📜 Verbum · 聖言
原文誦讀聖經與教父文獻
♥ 贊助

← 回書卷目次 · 拉丁教父 › 文集(CSEL)

文集(CSEL) 第 17 章 第 2/16 段

拉丁文原文.38 節.部分字詞可點開查義.本章太長已分段,此段為 17:40–17:77(全章共 584 節)

← 第 16 章
← 上一段下一段 →
ℹ️ 本語料沒有逐節的詞法標註,字義是依字形比對詞典得到的——對上了不代表是同一個字(變化形可能與另一個字的原形同形)。需要精確判斷時請覆核原文與專門詞典。
ℹ️ 中英對照為本站自譯,直接譯自本頁的原文(非和合本/WEB —— 那兩者譯自馬所拉文本,與本頁底本不同)。
17:40
non ergo libramentis suis inmobilis manet, sed frequenter dei nutu et arbitrio commouetur, sicut et Iob dicit quia dominus commouet eam a fundamentis, columnae autem eius exagitantur et alibi: nuda inferna in conspectu eius, et non est morti inuolucrum. extendens boream pro nihilo, suspendens terram in nihilo, alligans aquam in nubibus suis. columnae caeli euolauerunt et expauerunt ab increpatione eius. uirtute mitigauit mare, disciplina strauit cetum, claustra autem caeli timent eum. uoluntate igitur dei inmobilis manet et stat in saeculum terra secundum Ecclesiastae sententiam et in uoluntate dei mouetur et nutat. non.
所以地並非靠自己的平衡保持不動,乃是常被神的點頭與裁定所搖動,正如約伯也說:「主從根基搖動大地,地的柱子也都震動」;又在別處說:「在祂面前陰間顯露,死亡也無遮蓋。祂將北極鋪在空中,將大地懸在虛空。祂將水包在密雲中。天的柱子因祂的斥責戰兢驚駭。祂以能力平靜海洋,以智慧擊敗巨獸,天的門閂都懼怕祂。」所以按神的旨意,地保持不動,存到永遠,正如《傳道書》的判語;又按神的旨意,地被搖動、震顫。
It does not, therefore, remain immovable by its own balancing, but is frequently moved by the nod and decision of God, as Job too says that 'the Lord moves it from its foundations, and its pillars are shaken'; and elsewhere: 'Hell is naked in His sight, and there is no covering for death. He stretches out the north over the void, hanging the earth upon nothing, binding up the water in His clouds. The pillars of heaven flew away and trembled at His rebuke. By His power He calmed the sea, by His discipline He laid low the monster, and the bars of heaven fear Him.' By the will of God, therefore, the earth remains immovable and stands for ever, according to the sentence of Ecclesiastes; and by the will of God it is moved and totters.
17:41
ergo fundamentis suis innixa subsistit nec fulcris suis stabilis perseuerat, sed dominus statuit eam et firmamento uoluntatis suae continet, quia in manu eius omnes fines terrae. et haec fidei simplicitas argumentis omnibus antecellit. laudent alii quod ideo nusquam decidat terra, quia secundum naturam in medio regionem possideat suam, eo quod necesse sit eam manere in regione nec in partem inclinari alteram, quando contra naturam non mouetur, sed secundum naturam, praedicent artificis diuini et operatoris aeterni excellentiam — quis enim artificum non ab illo accepit aut quis dedit mulieribus texturae sapientiam aut uarietatis disciplinam?
所以地並非靠著自己的根基存立,也不是靠著自己的支柱保持穩固,乃是主立定了它,並用祂旨意的穹基托住它,因為地的一切邊界都在祂手中。而這信德的純樸勝過一切的論辯。讓別人去稱讚地之所以永不墜落於任何處,是因為它按本性在中間佔據自己的區域,因為它必然停留在自己的區域而不傾向一邊,既然它不是違反本性而動,乃是按本性而動;讓他們去宣揚那神聖工匠、永恆工作者的卓越——因為哪一個工匠不是從祂領受的,又是誰賜給婦女紡織的智慧或巧樣的本領呢?
It does not, then, subsist resting upon its own foundations, nor does it remain stable by its own props, but the Lord set it up and holds it together by the firmament of His will, because in His hand are all the ends of the earth. And this simplicity of faith excels all arguments. Let others praise the fact that the earth therefore never falls anywhere, because according to nature it possesses its own region in the middle, since it must necessarily remain in its region and not be inclined to one side, seeing that it is not moved contrary to nature, but according to nature; let them proclaim the excellence of the divine Craftsman and eternal Worker—for what craftsman has not received from Him, or who gave to women the wisdom of weaving or the discipline of variety?
17:42
— ego tamen, qui profundum maiestatis eius et artis excellentiam non queo conprehendere, non articulis me libramentis committo atque mensuris, sed omnia reposita in eius existimo uoluntate, quod uoluntas eius fundamentum sit uniuersorum et propter eum adhuc mundus hic maneat. quod apostolicae quoque liceat astruere auctoritatis exemplo. scriptum est enim quia uauitati uanitati creatura subiecta est non sponte, sed propter eum qui subiecit in spe. liberabitur autem et ipsa creatura a seruitute corruptionis, cum gratia diuinae remunerationis auiarium. ;
——然而我既不能參透祂威嚴的深邃與祂技藝的卓越,便不把自己交託於關節的平衡與尺度,乃認為萬物都存放在祂的旨意之中,因為祂的旨意乃是萬物的根基,並且為著祂的緣故,這世界至今仍存留。這也可以憑使徒權威的例子來確立。因為經上記著說:「受造之物服在虛空之下,不是自己願意,乃是因那叫他如此的,仍在指望之中。但受造之物自己也必脫離敗壞的轄制」,到那時神聖賞報的恩典便要臨到。
—Yet I, who cannot comprehend the depth of His majesty and the excellence of His art, do not commit myself to balancings of joints and to measures, but esteem all things to be deposited in His will, since His will is the foundation of all things, and on account of Him this world still endures. This too it is permissible to establish by the example of apostolic authority. For it is written that 'the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of Him who subjected it in hope. But the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption,' when the grace of the divine recompense shall come.
17:43
De natura autem et qualitate substantiae caeli quid enumerem ea quae disputationibus suis philosophi benignitatis cum alii conpositum caelum ex quattuor elementis adserant. alii quintam quandam naturam noui corporis ad constitutionem eius inducant atque adfingant aetherium esse corpus, cui nequa neque ignis admixtus sit neque aer neque aqua neque terra.
但論到天之本質的性質與質地,我何必一一列舉那些哲學家在他們辯論中所提出的事呢——因為有些人斷言天是由四種元素構成的,另有些人為它的構造引進某種第五種新物體的本性,並虛構說它是一種以太的物體,其中既不攙雜火,也不攙雜空氣、水或地?
But concerning the nature and quality of the substance of heaven, why should I enumerate those things which the philosophers in their disputations have set forth—since some assert that heaven is composed of the four elements, while others bring in a certain fifth nature of a novel body for its constitution, and feign that it is an ethereal body, with which is mingled neither fire nor air nor water nor earth?
17:44
quod huius mundi elementa suum quendam habeant cursum atque usum et motum naturae, ut grauiora demergant et in pronum ferantur, uacua et leuia in superiora se subrigant — est enim proprius cuique motus —, in sphaerae autem circuitu ista confundi et uim sui cursus amittere, quoniam sphaera in orbem suum uoluitur et superiora inferioribus, superioribus quoque inferiora mutantur. quorum autem secundum naturam motus mutati sunt, horum necessario ferant ferunt mutari solere qualitates substantiarum suarum. quid igitur defendimus aetherium corpus esse, ne uideatur corruptioni obnoxium? quod enim conpositum ex corruptibilibus elementis est necesse est resoluatur.
因為這世界的元素,各有其某種途徑、用途與本性的動向,以致較重的下沉,向下被帶動,而空虛輕浮的卻向上升起——因為各有其本有的動向——但在球體的旋轉中,這些動向卻被攪亂,失去了它們本有途徑的力量,因為球體在自己的軌道中旋轉,上面的變為下面,下面的也變為上面。然而那些按本性的動向已被改變的東西,它們本質的質地也必然會跟著改變。那麼,我們為什麼要主張有一種以太的物體,免得它顯為服在朽壞之下呢?因為凡由可朽元素構成的,必然要消解。
For the elements of this world have, each of them, a certain course and use and motion of nature, so that the heavier sink down and are borne downward, while the empty and light raise themselves upward—for there is a motion proper to each—but in the circuit of a sphere these are confounded and lose the force of their own course, since the sphere is rolled in its own orbit, and the upper things are changed into the lower, the lower also into the upper. But of those things whose motions according to nature have been changed, they necessarily bear that the qualities of their substances are wont to be changed. Why, then, do we defend that there is an ethereal body, lest it seem subject to corruption? For that which is composed of corruptible elements must necessarily be dissolved.
17:45
nam hoc ipso quod diuersae eadem sint elementa naturae simplicem et inuiolabilem motum habere non possunt, cum se diuersus elementorum motus inpugnet. canentur enim motus omnibus aptus esse non potest et elementis distantibus conuenire; nam qui leuibus lenibus adcommodus est fit incommodus grauioribus elementis. itaque quando ad superiora motus caeli est necessarius, terrenis grauatur, quando ad inferiora decursus expetitur, igneus uigor ille uiolenter adtrahitur; etenim contra naturae suae usum deorsum cogitur. omne autem quod in contrarium cogitur non naturae conlisis.
因為正由於性質各異之物乃是相同的元素,它們便不能有單純而不可侵犯的動向,既然元素彼此相異的動向自相爭戰。因為人會宣稱,一種動向不能適合一切事物,也不能與彼此相隔的元素相合;因為適合輕物的,對較重的元素反成不適合。所以當天需要向上的動向時,它便被屬地的元素所拖累;當下面的部分尋求向下的途徑時,那火熱的活力便被猛烈地拉下;因為它被迫違反自己本性的用途而向下。然而凡被強迫進入其相反狀態的,都不是它的本性。
For by the very fact that things of diverse nature are the same elements, they cannot have a simple and inviolable motion, since the diverse motion of the elements wars against itself. For it will be sung that one motion cannot be fit for all things, nor agree with elements that are distant from one another; for that which is suited to the light is rendered unsuited to the heavier elements. And so, when motion toward the upper parts is necessary for heaven, it is weighed down by the earthly elements; when a downward course is sought for the lower parts, that fiery vigor is violently drawn down; for it is forced downward contrary to the use of its own nature. But everything that is forced into its contrary is not its nature.
17:46
sed necessitati cito soluitur et in ea scinditur ex quibus uidetur esse conpositum in suam quamque regionem singulis recurrentibus. haec igitur alii considerantes stabilia esse non posse aetherium corpus caeli stellarumque esse arbitrati sunt quintam quandam naturam corporis introducentes, quo diuturnam caeli putarent mansuram esse substantiam. sed non ista opinio propheticae potuit obuiare sententiae, quam diuina quoque domini Tesu Christi maiestas dei nostri in euangelio conprobauit. dixit enim Dauid: principio terram tu fundasti, domine, et opera manuum tuarum sunt caeli. ipsi peribunt, tu autem permanes:
但它因必然性很快便消解,分裂為構成它的那些元素,各部分各歸自己的區域。所以另有些人考慮到這些事,判斷天與眾星的以太物體不能穩定,便引進某種第五種物體的本性,以為憑此天的本質便能持久存留。但這意見無法抵擋先知的判語,這判語連我們的主、我們的神耶穌基督的神聖威嚴也在福音中加以證實。因為大衛說:「主啊,你起初立了地的根基,天也是你手所造的。天地都要滅沒,你卻要長存。」
But it is quickly dissolved by necessity and is rent into those things of which it seems to be composed, each part recurring to its own region. Considering these things, therefore, others, judging that the ethereal body of heaven and of the stars could not be stable, introduced a certain fifth nature of body, by which they thought the substance of heaven would remain lasting. But this opinion could not withstand the prophetic sentence, which the divine majesty of our Lord Jesus Christ, our God, also confirmed in the Gospel. For David said: 'In the beginning You, Lord, founded the earth, and the heavens are the works of Your hands. They shall perish, but You remain.'
17:47
et omnia sicut uestimentum ueterescent, et tanquam amictum mutabis ea et mutabuntur, tu uero ipse es, et anni tui non deficient. quod adeo probauit in euangelio dominus ut diceret: caelum et terra praeteribunt, mea autem uerba non praeteribunt, nihil igitur agunt qui propter caeli adserendam perpetuitatem quintum corpus aetherium introducendum putarunt, cum aeque uideant dissimilem ceteris adiunctam membri unius portionem labem corpori magis adferre consuesse. simul illud aduerte, quia propheta Dauid, < dum) terram priori loco nominauit et postea caelum, credidit opus esse domini declarandum.
「天地都要像衣服漸漸舊了,你要將天地如裡衣更換,天地就改變了;惟有你永不改變,你的年數沒有窮盡。」主在福音中如此證實這話,說:「天地要廢去,我的話卻不能廢去。」所以那些為要主張天的永存而認為必須引進第五種以太物體的人,乃是徒勞無功,因為他們同樣看見,一個與其餘部分相異的單一肢體的部分,一旦被接合上去,反倒慣於把敗壞帶給身體。同時要注意這一點,就是先知大衛把地放在前面、天放在後面提及,乃是相信必須宣明它是主的工作。
'And they all shall grow old as a garment, and as a vesture You shall change them, and they shall be changed; but You are the same, and Your years shall not fail.' Which the Lord so confirmed in the Gospel that He said: 'Heaven and earth shall pass away, but My words shall not pass away.' Those, therefore, accomplish nothing who, for the sake of asserting the perpetuity of heaven, thought a fifth ethereal body must be introduced, since they equally see that a portion of a single member, unlike the rest, when adjoined, is wont rather to bring decay to the body. At the same time note this, that the prophet David, when he named the earth in the prior place and afterward the heaven, believed it must be declared to be the work of the Lord.
17:48
quando enim dixit et facta sunt, nihil interest quid prius exprimas, cum simul utrumque sit factum, simul ne eo saltem praerogatiua caelo diuinae uideatur adiudicata substantiae, ut primogenitae creaturae priuilegio potior extimetur. itaque illoa illos auis suis relinquamus contentionibus, qui mutuis disputationibus se refellunt: nobis autem satis est ad salutem non disputationum controuersia, sed praeceptorum ueritas nec argumentationis astutia, sed fides mentis, ut seruiamus creatori potius quam creaturae, qui est deus benedictus in saecula. Terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita.
因為當祂說「天地就造成了」時,你先說哪一個都無關緊要,既然二者是同時被造的——同時被造,免得由此甚至連最微小的特權都似乎被斷定歸給天,彷彿天有更為神聖的本質,以致它因首生受造之物的特權而被尊為更高。所以讓我們把那些人留給他們自己的爭辯吧,他們以彼此的辯論自相駁倒;但對我們來說,對救恩而言足夠的,不是辯論的爭執,乃是訓誨的真理;不是論證的詭巧,乃是心思的信德,叫我們事奉那創造主而非受造之物,祂是那永遠當受稱頌的神。「地是空虛混沌。」
For when He said 'and they were made,' it makes no difference which you express first, since both were made at the same time—at the same time, lest by this even the least prerogative should seem to be adjudged to heaven, as of a more divine substance, so that it should be esteemed superior by the privilege of being a firstborn creature. Therefore let us leave those men to their own contentions, who refute themselves by mutual disputations; but for us it is enough unto salvation, not the controversy of disputations, but the truth of the precepts; not the cunning of argumentation, but the faith of the mind, that we may serve the Creator rather than the creature, who is God blessed for ever. 'But the earth was invisible and unformed.'
17:49
bonus artifex prius fundamentum ponit, postea fundamento posito aedificationis membra distinguit et adiungit ornatum. posito igitur fundamento terrae et confirmata caeli substantia — duo enim ista sunt quasi uelut cardines rerum — subtexuit: terra autem erat inuisibilis et inconposita. quid est erat? ne forte in infinitum et sine principio extendant opinionem conficiens et dicant ecce quia materia, id est 5Xtj , sicut philosophi dicunt, etiam secundum scripturam diuinam non habuit initium. uerum hoc dicentibus respondebis quia scriptum est: erat autem Cain operarius terrae et de eo qui Iubal dictus est habet scriptura:
善巧的工匠先立根基;之後根基既立,他便分別出建築的各部分,再加上裝飾。所以地的根基既立、天的本質既已確定——因為這二者彷彿是萬物的樞紐——他便接著說:「地是空虛混沌。」「是」這字何意呢?免得他們或許把自己的意見構築成無限、無始,便說:看哪,那物質——就是哲學家所說的「hylē」(質料)——甚至按神聖聖經也沒有起頭。但對說這話的人,你要回答說,經上記著:「該隱是耕種土地的」,又論到那名叫猶八的人,聖經記著說:
A good craftsman first lays the foundation; afterward, the foundation being laid, he distinguishes the members of the building and adds the adornment. The foundation of the earth being laid, therefore, and the substance of heaven being confirmed—for these two are as it were the hinges of things—he subjoined: 'But the earth was invisible and unformed.' What is 'was'? Lest perchance, framing their opinion into infinity and without beginning, they should say: Behold, that matter—that is, hylē, as the philosophers say—even according to divine Scripture had no beginning. But to those saying this you will answer that it is written: 'Now Cain was a worker of the earth,' and of him who was called Jubal Scripture has it:
17:50
hic erat pater, qui demonstrauit psalterium et citharam et homo erat in Ausitide regione, cui nomen Iob. desinant ergo de uerbo quaestionem mouere, cum praesertim praemiserit Moyses quia fecit deus terram. erat ergo ex quo facta est. nam si sine principio eam dicunt esse, iam non solum dominum, sed etiam ὕλην sine principio dicentes definiant ubinam erat. si in loco, ergo etiam locus sine principio fuisse astruitur, in quo erat materia rerum, quae principium non habebat. quod si absurdum uidetur de loco credere, uidete ne forte uolatilem terram debeamus aestimare, quae non habens fundamentum alarum remigiis suspendebatur.
這就是那位指明瑟與琴的父;又在烏斯地有一個人,名叫約伯。所以,他們當停止就「話語」起爭辯,尤其摩西既已預先寫明神造了大地。如此說來,大地自被造之時便存在了。因為他們若說它本無起始而存在,那麼當他們說不僅主、連質料(ὕλη)也無起始時,就請他們界定它究竟在哪裡。若說在某處所,那便等於斷言那容納萬物質料、本身無起始者所在的處所也是無起始的。但若就處所如此相信顯得荒謬,那就要看我們是否得設想一個會飛的大地——它既無根基,竟靠著翅翼的划動懸於空中。
This was the father who pointed out the psaltery and the harp; and there was a man in the land of Uz, whose name was Job. Let them therefore cease to raise a question about the word, especially since Moses had set down beforehand that God made the earth. It was, therefore, from the moment it was made. For if they say that it exists without a beginning, then, saying that not only the Lord but also matter (ὕλη) is without beginning, let them define where it was. If it was in a place, then it is also asserted that the place itself existed without a beginning, in which was the matter of things, which had no beginning. But if it seems absurd to believe this concerning a place, see whether perhaps we ought to imagine a flying earth, which, having no foundation, was suspended by the oarage of wings.
17:51
unde ergo ei alas sumemus, nisi forte huc deriuemus prophetici sermonis interpretationem a pinnis terrae prodigia audiuimus et illud uae terrae nauium pinnae? sed ut sic accipiamus, in quo aere uolabat terra? sine aere enim uolare non poterat, sed aer esse adhuc non poterat, quia non erat sine rerum materia elementorum facta distinctio, cum adhuc ipsa elementa facta non essent. ubi erat ergo materia ista alarum subfulta remigiis ? in aere non erat, quia aer corpus est mundi, corpus autem esse aerem docet lectio, quia emissa sagitta in locum, quem iaculator intendit, incisus aer statim in se ipsum resolutus est.
那麼,我們要從哪裡為它取得翅翼呢?——除非我們把先知的話挪用到這裡來解釋:「我們從大地的翅翼聽見了奇事」,以及那另一句:「禍哉,地上船隻的翅翼。」可是縱然我們如此理解,大地又是在何種空氣中飛翔呢?因為沒有空氣它就不能飛;然而空氣那時還不能存在,因為元素間的分別尚未與萬物的質料分開,既然元素本身那時還未被造。那麼這質料,靠翅翼划動所托住的,究竟在哪裡呢?它不在空氣中,因為空氣是世界的形體;而空氣是形體,經文已教導我們,因為當箭射向射手所瞄準之處時,被劈開的空氣立刻又合回它自身。
From where, then, shall we get wings for it—unless perhaps we divert here the interpretation of the prophetic saying: 「We have heard wonders from the wings of the earth,」 and that other: 「Woe to the wings of the ships of the earth.」 But even granting that we take it so, in what air did the earth fly? For without air it could not fly; yet air could not as yet exist, because the distinction of the elements had not been made apart from the matter of things, since the very elements themselves had not yet been made. Where, then, was this matter, upheld by the oarage of wings? It was not in the air, because air is a body of the world; and that air is a body, the reading teaches us, since when an arrow is shot toward the spot at which the archer aims, the cleft air at once resolves itself back into itself.
17:52
ubi ergo erat ὕλη , nisi forte dicatur quadam dementi intentione quia in deo erat? ergo deus inuisibilis naturae atque inuiolabilis, qui lucem habitat inaccessibilem, inconprehensibilis et purissimus spiritus, locus erut erat materiae mundialis, et erat in deo mundi portio, cum de hoc mundo non sit mens seruolorum eius, sicut habemus scriptum: de hoc mundo non sunt, sicut et ego non sum de mundo. Quemadmodum ergo inuisibilia uisibilibus et ei qui ordinem ac decorem donauit omnibus inconposita copulabantur ? nisi forte, quia dixit:
那麼質料(ὕλη)究竟在哪裡呢?除非有人憑某種瘋狂的臆斷說它在神裡面。那麼,本性不可見、不可侵犯、住在人不能靠近之光中、不可測度、至純之靈的神,竟成了世界質料的所在,而神裡面竟有世界的一部分了——其實連祂僕人的心思都不屬這世界,正如所記的:「他們不屬這世界,正如我不屬這世界。」那麼,不可見之物怎能與可見之物相連,無形雜亂之物怎能與那賜萬物秩序與美好的那一位相連呢?除非或許因為祂說了:
Where, then, was matter (ὕλη), unless perhaps it be said—by some demented presumption—that it was in God? Then God, who is of invisible and inviolable nature, who dwells in light unapproachable, incomprehensible and most pure Spirit, would be the place of the world's matter, and there would be in God a portion of the world—although the mind of His servants is not of this world, as we have it written: 「They are not of this world, even as I also am not of the world.」 How then could invisible things be joined to visible things, and things uncomposed to Him who gave order and beauty to all things? Unless perhaps because He said:
17:53
terra autem erat inuisibilis, inuisibilem eam per substantiam credant et non ideo, quia aquis operta uisibilis corporeis oculis esse non poterat, quemadmodum pleraque in profundo aquarum sita uisum oculorum aciemque praetereunt. non enim deo aliquid inuisibile, sed creatura mundi creaturae utique extimatione censetur. inuisibilis etiam. terra, quia nondum lux quae inluminaret mundum, nondum sol; postea enim luminaria facta sunt caeli. quod si solis radius plerumque etiam conponit operta inluminat et profundo mersa splendore luminis sui prodit, quis dubitet deo ea quae in profundo sunt inuisibilia esse non posse?
「而大地是不可見的」——讓他們相信它就其本體而言是不可見的,而非因為它被水所覆蓋、肉眼不能見它,正如許多置於水深之處的東西避開了眼睛的視線與鋭利。因為在神,沒有什麼是不可見的;唯有世界的受造物,才照受造物的估量被算為不可見。大地之所以不可見,也是因為那時還沒有照亮世界的光,還沒有太陽;因為天上的諸光體是後來才造的。但若太陽的光線往往連被遮蓋之物也能照亮,並以其光的輝煌顯出沉於深處之物,誰還能懷疑深處之物在神面前不可能是不可見的呢?
「But the earth was invisible」—let them believe it invisible by its substance, and not for this reason, that, being covered with waters, it could not be visible to bodily eyes, just as very many things set in the depths of the waters escape the sight and keen edge of the eyes. For nothing is invisible to God; but a created thing of the world is reckoned so only by the estimation of a creature. The earth was invisible also because there was not yet light to illumine the world, not yet the sun; for the lights of heaven were made afterward. But if the sun's ray very often illumines even covered things and, by the splendor of its light, brings forth what is sunk in the deep, who can doubt that things which are in the deep cannot be invisible to God?
17:54
nisi forte sic accipiamus inuisibilem terram, quod nondum uerbo dei et protectione uisitabatur quae hominem non habebat, propter quem dominus respiceret in terram, sicut scriptum est: dominus respexit super filios hominum, si est intellegens aut requirens deum. et alibi ait: de caelo iaculatus est iudicium: terra tremuit et quieuit. et merito inuisibilis, quia inconposita, quae figuram et speciem congruentem adhuc non acceperat a proprio conditore. et fortasse dicant: cur enim deus - sicut dixit et facta sunt non simul ornatus congruos surgentibus donauit elementis, quasi non potuit caelum insignitum stellis subito ut creatum est refulgere et floribus ac fructibus terra uestiri?
除非我們或許該這樣理解大地之不可見:因為它尚未蒙神的話語與保護所眷顧,既然它還沒有人——主原是為人才垂顧大地的——正如所記的:「主觀看世人,要看有明白的、有尋求神的沒有。」又在別處說:「祂從天上發出審判;地就懼怕而靜默。」它被稱為不可見也是理所當然的,因為它雜亂無形,尚未從它自己的創造者領受合宜的形狀與樣式。或許他們會說:那麼,神既「說有就有」,為何不立即賜給初現的諸元素以合宜的妝飾呢?彷彿天一被造,便不能立刻繁星點點地閃耀,大地也不能立刻披上花果似的。
Unless perhaps we should so understand the earth to be invisible, because it was not yet visited by the word of God and His protection, since it had no man for whose sake the Lord might look upon the earth—as it is written: 「The Lord looked upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand or seek after God.」 And elsewhere He says: 「From heaven He hurled forth judgment: the earth trembled and was still.」 And rightly invisible, because uncomposed, since it had not yet received a fitting form and appearance from its own Maker. And perhaps they may say: Why then did not God—since He spoke and they were made—at once grant to the rising elements their fitting adornment, as though heaven could not, marked with stars, shine forth suddenly as soon as it was created, and the earth be clothed with flowers and fruits?
17:55
potuit utique, sed ideo primo facta, postea conposita declarantur, ne uere increata et sine principio crederentur, si species rerum uelut ingeneratae ab initio, non postea additae uiderentur. inconposita terra legitur et isdem a philosophis, aeternitatis quibus deus priuilegiis honoratur: quid dicerent si ab initio eius conseruatione uemasset ? demersa aquis describitur uelut cuidam principiorum suorum addicta naufragio et adhuc a nonnullis facta non creditur: quid si decorem primogenitum uindicaret? accedit illud quod imitatores nos sui deus esse uoluit, ut primo faciamus aliqua, postea uenustemus, ne dum simul utrumque adorimur, neutrum possimus inplere.
祂的確能夠;但正因如此,經上才宣告它們先被造、後被組構,免得人相信它們真是非受造、無起始的——倘若萬物的樣式從一開始就彷彿是非生成的、而非後來添上的,便會如此。連那些以永恆的特權尊崇神的哲學家也讀到大地是雜亂無形的;他們又會說什麼呢,倘若大地從起初便在自身的保存中欣欣向榮?它被描述為沉沒於水中,彷彿被交付於其自身本原的某種傾覆船難,甚至如今仍有人不信它是被造的;倘若它要求一種首生的美麗,又當如何?此外還有一點:神願意我們效法祂,叫我們先造一些東西、後來再加以美化,免得我們同時著手兩者,結果哪一樣都無法完成。
He could indeed; but for this reason they are declared first to have been made and afterward composed, lest they be believed truly uncreated and without beginning, if the appearance of things had seemed, as it were, unbegotten from the start, and not added afterward. The earth is read of as uncomposed even by those philosophers by whom God is honored with the prerogatives of eternity: what would they say if from the beginning it had flourished in its own preservation? It is described as sunk in waters, as though consigned to a kind of shipwreck of its own first principles, and even now is by some not believed to have been made: what if it had laid claim to a firstborn beauty? There is also this, that God willed us to be imitators of Himself, that we should first make some things and afterward beautify them, lest, while we attempt both at once, we be able to complete neither.
17:56
fides autem nostra quodam gradu crescit. ideo primum fecit deus, postea uenustauit, ut eundem credamus ornasse qui fecit et fecisse qui ornauerit, ne alterum putemus ornasse, alterum creauisse, sed eundem utrumque esse operatum, ut primum faceret, postea conponeret, ut alterum altero crederetur. habes in euangelio huius rei euidens testimonium. consueuerint suscitaturus Lazarum dominus iussit, ut Iudaei remouerent lapidem de sepulchro, ut mortuum uidentes postea resuscitatum crederent. deinde uocauit Lazarum, et resurrexit et ligatis manibus et pedibus exiuit foras. nonne poterat remouere lapidem qui poterat mortuum contendunt?
如今我們的信德乃是按某種次序漸漸增長的。所以神先造,後美化,叫我們相信那美化者與那創造者是同一位,那創造者與那美化者也是同一位,免得我們以為一位美化、另一位創造,乃是同一位成就了二者——先造,後組構——好叫人藉這一件而相信那一件。關於這事,你在福音書中有明確的見證。當主要叫拉撒路復活時,祂吩咐猶太人把石頭從墳墓挪開,好叫他們看見那死人,隨後便相信他被叫醒了。然後祂呼喚拉撒路,他就復活了,手腳被布捆著走了出來。那能(如他們所主張的)叫死人復活的,難道不能挪開那石頭嗎?
Now our faith grows by a certain gradation. Therefore God first made, afterward beautified, that we may believe the same One to have adorned who made, and to have made who adorned, lest we suppose one to have adorned and another to have created, but that the same One wrought both—first to make, afterward to compose—so that the one might be believed through the other. You have in the Gospel a clear testimony of this matter. When the Lord was about to raise Lazarus, He commanded that the Jews should remove the stone from the tomb, so that, seeing the dead man, they might afterward believe him raised. Then He called Lazarus, and he rose, and came forth with hands and feet bound. Could He not have removed the stone, who could—they contend—raise the dead?
17:57
et qui potuit defuncto uitam reddere non potuit nexus soluere uinculorum? cui uinctis pedibus gressum dedit, huic non potuit ruptis uinculis incessum reddere ? sed utique aduertimus quod uoluit primum demonstrare mortuum, ut oculis suis crederent, deinde resuscitare suscitare , tertio iubere, ut ipsi uincula funeris soluerent, ut inter ista fides infunderetur infidelibus et per gradus quosdam credulitas nasceretur. Fecit ergo primum deus caelum et terram, ea tamen non quasi perpetua, sed quasi corruptibilis creaturae consummationi uoluit subiacere. unde in Esaiae libro ait:
那能把生命還給死人的,難道不能解開那捆綁的結嗎?祂既給那雙腳被縛者一個步伐,難道不能在解開捆綁後叫他自由行走嗎?但我們確實看出,祂願意先顯出那死人,叫他們親眼相信;其次叫他復活;第三,吩咐他們自己解開殮葬的捆綁——好叫在這些步驟之間,信德被注入不信的人裡,使信靠藉著某些階段漸漸生出。所以神先造了天地,卻願它們——不是作為永存的,而是作為必朽壞的受造物——服在某種終結之下。因此祂在以賽亞書中說:
And He who could restore life to the dead, could He not loose the knots of the bindings? To him whose feet were bound He gave a stride; could He not, with the bonds broken, restore him a free gait? But assuredly we observe that He willed first to show the dead man, that they might believe with their own eyes; then to raise him; thirdly, to command that they themselves should loose the bonds of burial—so that amid these stages faith might be poured into the unbelieving, and belief might be born through certain degrees. God therefore first made heaven and earth, yet willed them to be subject—not as everlasting, but as corruptible creation—to a consummation. Hence in the book of Isaiah He says:
17:58
tollite in caelum oculos uestros et aspicite in terram deorsum, quia caelum ut fumus solidatum est, terra autem ut uestimentum ueterescet. haec terra est, quae ante erat inconposita. nondum erant enim maria suo fine distincta, et ideo uago fluctu et profundo gurgite terra inundabatur. considera quia etiam nunc palustri uligine terra inhorrere consueuit nec patiens est uomeris, ubi infusus terris umor exundat. erat ergo inconposita, utpote sollertis agricolae inarata culturis, quia adhuc deerat cultor. erat inconposita, quia nuda gignentium nec toris herbosa riparum nec opaca nemoribus nec laeta segetibus nec umbrosa superciliis montium nec odorata floribus nec grata uinetis.
「你們要向天舉目,觀看下面的地:因為天像煙一樣堅立,地卻要像衣服漸漸舊了。」這就是先前雜亂無形的大地。因為那時還沒有用各自界限分開的海洋,所以大地被漫流的洪水與深淵所淹沒。你想想,連如今大地也慣於因沼澤的潮濕而粗硬,在傾注於地的水氾濫之處,地便不堪犁鏵。所以它是雜亂無形的,彷彿未經巧妙農夫的耕作所犁過,因為那時還缺少耕者。它是雜亂無形的,因為赤裸無生長之物,既無岸畔土堆的青草,也無樹叢的蔭蔽,沒有莊稼的歡欣,沒有山巔眉峰的陰翳,沒有花朵的芬芳,也沒有葡萄園的怡人。
「Lift up your eyes to heaven, and look upon the earth beneath: for the heaven was made firm like smoke, but the earth shall grow old like a garment.」 This is the earth which before was uncomposed. For there were not yet seas bounded by their own limit, and therefore the earth was flooded with wandering flood and deep abyss. Consider that even now the earth is wont to bristle with marshy dampness, and is not patient of the plowshare, where the moisture poured upon the land overflows. It was therefore uncomposed, as it were unplowed by the tillage of a skillful farmer, because as yet the tiller was lacking. It was uncomposed, because bare of growing things, neither grassy with the mounds of its banks, nor shaded with groves, nor glad with crops, nor shadowy with the brows of mountains, nor fragrant with flowers, nor pleasing with vineyards.
17:59
merito inconposita, quae ornatibus indigebat, cui deerant uitium serta gemmantium. ostendere enim uoluit deus quia nec mundus ipse haberet . gratiam, nisi eum uario cultu operator conuersura. caelum ipsum intextum nubibus horrorem oculis, maestitiam animis excitare consueuit, terra imbribus madefacta fastidio est, maria procellis turbata quos non incutiunt metus ? pulcherrima est rerum species: sed quid esset sine lumine, quid sine temperie, quid sine aquarum congregatione, quibus ante demersa poli huius habebantur exordia? tolle solem terris, tolle caelo stellarum globos: omnia tenebris inhorrescunt. sic erat, antequam lumen huic mundo dominus infunderet.
它被稱為雜亂無形是理所當然的,因為它缺乏妝飾,沒有閃亮葡萄藤的花環。因為神願意顯明:連世界本身也不會有美麗,除非那工作者用各樣的耕治來改變它。連天本身,被雲所交織覆蓋,也慣於在眼中激起恐懼、在心中激起愁悶;被雨水浸透的大地令人厭惡;被風暴攪動的海洋——又有誰不被它的恐怖所擊呢?萬物的樣式固然極其美麗:但若沒有光,它會是什麼?沒有溫和的調節、沒有眾水的聚集,它又會是什麼?這蒼穹的起初本是被眾水所淹沒的。把太陽從大地挪去,把眾星的球體從天挪去:萬物便都因黑暗而粗硬可怖了。在主把光注入這世界之前,情形正是如此。
Rightly uncomposed, since it lacked adornments, since it was without the garlands of gleaming vines. For God willed to show that not even the world itself would have grace, unless the Worker should transform it with varied cultivation. Heaven itself, woven over with clouds, is wont to stir up dread in the eyes and gloom in the soul; the earth drenched with rains is a thing of loathing; the seas troubled by storms—whom do they not strike with fears? Most beautiful is the appearance of things: but what would it be without light, what without temperateness, what without the gathering of the waters, by which before this the very beginnings of this firmament were held submerged? Take the sun from the lands, take from heaven the orbs of the stars: all things bristle with darkness. So was it, before the Lord poured light into this world.
17:60
et ideo scriptura ait quia tenebrae erant super abyssum. tenebrae erant, quia splendor deerat lucis, tenebrae erant, quia aer ipse tenebrosus est. aqua ipsa sub nube tenebrosa est, quia tenebrosa aqua m nubibus aeris. erant ergo tenebrae super abyssos aquarum. non enim malas intellegendas arbitror potestates, quod dominus earum malitiam creauerit, cum utique non substantialis, sed accidens sit malitia, quae a naturae bonitate deflexerit. itaque in constitutione mundi opinio malitiae interim sequestretur, ne diuinae operationi et pulcherrimae creaturae ea quae decolora sunt admiscere uideamur, maxime cum sequatur:
因此經上說:「黑暗在深淵之上。」那時有黑暗,因為缺乏光的輝煌;有黑暗,因為空氣本身是黑暗的。雲下之水本身是黑暗的,因為空氣中雲層的水是黑暗的。所以眾水的深淵之上有黑暗。因為我認為這裡不該理解為邪惡的權勢,彷彿主造了它們的惡毒;既然惡毒斷不是本體性的,而是偶然附屬的,是從本性的良善偏離出來的。因此在論世界的構成時,且讓惡毒之念暫且擱下,免得我們顯得把那些變質失色之物攙入神的工作與至美的受造物中——尤其因為下文接著說:
And therefore Scripture says that 「darkness was upon the deep.」 There was darkness, because the brightness of light was wanting; there was darkness, because the air itself is dark. The water itself under the cloud is dark, because the water of the clouds of the air is dark. There were therefore darknesses upon the abysses of the waters. For I do not think that evil powers are to be understood, as though the Lord had created their malice; since malice is certainly not substantial but accidental, having turned aside from the goodness of nature. And so in the constitution of the world let the notion of malice be set aside for the moment, lest we seem to mingle things discolored with the divine working and the most beautiful creature—especially since there follows:
17:61
et spiritus dei superferebatur super aquas quem etsi aliqui pro aere accipiant, aliqui pro spiritu, quem spiramus et carpimus aurae huius uitalis spiritum, nos tamen cum sanctorum et fidelium sententia congruentes spiritum sanctum accipimus, ut in constitutione mundi operatio trinitatis eluceat. praemisso enim quia in principio fecit deus caelum et terram, id est in Christo fecit deus uel filius dei deus fecit uel per filium deus fecit, quia omnia per ipsum facta sunt et sine ipso factum est nihil, supererat plenitudo operationis in spiritu, sicut scriptum est: uerbo domini caeli firmati sunt et spiritu oris eius omnis uirtus eorum.
「神的靈運行在眾水之上。」雖然有人把這理解為空氣,有人理解為我們所呼吸吸入的那靈——這活命空氣的氣息——然而我們與眾聖徒和信實之人的看法一致,把它理解為聖靈,好叫三位一體的工作在世界的構成中顯明出來。因為既先寫明「起初神造天地」——就是說,神在基督裡造了它,或那身為神的神子造了它,或神藉著子造了它,既然「萬物是藉著祂造的,凡被造的,沒有一樣不是藉著祂造的」——那麼工作的全備便存留在聖靈裡了,正如所記的:「諸天藉耶和華的話而立,萬象藉祂口中的氣而成。」
「And the Spirit of God was borne above the waters.」 Even though some take this for the air, and some for the spirit which we breathe and draw in—the breath of this vital air—we nevertheless, in agreement with the opinion of the saints and the faithful, take it to be the Holy Spirit, so that in the constitution of the world the working of the Trinity may shine forth. For when it had been set down beforehand that 「in the beginning God made heaven and earth」—that is, God made it in Christ, or the Son of God who is God made it, or God made it through the Son, since 「all things were made through Him, and without Him was nothing made」—there remained the fullness of the working in the Spirit, as it is written: 「By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and by the Spirit of His mouth all their host.」
17:62
itaque quemadmodum in psalmo docemur operationem uerbi, quod est uerbum dei, et uirtutem, quam dedit spiritus sanctus, ita hic propheticum resultauit oraculum quia deus dixit et deus fecit. spiritus quoque dei superferebatur super aquas. ornando enim polo caeli germinaturis terris pulchre spiritus superferebatur, quia per ipsum habebant nouorum partuum semina germinare secundum quod dixit propheta: emitte spiritum tuum, et creabuntur et renouabis faciem terrae. denique Syrus, qui uicinus Hebraeo est et sermone consonat in plerisque et congruit, sic habet: et spiritus dei fouebat aquas, id est uiuificabat, ut in nouas cogeret creaturas et fotu suo animaret ad uitam.
所以,正如我們在詩篇中受教而知道「道」的工作——就是神的道——以及聖靈所賜的能力,照樣這裡先知的神諭也回響著:神說了,神也造了;「神的靈也運行在眾水之上。」因為在妝飾天的穹蒼與將要生長之物的大地時,那靈美妙地運行在其上,因為新生之物的種子要藉著祂發芽——正如先知所說:「你發出你的靈,它們便受造,你也使地面更新。」末了,敘利亞文——它與希伯來文相近,在許多地方語句相合相諧——如此記著:「神的靈溫煦地覆庇眾水」,就是賜給它們生命,好把它們聚成新的受造物,並以祂的溫煦使它們得生。
Therefore, just as in the psalm we are taught the working of the Word, which is the Word of God, and the power which the Holy Spirit gave, so here the prophetic oracle echoed back that God spoke and God made; 「the Spirit of God also was borne above the waters.」 For in adorning the vault of heaven and the earth that was to bring forth, the Spirit was beautifully borne above, because through Him the seeds of new births were to germinate—according to what the prophet said: 「Send forth Thy Spirit, and they shall be created, and Thou shalt renew the face of the earth.」 Finally, the Syriac, which is close to the Hebrew and in very many things agrees and harmonizes in expression, has thus: 「And the Spirit of God cherished the waters」—that is, gave them life, so as to gather them into new creatures and by its cherishing quicken them to life.
17:63
nam etiam spiritum sanctum legimus creatorem dicente conuerteris: spiritus diuinus, qui fecit me. siue ergo sanctus spiritus superferebatur super aquas, tenebrae contrariarum uirtutum super eas esse non poterant, ubi locum sibi tanta gratia uindicabat, siue ut quidam uolunt aerem accipiant, respondeant qua ratione spiritum dei dixerit, cum satis fuerit spiritum nuncupare. hi ergo uolunt a domino deo nostro quattuor primum elementa generata, caelum terram mare aerem, eo quod causae rerum ignis et aer, terra et aqua sint, ex quibus mundi species constat et forma. ubi igitur tenebrae nequitiarum spiritalium locum habere potuerunt, cum augustae huius decorem figurae mundus indueret?
因為我們也讀到聖靈是創造者,正如所說的:「你必使我回轉;那造我的,是神聖的靈。」那麼,無論聖靈是否運行在眾水之上,敵對權勢的黑暗都不可能在它們之上,因為這麼大的恩典已在那裡為自己取得了地位;或者——若有人主張此處指空氣——就讓他們回答:為何祂稱之為「神的靈」,既然單稱「靈(氣息)」便已足夠。如此說來,這些人主張我們主神先生成了四種元素——天、地、海、氣——因為火與氣、地與水乃是萬物的因,世界的形態與樣式即由此構成。那麼,當世界披上這莊嚴形態的華美時,屬靈邪惡的黑暗又怎能有容身之地呢?
For we also read that the Holy Spirit is the Creator, when it is said: 「Thou shalt turn me back: the divine Spirit, who made me.」 Whether, then, the Holy Spirit was borne above the waters, the darkness of the contrary powers could not be upon them, where so great a grace claimed a place for itself; or—if some will have it that air is meant—let them answer for what reason He called it 「the Spirit of God,」 when it would have been enough to name it 「spirit」 (breath). These, then, would have it that four elements were first generated by the Lord our God—heaven, earth, sea, air—because fire and air, earth and water, are the causes of things, of which the form and shape of the world consists. Where, then, could the darkness of spiritual wickednesses have a place, when the world was putting on the comeliness of this august form?
17:64
numquid malitiam simul deus creauit ? sed ea ex nobis orta, non a creatore deo condita morum leuitate generatur non ullam creaturae habens praerogatiuam nec auctoritatem substantiae naturalis, sed mutabilitatis uitium et errorem prolapsionis. eradicari hanc deus uult de animis singulorum: quomodo eam ipse generaret? clamat propheta: desinite a malitiis uestris et praecipue sanctus Dauid: desine a malo et fac bonum: quomodo ei initium a domino damus? sed haec opinio feralis eorum qui perturbandam ecclesiam putauerunt. hinc Marciones, hinc Ualentini, hinc pestis illa Manicheorum funesta sanctorum mentibus temptauerunt inferre contagia.
神難道是同時造了惡毒嗎?其實它是從我們而起,並非由創造之神所立的,乃是由我們品行的輕浮所生,既無受造之物的特權,也無自然本體的權柄,乃是可變性的惡習與墮落的偏差。神願這從各人的心靈中連根拔除:祂自己又怎會生出它呢?先知呼喊:「你們當停止你們的惡毒」;尤其是聖大衛:「要離惡行善。」那麼,我們怎能把它的起頭歸於主呢?這致命的見解乃是那些妄想攪亂教會之人的;由此馬吉安派、由此瓦倫提努派、由此摩尼教那禍患,竟試圖把致命的毒染帶進眾聖徒的心思裡。
Did God create malice at the same time? But it, arising from us, not founded by God the Creator, is generated by the levity of our morals, having no prerogative of a created thing nor authority of a natural substance, but is a vice of mutability and an error of falling away. God wills this to be uprooted from the souls of each one: how should He Himself generate it? The prophet cries out: 「Cease from your malice」; and especially holy David: 「Cease from evil and do good.」 How then do we assign to the Lord its beginning? But this deadly opinion belongs to those who have thought to throw the Church into confusion. Hence the Marcionites, hence the Valentinians, hence that pestilence of the Manichaeans have attempted to bring deadly contagions upon the minds of the saints.
17:65
quid nobis ipsi in lumine uitae tenebras mortis inquirimus ? scriptura diuina salutem suggerit, uitae odorem fraglat , ut suauitatem legens capias, non praecipiti discnmen discrimen incurras. simpliciter leges lege o homo, non tibi ipse foueam prauus interpres effodias. simplex sermo est quia fecit deus caelum et terram: fecit quod non erat, non quod erat, et terra erat inuisibilis: ex quo facta est, erat, et erat inuisibilis, quia exundabat aqua et operiebat eam, et erant super eam tenebrae superfusae, quia nondum erat lumen diei, nondum solis radius, qui solet et sub aquis latentia declarare.
我們為何在生命之光中為自己尋找死亡的黑暗呢?神聖的經文供給救恩,發出生命的馨香,叫你在閱讀時嚐到它的甘甜,而非倉促地陷入危險。人哪,你要單純地讀;不要作個悖謬的解釋者,為自己挖陷坑。這話原是單純的:神造了天地——祂造了本不存在的,而非本已存在的;又「地是不可見的」——自被造之時起,它便存在,且是不可見的,因為水氾濫覆蓋了它,而「黑暗鋪在它之上」,因為那時還沒有白晝的光,還沒有太陽的光線——那慣於連水下隱藏之物也顯露出來的光線。
Why do we ourselves seek out the darkness of death in the light of life? Divine Scripture supplies salvation, breathes forth the fragrance of life, that as you read you may take in its sweetness, and not headlong rush into danger. Read simply, O man; do not, as a perverse interpreter, dig a pit for yourself. The saying is simple: that God made heaven and earth—He made what was not, not what was; and 「the earth was invisible」—from the moment it was made, it was, and it was invisible, because the water overflowed and covered it, and 「darkness was poured out upon it,」 because there was not yet the light of day, not yet the sun's ray, which is wont to reveal even things hidden beneath the waters.
17:66
quid ergo dicunt quod deus creauerit malum, cum ex contrariis et aduersis nequaquam sibi aduersa generentur? nec enim uita mortem generat nec lux tenebras. non enim sicut mutabilitates adfectuum ita etiam generationum progressiones sunt. illae ex contrariis in contraria propositi deflexione uertuntur, istae non ex contrariis in aduersa cariorem, sed ex eiusdem generis uel auctoribus uel causis creatae in similitudinem sui referuntur auctoris. Quid igitur dicemus ? si enim neque sine principio est quasi increata neque a deo facta, unde habet natura malitiam ? nam mala esse in hoc mundo nullus sapiens denegauit, cum sit tam frequens in hoc saeculo lapsus ad mortem.
那麼,他們說神造了惡,是什麼意思呢?既然從相反相敵之物,斷不會生出與自身相敵之物。因為生命不生出死亡,光也不生出黑暗。因為生成的進程並不像情感的變化。情感是憑意志的偏轉、從相反轉向相反;生成卻不是從相反轉向相敵,而是由同類之物——無論其源頭或其因——被造,並被引回它源頭的樣式中。那麼,我們該說什麼呢?因為惡毒既不像非受造之物那樣無起始,也不是神所造的,那麼本性的惡毒是從何而來?因為沒有一個智者否認這世上有諸惡,既然在這世代中如此頻繁地墮入死亡。
What, then, do they mean by saying that God created evil, since from things contrary and adverse nothing adverse to itself is in any way generated? For neither does life generate death, nor light darkness. For the progressions of generations are not like the changes of affections. The latter are turned from contraries into contraries by the deflection of the will; the former are not turned from contraries into adverse things, but, created from things of the same kind—whether their authors or their causes—are referred back into the likeness of their author. What, then, shall we say? For if malice is neither without a beginning, as though uncreated, nor made by God, whence has nature its malice? For no wise man has denied that there are evils in this world, since there is so frequent a falling into death in this age.
17:67
sed ex declinauit quae iam diximus possumus colligere quia non est uiua substantia, sed mentis atque animi deprauatio a tramite uiitutis deuia, quae incuriosorum animis frequenter obrepit. non igitur ab extraneis est nobis quam a nobis ipsis maius periculum. intus est aduersarius, intus auctor erroris, intus inquam clausus in nobismet ipsis. propositum tuum speculare, habitum tuae mentis explora, excubias optende aduersus mentis tuae cogitationes et animi cupiditates. tu ipse tibi causa es inprobitatis, tu ipse dux flagitiorum tuorum atque incentor criminum. quid alienam naturam accersis ad excusationem tuorum lapsuum?
但從我們已說過的,我們能推斷出:它並不是一個活的本體,而是心思與靈魂的敗壞,偏離了德行的正路,常常悄悄潛入那些粗心之人的心靈。所以更大的危險不是來自我們之外的事物,而是來自我們自己。仇敵在內裡,謬誤的源頭在內裡,我說,就封閉在我們自身之中。你要審視你自己的意圖,察驗你心思的狀態,設立守望抵擋你心思的念頭與靈魂的私慾。你自己才是你自己邪惡的成因,你自己才是你自己醜行的首領、你罪愆的點火者。你為何召來一個外來的本性,來為你自己的墮落辯解呢?
But from what we have already said we can gather that it is not a living substance, but a depravity of the mind and soul, straying aside from the path of virtue, which frequently creeps in upon careless souls. The greater peril, then, is not from things external to us, but from ourselves. Within is the adversary, within the author of error, within—I say—shut up in our very selves. Survey your own purpose, examine the state of your mind, set a watch against the thoughts of your mind and the desires of your soul. You yourself are the cause of your own wickedness, you yourself the leader of your own disgraceful deeds and the kindler of your crimes. Why do you summon an alien nature to excuse your own falls?
17:68
utinam te ipse non inpelleres, utinam non praecipitares, utinam non inuolueres aut studiis decursi aut indignatione aut cupiditatibus, quae nos innexos uelut quibusdam retibus tenent. et certe in nobis est moderare studia, cohibere iracundiam, cohercere cupiditates, in nobis etiam indulgere luxuriae, adolere libidines, inflammare iracundiam uel inflammanti aurem accommodare, eleuari magis superbia, effundi in saeuitiam quam reprimi in humilitatem, diligere mansuetudinem. quid naturam accusas, o homo? habet illa uelut inpedimenta quaedam senectutem et infirmitatem.
但願你不曾推自己前去,但願你不曾把自己擲下,但願你不曾使自己纏陷——無論是因倉促奔逐的熱衷,或因憤恨,或因那些像羅網般把我們束縛纏住的私慾!而節制我們的熱衷、抑制怒氣、約束私慾,這確實在我們的能力之內;放縱奢華、煽起情慾的烈焰、激動怒氣、或向那煽動者側耳,這也在我們的能力之內;寧可被驕傲高舉、傾流於兇暴,而非被約束於謙卑、愛慕溫柔,這也在我們的能力之內。人哪,你為何控告本性呢?它確有某些攔阻,就是年老與軟弱。
Would that you did not push yourself on, would that you did not hurl yourself down, would that you did not entangle yourself, either by pursuits run headlong, or by indignation, or by desires which hold us ensnared as in certain nets! And surely it is in our power to moderate our pursuits, to restrain anger, to curb desires; in our power also to indulge luxury, to fan the flames of lust, to inflame anger, or to lend an ear to one who inflames it; to be lifted up rather by pride, to be poured out into savagery rather than to be checked into humility, to love gentleness. Why do you accuse nature, O man? It has, as it were, certain hindrances—old age and weakness.
17:69
sed senectus ipsa in nobis moribus dulcior, in consiliis utilior, ad constantiam subeundae mortis paratior, ad reprimendas libidines fortior. infirmitas quoque corporis sobrietas mentis est. unde ait apostolus : cum infirmor, tunc potens sum. itaque non in uirtutibus, sed in infirmitatibus gloriabatur. responsum quoque diuinum refulsit oraculo salutari quia uirtus in infirmitate consummatur. illa cauenda quae ex nostra uoluntate prodeunt delicta iuuentutis et inrationabiles passiones corporis. quorum igitur nos sumus domini, horum principia extrinsecus non requiramus nec diriuemus in alios, sed agnoscamus ea quae propria nostra sunt.
但年老本身在我們裡面,品格更甘美,謀略更有益,更甘心承受赴死的堅毅,更剛強於抑制情慾。身體的軟弱也是心思的清醒。因此使徒說:「我什麼時候軟弱,什麼時候就剛強。」所以他不誇自己的剛強,乃誇自己的軟弱。神聖的答覆也在那拯救的神諭中閃耀,就是「能力在軟弱上得以完全」。當提防的,是那些出於我們自己意志的——青年的罪愆與身體不合理的私慾。那麼,凡我們作主的事,我們就不要從外面尋找它們的起頭,也不要把它們轉嫁給別人,乃要承認那些本屬我們自己的事。
But old age itself in us is sweeter in character, more useful in counsel, more ready for the constancy of undergoing death, stronger for restraining lusts. Weakness of body, too, is sobriety of mind. Hence the Apostle says: 「When I am weak, then am I strong.」 And so he gloried not in his strengths, but in his weaknesses. The divine answer too shone forth in a saving oracle, that 「strength is made perfect in weakness.」 Those things are to be guarded against which proceed from our own will—the sins of youth and the irrational passions of the body. Of those things, then, of which we are the masters, let us not seek their beginnings from outside, nor divert them onto others, but acknowledge those things which are properly our own.
17:70
quod enim possumus non facere si nolimus, huius electionem mali nobis potius debemus quam aliis ascribere. ideo etiam in iudiciis istius mundi uoluntarios reos, non ex necessitate conpulsos culpa astringit, poena condemnat. neque enim si per furorem aliquis innocentem peremerit, obnoxius morti est. quin etiam ipsius diainae diuinae legis oraculo, si quis per inprudentiam intulerit necem, accipit inpunitatis spem, refugii facultatem, ut possit euadere. hoc igitur de eo quod proprie malum uidetur dictum sit; mala enim non sunt nisi quae crimine mentem inplicant et conscientiam ligant.
因為凡我們若不願便能不去做的,那惡的選擇,我們就當歸於自己而非歸於別人。因此,連在這世界的審判中,罪責所束縛、刑罰所定罪的,是那些出於自願的犯罪者,而非那些被必然所逼迫的。因為若有人在瘋狂發作中殺了無辜之人,他不至於償命。不但如此,照神聖律法本身的諭令,若有人因不謹慎而致人於死,他可得免罰的指望、逃避的途徑,叫他得以脫逃。那麼,這話是就那本身顯為惡的而說的;因為惟有那些使心思牽連於罪、捆綁良心的,才是諸惡。
For what we can refrain from doing if we will not, the choice of that evil we ought to ascribe rather to ourselves than to others. Therefore even in the judgments of this world, guilt binds and punishment condemns those who are voluntary offenders, not those compelled by necessity. For if someone in a fit of madness slays an innocent person, he is not liable to death. Nay more, by the oracle of the divine law itself, if anyone through imprudence has inflicted death, he receives hope of impunity, a means of refuge, that he may be able to escape. Let this, then, be said concerning that which properly seems to be evil; for those things alone are evils which implicate the mind in crime and bind the conscience.
17:71
ceterum pauperiem ignobilitatem aegritudinem mortem nemo sapiens mala dixerit nec in malorum sorte numerauerit, quia nec contraria istis in bonis habentur maximis, quorum alia nobis ex natura, alia ex commoditate accidere uidentur. non otiose nobis excursus iste processit, ut probaremus tenebras et abyssum simpliciter accipienda. erant enim tenebrae de obumbratione caeli, quia omne corpus umbram facit, qua obumbrat uel finitima uel inferiora et ea maxime quae operire atque includere uidetur. includit autem caeli polus, quia caelum sicuti camera extenditur, quemadmodum supra demonstrauimus.
至於其餘的,沒有一個智者會把貧窮、出身卑微、疾病或死亡稱為惡,也不會把它們列入諸惡之列,既然它們的反面也不算在至大之善中——這些反面之物,有的看似由本性臨到我們,有的看似由便利臨到我們。我們這番離題並非徒然進行的,乃是要證明黑暗與深淵當按字面單純地理解。因為那黑暗是出於天的遮蔽,既然每個形體都投下陰影,藉此遮蔽鄰近或在它之下的事物,尤其是那些它看似覆蓋並包圍的事物。如今天的穹蒼遮蔽,是因為天像一個拱頂房間般展開,正如我們上面所顯明的。
For the rest, no wise man would call poverty, lowliness of birth, sickness, or death evils, nor reckon them in the lot of evils, since their contraries are not held among the greatest goods either—of which some seem to befall us from nature, others from convenience. This digression of ours has not proceeded idly, that we might prove that darkness and the deep are to be taken simply. For there was darkness from the overshadowing of heaven, since every body casts a shadow, by which it overshadows things either neighboring or beneath it, and especially those things which it seems to cover and enclose. Now the vault of heaven encloses, because heaven is stretched out like a vaulted chamber, as we have shown above.
17:72
non ergo principalis erat tenebrosa substantia, sed quasi umbra secuta est mundi corpus caligo tenebrarum. itaque momento diuinae praeceptionis mundus adsurgens intra se inclusit umbram, ut si quis in campi medio, quem sol meridianus inluminat, B locum aliquem repente obsaepiat et densis ramorum frondibus tegat, nonne quo splendidior foris species loci eius effulgeat, hoc horrenti desuper scaena gurgustium eius intus obscurius fit? aut unde antrum clausum undique huiusmodi locum uocarunt, nisi quod atro inhorrescat situ atque offusione tenebrarum? istae ergo tenebrae super aquarum abyssos erant.
所以那黑暗的本體並非原始本有的,乃是彷彿陰影一般,黑暗的幽暗隨著世界的形體而生。因此,在神命令的那一刻,世界興起,便在自身內包圍了一個陰影——正如有人在正午太陽所照的田野中央,忽然圍起某處,用茂密的枝葉遮蓋它:難道那裡面的居所不是越發黑暗嗎?外面那地方的景象越是輝煌閃耀,上方那可怖的帷蓋就使裡面越是幽暗。或者,人為何把這種四面封閉之處稱為「洞穴」,豈不正因它因幽黑的處境與黑暗的瀰漫而粗硬可怖嗎?所以這些黑暗乃是在眾水的深淵之上。
Therefore the dark substance was not primordial, but, as it were a shadow, the murk of darkness followed the body of the world. And so, at the moment of the divine command, the world, rising up, enclosed a shadow within itself—just as if someone in the middle of a field which the noonday sun illumines should suddenly fence off some spot and cover it with the dense foliage of branches: does not the dwelling within become darker, the more splendid the appearance of that place shines outside, by the dreadful canopy overhead? Or whence did men call a cave 「a place shut in on every side」 of this kind, except that it bristles with a black situation and the suffusion of darkness? These darknesses, then, were upon the abysses of the waters.
17:73
nam abyssum multitudinem et profundum aquarum dici lectio euangelii docet, ubi rogabant saluatorem daemonia, ne iuberet illis ut in abyssum irent. sed qui docebat uoluntates daemoniorum non esse faciendas praecepit illis ut irent in porcos, porci autem se in stagnum aquarum praecipitauerunt, ut quod recusabant daemonia non euaderent, sed digno praecipitio demergerentur. erat ergo haec mundi inconposita species et forma. Et spiritus inquit dei superferebatur super aquas et dixit deus: fiat lux. merito ergo praemissus est spiritus dei, ubi diuina incipere habebat operatio. fiat inquit lux.
至於「深淵」是指眾水的繁多與深處,福音書的記載教導了我們,那裡群鬼求救主,不要吩咐它們進入深淵。但那教導人不可遵行群鬼意願的主,卻吩咐它們進入豬群;豬群便把自己投入水塘,叫它們所拒絕的,群鬼竟未能逃脫,反被一個應得的傾覆所沉沒。如此,世界雜亂無形的樣式與形態便是這樣。經上說:「神的靈運行在眾水之上,神說:要有光。」所以,在神的工作將要開始之處,神的靈先被差遣,乃是理所當然的。祂說:「要有光。」
For that 「the deep」 means a multitude and depth of waters, the reading of the Gospel teaches us, where the demons begged the Savior not to command them to go into the deep. But He who taught that the wills of demons are not to be done commanded them to go into the swine; and the swine hurled themselves into a pool of water, so that what the demons refused they did not escape, but were plunged down by a worthy precipitation. Such, then, was the uncomposed appearance and form of the world. 「And the Spirit of God,」 it says, 「was borne above the waters, and God said: Let there be light.」 Rightly, then, was the Spirit of God sent ahead, where the divine working was to begin. 「Let there be light,」 He says.
17:74
unde uox dei in scriptura diuina debuit incohare nisi a lumine, unde mundi ornatus nisi a luce exordium sumere? frustra enim esset, si non uideretur. erat quidem deus ipse in lumine, quia lucem habitat inaccessibilem, et erat lumen uerum, quod inluminat omnem hominem uenientem in hunc mundum: sed eam lucem fieri uoluit, quae oculis corporalibus conprehenderetur. qui aedificium aliquod dignum habitaculo patris familias struere desiderat, antequam fundamentum ponat, unde lucem ei infundat explorat. et ea prima est gratia, quae si desit, tota domus deformi horret incultu. lux est, quae reliquos domus conmendat ornatus. fiat inquit lux.
在神聖的經文中,神的聲音當從何處開始,豈不是從光開始嗎?世界的妝飾當從何處取得開端,豈不是從光嗎?因為若不被看見,那便是徒然的。神自己固然在光中,因為祂住在人不能靠近的光裡,並且祂是真光,照亮一切生在世上的人;但祂願意叫那能被肉眼領會的光成就出來。凡想建造一座配得家主居住的建築物的人,在奠基之先,總要探尋從何處可把光注入其中。而那便是首要的恩典;這恩典若缺乏,整座房屋便因醜陋的荒蕪而粗硬可怖。是光使房屋其餘的妝飾顯為可貴。祂說:「要有光。」
From where ought the voice of God in divine Scripture to have begun, except from light? Whence ought the adornment of the world to take its beginning, except from light? For it would be in vain, if it were not seen. God Himself indeed was in light, because He dwells in light unapproachable, and was the true Light, which enlightens every man coming into this world; but He willed that light to come into being which could be apprehended by bodily eyes. He who desires to build some edifice worthy of the dwelling of the head of a household, before he lays the foundation, explores from where he may pour light into it. And that is the first grace, which, if it be lacking, the whole house bristles with deformed neglect. It is light that commends the remaining adornments of the house. 「Let there be light,」 He says.
17:75
plena uox luminis non dispositionis apparatum significat, sed operationis resplendet effectu. naturae opifex lucem locutus est et creauit. sermo dei uoluntas est, opus dei natura est: lucem creauit. tenebras inluminauit. et dixit deus: fiat lux. et facta est lux. non ideo dixit ut sequeretur operatio, sed dicto absoluit negotium. unde pulchre Dauiticum illud dixit et facta sunt, quia dictum inpleuit effectus. auctor ergo lucis deus, locus autem et causa tenebrarum mundus est. sed bonus auctor ita lucem dixit, ut mundum ipsum infuso aperiret lumine atque eius speciem uenustaret.
光那完滿的話語,所表示的並非某種安排的籌備,乃是在工作的果效中閃耀。本性的創造主說了光,便創造了光。神的話就是祂的意志,神的工作就是本性:祂創造了光,照亮了黑暗。「神說:要有光。就有了光。」祂並非說了話之後,工作才隨之而來,乃是以話語就成全了這事。因此大衛美妙地說:「祂說有,就有了」,因為那果效成全了那話。如此,神是光的本源,世界卻是黑暗的所在與起因。然而那良善的本源如此說了「光」,叫祂藉著所注入的光,把世界本身開啟,並使它的樣式得以美化。
The full utterance of light signifies not the apparatus of an arrangement, but shines forth in the effect of the working. The Maker of nature spoke light and created it. The word of God is His will, the work of God is nature: He created light, He illumined the darkness. 「And God said: Let there be light. And there was light.」 He did not say it so that the working might follow, but with the word He completed the business. Hence beautifully did David say: 「He spoke, and they were made,」 because the effect fulfilled the word. God, then, is the author of light, but the world is the place and cause of darkness. Yet the good author so spoke 「light」 that, by the light poured in, He might open up the world itself and beautify its appearance.
17:76
resplenduit subito igitur aer et expauerunt tenebrae noui luminis claritate, repressit eas et quasi in abyssos demersit repente per uniuersa mundi fulgor lucis infusus. pulchre itaque et proprie dixit: facta est lux. sicut enim cito lux caelum terras diuinitatem inluminat et momento temporis sine ulla conprehensione retectis surgentis diei splendore regionibus nostro se circumfundit aspectui, ita ortus eius cito debuit explicari. quid miramur si deus locutus est lucem et caliganti mundo lumen emicuit, quando si quis inter aquas mersus oleum ore miserit, clariora faciat ea quae profundi tegebantur occultis?
所以空氣忽然發出光輝,黑暗在新光的明亮前驚惶失措;那注入的光之輝煌立刻把它壓制,並彷彿把它沉入遍及全世界的深淵中。所以祂美妙而恰當地說:「就有了光。」因為正如光迅速照亮天、地、整片廣袤之境,並在一瞬之間,毫無任何遲滯領會,以初升白晝的輝煌鋪滿諸地,把自己環繞於我們的視線,照樣,那光的升起也理當迅速地展開。我們何必詫異,神說了光,光輝便在幽暗的世界中閃現呢?既然連有人沉沒在水中、從口中放出油來,也能使那被深處隱藏所覆蓋之物變得更清晰。
Suddenly, therefore, the air shone forth, and the darkness took fright at the brightness of the new light; the inpoured radiance of light at once repressed it and as it were plunged it down into the abysses throughout the whole world. Beautifully, then, and properly did He say: 「There was light.」 For just as light swiftly illumines the heaven, the lands, the whole expanse, and in a moment of time, without any apprehension, with the splendor of the rising day spread over the regions, pours itself around our sight, so the rising of that light ought swiftly to have been unfolded. Why do we wonder if God spoke light and a glow flashed out upon the murky world, when, if anyone submerged among the waters should let oil out of his mouth, he makes clearer those things which were covered by the hidden depth?
17:77
dixit deus non ut per uocis organa quidam sonus sermonis exiret nec ut linguae motus caeleste formaret adloquium atque aerem istum quidam uerborum strepitus uerberaret, sed ut uoluntatis suae cognitionem proderet operationis effectu. et discreuit inter lucem et tenebras et uidit deus lucem quia bona est. dixit, et sonum uocis nullus audiuit: discreuit, et operationis molimina nemo deprehendit: uidit, et oculorum eius intentionem nullus aspexit. et uidit inquit deus lucem quia bonja bona . nec quod ignorabat uidit nec id quod nesciebat ante aut non uiderat conprobauit, sed bonorum operum propnum proprium est, ut externo caecauit non egeant, sed gratiam suam, cum uidentur, ipsa testentur.
神說了——並非有某種言語的聲音藉發聲的器官發出,也不是有舌頭的動作構成天上的言談、有某種詞語的喧響拍打這空氣,乃是祂藉著工作的果效,使祂意志的認知顯明出來。「祂分開了光與暗,神看光是好的。」祂說了,卻無人聽見聲音;祂分開了,卻無人察覺工作的努力;祂看了,卻無人望見祂眼目的意向。經上說:「神看光是好的。」祂既非看見祂所不知的,也非認可祂先前所不識或未曾見過的,乃是因為善工的特性,就是它們無需任何外在之物來宣揚,乃是當它們被看見時,便自己見證自己的美好。
God said—not that some sound of speech should issue through the organs of the voice, nor that the motion of a tongue should form a heavenly address and a certain din of words should beat upon this air, but that He should make known the cognition of His will by the effect of His working. 「And He divided between the light and the darkness, and God saw the light, that it was good.」 He spoke, and no one heard the sound of a voice; He divided, and no one perceived the efforts of the working; He saw, and no one beheld the intention of His eyes. 「And God saw,」 it says, 「the light, that it was good.」 He neither saw what He was ignorant of, nor approved what He had not known or seen before; but it is proper to good works that they do not need to be blazoned by anything external, but that, when they are seen, they themselves attest their own grace.
← 上一段下一段 →
← 第 16 章
1234567891011121314151617

新的原文誦讀上線時通知我

每次有新章節誦讀影片就寄一封信。採雙重確認,隨時可一鍵取消。