📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集

文集 第 4 章 第 3/3 段

拉丁文原文.4 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 4:81–4:84(全章共 84 節)

← 第 3 章第 5 章 →
← 上一段
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
4:81
Unde nomina accidentalia concretive dicta non ponuntur in praedicamento sicut species vel genera, ut album vel musicum, nisi per reductionem, sed solum secundum quod in abstracto significantur, ut albedo et musica. Et quia accidentia non componuntur ex materia et forma, ideo non potest in eis sumi genus a materia et differentia a forma sicut in substantiis compositis, sed oportet ut genus primum sumatur ex ipso modo essendi, secundum quod ens diversimode secundum prius et posterius de decem generibus praedicatur; sicut dicitur quantitas ex eo quod est mensura substantiae, et qualitas secundum quod est dispositio substantiae, et sic de aliis secundum Philosophum IX Metaphysicae.
故而那些以具體方式稱說的偶性名稱,並不像種或類那樣被置於述項中,例如「白的」或「懂音樂的」,除非藉歸約;而只有當它們以抽象方式被標示時才如此,例如「白」與「音樂」。又因為偶性並非由物質與形式構成,故在它們之中不能像在複合實體中那樣,由物質取類、由形式取種差;而是必須由「存在的方式」本身取得最高的類,即依存有以不同方式、按先後對十個範疇(類)所作的稱述;好比「量」乃因其為實體的尺度而得名,「質」乃因其為實體的某種狀態而得名,其餘亦然,正如哲學家在《形上學》第九卷所言。
Hence accidental names said concretely are not placed in a predicament as species or genera, such as 'white' or 'musical,' except by reduction, but only according as they are signified in the abstract, such as 'whiteness' and 'music.' And because accidents are not composed of matter and form, therefore in them the genus cannot be taken from matter and the difference from form, as in composite substances; but the first genus must be taken from the very mode of being, according as being is predicated in diverse ways, according to prior and posterior, of the ten genera; just as quantity is named from the fact that it is the measure of substance, and quality according as it is a disposition of substance, and so of the others, according to the Philosopher in Book IX of the Metaphysics.
4:82
Differentiae vero in eis sumuntur ex diversitate principiorum, ex quibus causantur. Et quia propriae passiones ex propriis principiis subiecti causantur, ideo subiectum ponitur in diffinitione eorum loco differentiae, si in abstracto diffiniuntur secundum quod sunt proprie in genere, sicut dicitur quod simitas est nasi curvitas. Sed e converso esset, si eorum diffinitio sumeretur secundum quod concretive dicuntur. Sic enim subiectum in eorum diffinitione poneretur sicut genus, quia tunc diffinirentur per modum substantiarum compositarum, in quibus ratio generis sumitur a materia, sicut dicimus quod simum est nasus curvus.
但它們之中的種差,則取自那使之被產生的諸本原的差別。又因為固有屬性乃由主體本有的諸本原所產生,故而主體被置於它們的定義中以替代種差,倘若它們是依其本屬某類的方式而以抽象態被界定,正如「塌」被說為鼻的彎曲。但若它們的定義是依其以具體方式被稱說而取,情形便相反。因為那樣主體便被置於它們的定義中作為類,因為那時它們乃按複合實體的方式被界定,而在複合實體中類的理路取自物質,正如我們說「塌的」乃是彎曲的鼻。
But the differences in them are taken from the diversity of the principles by which they are caused. And because the proper passions are caused by the proper principles of the subject, therefore the subject is placed in their definition in the place of a difference, if they are defined in the abstract according as they are properly in a genus, just as it is said that snubness is the curvature of a nose. But it would be the reverse if their definition were taken according as they are said concretely. For thus the subject would be placed in their definition as a genus, because then they would be defined after the manner of composite substances, in which the account of the genus is taken from matter, just as we say that the snub is a curved nose.
4:83
Similiter etiam est, si unum accidens alterius accidentis principium sit, sicut principium relationis est actio et passio et quantitas; et ideo secundum haec dividit Philosophus relationem in V Metaphysicae. Sed quia propria principia accidentium non semper sunt manifesta, ideo quandoque sumimus differentias accidentium ex eorum effectibus, sicut congregativum et disgregativum dicuntur differentiae coloris, quae causantur ex abundantia vel paucitate lucis, ex quo diversae species colorum causantur. CONCLUSIO:
同樣,若一偶性是另一偶性的本原,亦然,好比關係的本原乃是行動、承受與量;因此哲學家在《形上學》第五卷便依這些來劃分關係。但因為偶性本有的諸本原並不總是顯明的,故我們有時便由偶性的結果來取其種差,好比「聚合的」與「散離的」被稱為顏色的種差,這乃由光的充裕或稀少所致,並由此產生顏色的不同種類。結論:
It is likewise also if one accident is the principle of another accident, just as the principle of relation is action and passion and quantity; and therefore the Philosopher divides relation according to these in Book V of the Metaphysics. But because the proper principles of accidents are not always manifest, therefore sometimes we take the differences of accidents from their effects, just as 'gathering together' and 'scattering apart' are called differences of color, which are caused by the abundance or scarcity of light, from which diverse species of colors are caused. CONCLUSION:
4:84
Sic ergo patet quomodo essentia est in substantiis et accidentibus et quomodo in substantiis compositis et simplicibus et qualiter in his omnibus intentiones universales logicae inveniuntur, excepto primo, quod est in fine simplicitatis, cui non convenit ratio generis vel speciei et per consequens nec diffinitio propter suam simplicitatem. In quo sit finis et consummatio huius sermonis. Amen.
如此,便清楚顯明了本質如何存在於實體與偶性之中,又如何存在於複合實體與單純實體之中,以及在這一切之中普遍的邏輯「意向」如何被尋見——唯獨那「第一者」例外,祂處於單純的極限,類或種的理路不適用於祂,因而由於祂的單純,定義也不適用。願此論述的終結與圓成在於祂內。阿們。
Thus, therefore, it is clear how essence exists in substances and in accidents, and how in composite and in simple substances, and in what way in all these the universal logical intentions are found—except in the First, which is at the limit of simplicity, to which the account of genus or species does not belong, and consequently neither does definition, on account of its simplicity. In Whom may there be the end and consummation of this discourse. Amen.
← 上一段
← 第 3 章第 5 章 →
123456

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。