📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 證道篇與文集

證道篇與文集 第 2 章 第 1/2 段

拉丁文原文.36 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 2:1–2:36(全章共 60 節)

← 第 1 章
下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
2:1
Prooemium Postquam opusculum quoddam velut exemplum meditandi de ratione fidei cogentibus me precibus quorundam fratrum, in persona alicuius tacite secum ratiocinando quae nesciat investigantis edidi: considerans illud esse multorum concatenatione contextum argumentorum, coepi mecum quaerere, si forte posset inveniri unum argumentum, quod nullo alio ad se probandum quam se solo indigeret, et solum ad astruendum quia Deus vere est, et quia est summum bonum nullo alio indigens, et quo omnia indigent ut sint et ut bene sint, et quaecumque de divina credimus substantia, sufficeret.
序。我先前因某些弟兄祈求的催逼,曾出版了一篇小著作,作為默想信德之理性根據的範例——在那書中我以一個藉探問追究自己所不知之事的人的身分,默默地與自己推理——後來思想到那書是由許多論證連環交織而成的,便開始自問:是否或許能尋得一個單一的論證,它除了自己本身之外,無需別的甚麼來證明自己,且單憑它就足以確立神確實存在,並祂是無需別的、至高的善,是萬有為要存在、為要美好所必需的,以及我們所信關乎神聖本質的一切。
Preface After I had published a certain little work as a specimen of meditating on the rational basis of faith, at the urging of the prayers of certain brethren—reasoning silently with myself in the person of one who investigates by inquiry things he does not know—considering that this was woven together by a chain of many arguments, I began to ask myself whether perhaps one single argument could be found which needed no other than itself alone to prove itself, and which alone would suffice to establish that God truly exists, and that he is the supreme good needing no other, and which all things need in order to exist and to be well, and whatever we believe concerning the divine substance.
2:2
Ad quod cum saepe studioseque cogitationem converterem, atque aliquando mihi videretur iam posse capi quod quaerebam, aliquando mentis aciem omnino fugeret: tandem desperans volui cessare velut ab inquisitione rei, quam inveniri esset impossibile. Sed cum illam cogitationem, ne mentem meam frustra occupando ab aliis, in quibus proficere possem, impediret, penitus a me vellem excludere: tunc magis ac magis nolenti et defendenti se coepit cum importunitate quadem ingerere. Cum igitur quadam die vehementer eius importunitati resistendo fatigarer, in ipso cogitationum conflictu sic se obtulit quod desperaveram, ut studiose cogitationem amplecterer, quam sollicitus repellebam.
我屢次殷切地將思緒轉向此事,有時似乎我所尋求的如今可以被把握,有時卻又全然逃脫我心思的銳鋒:終於我灰心了,想要止息,如同止息對一件不可能尋見之事的探究。但當我想要把那思想全然從自己心中排除,免得它徒然佔據我的心思,攔阻我去作別樣我能進步的事:那時,我越是不情願、越是抵擋,它就越發以某種糾纏不休的方式向我逼近。所以有一天,我因猛力抗拒它的糾纏而疲乏,正在思想交戰之際,那我所灰心絕望的,竟如此呈現出來,以致我熱切地擁抱那先前我憂慮著要推開的思想。
When I turned my thought to this often and earnestly, and at times it seemed to me that what I was seeking could now be grasped, while at times it altogether escaped the keen edge of my mind: at last, in despair, I wished to cease, as from the inquiry into a thing which it was impossible to find. But when I wished to exclude that thought wholly from myself, lest by uselessly occupying my mind it should hinder me from other matters in which I could make progress: then more and more, as I was unwilling and warding it off, it began to press itself upon me with a certain importunity. When therefore on a certain day I was wearied by vehemently resisting its importunity, in the very conflict of my thoughts that which I had despaired of so presented itself that I eagerly embraced the thought which, anxious, I had been repelling.
2:3
Aestimans igitur quod me gaudebam invenisse, si scriptum esset, alicui legenti placiturum, de hoc ipso et de quibusdam aliis sub persona conantis erigere mentem suam ad contemplandum Deum et quaerentis intelligere quod credit, subditum scripsi opusculum. Et quoniam nec istud nec illud, cuius supra memini, dignum libri nomine aut cui auctoris praeponeretur nomen iudicabam, nec tamen eadem sine aliquo titulo, quo aliquem, in cuius manus veniret, quodam modo ad se legendum invitarent, dimittenda putabam: unicuique suum dedi titulum, ut prius Exemplum meditandi de ratione fidei, et sequens Fides quaerens intellectum diceretur.
因此我判斷我所欣然尋得的,若記下來,必能討某讀者的喜悅,就以一個努力提起自己心思去默觀神、並尋求明白自己所信之人的身分,寫了以下這篇關於此事並關於其他某些事的小著作。又因我判斷無論這篇或上文所提的那篇,都不配稱為書,也不配冠上作者之名,然而又想它們不該毫無標題地發出,免得無人受邀去讀,故各給它們一個標題,使前者稱為《默想信德理性根據之範例》,後者稱為《信德尋求理解》。
Judging therefore that what I rejoiced to have found, if it were written down, would please some reader, I wrote the following little work concerning this very thing and concerning certain other matters, under the person of one striving to lift up his mind to the contemplation of God, and seeking to understand what he believes. And since I judged neither this nor the other, of which I made mention above, worthy of the name of a book or to have the name of an author prefixed to it, and yet thought they ought not to be sent forth without some title by which they might in some way invite anyone into whose hands they came to read them: I gave to each its own title, so that the former might be called Specimen of Meditating on the Rational Basis of Faith, and the latter, Faith Seeking Understanding.
2:4
Sed cum iam a pluribus cum his titulis utrumque transcriptum esset, coegerunt me plures, et maxime reverendus archiepiscopus Lugdunensis, Hugo nomine, fungens in Gallia legatione Apostolica qui mihi hoc ex Apostolica praecepit auctoritate, ut nomen meum illis praescriberem. Quod ut aptius fieret, illud quidem Monologion, id est soliloquium, istud vero Proslogion, id est alloquium, nominavi. 1 Excitatio mentis ad contemplandum Deum Eia, nunc homuncio, fuge paululum occupationes tuas, absconde te modicum a tumultuosis cogitationibus tuis Abice nunc onerosas curas, et postpone laboriosas distentiones tuas. Vaca aliquantulum Deo, et requiesce aliquantulum in eo.
但當這兩篇連同這些標題已被數人抄錄之後,許多人催逼我,尤其是里昂可敬的大主教,名叫雨果的,他在高盧執行使徒的特使職分,憑使徒的權柄吩咐我,要我在其上冠以我的名字。為使此事更為合宜,前者我便定名為《獨白錄》(Monologion,即獨語),後者定名為《證道篇》(Proslogion,即對語)。一。喚起心思去默觀神。來吧,渺小的人哪,暫且逃離你的事務,暫時從你紛擾的思緒中藏起自己。如今卸下你沉重的掛慮,撇下你勞苦的紛心之事。略略歸於神,略略安息於祂。
But when both had now been transcribed by several persons with these titles, many compelled me, and especially the reverend archbishop of Lyons, Hugh by name, exercising the apostolic legation in Gaul, who commanded me this by apostolic authority, that I should prefix my name to them. And that this might be done more fittingly, the former I named indeed Monologion, that is, soliloquy, but the latter Proslogion, that is, address. 1 The rousing of the mind to the contemplation of God Come now, little man, flee for a while your occupations, hide yourself for a moment from your tumultuous thoughts. Cast off now your burdensome cares, and put aside your laborious distractions. Be free for a little while for God, and rest for a little while in him.
2:5
"Intra in cubiculum" [Mt 6,6] mentis tuae, exclude omnia praeter Deum et quae te iuvent ad quaerendum eum, et "clauso ostio" [Mt 6,6] quaere eum. Dic nunc, totum "cor meum", dic nunc Deo: "Quaero vultum tuum, vultum tuum, Domine, requiro" [Ps 26,8]. Eia nunc ergo tu, Domine Deus meus, doce cor meum ubi et quomodo quaerat ubi et quomodo te inveniat. Domine, si hoc non es, ubi te quaeram absentem? Si autem ubique es, Cur non video praesentem? Sed certe habitas "lucem inaccessibilem" [1 Tim 6,16]. Et ubi est lux inaccessibilis? Aut quomodo accedam ad lucem inaccessibilem? Aut quis ducet et inducet in illam, ut videam te in illa? Deinde quibus signis, qua facie te quaeram?
「你要進入」你心思的「內室」〔太六6〕,把除神以外、並除幫助你尋求祂的一切都關在外面,然後「關上門」〔太六6〕尋求祂。我的全「心」哪,如今你要說,如今向神說:「我尋求你的面;耶和華啊,你的面我正尋求」〔詩二六8〕。所以,耶和華我的神啊,如今求你教導我的心,何處並如何可以尋求你,何處並如何可以尋見你。主啊,你若不在這裏,我這隱不可見的你,當往何處尋求你呢?你若無所不在,我為何不見你的同在呢?然而你確是住在「人不能靠近的光中」〔提前六16〕。那人不能靠近的光在何處呢?我又如何能靠近那不能靠近的光呢?或誰能引領我、帶我進入其中,使我在其中得見你呢?再者,我要憑甚麼記號、憑甚麼面貌來尋求你呢?
"Enter into the chamber" [Mt 6:6] of your mind, shut out everything except God and what helps you to seek him, and "with the door closed" [Mt 6:6] seek him. Say now, my whole "heart," say now to God: "I seek your face; your face, Lord, do I require" [Ps 26:8]. Come now, therefore, you, Lord my God, teach my heart where and how it may seek you, where and how it may find you. Lord, if you are not here, where shall I seek you, you who are absent? But if you are everywhere, why do I not see you present? But surely you dwell in "inaccessible light" [1 Tim 6:16]. And where is the inaccessible light? Or how shall I approach the inaccessible light? Or who shall lead me and bring me into it, that I may see you in it? Then by what signs, by what face shall I seek you?
2:6
Numquam te vidi, Domine Deus meus, non novi faciem tuam. Quid faciet, altissime Domine, quid faciet iste tuus longinquus exsul? Quid faciet servus tuus, anxius amore tui et longe "proiectus a facie tua" [Ps 50,13]? Anhelat videre te et nimis abest illi facies tua. Accedere ad te desiderat et inaccessibilis est habitatio tua. Invenire te cupit et nescit locum tuum. Quaerere te affectat et ignorat vultum tuum. Domine, Deus meus es et Dominus meus es et numquam te vidi. Tu me fecisti et refecisti et omnia bona tu mihi contulisti et nondum novi te. Denique ad te videndum factus sum et nondum feci, propter quod factus sum. O misera sors hominis, cum hoc perdidit, ad quod factus est!
耶和華我的神啊,我從未見過你,我不認識你的面。至高的主啊,這你那遠方的逐客要怎麼辦呢?你的僕人,因愛你而焦慮、又被「從你面前丟棄」〔詩五十13〕的,要怎麼辦呢?他切慕見你,你的面卻離他太遠。他渴想親近你,你的居所卻不可靠近。他渴望尋見你,卻不知你的所在。他熱切尋求你,卻不認得你的容貌。主啊,你是我的神,你是我的主,我卻從未見過你。是你造了我,又再造了我,把一切美善都賜給我,我卻仍不認識你。總之,我受造原是為要見你,我卻仍未成就我受造的目的。人的命運何其可憐,竟失去了他受造的目的!
Never have I seen you, O Lord my God; I have not known your face. What shall he do, O most high Lord, what shall this your distant exile do? What shall your servant do, anxious with love of you and "cast far from your face" [Ps 50:13]? He pants to see you, and your face is too far from him. He longs to approach you, and your dwelling is inaccessible. He desires to find you, and knows not your place. He yearns to seek you, and is ignorant of your countenance. Lord, you are my God and you are my Lord, and never have I seen you. You made me and remade me, and you have bestowed upon me all good things, and not yet do I know you. In short, I was made to see you, and I have not yet done that for which I was made. O wretched lot of man, when he has lost that for which he was made!
2:7
O durus et dirus casus ille! Heu, quid perdidit et quid invenit, quid abscessit et quid remansit! Perdidit beatitudinem, ad quam factus est, et invenit miseriam, propter quod factus non est. Abscessit, sine quo nihil felix est, et remansit, quod per se non nisi miserum est. "Manducabat tunc homo panem angelorum"[Ps 77,25], quem nunc esurit manducat nunc "panem dolorum" [Ps 126,2], quem tunc nesciebat. Heu publicus luctus hominum, universalis planctus filiorum Adae! Ille ructabat saturitate nos suspiramus esurie. Ille abundabat nos mendicamus. Ille feliciter tenebat et misere deseruit nos infeliciter egemus et miserabiliter desideramus. et heu, vacui remanemus!
那墮落何其慘酷、何其可怕!唉,他失去了甚麼,又得著了甚麼,甚麼離去了,甚麼存留了!他失去了他受造所為的福樂,得著了他受造所非為的愁苦。那離去的,是缺了它就無一物有福;那存留的,是它本身只是愁苦。「那時人喫天使的食物」〔詩七七25〕,如今他卻為之飢餓;如今他喫「愁苦的食物」〔詩一二六2〕,那時他卻不知道。唉,眾人共同的哀慟,亞當眾子普世的悲歎!他因飽足而打嗝,我們因飢餓而歎息。他豐富有餘,我們行乞討飯。他有福地持守,卻可悲地撇棄了;我們不幸地缺乏,可憐地渴想。唉,我們空空地存留!
O hard and dire that fall! Alas, what did he lose and what did he find, what departed and what remained! He lost the blessedness for which he was made, and found the misery for which he was not made. That departed without which nothing is happy, and that remained which by itself is nothing but wretched. "Man ate then the bread of angels" [Ps 77:25], for which he now hungers; he eats now "the bread of sorrows" [Ps 126:2], which then he knew not. Alas the common mourning of men, the universal lament of the sons of Adam! He belched from fullness; we sigh from hunger. He abounded; we beg. He held happily and wretchedly forsook; we are in want unhappily and desire miserably. And alas, we remain empty!
2:8
Cur non nobis custodivit, cum facile posset, quo tam graviter careremus? Quare sic nobis obseravit lucem et obduxit nos tenebris? Ut quid nobis abstulit vitam et inflixit mortem? Aerumnosi, unde sumus expulsi, quo sumus impulsi! Unde praecipitati, quo obruti! A patria in exsilium, a visione Dei in caecitatem nostram. A iucunditate immortalitatis in amaritudinem et horrorem mortis. Misera mutatio! De quanto bono in quantum malum! Grave damnum, gravis dolor, grave totum! Sed heu me miserum, unum de aliis miseris filiis Evae elongatis a Deo! quid incepi, quid effeci? Quo tendebam, quo deveni? Ad quid aspirabam, in quibus suspiro? "Quaesivi bona et ecce turbatio" [Ps 121,9; Jer 14,19]!
他既容易能保守,為何不為我們保守那我們如此痛切缺乏之物呢?他為何如此向我們關閉光明,以黑暗遮蓋我們呢?他為甚麼從我們奪去生命,加給我們死亡呢?可憐的人哪,我們從何處被趕出,被趕到何處!從何處被擲下,被淹沒到何處!從家鄉到客旅之地,從見神到我們的瞎眼。從不朽的歡樂到死亡的苦楚與恐怖。何等可悲的變遷!從何等大的善到何等大的惡!沉重的損失,沉重的悲傷,一切都沉重!但唉,可憐的我,是與神遠離的夏娃眾可憐之子中的一個!我起頭作了甚麼,成就了甚麼?我原向何處去,如今來到了何處?我素來渴慕甚麼,如今卻在甚麼中歎息?「我尋求美善,看哪,竟是煩擾」〔詩一二一9;耶十四19〕!
Why did he not keep for us, when he easily could, that which we should so grievously lack? Why did he thus bar the light from us and cover us with darkness? To what end did he take away life from us and inflict death? Wretched ones, whence we are expelled, whither we are driven! Whence cast down, whither overwhelmed! From our fatherland into exile, from the vision of God into our blindness. From the joy of immortality into the bitterness and horror of death. O miserable change! From how great a good into how great an evil! Grave loss, grave grief, all grave! But alas, wretched me, one among the other wretched sons of Eve estranged from God! What did I begin, what did I accomplish? Whither was I tending, whither have I come? To what did I aspire, in what do I sigh? "I sought good things, and behold, trouble" [Ps 121:9; Jer 14:19]!
2:9
Tendebam in Deum et offendi in me ipsum. Requiem quaerebam in secreto meo et "tribulationem et dolorem inveni" [Ps 114,3] in intimis meis. Volebam ridere a gaudio mentis meae et cogor "rugire a gemitu cordis mei" [Ps 37,9]. Sperabatur laetitia et ecce, unde densentur suspiria! Et o "tu, Domine, usquequo? Usquequo, Domine, oblivisceris nos, usquequo avertis faciem tuam a nobis"? Quando "respicies et exaudies" nos? Quando "illuminabis oculos" nostros et "ostendes" [Ps 6,4; Ps 12,1-4] nobis "faciem tuam" [Ps 79,4.8]? Quando restitues te nobis? Respice, Domine, exaudi, illumina nos, ostende nobis teipsum. Restitue te nobis, ut bene sit nobis, sine quo tam male est nobis.
我向著神伸展,卻撞在自己身上。我在我隱密之處尋求安息,卻在我至深之處「遇見患難與愁苦」〔詩一一四3〕。我願因我心思的喜樂而歡笑,卻被迫「因我心的呻吟而哀號」〔詩三七9〕。所盼望的是歡樂,看哪,歎息卻從何處密集!主啊,「你要到幾時呢?耶和華啊,你忘記我們要到幾時呢?你掩面不顧我們要到幾時呢」?你幾時「眷顧並垂聽」我們呢?你幾時「光照我們的眼目」,將「你的面」「指示」〔詩六4;詩十二1~4〕我們〔詩七九4、8〕呢?你幾時把你自己復還給我們呢?主啊,求你眷顧、垂聽、光照我們,將你自己指示我們。求你把你自己復還給我們,使我們得福;沒有你,我們就這樣受苦。
I was reaching toward God, and I struck against myself. I was seeking rest in my secret place, and "I found tribulation and grief" [Ps 114:3] in my inmost parts. I wished to laugh from the joy of my mind, and I am compelled to "roar from the groaning of my heart" [Ps 37:9]. Gladness was hoped for, and behold, whence sighs are thickened! And O "you, Lord, how long? How long, Lord, will you forget us, how long will you turn away your face from us"? When will you "look upon and hear" us? When will you "enlighten our eyes" and "show" [Ps 6:4; Ps 12:1-4] us "your face" [Ps 79:4,8]? When will you restore yourself to us? Look, Lord, hear, enlighten us, show us yourself. Restore yourself to us, that it may be well with us, without whom it is so ill with us.
2:10
Miserare labores et conatus nostros ad te, qui nihil valemus sine te. Invita nos, "adiuva" nos [Ps 78,9]. Obsecro, Domine, ne desperem suspirando, sed respirem sperando. Obsecro, Domine, amaricatum est cor meum sua desolatione, indulca illud tua consolatione. Obsecro, Domine, esuriens incepi quaerere te, ne desinam ieiunus de te. Famelicus accessi, ne recedam impastus. Pauper veni ad divitem, miser ad misericordem, ne redeam vacuus et contemptus. Et si "antequam comedam, suspiro" [Iob 3,24], da vel post suspiria quod comedam. Domine, incurvatus non possum nisi deorsum aspicere; erige me, ut possim sursum intendere.
求你憐憫我們向著你的勞苦與努力,我們沒有你就一無所能。求你邀請我們,「幫助」我們〔詩七八9〕。主啊,我懇求你,叫我不至因歎息而絕望,乃因盼望而重得呼吸。主啊,我懇求你,我的心因它的荒涼而苦澀,求你以你的安慰使它甘甜。主啊,我懇求你,我飢餓地開始尋求你,求你不叫我空著不得著你而止息。我飢渴地前來,求你不叫我未得餵養就離去。我貧窮地來到富足者面前,愁苦地來到滿有憐憫者面前,求你不叫我空空地、被藐視地回去。我若「未喫之先就先歎息」〔伯三24〕,求你在我歎息之後,賜下我可喫的。主啊,我屈身彎曲,只能向下看;求你扶我起來,使我能向上仰望。
Have mercy on our toils and efforts toward you, we who avail nothing without you. Invite us, "help" us [Ps 78:9]. I beseech you, Lord, that I may not despair by sighing, but breathe again by hoping. I beseech you, Lord, my heart is embittered by its desolation; sweeten it by your consolation. I beseech you, Lord, hungry I began to seek you; let me not cease fasting from you. Famished I drew near; let me not depart unfed. Poor I came to the rich, wretched to the merciful; let me not return empty and despised. And if "before I eat, I sigh" [Job 3:24], grant even after my sighs that which I may eat. Lord, bent down I can look only downward; raise me up, that I may be able to strain upward.
2:11
"Iniquitates meae supergressae caput meum" obvolvunt me, "et sicut onus grave" [Ps 37,5] gravant me. Evolve me, exonera me, ne "urgeat puteus" earum "os suum super me" [Ps 68,16]. Liceat mihi suspicere lucem tuam, vel de longe, vel de profundo. Doce me quaerere te et ostende te quaerenti; quia nec quaerere te possum, nisi tu doceas, nec invenire, nisi te ostendas. Quaeram te desiderando, desiderem quaerendo. Inveniam amando, amem inveniendo. Fateor, Domine, et gratias ago, quia creasti in me hanc "imaginem tuam" [Gen 1,27], ut tui memor te cogitem, te amem.
「我的罪孽高過我的頭」,纏裹著我,「如同重擔」〔詩三七5〕壓住我。求你為我解開,為我卸下,免得「它們的坑」「在我以上閉口」〔詩六八16〕。求你容我仰望你的光,或從遠處,或從深處。求你教我尋求你,並向尋求的人顯出你自己;因為你若不教導,我就不能尋求你,你若不顯出自己,我就不能尋見。求你叫我在渴慕中尋求你,在尋求中渴慕你;叫我在愛中尋見你,在尋見中愛你。主啊,我承認並感謝你,因你在我裏面創造了「你這形像」〔創一27〕,叫我得以記念你而思想你、愛你。
"My iniquities have gone over my head," they envelop me, "and like a heavy burden" [Ps 37:5] they weigh me down. Unwind me, unburden me, lest "the pit" of them "shut its mouth over me" [Ps 68:16]. Let it be permitted me to look up at your light, even from afar, even from the depth. Teach me to seek you, and show yourself to the one seeking; for I can neither seek you unless you teach, nor find unless you show yourself. Let me seek you in desiring, let me desire you in seeking. Let me find you in loving, let me love you in finding. I confess, Lord, and give thanks, that you created in me this "your image" [Gen 1:27], so that, mindful of you, I may think of you, may love you.
2:12
Sed sic est abolita attritione vitiorum, sic offuscata fumo peccatorum, ut non possit facere, ad quod facta est, nisi tu renoves et reformes eam. Non tento, Domine, penetrare altitudinem tuam, quia nullatenus comparo illi intellectum meum; sed desidero aliquatenus intelligere veritatem tuam, quam credit et amat cor meum. Neque enim quaero intelligere ut credam, sed credo ut intelligam. Nam et hoc credo: quia "nisi credidero, non intelligam" [Is 7,9]. 2 Quod vere sit Deus Ergo Domine, qui das fidei intellectum, da mihi, ut, quantum scis expedire, intelligam, quia es sicut credimus, et hoc es quod credimus. Et quidem credimus te esse aliquid quo nihil maius cogitari possit.
但這形像被諸惡的磨損所損耗,被諸罪的煙霧所昏暗,以致它不能成就它受造的目的,除非你更新並重塑它。主啊,我不試圖洞穿你的高深,因為我絕不能把我的悟性與之相比;但我渴望在某種程度上明白你的真理,就是我心所信、所愛的。因我並非為要相信才尋求明白,乃是為要明白才相信。因為這我也信:「我若不信,就不能明白」〔賽七9〕。二。論神確實存在。所以,主啊,你這賜悟性給信德的,求你照你所知對我有益的,賜我明白:你正如我們所信的而存在,並你就是我們所信的那一位。我們的確相信,你乃是一位無可設想比之更大的。
But it is so worn away by the attrition of vices, so darkened by the smoke of sins, that it cannot do that for which it was made, unless you renew and reform it. I do not attempt, Lord, to penetrate your height, for in no way do I compare my understanding to it; but I desire in some measure to understand your truth, which my heart believes and loves. For I do not seek to understand in order that I may believe, but I believe in order that I may understand. For this too I believe: that "unless I shall have believed, I shall not understand" [Is 7:9]. 2 That God truly exists Therefore, Lord, you who give understanding to faith, grant me to understand, as far as you know it to be expedient, that you exist as we believe, and that you are that which we believe. And indeed we believe you to be something than which nothing greater can be thought.
2:13
An ergo non est aliqua talis natura, quia "dixit insipiens in corde suo: non est Deus" [Ps 13,1; 52,1]? Sed certe ipse idem insipiens, cum audit hoc ipsum quod dico: 'aliquid quo maius nihil cogitari potest', intelligit quod audit; et quod intelligit, in intellectu eius est, etiam si non intelligat illud esse. Aliud enim est rem esse in intellectu, alium intelligere rem esse. Nam cum pictor praecogitat quae facturus est, habet quidem in intellectu, sed nondum intelligit esse quod nondum fecit. Cum vero iam pinxit, et habet in intellectu et intelligit esse quod iam fecit.
那麼難道沒有這樣的一個性質麼,既然「愚頑人心裏說,沒有神」〔詩十四1;五三1〕?但那同一個愚頑人,當他聽見我所說的這話,就是「一位無可設想比之更大的」,他確是明白他所聽見的;他所明白的,就在他的悟性中,縱然他不明白這一位是存在的。因為一物在悟性中,是一回事;明白那物存在,又是另一回事。譬如畫家在先思想他將要作的,他確是在悟性中有了,但他尚未明白那他尚未作成的是存在的。然而當他已經畫成了,他就既在悟性中有了,又明白那他如今所作成的是存在的。
Is there then no such nature, since "the fool said in his heart: there is no God" [Ps 13:1; 52:1]? But surely that very same fool, when he hears this very thing which I say, namely 'something than which nothing greater can be thought,' understands what he hears; and what he understands is in his understanding, even if he does not understand that it exists. For it is one thing for a thing to be in the understanding, and another to understand that the thing exists. For when a painter beforehand thinks out what he is going to make, he has it indeed in his understanding, but he does not yet understand to exist what he has not yet made. But when he has already painted it, he both has it in his understanding and understands to exist what he has now made.
2:14
Convincitur ergo etiam insipiens esse vel in intellectu aliquid quo nihil maius cogitari potest, quia hoc, cum audit, intelligit, et quidquid intelligitur, in intellectu est. Et certe id quo maius cogitari nequit, non potest esse in solo intellectu. Si enim vel in solo intellectu est, potest cogitari esse et in re; quod maius est. Si ergo id quo maius cogitari non potest, est in solo intellectu: id ipsum quo maius cogitari non potest, est quo maius cogitari potest. Sed certe hoc esse non potest. Existit ergo procul dubio aliquid quo maius cogitari non valet, et in intellectu et in re. 3 Quod non possit cogitari non esse Quod utique sic vere est, ut nec cogitari possit non esse.
所以連那愚頑人也不得不承認,至少在悟性中有一位無可設想比之更大的,因為他聽見這話就明白它,凡被明白的都在悟性中。然而那無可設想比之更大的,斷不能單在悟性中。因為它若單在悟性中,就可被設想也在實際中存在;而這是更大的。所以那無可設想比之更大的,若單在悟性中:那同一位無可設想比之更大的,就成了可設想比之更大的。但這斷不可能。所以無疑地,確實存在一位無可設想比之更大的,既在悟性中,也在實際中。三。論祂不能被設想為不存在。這一位實在如此真實地存在,以致連被設想為不存在也不可能。
Therefore even the fool is convinced that there is at least in the understanding something than which nothing greater can be thought, because when he hears this, he understands it, and whatever is understood is in the understanding. And surely that than which a greater cannot be thought cannot be in the understanding alone. For if it is even in the understanding alone, it can be thought to be also in reality; which is greater. If therefore that than which a greater cannot be thought is in the understanding alone: that very thing than which a greater cannot be thought is one than which a greater can be thought. But surely this cannot be. There exists therefore beyond doubt something than which a greater cannot be thought, both in the understanding and in reality. 3 That it cannot be thought not to exist Which indeed so truly exists that it cannot even be thought not to exist.
2:15
Nam potest cogitari esse aliquid, quod non possit cogitari non esse; quod maius est quam quod non esse cogitari potest. Quare si id quo maius nequit cogitari, potest cogitari non esse: id ipsum quo maius cogitari nequit, non est id quo maius cogitari nequit; quod convenire non potest. Sic ergo vere est aliquid quo maius cogitari non potest, ut nec cogitari possit non esse. Et hoc es tu, Domine Deus noster. Sic ergo vere es, Domine, Deus meus, ut nec cogitari possis non esse. Et merito. Si enim aliqua mens posset cogitare aliquid melius te, ascenderet creatura super creatorem et iudicaret de creatore; quod valde est absurdum.
因為可以設想有一物存在,是不能被設想為不存在的;而這比那可被設想為不存在的更大。因此,那無可設想比之更大的,若能被設想為不存在:那同一位無可設想比之更大的,就不是那無可設想比之更大的了;而這是說不通的。所以確實有一位無可設想比之更大的真實存在,以致連被設想為不存在也不可能。這一位就是你,主我們的神。所以,主我的神,你真實存在,以致連被設想為不存在也不可能。這也是理所當然的。因為若有甚麼心思能設想出一物比你更美好,受造之物就要升高過造物主,並要論斷造物主;而這是極其荒謬的。
For there can be thought to exist something which cannot be thought not to exist; which is greater than that which can be thought not to exist. Wherefore if that than which a greater cannot be thought can be thought not to exist: that very thing than which a greater cannot be thought is not that than which a greater cannot be thought; which cannot be consistent. So therefore there truly exists something than which a greater cannot be thought, so that it cannot even be thought not to exist. And this are you, O Lord our God. So therefore you truly exist, O Lord my God, so that you cannot even be thought not to exist. And rightly so. For if any mind could think something better than you, the creature would ascend above the Creator and would judge concerning the Creator; which is utterly absurd.
2:16
Et quidem quidquid est aliud praeter te solum, potest cogitari non esse. Solus igitur verissime omnium et ideo maxime omnium habes esse, quia quidquid aliud est, non sic vere, et idcirco minus habet esse. Cur itaque "dixit insipiens in corde suo: non est Deus" [Ps 13,1; 52,1], cum tam in promptu sit rationali menti te maxime omnium esse? Cur, nisi quia stultus et insipiens? 4 Quomodo insipiens dixit in corde, quod cogitari non potest Verum quomodo dixit in corde quod cogitare non potuit; aut quomodo cogitare non potuit quod dixit in corde, cum idem sit dicere in corde et cogitare? Quod si vere, immo quia vere et cogitavit, quia dixit in corde, et non dixit in corde, quia cogitare non potuit:
並且凡是你獨一以外的任何別物,都能被設想為不存在。所以惟有你,在萬有中最真實地、因而最大程度地有存在,因為凡別的所存在的,都不如此真實地存在,所以較少地有存在。那麼為何「愚頑人心裏說,沒有神」〔詩十四1;五三1〕,既然對有理性的心思如此明顯,你乃是最大程度地存在?這豈不是因他蠢笨愚頑麼?四。論愚頑人如何在心裏說了那不能被設想的事。但他如何在心裏說了他所不能設想的;又如何不能設想他在心裏所說的,既然在心裏說與設想原是同一回事?但若他真是(不,正因他真是)既設想了——因他在心裏說了,又沒有在心裏說——因他不能設想:
And indeed whatever is anything other than you alone can be thought not to exist. You alone therefore most truly of all, and therefore most of all, have being, because whatever else exists does not exist so truly, and therefore has less being. Why then "did the fool say in his heart: there is no God" [Ps 13:1; 52:1], when it is so plainly evident to a rational mind that you exist most of all? Why, except because he is stupid and foolish? 4 How the fool said in his heart what cannot be thought But how did he say in his heart what he could not think; or how could he not think what he said in his heart, since to say in the heart and to think are the same? But if truly—nay, because truly—he both thought, because he said in his heart, and did not say in his heart, because he could not think:
2:17
non uno tantum modo dicitur aliquid in corde et cogitatur. Aliter enim cogitatur re, cum vox eam significans cogitatur, aliter cum id ipsum quod res est intelligitur. Illo itaque modo potest cogitari Deus non esse, isto vero minime. Nullus quippe intelligens id quod Deus est, potest cogitare quia Deus non est, licet haec verba dicat in corde, aut sine ulla aut cum aliqua extranea significatione. Deus enim est id quo maius cogitari non potest. Quod qui bene intelligit, utique intelligit id ipsum sic esse, ut nec cogitatione queat non esse. Qui ergo intelligit sic esse Deum, nequit eum non esse cogitare.
可見一物在心裏被說、被設想,不只是用一種方式。因為一物以一種方式被設想,是當那指稱它的字被設想之時;以另一種方式被設想,是當那物所是的本身被理解之時。照前一種方式,神可被設想為不存在;但照後一種方式,斷不能如此。因為凡理解神所是的,斷不能設想神不存在,縱然他可在心裏說這些字句,或全無意義,或帶著某種外來的意義。因為神乃是那無可設想比之更大的。凡好好理解這話的,必定理解這一位如此存在,以致連在思想中也不能不存在。所以凡理解神如此存在的,就不能設想祂不存在。
something is not said in the heart and thought in only one way. For a thing is thought in one way when the word signifying it is thought, in another way when that very thing which the thing is, is understood. In the former way, then, God can be thought not to exist, but in the latter way not at all. For no one who understands that which God is can think that God does not exist, although he may say these words in his heart, either with no signification at all or with some foreign signification. For God is that than which a greater cannot be thought. And whoever well understands this, surely understands that this very thing so exists that it cannot even in thought fail to exist. Whoever therefore understands God so to exist, cannot think him not to exist.
2:18
Gratias tibi, bone Domine, gratias tibi, quia quod prius credidi te donante, iam sic intelligo te illuminante, ut, si te esse nolim credere, non possim non intelligere. 5 Quod Deus sit quidquid melius est esse quam non esse: et solus existens per se omnia alia faciat de nihilo Quid igitur es. Domine Deus, quo nil maius valet cogitari? Sed quid es, nisi id quod summum omnium solum existens per seipsum, omnia alia fecit de nihilo? Quidquid enim hoc non est, minus est quam cogitari possit. Sed hoc de te cogitari non potest. Quod ergo bonum deest summo bono, per quod est omne bonum? Tu es itaque iustus, verax, beatus, et quidquid melius est esse quam non esse.
良善的主啊,感謝你,感謝你,因為我先前藉你的賜予所信的,如今藉你的光照如此明白,以致即使我不願信你存在,我也不能不明白這事。五。論神乃是凡有勝於無之一切;並論祂獨自憑自己存在,從無中造成其餘的萬有。那麼主神啊,你這無可設想比之更大的,究竟是甚麼呢?你究竟是甚麼,豈不就是那作為萬有之至高、獨自憑自己存在、從無中造成其餘萬有的麼?因為凡不是這樣的,就比可被設想的更小。但你不能被如此設想。那麼藉之而有一切善的至高之善,還缺甚麼善呢?所以你是公義的、信實的、有福的,並是凡有勝於無的一切。
Thanks to you, good Lord, thanks to you, that what I previously believed by your giving, I now so understand by your enlightening, that, even if I should not wish to believe that you exist, I could not fail to understand it. 5 That God is whatever it is better to be than not to be: and that, existing alone through himself, he makes all other things from nothing What therefore are you, Lord God, than whom nothing greater can be thought? But what are you, except that which, as the highest of all, existing alone through itself, made all other things from nothing? For whatever is not this is less than can be thought. But this cannot be thought of you. What good, then, is lacking to the highest good, through which is every good? You are therefore just, truthful, blessed, and whatever it is better to be than not to be.
2:19
Melius namque est esse iustum quam non iustum, beatum quam non 6 Quomodo sit sensibilis, cum non sit corpus Verum cum melius sit esse sensibilem, omnipotentem, misericordem, impassibilem quam non esse: quomodo es sensibilis, si non es corpus; aut omnipotens, si omnia non potes; aut misericors simul et impassibilis? Nam si sola corporea sunt sensibilia, quoniam sensus circa corpus et in corpore sunt: quomodo es sensibilis, cum non sis corpus, sed summus spiritus, qui corpore melior est? Sed si sentire non nisi cognoscere aut non nisi ad cognoscendum est qui enim sentit cognoscit secundum sensuum proprietatem, ut per visum colores, per gustum sapores :
因為作義者勝於不義,蒙福者勝於不蒙福。論神如何有知覺,雖然祂並非身體。既然有知覺、全能、有憐憫、又不受苦,勝於沒有這些:那麼,祢若不是身體,怎能有知覺?祢若不能行一切事,怎能全能?又怎能既有憐憫卻同時不受苦?因為若惟有具形體之物才能有知覺,既然諸感官是繞著身體、並在身體之內,那麼祢既不是身體,乃是至高的靈,比身體更美,怎能有知覺?但若知覺無非就是認識,或無非是為著認識——因為有知覺者乃按諸感官的特性而認識,如藉視覺認識顏色,藉味覺認識滋味——
For it is better to be just than not just, blessed than not blessed. How God is perceptive, though He is not a body. Since it is better to be perceptive, omnipotent, merciful, and impassible than not to be these things: how art Thou perceptive, if Thou art not a body; or omnipotent, if Thou canst not do all things; or merciful and at the same time impassible? For if only corporeal things are capable of perceiving, since the senses are about a body and within a body, how art Thou perceptive, when Thou art not a body but the highest spirit, who is better than a body? But if to perceive is nothing other than to know, or is only directed toward knowing — for he who perceives knows according to the property of the senses, as colors through sight, flavors through taste —
2:20
non inconvenienter dicitur aliquo modo, sentire quidquid aliquo modo cognoscit. Ergo, Domine, quamvis non sis corpus, vere tamen eo modo summe sensibilis es, quo summe omnia cognoscis, non quo animal corporeo sensu cognoscit. 7 Quomodo sit omnipotens, cum multa non possit Sed et omnipotens quomodo es, si omnia non potes? Aut si non potes corrumpi nec mentiri nec facere verum esse falsum, ut quod factum est non esse factum, et plura similiter: quomodo potes omnia? An haec posse non est potentia, sed impotentia? Nam qui haec potest quod sibi non expedit et quod non debet potest. Quae quanto magis potest, tanto magis adversitas et perversitas possunt in illum et ipse minus contra illas.
那麼,凡以某種方式認識的,就以某種方式有知覺,這話說來並不不妥。所以,主啊,祢雖不是身體,卻真是至高地有知覺,因祢至高地認識萬有,並非如動物藉形體的感官而認識。論神如何全能,雖然有許多事祂不能行。但祢若不能行一切事,怎能全能呢?或者,祢若不能被敗壞、不能說謊、不能使真的成為假的,使已成之事如同未成,以及許多類似的事:祢怎能行一切事呢?難道能行這些事不是能力,反倒是無能麼?因為能行這些事的,乃是能行對自己無益的、並自己不當行的事。他越能行這些,逆境與悖謬就越能勝過他,而他越無力抵擋它們。
then it is not improperly said that whatever in some manner knows, in some manner perceives. Therefore, Lord, although Thou art not a body, yet truly Thou art in the highest degree perceptive in that manner whereby Thou knowest all things in the highest degree, not in the manner whereby an animal knows through bodily sense. How God is omnipotent, although He cannot do many things. But how art Thou omnipotent, if Thou canst not do all things? Or if Thou canst not be corrupted, nor lie, nor make the true to be false, so that what has been done should not have been done, and many like things: how canst Thou do all things? Or is the power to do these things not power, but powerlessness? For he who can do these things can do what is not expedient for him and what he ought not. The more he is able to do them, the more adversity and perversity are able to prevail against him, and he the less against them.
2:21
Qui ergo sic potest, non potentia potest, sed impotentia. Non enim ideo dicitur posse, quia ipse possit, sed quia sua impotentia facit aliud in se posse; sive aliquo alio genere loquendi, sicut multa improprie dicuntur. Ut cum ponimus 'esse' pro 'non esse', et 'facere' pro eo quod est 'non facere', aut pro 'nihil facere'. Nam saepe dicimus ei, qui rem aliquam esse negat: sic est, quemadmodum dicis esse; cum magis proprie videatur dici: sic non est quemadmodum dicis non esse. Item dicimus: iste sedet, sicut ille facit, aut: iste quiescit, sicut ille facit; cum 'sedere' sit quiddam non facere et 'quiescere' sit nihil facere.
所以,能如此行的,並非藉能力而行,乃是藉無能而行。因為他被稱為能,並不是因他自己有能力,乃是因他的無能使別的事物得以勝過他;或者這是用另一種說法說的,正如許多事是被不嚴格地說出的。譬如我們用「是」代替「不是」,用「作」代替那「不作」或「甚麼都不作」。因為我們常對否認某物存在的人說:正如你說它是這樣,它就是這樣;其實更恰當的說法是:正如你說它不是這樣,它就不是這樣。同樣我們說:那人坐著,正如這人那樣;或說:那人歇息,正如這人那樣;其實「坐」乃是一種不作,「歇息」乃是甚麼都不作。
He, therefore, who can do thus, can do so not by power but by powerlessness. For he is not said to be able because he himself has power, but because his powerlessness makes something else have power over him; or else it is said by some other manner of speech, just as many things are said improperly. As when we put 'to be' for 'not to be', and 'to do' for that which is 'not to do', or for 'to do nothing'. For we often say to one who denies that some thing exists: it is so, just as you say it to be; whereas it would more properly be said: it is not so, just as you say it not to be. Likewise we say: that man sits, as this one does; or: that man rests, as this one does; whereas 'to sit' is a certain not-doing, and 'to rest' is doing nothing.
2:22
Sic itaque, cum dicitur habere potentiam faciendi aut patiendi quod sibi non expedit aut quod non debet, impotentia intelligitur per potentiam; quia quo plus habet hanc potentiam, eo adversitas et perversitas in illum sunt potentiores, et ille contra eas impotentior. Ergo, Domine Deus, inde verius et omnipotens, quia nihil potes per impotentiam, et nihil potest contra te. 8 Quomodo sit misericors et impassibilis Sed et misericors simul et impassibilis quomodo es? Nam si es impassibilis, non compateris; si non compateris, non est tibi miserum cor ex compassione miseri, quod est esse misericordem. At si non es misericors, unde miseris est tanta consolatio?
因此,當人被說成有能力去作或承受那對自己無益的、或自己不當行的事時,那「能力」之名底下所領會的乃是無能;因為他越有這「能力」,逆境與悖謬就越勝過他,而他越無力抵擋它們。所以,主神啊,祢正因不能藉無能行甚麼,且沒有甚麼能勝過祢,祢就更真是全能的。論神如何既有憐憫又不受苦。但祢怎能既有憐憫又不受苦呢?因為祢若不受苦,就不與人同苦;祢若不與人同苦,就不因憐恤苦難之人而心懷愁苦,而這正是有憐憫的意思。但祢若不是有憐憫的,受苦之人從何得著這樣大的安慰呢?
Thus then, when one is said to have the power of doing or suffering what is not expedient for him or what he ought not, powerlessness is understood under the name of power; for the more he has this power, the more adversity and perversity have power over him, and he is the more powerless against them. Therefore, O Lord God, Thou art the more truly omnipotent precisely because Thou canst do nothing through powerlessness, and nothing can prevail against Thee. How God is at once merciful and impassible. But how art Thou at once merciful and impassible? For if Thou art impassible, Thou dost not suffer with others; if Thou dost not suffer with others, Thy heart is not made wretched out of compassion for the wretched, which is what it means to be merciful. But if Thou art not merciful, whence comes to the wretched such great consolation?
2:23
Quomodo ergo es et non es misericors, Domine, nisi quia es misericors secundum nos, et non es secundum te? Es quippe secundum nostrum sensum, et non es secundum tuum. Etenim cum tu respicis nos miseros, nos sentimus misericordis effectum, tu non sentis affectum. Et misericors es igitur, quia misericors salvas et peccatoribus tuis parcis; et misericors non es, quia nulla miseriae compassione afficeris. 9 Quomodo totus iustus es et summe iustus parcat malis, et quod iuste misereatur malis Verum malis quomodo parcis, si es totus iustus et summe iustus? Quomodo enim totus et summe iustus facit aliquid non iustum? Aut quae iustitia est merenti mortem aeternam dare vitam sempiternam?
主啊,祢怎能既有憐憫又非有憐憫呢?無非是說,祢就我們而言是有憐憫的,就祢自己而言卻非有憐憫的。因為照我們的感受,祢是有憐憫的;照祢自己,卻非有憐憫的。確實,當祢眷顧我們這些苦難之人時,我們感受到憐憫的果效,祢卻不感受到那情懷。所以,祢是有憐憫的,因祢憐憫地拯救、又赦免祢的罪人;祢又非有憐憫的,因祢並不被任何對苦難的同情所動。論那全然公義、至高公義者如何能赦免惡人,並如何公義地憐憫惡人。但祢若是全然公義、至高公義的,怎能赦免惡人呢?因為那全然並至高公義者,怎能行甚麼不義的事呢?或者,把永遠的生命賜給該受永遠死亡的人,這是甚麼公義呢?
How then art Thou both merciful and not merciful, O Lord, except that Thou art merciful in respect of us and not merciful in respect of Thyself? For Thou art merciful according to our experience, and not merciful according to Thine own. Indeed, when Thou lookest upon us in our wretchedness, we feel the effect of mercy, but Thou dost not feel the affection of it. And so Thou art merciful, because Thou dost mercifully save and spare Thy sinners; and Thou art not merciful, because Thou art moved by no suffering of compassion for misery. How He who is wholly just and supremely just can spare the wicked, and how He justly has mercy on the wicked. But how dost Thou spare the wicked, if Thou art wholly just and supremely just? For how does one wholly and supremely just do anything not just? Or what justice is it to give eternal life to him who deserves eternal death?
2:24
Unde ergo, bone Deus, bone bonis et malis, unde tibi salvare malos, si hoc non est iustum, et tu facis aliquid non iustum? An quia bonitas tua est incomprehensibilis, latet hoc in "luce inaccessibili quam habitas" [1 Tim 6,16]? Vere in altissimo et secretissimo bonitatis tuae latet fons, unde manat fluvius misericordiae tuae. Nam cum totus et summe iustus sis, tamen idcirco etiam malis benignus es, quia totus summe bonus es. Minus namque bonus esses, si nulli malo esses benignus. Melior est enim qui et bonis et malis bonus est, quam qui bonis tantum est bonus. Et melior est, qui malis et puniendo et parcendo est bonus, quam qui puniendo tantum.
良善的神啊,祢善待善人,也善待惡人,那麼,這拯救惡人之事若不公義,而祢竟行了甚麼不義的事,這從何而來呢?難道是因祢的良善不可測度,這事便隱藏在祢所居住那「人不能靠近的光裏」〔提前六16〕麼?確實,在祢良善至深至隱之處,隱藏著那源頭,從那裏湧出祢憐憫的江河。因為祢雖是全然並至高公義的,卻正因這緣故,祢連惡人也以恩慈相待,因祢是全然並至高良善的。因為祢若不以恩慈待任何惡人,祢的良善就要減損了。因為那既善待善人又善待惡人的,勝過那只善待善人的。那既藉懲罰又藉赦免來善待惡人的,勝過那只藉懲罰的。
Whence then, O good God, good to the good and to the wicked, whence comes to Thee the saving of the wicked, if this is not just, and Thou doest something not just? Or is it that, because Thy goodness is incomprehensible, this lies hidden in that "unapproachable light wherein Thou dwellest" [1 Tim 6:16]? Truly in the deepest and most secret place of Thy goodness lies hidden the source from which flows the river of Thy mercy. For though Thou art wholly and supremely just, yet for this very reason Thou art kind even to the wicked, because Thou art wholly and supremely good. For Thou wouldst be less good, if Thou wert kind to no wicked man. For he is better who is good both to the good and to the wicked, than he who is good only to the good. And He is better who is good to the wicked both by punishing and by sparing, than He who is good only by punishing.
2:25
Ideo ergo misericors es, quia totus et summe bonus es. Et cum forsitan videatur, cur bonis bona et malis mala retribuas, illud certe penitus est mirandum, cur tu totus iustus et nullo egens malis et reis tuis bona tribuas. O altitudo bonitatis tuae, Deus! et videtur, unde sis misericors, et non pervidetur. Cernitur, unde flumen manat, et non perspicitur fons, unde nascatur. Nam et de plenitudine bonitatis est, quia peccatoribus tuis pius es; et in altitudine bonitatis latet, qua ratione hoc es. Etenim licet bonis bona et malis mala ex bonitate retribuas, ratio tamen iustitiae hoc postulare videtur. Cum vero malis bona tribuis:
所以,祢有憐憫,乃因祢是全然並至高良善的。雖然或許顯而易見,祢為何當以善報善人、以惡報惡人,但這事確實全然可驚奇:祢這全然公義、一無所缺的,為何竟把美善賜給惡人,並祢這些有罪的人。神啊,祢良善的深處!人看得見祢的憐憫從何而來,卻看不透。人辨得出那河流從何湧出,卻看不見它所從生的源頭。因為祢恩慈待祢的罪人,乃是出於良善的豐滿;而祢何以如此,這道理卻隱藏在良善的深處。因為祢雖出於良善以善報善人、以惡報惡人,而公義的原則似乎也正要求如此。但當祢把美善賜給惡人時:
For this reason therefore Thou art merciful, because Thou art wholly and supremely good. And whereas it may perhaps appear plain why Thou shouldst repay good to the good and evil to the wicked, this surely is wholly to be wondered at: why Thou, who art wholly just and lackest nothing, shouldst bestow good things upon the wicked and upon Thy guilty ones. O the depth of Thy goodness, O God! It is seen whence Thou art merciful, and yet it is not seen through. It is discerned whence the stream flows, and yet the source whence it is born is not perceived. For it is of the fulness of goodness that Thou art tender toward Thy sinners; and it lies hidden in the depth of goodness by what reason Thou art this. For though out of goodness Thou repayest good to the good and evil to the wicked, yet the principle of justice seems to demand this. But when Thou bestowest good upon the wicked:
2:26
et scitur, quia summe bonus hoc facere voluit, et mirum est, cur summe iustus hoc velle potuit. O misericordia, de quam opulenta dulcedine et dulci opulentia nobis profluis! O immensitas bonitatis Dei, quo affectu amanda es peccatoribus! Iustos enim salvas iustitia comitante; istos vero liberas iustitia damnante. Illos meritis adiuvantibus istos meritis repugnantibus. Illos bona, quae dedisti, cognoscendo, istos mala, quae odisti, ignoscendo. O immensa bonitas, quae sic omnem intellectum excedis, veniat super me misericordia illa, quae de tanta opulentia tui procedit! Influat in me, quae profluit de te. Parce per clementiam, ne ulciscaris per iustitiam.
人固然知道那至高良善者願意如此行,卻不知何以那至高公義者竟能存這意願,這真是奇事。憐憫啊,祢從何等豐盈的甘甜、甘甜的豐盈中向我們湧流而出!神良善的無量啊,罪人當以何等的愛來愛祢!因為義人祢加以拯救,公義隨之相伴;惡人祢加以釋放,公義加以定罪。前者藉著功德相助,後者卻是功德相阻。前者是因認得祢所賜的美善,後者卻是因祢赦免祢所恨惡的諸惡。無量的良善啊,祢如此超越一切悟性,願那從祢這樣豐盈所發出的憐憫臨到我!願那從祢湧流的流入我裏面。求祢藉慈憐赦免,免得祢藉公義報應。
it is known indeed that the supremely good One willed to do this, and yet it is a marvel why the supremely just One could will this. O mercy, out of how rich a sweetness and sweet richness thou flowest forth to us! O immensity of the goodness of God, with what affection art Thou to be loved by sinners! For the just Thou savest, with justice attending; but the wicked Thou deliverest, with justice condemning. The former by their merits helping, the latter by their merits resisting. The former by acknowledging the good things Thou hast given, the latter by pardoning the evil things Thou hast hated. O measureless goodness, which thus dost exceed all understanding, let that mercy come upon me which proceeds from Thy so great richness! Let that flow into me which flows forth from Thee. Spare through clemency, lest Thou take vengeance through justice.
2:27
Nam etsi difficile sit intelligere, quomodo misericordia tua non absit a tua iustitia, necessarium tamen est credere, quia nequamquam adversatur quod exundat ex bonitate, quae nulla est sine iustitia, immo vere concordat iustitiae. Nempe si misericors es, quia es summe bonus, et summe bonus non es, nisi quia es summe iustus: vere idcirco es misericors, quia summe iustus es. Adiuva me, iuste et misericors Deus, cuius lucem quaero, adiuva me, ut intelligam quod dico. Vere ergo ideo misericors es, . Ergone misericordia tua nascitur ex iustitia tua? Ergone parcis malis ex iustitia? Si sic est, Domine, si sic est, doce me quomodo est.
因為祢的憐憫如何不離祢的公義,這雖難以明白,卻必須信:那從良善所滿溢出來的——而良善若無公義便無所有——絕不與公義相違;不,乃是真與公義相和。誠然,祢若因是至高良善而有憐憫,而祢若非至高公義便非至高良善:那麼祢真是正因這緣故有憐憫,就是因祢是至高公義的。公義又有憐憫的神啊,我尋求祢的光,求祢幫助我,使我明白我所說的。所以,祢真是因這緣故有憐憫。那麼,祢的憐憫是從祢的公義而生的麼?那麼,祢赦免惡人是出於公義的麼?主啊,若是這樣,若是這樣,求祢教導我這是怎麼回事。
For although it be hard to understand how Thy mercy is not absent from Thy justice, yet it is necessary to believe that what overflows from goodness — which is nothing without justice — is in no way contrary to it; nay, that it truly agrees with justice. Surely if Thou art merciful because Thou art supremely good, and Thou art not supremely good except because Thou art supremely just: then truly Thou art merciful for this very reason, that Thou art supremely just. Help me, just and merciful God, whose light I seek, help me that I may understand what I say. Truly therefore Thou art merciful for this reason. Is Thy mercy then born of Thy justice? Dost Thou then spare the wicked out of justice? If it is so, Lord, if it is so, teach me how it is so.
2:28
An quia iustum est te sic esse bonum, ut nequeas intelligi melior, et sic potenter operari, ut non possis cogitari potentius? Quid enim hoc iustius? Hoc utique non fieret, si esses bonus tantum retribuendo et non parcendo, et si faceres de non bonis tantum bonos et non etiam de malis. Hoc itaque modo iustum est ut parcas malis, et ut facias bonos de malis. Denique quod non iuste fit, non debet fieri; et quod non debet fieri, iniuste fit. Si ergo non iuste malis misereris, non debes misereri; et si non debes misereri, iniuste misereris. Quod si nefas est dicere, fas est credere te iuste misereri malis. 10 Quomodo iuste puniat et iuste parcat malis Sed iustum est, ut malos punias.
莫非是因為這事乃是公義的,就是祢當這樣良善,以致不能被想得更好,又當這樣大能地運行,以致不能被思想得更有能力麼?有甚麼比這更公義呢?但這事若祢只藉報應而非藉赦免來顯為良善,又若祢只從不善之人造出善人,而不也從惡人造出善人,這事就斷不能成就了。所以照這樣,祢赦免惡人、並從惡人造出善人,乃是公義的。再者,凡不公義而行的,就不當行;凡不當行的,行了便是不義。所以,祢若不義地憐憫惡人,祢就不當憐憫;祢若不當憐憫,祢就是不義地憐憫了。但這話既是邪惡不可說的,那麼信祢公義地憐憫惡人乃是正當的。論祂如何公義地懲罰、又公義地赦免惡人。然而,祢懲罰惡人乃是公義的。
Is it because it is just that Thou shouldst be so good that Thou canst not be conceived better, and shouldst work so mightily that Thou canst not be thought of as more mighty? For what is more just than this? But this surely would not come about if Thou wert good only by repaying and not by sparing, and if Thou madest good men only out of those not good, and not also out of the wicked. In this way, then, it is just that Thou shouldst spare the wicked, and shouldst make good men out of the wicked. Finally, what is not done justly ought not to be done; and what ought not to be done is done unjustly. If, therefore, Thou hast mercy on the wicked unjustly, Thou oughtest not to have mercy; and if Thou oughtest not to have mercy, Thou hast mercy unjustly. But since it is wicked to say this, it is right to believe that Thou hast mercy on the wicked justly. How He justly punishes and justly spares the wicked. But it is just that Thou shouldst punish the wicked.
2:29
Quid namque iustius, quam ut boni bona et mali mala recipiant? Quomodo ergo et iustum est ut malos punias, et iustum est ut malis parcas? An alio modo iuste punis malos, et alio modo iuste parcis malis? Cum enim punis malos, iustum est, quia illorum meritis convenit; cum vero parcis malis, iustum est, non quia illorum meritis, sed quia bonitati tuae condecens est. Nam parcendo malis ita iustus es secundum te et non secundum nos, sicut misericors es secundum nos et non secundum te. Quoniam salvando nos, quos iuste perderes, sicut misericors es, non quia tu sentias affectum, sed quia nos sentimus effectum: ita iustus es, non quia nobis reddas debitum, sed quia facis quod decet te summe bonum.
因為有甚麼比善人得善、惡人得惡更公義的呢?那麼,祢懲罰惡人為公義,祢赦免惡人也為公義,這是怎麼回事呢?莫非祢公義地懲罰惡人是一種方式,公義地赦免惡人是另一種方式麼?因為當祢懲罰惡人時,這是公義的,因合乎他們的應得;但當祢赦免惡人時,這是公義的,並非因合乎他們的應得,乃因相稱於祢的良善。因為在赦免惡人這事上,祢就祢自己而言是公義的,就我們而言卻不是,正如祢就我們而言是有憐憫的,就祢自己而言卻不是。因為在拯救我們——祢本可公義地毀滅的——這事上,正如祢有憐憫並非因祢感受那情懷,乃因我們感受那果效,照樣祢是公義的,並非因祢償還我們所當得的,乃因祢行那相稱於祢這至高良善者的事。
For what is more just than that the good should receive good and the wicked evil? How then is it both just that Thou shouldst punish the wicked, and just that Thou shouldst spare the wicked? Or dost Thou justly punish the wicked in one manner, and justly spare the wicked in another manner? For when Thou punishest the wicked, it is just, because it accords with their deserts; but when Thou sparest the wicked, it is just, not because it accords with their deserts, but because it befits Thy goodness. For in sparing the wicked Thou art just in respect of Thyself and not in respect of us, just as Thou art merciful in respect of us and not in respect of Thyself. For in saving us, whom Thou mightest justly destroy, just as Thou art merciful not because Thou feelest the affection but because we feel the effect, so Thou art just not because Thou renderest to us our due, but because Thou doest what befits Thee, the supremely good.
2:30
Sic itaque sine repugnantia iuste punis et iuste parcis. 11 Quomodo universae viae Domini misericordia et veritas, et tamen iustus Dominus in omnibus viis suis Sed numquid etiam non est iustum secundum te, Domine, ut malos punias? Iustum quippe est te sic esse iustum, ut iustior nequeas cogitari. Quod nequaquam esses, si tantum bonis bona et non malis mala redderes. Iustior enim est qui et bonis et malis, quam qui bonis tantum merita retribuit. Iustum igitur est secundum te, iuste et benigne Deus, et cum punis et cum parcis. Vere igitur "universae viae Domini misericordia et veritas" et tamen "iustus Dominus in omnibus viis suis" [Ps 22,10; 144,17]. Et utique sine repugnantia;
因此,祢公義地懲罰、又公義地赦免,並無矛盾。論主一切的道路怎能是憐憫和真實,主在祂一切的道路上卻仍是公義的。但主啊,就祢而言,祢懲罰惡人豈不也是公義的麼?祢當這樣公義,以致不能被想得更公義,這確是公義的。但祢若只以善報善人,不以惡報惡人,祢就斷不能如此了。因為那照應得以善惡報善人惡人的,比那只報善人的,更為公義。所以,公義又恩慈的神啊,就祢而言,無論祢懲罰或赦免,都是公義的。所以,「主一切的道路盡都是慈愛和真實」,而「主在祂一切所行的,無不公義」〔詩二五10;一四五17〕,這是真的。並且確實毫無矛盾;
Thus then without contradiction Thou justly punishest and justly sparest. How all the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth, and yet the Lord is just in all His ways. But is it not also just, in respect of Thee, O Lord, that Thou shouldst punish the wicked? Surely it is just that Thou shouldst be so just that Thou canst not be conceived more just. And this Thou wouldst by no means be, if Thou didst render good only to the good and not evil to the wicked. For he is more just who repays to both the good and the wicked according to their deserts, than he who does so to the good alone. It is therefore just, in respect of Thee, O just and kindly God, both when Thou punishest and when Thou sparest. Truly therefore "all the ways of the Lord are mercy and truth", and yet "the Lord is just in all His ways" [Ps 25:10; 145:17]. And indeed without any contradiction;
2:31
quia quos vis punire, non est iustum salvari, et quibus vis parcere, non est iustum damnari. Nam id solum iustum est quod vis et non iustum quod non vis. Sic ergo nascitur de iustitia tua misericordia tua, quia iustum est te sic esse bonum, ut et parcendo sis bonus. Et hoc est forsitan, cur summe iustus potest velle bona malis. Sed si utcumque capi potest, cur malos potes velle salvare: illud certe nulla ratione comprehendi potest, cur de similibus malis hos magis salves quam illos per summam bonitatem, et illos magis damnes quam istos per summam iustitiam.
因為祢所要懲罰的,他們得救便不公義;祢所要赦免的,他們受定罪便不公義。因為惟有祢所願意的才是公義的,祢所不願意的便不公義。因此,祢的憐憫乃是從祢的公義而生,因為祢當這樣良善,以致連在赦免上祢也是良善的,這乃是公義的。這或許就是那至高公義者能為惡人存善願的緣故。但祢何以能願意拯救惡人,這縱然多少可以領會:然而有一事確實無論如何也不能藉理性測透——就是在同樣的惡人中,祢為何憑至高的良善寧救這些而不救那些,又憑至高的公義寧定那些的罪而不定這些的罪。
for those whom Thou willest to punish, it is not just that they should be saved; and those whom Thou willest to spare, it is not just that they should be condemned. For that alone is just which Thou willest, and that not just which Thou willest not. Thus then Thy mercy is born of Thy justice, because it is just that Thou shouldst be so good that Thou art good even in sparing. And this is perhaps the reason why the supremely just One can will good things for the wicked. But even if it can in some way be grasped why Thou canst will to save the wicked: this surely can by no reasoning be comprehended — why, out of the like wicked, Thou savest these rather than those by Thy supreme goodness, and condemnest those rather than these by Thy supreme justice.
2:32
Sic ergo vere es sensibilis, omnipotens, misericors et impassibilis, quemadmodum vivens, sapiens, bonus, beatus, aeternus, et quidem melius esse quam non esse. 12 Quod Deus sit ipsa vita qua vivit, et sic de similibus Sed certe quidquid es, non per aliud es quam per teipsum. Tu es igitur ipsa vita qua vivis, et sapientia qua sapis, et bonitas ipsa qua bonis et malis bonus es; et ita de similibus. 13 Quomodo solus sit incircumscriptus et aeternus, cum alii spiritus sint incircumscripti et aeterni Sed omne quod clauditur aliquatenus loco et tempore, minus est quam nulla lex loci aut temporis coercet. Quoniam ergo maius te nihil est, nullus locus aut tempus te cohibet, sed ubique et semper es.
因此,祢真是有知覺、全能、有憐憫、又不受苦的,正如祢是活的、智慧的、良善的、有福的、永遠的——而成為這些的確勝於不是這些。論神就是祂藉以活著的生命,其餘屬性亦然。但凡祢所是的,祢無一不是藉著祢自己而是。所以,祢就是祢藉以活著的生命,是祢藉以有智慧的智慧,是祢藉以善待善人惡人的良善本身;其餘屬性也是如此。論祂如何單獨不受限、又永遠,雖然別的靈也不受限、又永遠。但凡多少被空間和時間所封閉的,都不及那不受任何空間或時間之律所拘束的。既然沒有甚麼比祢更大,就沒有空間或時間能限制祢,乃是祢無處不在、永遠常在。
Thus then Thou art truly perceptive, omnipotent, merciful, and impassible, just as Thou art living, wise, good, blessed, eternal — and indeed it is better to be these than not to be. That God is the very life by which He lives, and so of like attributes. But surely whatever Thou art, Thou art not through anything other than through Thyself. Thou art therefore the very life by which Thou livest, and the wisdom by which Thou art wise, and the very goodness by which Thou art good to the good and to the wicked; and so it is with like attributes. How He alone is uncircumscribed and eternal, although other spirits are uncircumscribed and eternal. But everything that is in any way enclosed by place and time is less than that which no law of place or time constrains. Since therefore nothing is greater than Thou, no place or time confines Thee, but Thou art everywhere and always.
2:33
Quod quia de te solo dici potest, tu solus incircumscriptus es et aeternus. Quomodo igitur dicuntur et alii spiritus incircumscripti et aeterni? Et quidem solus es aeternus, quia solus omnium, sicut non desinis, sic non incipis esse. Sed solus quomodo es incircumscriptus? An creatus spiritus ad te collatus est circumscriptus, ad corpus vero incircumscriptus? Nempe omnino circumscriptum est, quod cum alicubi totum est, non potest simul esse alibi; quod de solis corporeis cernitur. Incircumscriptum vero, quod simul est ubique totum; quod de te solo intelligitur. Circumscriptum autem simul et incircumscriptum est, quod, cum alicubi sit totum, potest simul esse totum alibi, non tamen ubique;
因為這話惟獨能用以論祢,所以惟有祢不受限、又永遠。那麼,別的靈怎能也被稱為不受限、又永遠呢?實在說來,惟有祢是永遠的,因為惟有祢在萬有中既不止息,也不開始存在。但祢怎能單獨不受限呢?莫非受造之靈相較於祢是受限的,相較於身體卻是不受限的麼?凡完全受限的,就是當它整個在某處時,便不能同時在別處;這只見於具形體之物。凡不受限的,就是整個同時無處不在;這惟獨論到祢才能領會。凡既受限又不受限的,就是當它整個在某處時,能同時整個在別處,卻不能無處不在;
And because this can be said of Thee alone, Thou alone art uncircumscribed and eternal. How then are other spirits also said to be uncircumscribed and eternal? And indeed Thou alone art eternal, because Thou alone of all things, even as Thou dost not cease, so dost not begin to be. But how art Thou alone uncircumscribed? Is it that a created spirit, compared to Thee, is circumscribed, but compared to a body is uncircumscribed? Surely that is wholly circumscribed which, when it is somewhere as a whole, cannot at the same time be elsewhere; and this is seen only of corporeal things. But that is uncircumscribed which is at the same time everywhere as a whole; and this is understood of Thee alone. But that is at once circumscribed and uncircumscribed which, when it is somewhere as a whole, can at the same time be wholly elsewhere, yet not everywhere;
2:34
quod de creatis spiritibus cognoscitur. Si enim non esset anima tota in singulis membris sui corporis, non sentiret tota in singulis. Tu ergo, domine, singulariter es incircumscriptus et aeternus, et tamen et alii spiritus sunt incircumscripti et aeterni. 14 Quomodo et cur videtur et non videtur Deus a quaerentibus eum An invenisti, anima mea, quod quaerebas? Quaerebas Deum et invenisti eum esse quiddam summum omnium, quo nihil melius cogitari potest; et hoc esse ipsam vitam, lucem, sapientiam, bonitatem, aeternam beatitudinem et beatam aeternitatem; et hoc esse ubique et semper. Nam si non invenisti Deum tuum:
這可見於受造之靈。因為魂若不是整個在身體的各肢體之內,就不能整個在各肢體中有知覺。所以,主啊,惟獨祢以獨特的方式不受限、又永遠,然而別的靈也不受限、又永遠。論神如何並為何被尋求祂的人看見、又不被看見。我的魂哪,你尋見了你所尋求的麼?你尋求神,並已尋見祂是萬有中的某一至高者,沒有甚麼比祂更美可被思想;又尋見這位就是生命本身、是光、是智慧、是良善、是永遠的福樂與有福的永遠;又尋見這位無處不在、永遠常在。因為你若沒有尋見你的神:
and this is recognized of created spirits. For if the soul were not whole in each member of its body, it would not perceive as a whole in each member. Thou therefore, O Lord, art in a singular way uncircumscribed and eternal, and yet other spirits also are uncircumscribed and eternal. How and why God is seen and not seen by those who seek Him. Hast thou found, O my soul, what thou wast seeking? Thou wast seeking God, and thou hast found Him to be a certain highest of all, than which nothing better can be conceived; and that this is life itself, light, wisdom, goodness, eternal blessedness and blessed eternity; and that this is everywhere and always. For if thou hast not found thy God:
2:35
quomodo est ille hoc quod invenisti, et quod illum tam certa veritate et vera certitudine intellexisti? Si vero invenisti: quid est, quod non sentis quod invenisti? Cur non te sentit, Domine Deus, anima mea, si invenit te? An non invenit, quem invenit esse lucem et veritatem? Quomodo namque intellexit hoc, nisi videndo lucem et veritatem? Aut potuit omnino aliquid intelligere de te, nisi per "lucem tuam et veritatem tuam" [Ps 42,3]? Si ergo vidit lucem et veritatem, vidit te. Si non vidit te, non vidit lucem nec veritatem. An et veritas et lux est quod vidit, et tamen nondum te vidit, quia vidit te aliquatenus, sed non vidit te "sicuti es" [1 Joh 3,2]?
祂怎能是你所尋見的,又怎能是你以這樣確切的真理、真確的把握所領會的呢?但你若實在尋見了祂:你怎麼不感知你所尋見的呢?主神啊,我的魂若尋見了祢,為何不感知祢呢?或者,它所尋見為光、為真理的,它並沒有尋見麼?因為它若非藉著看見光與真理,怎能領會這事呢?或者,它若非藉著「祢的光、祢的真理」〔詩四三3〕,豈能領會關乎祢的任何事麼?所以,它若看見了光與真理,就看見了祢。它若沒有看見祢,就沒有看見光,也沒有看見真理。或者,它所看見的既是真理又是光,卻仍未看見祢,因它在某種程度上看見了祢,卻沒有看見祢的「真體」〔約壹三2〕麼?
how is He that which thou hast found, and that which thou hast understood Him to be with such sure truth and true certainty? But if thou hast indeed found Him: what is it that thou dost not perceive what thou hast found? Why does my soul not perceive Thee, O Lord God, if it has found Thee? Or has it not found Him whom it has found to be light and truth? For how did it understand this, except by seeing light and truth? Or could it understand anything at all of Thee, except through "Thy light and Thy truth" [Ps 43:3]? If, therefore, it saw light and truth, it saw Thee. If it did not see Thee, it saw neither light nor truth. Or is it both truth and light that it saw, and yet it has not yet seen Thee, because it saw Thee in some measure, but did not see Thee "as Thou art" [1 John 3:2]?
2:36
Domine Deus meus, formator et reformator meus, dic desideranti animae meae, quid aliud es, quam quod vidit, ut pure videat quod desiderat. Intendit se ut plus videat, et nihil videt ultra hoc quod vidit, nisi tenebras; immo non videt "tenebras, quae nullae sunt in te" [1 Joh 1,5], sed videt se non plus posse videre propter tenebras suas. Cur hoc, Domine cur hoc? Tenebratur oculus eius infirmitate sua, aut reverberatur fulgore tuo? Sed certe et tenebratur in se, et reverberatur a te. Utique et obscuratur sua brevitate, et obruitur tua immensitate. Vere et contrahitur angustia sua, et vincitur amplitudine tua. Quanta namque est lux illa, de qua micat omne verum. quod rationali menti lucet!
主我的神,我的塑造者與再造者啊,求祢告訴我這渴慕的魂,除了它所看見的之外,祢還是甚麼,使它能純淨地看見它所渴慕的。它竭力要看見更多,卻看不見它所看見之外的甚麼,惟見黑暗;不,它並非看見那「在祢裏面毫無的黑暗」〔約壹一5〕,乃是看見因自己的黑暗便不能再看得更遠。主啊,這是為何?這是為何?它的眼是被自己的軟弱所昏暗,還是被祢的光輝所擊退呢?確實是既在自身被昏暗,又被祢擊退。實在是既被自己的渺小所遮蔽,又被祢的無量所淹沒。實在是既被自己的狹隘所束縮,又被祢的廣大所勝過。因為那光是何等的大,凡照亮理性心思的真理,無不從那光中閃耀!
O Lord my God, my fashioner and re-fashioner, tell my desiring soul what else Thou art than that which it has seen, that it may purely see what it desires. It strains itself to see more, and sees nothing beyond what it has seen, save darkness; nay, it does not see "darkness, which is none in Thee" [1 John 1:5], but it sees that it can see no further because of its own darkness. Why is this, O Lord, why is this? Is its eye darkened by its own weakness, or beaten back by Thy splendor? Surely it is both darkened in itself and beaten back by Thee. Indeed it is both obscured by its own smallness and overwhelmed by Thy immensity. Truly it is both narrowed by its own straitness and overcome by Thy vastness. For how great is that light, from which flashes every truth that shines upon the rational mind!
下一段 →
← 第 1 章
12

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。