebant fluores? 5. unus fuit e nobis, cuius manus intercutes et veternosae fugiebant undae, penetrabilis ille vitabat liquor et turgentia viscera salutari ariditate deflabant? 6. unus fuit e nobis qui claudos currere praecipiebat, et iam operis res erat; porrigere mancos | f.
難道祂是我們中的一員嗎?那潛藏在人臟腑中的邪靈群,連祂的臨在、祂的目光都承受不住,被一種新的能力嚇得放棄了牠們對肢體的佔據。三、難道祂是我們中的一員嗎?在祂的命令下,污穢的麻瘋斑立時被逐去、順服了,並使那變色的皮肉恢復了顏色的協調。四、難道祂是我們中的一員嗎?祂輕輕一觸,流血就止住,抑制了那無節制的血流。五、難道祂是我們中的一員嗎?水腫與滯積的水從祂面前逃遁,那滲透全身的積液消失了,腫脹的臟腑在有益健康的乾涸中消退。六、難道祂是我們中的一員嗎?祂吩咐瘸腿的奔跑,事就立刻成了;祂吩咐殘廢的伸出
Was He one of us, whose presence, whose very look that race of demons plunged in men's vitals could not bear, and terrified by a new power gave up its possession of the limbs? 3. Was He one of us, at whose command foul leprous blotches obeyed, driven off at once, and left the discoloured flesh restored to a harmony of colours? 4. Was He one of us, at whose light touch the flowings of blood stood still and checked their immoderate discharge? 5. Was He one of us, from whom the dropsical and torpid waters fled, that penetrating fluid vanished, and the swollen vitals subsided in health-giving dryness? 6. Was He one of us who bade the lame to run, and the thing was at once done; who bade the maimed stretch out
← 上一段下一段 →
第 2 章 →
1234567

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。