← All books · Latin Fathers › On the Trinity & Psalm Commentary

On the Trinity & Psalm Commentary 6

Latin original · 7 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss

ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.

ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).

6:1

ex Collectaneis Antiarianis Parisinis et Appendice (Libro I ad Constantium) per coniecturam dispositi. LIBER I (scriptus a. 356). Praefatio = Series B I (supra p. 98—102). De synodo Arelatensi et de exsilio Paulini episcopi Treuirensis (deest, cf. Studien 1 83). ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula synodi Sardicensis Orientalium cum symbolo et nominibus episcoporum, qui subscripserunt (c. 9 est decurtatum; deest narratio de Paulo episcopo Constantinopolitano, d. Studien I 184) — Ser. A IV (supra p. 48-78). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ Uaria ex actis synodi Sardicensis Occidentalium, duae epistulae Ualentis et Ursacii, symbolum Nicaenum una cum textu narratiuo (n. 9 c.

(Pieces arranged by conjecture out of the Parisian Anti-Arian Collections and the Appendix, the First Book to Constantius.) BOOK I (written A.D. 356). Preface = Series B I (above, pp. 98-102). On the Synod of Arles and on the exile of Paulinus, bishop of Trier (missing; cf. Studien I 83). * * * The letter of the Sardican synod of the Easterners, with the creed and the names of the bishops who subscribed (chapter 9 is abridged; the account of Paul, bishop of Constantinople, is missing; cf. Studien I 184) = Series A IV (above, pp. 48-78). * * * Various matters from the acts of the Sardican synod of the Westerners: two letters of Valens and Ursacius, the Nicene creed together with a narrative text (n. 9 c.

（此處諸篇乃憑推斷，從《巴黎反亞流文集》及其附錄——即〈致君士坦提烏斯第一書〉——中編排而成。）第一卷（寫於主後三五六年）。序言＝乙系列一（見上文，第98至102頁）。論亞爾勒會議及特里爾主教保利努斯的放逐（此段闕失；參《研究》卷一83）。＊＊＊東方諸主教撒爾狄卡會議的書信，附信經及簽署的主教名單（第九章被刪節；論君士坦丁堡主教保羅的敘述闕失；參《研究》卷一184）＝甲系列四（見上文，第48至78頁）。＊＊＊取自西方諸主教撒爾狄卡會議紀錄的雜項：瓦倫斯與烏爾撒基烏斯的兩封書信，尼西亞信經連同一段敘事本文（第九項，第……）。

6:2

1 est decurtatum; uidetur enim deesse symbolum Sirmiense atque initium refutationis, cf. supra p. 146. praeterea excidit ante primam epistulam synodi certe textus Hilarii, quo dispositionem textus narratiui insequentis indicabat, cf. Studien I 97) = Ser. B 11 (supra p. 103-154). Oratio synodi Sardicensis Occidentalium ad Constantium imperatorem una cum textu narratiuo = Liber, qui uulgo dicitur I ad Constantium imperatorem, 1-7 (supra p. 181-186). I)e synodo Mediolanensi: textus narratiuus (decurtatus in fine, cf. Studien I 149) = Liber, qui uulgo dicitur 1 ad Constantium, 8 (supra p. 186 sq.).

1 is abridged; for the Sirmian creed and the beginning of the refutation seem to be missing; cf. above, p. 146. Moreover, before the first letter of the synod there has certainly fallen out a text of Hilary in which he indicated the arrangement of the following narrative text; cf. Studien I 97) = Series B II (above, pp. 103-154). The oration of the Sardican synod of the Westerners to the emperor Constantius, together with a narrative text = the Book commonly called the First to the Emperor Constantius, chapters 1-7 (above, pp. 181-186). On the Synod of Milan: a narrative text (abridged at the end; cf. Studien I 149) = the Book commonly called the First to Constantius, chapter 8 (above, pp. 186 f.).

……第一項被刪節；因為西爾米烏姆信經以及駁斥的開端似乎闕失；參見上文第146頁。此外，在會議的第一封書信之前，必定遺失了希拉里的一段本文，他在其中指明後續敘事本文的編排；參《研究》卷一97）＝乙系列二（見上文，第103至154頁）。西方諸主教撒爾狄卡會議致君士坦提烏斯皇帝的演說，連同一段敘事本文＝一般稱為〈致君士坦提烏斯皇帝第一書〉的第一至七章（見上文，第181至186頁）。論米蘭會議：敘事本文（末尾被刪節；參《研究》卷一149）＝一般稱為〈致君士坦提烏斯第一書〉的第八章（見上文，第186頁及其後）。

6:3

∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ \'LIBER II (scriptus hieme 359/360). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ De Liberio episcopo Romano: Epistula dubia Liberio ad Orientales episcopos Studens paci una cum textu narratiuo (deest textus narratiuus epistulae praemissus, cf. Studien I 167) = Series B III (supra p. 155 sq.). Epistula Liberii ad Constantium imperatorem Obsecro = Ser. A VII (supra p. 89-93). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ Epistulae Liberii Quamuis sub, Nolo te rex parte), Inter haec (ex parte) et epistulae dubiae Pro deifico, Quia scio, Non doceo una cum textu narratiuo = Ser. B VII (supra p. 164—173).

* * * BOOK II (written in the winter of 359/360). * * * On Liberius, bishop of Rome: the doubtful letter of Liberius to the Eastern bishops, 'Studens paci,' together with a narrative text (the narrative text prefixed to the letter is missing; cf. Studien I 167) = Series B III (above, pp. 155 f.). The letter of Liberius to the emperor Constantius, 'Obsecro' = Series A VII (above, pp. 89-93). * * * The letters of Liberius, 'Quamuis sub,' 'Nolo te rex' (in part), 'Inter haec' (in part), and the doubtful letters 'Pro deifico,' 'Quia scio,' 'Non doceo,' together with a narrative text = Series B VII (above, pp. 164-173).

＊＊＊第二卷（寫於三五九至三六〇年冬）。＊＊＊論羅馬主教里貝里烏斯：里貝里烏斯致東方諸主教、可疑的〈致力於和平〉一函，連同一段敘事本文（置於此信之前的敘事本文闕失；參《研究》卷一167）＝乙系列三（見上文，第155頁及其後）。里貝里烏斯致君士坦提烏斯皇帝的〈我懇求〉一函＝甲系列七（見上文，第89至93頁）。＊＊＊里貝里烏斯的諸函：〈雖然在……之下〉、〈王啊，我不願你〉（部分）、〈在這其間〉（部分），以及可疑的諸函〈為著神所定的〉、〈因我知道〉、〈我不教導〉，連同一段敘事本文＝乙系列七（見上文，第164至173頁）。

6:4

∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ De synodi Ariminensis et Seleuciensis: Epistula Constantii imperatoris ad episcopos synodi Ariminensis = Ser. A VIII (supra p. 93 sq.). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Ex actis synodi Ariminensis: Definitio episcoporum homousianorum, textus narratiuus, damnatio haereticorum = Ser. A IX (supra p. 95—97). ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗ x Epistula synodi Ariminensis ad Constantium imperatorem et gesta Nicaena una cum textu narratiuo (sequebatur forte symbolum Nicaena Thraciae propositum, cf. Studien I 76 sq.) = Ser. A V supra p. 78—86). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula episcoporum Arianorum, qui synodo Ariminen.

* * * On the Synods of Rimini and Seleucia: the letter of the emperor Constantius to the bishops of the synod of Rimini = Series A VIII (above, pp. 93 f.). * * * From the acts of the synod of Rimini: the definition of the Homoousian bishops, a narrative text, the condemnation of the heretics = Series A IX (above, pp. 95-97). * * * The letter of the synod of Rimini to the emperor Constantius and the Nicene proceedings, together with a narrative text (there perhaps followed the Nicene creed proposed to Thrace; cf. Studien I 76 f.) = Series A V (above, pp. 78-86). * * * The letter of the Arian bishops who were present at the synod of Rimini...

＊＊＊論里米尼會議與塞琉基亞會議：君士坦提烏斯皇帝致里米尼會議諸主教的書信＝甲系列八（見上文，第93頁及其後）。＊＊＊取自里米尼會議紀錄：同質論諸主教的定義、一段敘事本文、對異端的定罪＝甲系列九（見上文，第95至97頁）。＊＊＊里米尼會議致君士坦提烏斯皇帝的書信，及尼西亞的議事紀錄，連同一段敘事本文（其後或許接著呈給色雷斯的尼西亞信經；參《研究》卷一76頁及其後）＝甲系列五（見上文，第78至86頁）。＊＊＊出席里米尼會議的亞流派諸主教的書信……

6:5

i inter- ■ erant, ad Constantium imperatorem = Ser. A VI (supra p. 87 sq.). ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ Epistula legatorum synodi Seleuciensis ad legatos synodi Ariminensis una cum textu narratiuo (ante epistulam excidit textus narratiuus, qui \'librum Ualentis et Ualentis\' interpretabatur, cf. Studien Illlsq.) = Ser. B VIII (supra p. 174—177). x ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ LIBER III .(scriptus a. 367). x ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula synodi Parisiensis ad episcopos Orientales = Ser. A I (supra p. 43—46).

...to the emperor Constantius = Series A VI (above, pp. 87 f.). * * * The letter of the legates of the synod of Seleucia to the legates of the synod of Rimini, together with a narrative text (before the letter there has fallen out the narrative text which interpreted the 'book of Valens and Valens'; cf. Studien I 111 f.) = Series B VIII (above, pp. 174-177). * * * BOOK III (written A.D. 367). * * * The letter of the synod of Paris to the Eastern bishops = Series A I (above, pp. 43-46).

……致君士坦提烏斯皇帝＝甲系列六（見上文，第87頁及其後）。＊＊＊塞琉基亞會議使節致里米尼會議使節的書信，連同一段敘事本文（在此信之前，遺失了那闡釋「瓦倫斯與瓦倫斯之書」的敘事本文；參《研究》卷一111頁及其後）＝乙系列八（見上文，第174至177頁）。＊＊＊第三卷（寫於主後三六七年）。＊＊＊巴黎會議致東方諸主教的書信＝甲系列一（見上文，第43至46頁）。

6:6

∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗x Epistula Eusebii episcopi Uercellensis ad Gregorium episcopum Eliberitanum = Ser. A II (supra p, 46 sq.). ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistulae duae de reconciliandis episcopis lapsis = Ser. H IV (supra p. 156—159). ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ ∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ De Germinio episcopo Sirmiensi: Ex epistula Germinii ad episcopos Arianos: symbolum Germinii (excidit ipsa epistula, cf. Studien I 103) = Ser. A III (supra p. 47 sq.). ∗ ∗∗∗∗ ∗ w ∗ ∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula Ualentis, Ursacii, Gaii et Pauli ad Germinium = Ser. B V (supra p. 159 sq.).

* * * The letter of Eusebius, bishop of Vercelli, to Gregory, bishop of Elvira = Series A II (above, pp. 46 f.). * * * Two letters on the reconciliation of lapsed bishops = Series B IV (above, pp. 156-159). * * * On Germinius, bishop of Sirmium: from the letter of Germinius to the Arian bishops, the creed of Germinius (the letter itself has fallen out; cf. Studien I 103) = Series A III (above, pp. 47 f.). * * * The letter of Valens, Ursacius, Gaius, and Paul to Germinius = Series B V (above, pp. 159 f.).

＊＊＊維爾切利主教尤西比烏斯致埃爾維拉主教格里高利的書信＝甲系列二（見上文，第46頁及其後）。＊＊＊論使墮落主教復和的兩封書信＝乙系列四（見上文，第156至159頁）。＊＊＊論西爾米烏姆主教革爾米尼烏斯：取自革爾米尼烏斯致亞流派諸主教書信中的、革爾米尼烏斯的信經（書信本身闕失；參《研究》卷一103）＝甲系列三（見上文，第47頁及其後）。＊＊＊瓦倫斯、烏爾撒基烏斯、蓋烏斯與保羅致革爾米尼烏斯的書信＝乙系列五（見上文，第159頁及其後）。

6:7

∗ ∗ ∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗ Epistula Germinii ad Kufianum, Palladium et ceteros = Ser. B VI (supra p. 160—164). ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗

* * * The letter of Germinius to Rufianus, Palladius, and the rest = Series B VI (above, pp. 160-164). * * *

＊＊＊革爾米尼烏斯致魯非安努斯、帕拉狄烏斯及其餘諸人的書信＝乙系列六（見上文，第160至164頁）。＊＊＊

← ch. 5ch. 7 →

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.