For you wrote, beloved and truly most longed-for one, grieving yourself, that certain ones had departed from the Arians on account of their blasphemy against the Son of God, but were minded against the Holy Spirit, saying that He is not only a creature, but is even one of the ministering spirits, and differs from the angels only in degree.
1:8
ΤοῦτοδέἐστιπρὸςμὲντοὺςἈρειανοὺςπροσποιητὸςμάχη·
這一來,他們對亞流派的反對其實是假裝的爭執;
Now this is, toward the Arians, a feigned contention;
1:9
ἀληθὴςδὲἀντιλογίαπρὸςτὴνεὐσεβῆπίστιν
對敬虔的信仰卻是真實的抵擋。
but it is a true gainsaying against the godly faith.
And both parties have divided between them the opposition to the truth, that the one, minded against the Word, and the other, against the Spirit, might hold the same blasphemy against the Holy Trinity.
Perceiving these things, then, and pondering much, I fell into despondency, that the devil had again found a way to make sport in those who feign his madness;
1:14
καὶκρίναςμὲνἤμηνσιωπᾷνἐντοιούτῳκαιρῷ·
我這樣斷定之後,本想在這樣的時候保持緘默;
and having judged it so, I was minded to keep silence at such a season;
but on account of the exhortation of your holiness, and because of their heterodoxy and satanic rashness, I have written this letter in few words—and that with difficulty—only that you too, taking from it an occasion, may according to the understanding that is in you supply what is lacking, and that the refutation of the impious heresy may be made complete.
1:16
ΤῶνμὲνοὖνἈρειανῶνοὐκἀλλότριονκαὶτοῦτοἐνθύμημα
對亞流派而言,這樣的想法也並不陌生。
Now to the Arians this notion also is no alien thing.
But toward those who have been deceived concerning the Spirit, it is fitting, after a manner—as they themselves would say—to make inquiry and to speak.
For one might well marvel at the folly of these men: that, though they will not have the Son of God to be a creature—and in this they are rightly minded—how could they endure even to hear the Spirit of the Son called a creature? For if, on account of the unity of the Word with the Father, they will not have the Son Himself to be among things originated, but are minded—as is truly the case—that He is the Maker of created things,
yet they fashion it for themselves as composed of two natures, differing one from another, because of the Spirit's being of another essence than the Son, as they have made up for themselves.
What kind of theology, then, is this, composed of Creator and creature? For either it is not a Trinity, but a duad, and the rest is creation; or, if it is a Trinity—as indeed it is—how do they rank with the creatures that come after the Trinity the Spirit of the Trinity? For this is once more to divide and dissolve the Trinity.
For if they thought rightly concerning the Word, they would think soundly also concerning the Spirit, who proceeds from the Father, and being the Son's own, is given by Him to the disciples and to all who believe on Him.
“Whoever shall blaspheme against the Holy Spirit has no forgiveness, neither in this age nor in the age to come”? For the Arians, indeed—though they did not understand the incarnate presence of the Word and the things spoken on account of it—nevertheless, taking occasion from these for their own heresy, were thus convicted as fighters against God and as truly babbling vain things out of the earth.
But you—whence were you deceived? from whom did you hear it, or what is the manner of such an error of yours? “We read,” they say, “in the prophet Amos, where God says: Behold, I am He that establishes the thunder, and creates the spirit/wind, and declares unto men His Christ;”
“who makes the morning and the mist, and treads upon the high places of the earth—the Lord God, the Almighty, is His name. And thence we were persuaded by the Arians who say that the Holy Spirit is a creature.”
but what is said in the Proverbs—“The Lord created me as the beginning of His ways for His works”—did you not read, or did you read it? And this you do interpret, as it has the truth, lest you should call the Word a creature;
but what is in the prophet you do not interpret; rather, simply hearing “spirit,” you supposed that the Holy Spirit is said to be a creature. And yet in the Proverbs it is plainly Wisdom that says, “He created me”; and nevertheless, doing well, you interpret the saying, lest you should number among the creatures the creative Wisdom.
How then, although there is great variety in the Scriptures concerning spirits, and the saying is able to have its own right meaning, do you—as contentious, or as injured by the bite of the Arian serpent—suppose that the Holy Spirit is meant by Amos, only that you may not forget to think Him a creature? Tell us, then, if anywhere in the divine Scripture you find the Holy Spirit spoken of simply as “spirit,” without the addition of being called either “of God,” or “of the Father,” or “Mine,” or “His”—that is, of Christ Himself and of the Son—or “from Me,” which is from God, or with the article, so that it is not said simply “spirit,” but “the Spirit”;
or this very thing, “the Holy Spirit,” or “Paraclete,” or “of truth,” which is of the Son who says, “I am the truth”—so that, hearing simply “spirit,” you should surmise that it is the Holy Spirit? Let there be excepted now from this argument those who, having already received Him, name Him again, and all who, having first learned concerning the Holy Spirit, afterward—as by way of recapitulation and reminder, even when “the Spirit” alone is said—are not ignorant concerning whom they hear;
1:38
καὶμάλιστα, ὅτικαὶοὕτωμετὰτοῦἄρθρουλέγεται
尤其因為這樣說的時候也是帶著冠詞的。
and especially because thus also it is said with the article.
“Quench not the Spirit”; he was saying to them, who themselves knew what they had received, that they should not, through neglect, quench the grace of the Spirit kindled in them.
And in the Gospels, concerning the Saviour—spoken humanly because of the flesh which He assumed—if the evangelists say, “And Jesus, being full of the Spirit, returned from the Jordan,” and, “Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness,” it has the same meaning.
“Now it came to pass, when all the people were baptized, and Jesus having been baptized and praying, that the heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit descended in bodily form, as a dove, upon Him.” And it was plain that, when “the Spirit” was said, the Holy Spirit was signified.
Thus, then, among those who have the Holy Spirit, even if “the Spirit” alone is said, without the addition concerning Him, it is not doubtful that the Holy Spirit is meant, having especially the article.
But you, answer what has been set before you: whether you have found anywhere in the divine Scripture the Holy Spirit called simply “Spirit,” without the aforesaid addition concerning Him, and apart from the qualification of which we have made mention;
“Yet receive My words and My ordinances, all that I command by My Spirit to My servants the prophets.” And when the prophet also brought accusation against the people, he said a little after:
“...and the words which the Lord Almighty sent in His Spirit by the hand of the former prophets.” And these things, gathered out of the Old Testament, we have set forth as a few.
But do you also inquire concerning the things in the Gospels and what the apostles wrote, and you will hear how there too, although there is great variety of spirits, the Holy Spirit in particular is named not simply “Spirit,” but with the addition of which we spoke.
Now the Lord, when, as I said before, He was baptized humanly because of the flesh which He bore, is said to have had the Holy Spirit descend upon Him;
“The Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He shall teach you all things.” And a little after, concerning the same, He said:
“When the Paraclete is come, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, He shall bear witness concerning Me.” And again:
“But if I cast out the demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.” And summing up all the theology and our perfecting—in which He joined us to Himself, and through Himself to the Father—in this He gave charge to the disciples:
“Go, disciple all the nations, baptizing them into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.” And having promised them that He would send Him, He charged them not to depart from Jerusalem; and after a few days, “When the day of Pentecost was being fulfilled, they were all together in one place;
“and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them to utter.” Hence, then, both through the laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Spirit was given to those being regenerated;
1:82
Ἄγαβοςδέτιςπροεφήτευσενἐντούτῳλέγων·
那時,有一個名叫亞迦布的,預言說:
And a certain Agabus prophesied at this time, saying:
“In which the Holy Spirit has made you overseers, to shepherd the church of God, which He purchased through His own blood.” And when the eunuch had been baptized, “the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip.” And Peter wrote:
1:85
Κομιζόμενοιτὸτέλοςτῆςπίστεως, σωτηρίανψυχῶν·
「得著你們信心的結局,就是靈魂的救恩;
“Receiving the end of your faith, the salvation of souls;
“concerning which salvation the prophets sought out and searched diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come unto you, searching what or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ in them was signifying, when it testified beforehand the sufferings appointed for Christ, and the glories that should follow these.” And John wrote:
“But if the Spirit of Him that raised up Jesus dwells in you, He that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead shall also give life to your mortal bodies, through His Spirit that dwells in you.” And to the Corinthians:
1:92
ΤὸγὰρΠνεῦμαπάνταἐρευνᾷ, καὶτὰβάθητοῦΘεοῦ
「因為那靈參透萬事,就是神深奧的事也參透了。
“For the Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God.
“Now we received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit which is from God, that we might know the things freely given to us by God.” And a little after:
“how much more shall the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without blemish unto God, cleanse our conscience from dead works?” And to the Thessalonians:
“And then shall be revealed the lawless one, whom the Lord Jesus shall slay with the breath/Spirit of His mouth, and bring to nought by the manifestation of His coming.” Behold, how the Holy Spirit is made known throughout all the divine Scripture.
What, then, have you observed of such a kind in the prophet? For the “spirit” now spoken of by the prophet does not even have the article, that you might at least have a pretext.
But you have simply dared to devise for yourselves arguments, and to say that the spirit said to be created is the Holy Spirit—although you might learn even from philological men concerning the difference of spirits.
“No one knows the things of a man, save the spirit of the man which is in him.” And in the epistle to the Thessalonians, praying, he says, “And may your spirit and soul and body be preserved entire, without blame, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.” And there are also spoken of “spirits” of the winds, thus—in Genesis:
“the south wind/spirit broke you in pieces.” And when you yourselves also study the Holy Scriptures, you will find “spirit” spoken of also as the mind that is in the divine words themselves, Paul writing:
“For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set me free from the law of sin.” And Philip, wishing to turn the eunuch from the letter to the spirit, said:
“But My servant Caleb, because another spirit was in him, and he fully followed Me—him will I bring into the land into which he entered there.” For having spoken with another mind than that of those men, he became well-pleasing to God.
“Make yourselves a new heart and a new spirit.” These things, then, being so, and so great a difference being shown concerning the spirits, you would be the better if, hearing of a created spirit, you thought of one of the aforesaid—such as was the one concerning which it is written in Isaiah:
“Aram agreed with Ephraim, and his soul was amazed, and the soul of his people, as a tree in a wood is shaken by the wind/spirit.” And of such a kind was also, “That which the Lord raised up, a wind/spirit upon the sea, on account of Jonah.”
“And it came to pass here, and unto here, and the heaven grew dark with clouds and wind/spirit.” But since the oracle, they say, makes mention of Christ, accordingly the “spirit” there spoken of is to be understood as nothing other than the Holy Spirit.
but where did you take it into your mind to divide Him in nature, and to estrange Him from the Son—so that you say that Christ is not a creature, but call the Holy Spirit a creature? And it is absurd to name together, and to glorify together, things unlike in nature.
For what fellowship, or what likeness, has the creature with the Creator? Since otherwise it were time for you also to number and join together with the Son the creatures made through Him.
but since you make a pretext of the mention of Christ in the saying, it is necessary to examine accurately what is said, lest perchance even concerning the spirit said to be created we may find a more proper meaning.
“and they shall call His name Emmanuel”; and the other things, as many as are written concerning His coming? But when the incarnate presence is being declared concerning the Word, what spirit ought one to understand as being created, save the spirit of men that is re-created and renewed? For this also God promised through Ezekiel, saying:
“and My Spirit will I put within you.” When, then, was this fulfilled, save when the Lord, being come, renewed all things by grace? For behold, in this saying too the difference of the spirits is shown;
how is it not blasphemous for you to call a creature the Spirit, in whom the Father, through the Word, perfects and renews all things? And if, because it is written simply that a “spirit” is created, they fashioned for themselves that this is the Holy Spirit;
“Stretching out the heaven, and laying the foundation of the earth, and forming the spirit of man within him.” For what He formerly formed, this, having fallen, He re-created, Himself coming to be in the creature, when the Word became flesh, that—as the Apostle said—He might create the two into one new man, the one created according to God in righteousness and holiness of the truth. For He did not speak as of another man fashioned alongside the man who was made from the beginning according to the image;
“For indeed He established the world, which shall not be shaken.” The saying in the prophet, then, signifies the coming of the Saviour, in which we also were renewed, and the law of the spirit remains unshaken.
But those who are in very deed “Tropici,” having made common cause with the Arians, and having shared with them the blasphemy against the Godhead—so that the one say the Son, and the other the Spirit, is a creature—
dared, as they themselves say, again to invent for themselves “turns” (interpretations), and to wrest also the saying of the Apostle, which he himself wrote rightly to Timothy, saying...
For if, according to them, the angels are after the Father and the Son, plainly the angels are of the Trinity, and they would no longer be ministering spirits sent forth unto service, nor sanctified, but would rather themselves be sanctifying others.
What, then, is this so great senselessness of theirs? Where again in the Scriptures did they find the Spirit called an angel? I am compelled to say the same things to them as before.
“and the power of the Most High shall overshadow you.” But since the Scriptures do not call the Spirit an angel, what defence could there be for these men of such unreasoning boldness?—seeing that even Valentinus, who sowed in them such malice, named the one “Paraclete,” and the others “angels”;
“Not by great might, nor by strength, but by My Spirit, says the Lord Almighty.” It is therefore quite clear that the angel speaking to the prophet was not the Holy Spirit, but he himself was an angel, while the Spirit is the Spirit of God the Almighty;