📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Anti-Arian Works

Anti-Arian Works 4 part 1/3

Latin original · 37 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 4:1–4:37 (90 verses in all)

← ch. 3ch. 5 →
next part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
4:1
340 CAPUT PRIMUM. Cum tuas litteras, carissime fili Victor, fidei et ea­ ritatis odorem suavissimum continentes, tota dele­ ctatione atque alacritate animi recenserem, subjectum reperi, quem mihi refellendum destinasti, Fastidiosi sermonem. Quo reecnsito, tanto dolui perditum. quanto magis sum compulsus exhorrere blasphemum; quem novimus post Christianam fidem, post mona­ chi professionem, post presbyterii honorem, quem in conspectu hominum cepit, et coram Domino uon habuit, a via veritatis aversum, et suæ prorsus re­ demptionis oblitum, factum fuisse fornicationis ac luxuriæ servum, et ex hoc respuere majestatis divi­ næ servitium.
CHAPTER ONE. When, most beloved son Victor, I was reading over your letter, which breathed the most sweet fragrance of faith and charity, with every delight and eagerness of soul, I found appended the discourse of Fastidiosus, which you assigned me to refute. Having read it through, I grieved the more for one lost, the more I was compelled to shudder at the blasphemer; whom we knew, after the Christian faith, after the profession of a monk, after the honor of the priesthood which he received in the sight of men and did not possess before the Lord, to have turned away from the way of truth and to have utterly forgotten his own redemption, becoming a slave of fornication and luxury, and on this account to spurn the service of the divine majesty.
第一章。至愛之子維克托啊,當我以滿心的喜悅與熱切的心神細讀你那封散發著信德與愛德最馨香之氣的書信時,我發現其中附上了你指派我駁斥的法斯提迪奧素的講辭。讀畢之後,我愈是被迫對這褻瀆者感到戰慄,就愈為這一失喪之人悲傷;我們知道他曾領受基督信仰、曾發修士之願、曾在眾人眼前取得司鐸之榮(雖在主前並未真正擁有),卻背離了真理之道,全然忘記了自己的救贖,淪為淫亂與奢逸的奴隸,並因此鄙棄事奉天主的威嚴。
4:2
Inde est quod ex catholico factus hæ­ reticus, ac de malo thesauro cordis sui proferens mala, contra rectam fidem, contra catholicam veri­ tatem non immerito illum sermonem veneno impie­ tatis crapulatus evomat, quando panem vitæ res­ puit, et salubrem veræ fidei cibum sui nominis indi­ cio fastidiosus abjecit. In illo autem profano sermone vocans nos Homousianos, quod nos Ariani assolent nuncupare, hæc verba posuit : Homousianis, inquit, asserentibus inseparabilem atque individuam Trinita­ tem, nec Patri Filium fuisse minorem, nec Patrem in­ genitum Filii sui esse factorem. Attende, quæso, in istis Fastidiosi verbis quædam sic male posita, ut nunquam possint bene asseri;
Hence it is that, having become a heretic from a Catholic, and bringing forth evil things out of the evil treasure of his heart, against the right faith, against the Catholic truth, gorged with the poison of impiety, he not undeservedly vomits out that discourse, since he has spurned the bread of life and, fastidious by the token of his own name, has cast away the wholesome food of the true faith. Moreover, in that profane discourse, calling us Homousians (which we Arians are wont to be named), he set down these words: 'To the Homousians,' he says, 'who assert an inseparable and undivided Trinity, and that the Son was not less than the Father, and that the Father, unbegotten, is not the maker of His own Son.' Consider, I pray, in these words of Fastidiosus certain things so badly put that they can never be rightly maintained;
因此,他從公教徒變成了異端,從自己心中邪惡的寶庫中發出惡言,違抗正信、違抗公教真理,飽飲不虔之毒,於是他理所當然地吐出那篇講辭;因他鄙棄了生命之糧,且如其名所示般厭膩地拋棄了真信仰的有益食糧。而且,在那篇褻瀆的講辭中,他稱我們為「同質論者」(正如我們亞略派慣被稱呼的),並寫下這些話:他說:「對於那些主張不可分、不可分割之三位一體、主張聖子並不遜於聖父、主張非受生的聖父並非其自己聖子之造作者的同質論者……」請你留意,在法斯提迪奧素這些話中,有些說得如此惡劣,以致永遠無法被正確地維護;
4:3
quædam sic ab illo impie dicta, ut et bene possint,'si tamen adsit pietas, et dici pariter et audiri. Illud enim quo nos arguendos putavit, quia inseparabilem atque individuam Trini­ tatem dicimus, ita male atque impie protulit, ut hoc quisquam 341 bene proferre non possit. Quis enim non videat, quanta impietate ab Arianis Trinitas se­ parabilis asseratur? Beatus Apostolus de nobis dicit : Quis nos separabit a caritate Christi ? Tribulatio, an angustia, an periculum, an fames, an persecutio, an gladius (Rom. VIII, 55)? Et paulo post : Certus sum quod neque mors, neque vita, neque angeli, neque prin­ cipatus, neque instantia;
and certain things spoken by him so impiously that they could also be well spoken (if only piety be present) and alike be uttered and heard. For that on which he thought we should be charged, namely because we call the Trinity inseparable and undivided, he put forth so badly and impiously that no one can put it forth well. For who does not see with what impiety a separable Trinity is asserted by the Arians? The blessed Apostle says of us: 'Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Tribulation, or distress, or peril, or famine, or persecution, or the sword?' (Rom. VIII). And a little after: 'I am certain that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present;'
而他所說的某些話則是如此不虔,其實只要有虔敬同在,也可以說得好,且同樣可以被說、被聽。因為他認為應當控告我們的那一點——即我們稱三位一體為不可分、不可分割——他表述得如此惡劣不虔,以致無人能正確地表述它。因為誰看不出亞略派以何等的不虔主張一個可分的三位一體呢?聖使徒論到我們說:「誰能使我們與基督的愛隔絕呢?難道是患難嗎?是困苦嗎?是危險嗎?是飢餓嗎?是逼迫嗎?是刀劍嗎?」(羅馬書第八章)稍後又說:「我深信無論是死、是生、是天使、是掌權的、是現今的事……」
4:4
neque futura, neque fortitu­ dines, neque altiludo, neque profundum, neque creatura alia poterit nos separare a caritate Dei, quæ est in Christo Jesu Domino nostro (Ibid., 58;. CAPUT II. Cum ergo beatus Apostolus per gratiam Dei non nos posse ab ipsius separari caritate confidat, quomodo se non sentiant laqueo mortifero impietatis innexos, qui sanctam Trinitatem separatam prædicare non dubitant, cujus opera in aliquo separabilia demon­ strare non possunt ? Nam in eo quod evangelista de . Filio dicit: Omnia per ipsum facta sunt, et sine ipso factum est nihil (Joan. t, 3); et in eo quod beatus David canit: Quam magnificata sunt opera tua, Do­ mine ! omnia in sapientia fecisti (Psal.
'nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord' (ibid.). CHAPTER TWO. Since therefore the blessed Apostle is confident that through the grace of God we cannot be separated from His love, how do they not perceive themselves entangled in the deadly noose of impiety, who do not hesitate to preach the holy Trinity as separated, whose works they cannot show to be separable in anything? For in that which the evangelist says of the Son, 'All things were made by Him, and without Him was made nothing' (John 1); and in that which blessed David sings, 'How magnificent are Thy works, O Lord! Thou hast made all things in wisdom' (Ps.
「是將來的事、是能力、是高處、是深處,或是任何其他受造物,都不能使我們與天主的愛隔絕,這愛是在我們的主基督耶穌裡的」(同上)。第二章。既然聖使徒確信,藉著天主的恩典我們不能與祂的愛隔絕,那麼那些毫不猶豫地宣講聖三位一體為彼此分離的人,豈不是察覺不到自己已陷入不虔的致命絞索中嗎?他們無法顯明三位一體的工作在任何事上是可分的。因為福音史家論到聖子說:「萬物是藉著祂造的,凡受造的沒有一樣不是藉著祂造的」(若望福音第一章);又如蒙福的達味所歌唱的:「主啊,你的工作何其浩大!你都是憑智慧造成的」(詠……
4:5
CIII, 24) ; Chri­ slum autem Dei virtulem et Dei sapientiam beatus profitetur Apostolus, de quo dicitur : Quia in ipso condita suM universa in cælis et in terra, visibilia et invisibila, sive Throni, sive Dominationes, sive Prin­ cipatus, sive Potestates, omnia per ipsum, et in ipso creata sunt (Coloss. i, 16); manifestum est omnia opera Patris eadem esse opera Filii, eademque esse opera Spiritus sancti. Inseparabiliter quippe sancta Trinitas operatur : nec est opus quod fecerit Pater, et non fecerit Filius; aut quod fecerit Filius, et non fecerit Spiritus sanctus : Scriptum est enim, Verbo Domini cœli firmati sunt, ct Spiritu oris ejus omnis virtus eorum (Psal XXXII, 6).
CIII, 24); and the blessed Apostle professes Christ to be the power of God and the wisdom of God, of whom it is said: 'For in Him were all things created in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether Thrones, or Dominations, or Principalities, or Powers; all things were created by Him and in Him' (Col. 1, 16); it is manifest that all the works of the Father are the same works of the Son, and the same are the works of the Holy Spirit. For the holy Trinity works inseparably: nor is there any work which the Father has made and the Son has not made; or which the Son has made and the Holy Spirit has not made. For it is written: 'By the word of the Lord the heavens were established, and by the Spirit of His mouth all their power' (Ps. XXXII, 6).
(詠一〇三篇24節);聖使徒又宣認基督是天主的能力與天主的智慧,論到祂說:「因為在祂裡面,天上地上的一切都受造了,無論是有形的、無形的,或是上座者、宰制者、率領者、掌權者,一切都是藉著祂並在祂裡面受造的」(哥羅森書一章16節);由此顯然可見,父的一切工作即是子的同一工作,也即是聖神的同一工作。因為聖三位一體不可分地運作:沒有任何一項工作是父所造而子沒有造的;也沒有任何一項是子所造而聖神沒有造的。因為經上記著說:「諸天藉主的話而堅立,天上的萬象藉祂口中的氣而成」(詠三十二篇6節)。
4:6
De sapientia quoque quam nos in angelis creatam dicimus, in Ecclesiastico libro scriptum legimus : Prior omnium creata est sa­ pientia, et intellectus prudentiæ ab ævo (Eccli. I, 4). Ut ostenderet Verbo Dei, per quod facla sunt omnia, etiam angelos factos, continuo sancta Scriptura suh­ junxit : Fons sapientiæ Verbum Dei, et ingressus il­ lius mandata æterna (Ibid., 5). Et paulo post, ut ostenderet angelos ad opera Spiritus sancti pertinere, ita dicitur : Unus altissimus creator omnipotens est, Rex potens, metuendus nimis, sedens super thronum illius et dominans. Deus creavit illam Spiritu sancto (Ibid., 8).
Concerning wisdom also, which we say was created among the angels, we read written in the book of Ecclesiasticus: 'Wisdom was created before all things, and the understanding of prudence from everlasting' (Ecclus. I, 4). That He might show that the angels too were made by the Word of God, through whom all things were made, holy Scripture immediately subjoined: 'The Word of God is the fountain of wisdom, and His commandments are eternal entrance' (ibid., 5). And a little after, that He might show the angels to belong to the works of the Holy Spirit, it is thus said: 'One is the most high Creator, almighty, a powerful King and greatly to be feared, sitting upon His throne and ruling. God created her by the Holy Spirit' (ibid., 8).
至於我們所說在眾天使中受造的智慧,我們在德訓篇中讀到記載說:「智慧在萬物之先受造,明智的悟性自亙古而有」(德訓篇一章4節)。為了顯明萬物既藉天主聖言而造,眾天使也是藉之而造,聖經隨即補充說:「智慧的泉源是天主的聖言,通往智慧之門是永恆的誡命」(同上5節)。稍後,為了顯明眾天使屬於聖神的工作,經上如此說:「唯有一位至高者,是全能的造物主、大能的君王,至可畏懼,坐在祂的寶座上而統管萬有。天主藉聖神造了她」(同上8節)。
4:7
Quid igitur ab Spiritu sancto facturn ne­ gabitur, a quo virtus coelorum firmata legitur, et cu­ jus opera creata sapientia prædicatur? Nam et de di- vinis donis quae Deus Ecclesiæ suæ tribuit, cum beatus loqueretur Apostolus et dixisset : Divisiones autem gratiarum sunt, idem autem Spiritus ; et di­ visionis ministrationum sunt, idem vero Deus, qui operatur omnia in omnibus (I Cor. XII, 4) ; enu­ merata deinde donorum diversitate cœlestium, in­ tulit : Hcec omnia operatur unus atque idem Spiritas dividens singulis prout vult (Ibid., 12). Quid autem in omnibus creaturis, in quibus sapientia attingit a fine usque ad finem fortiter, et disponit omnia suaviter (Sap.
What then shall be denied to have been made by the Holy Spirit, by whom the power of the heavens is read to have been established, and whose work created wisdom is proclaimed to be? For also concerning the divine gifts which God bestows on His Church, when the blessed Apostle spoke and had said: 'Now there are diversities of graces, but the same Spirit; and there are diversities of ministries, but the same Lord, who works all things in all' (1 Cor. XII, 4); then, having enumerated the diversity of heavenly gifts, he added: 'But all these things one and the same Spirit works, dividing to everyone according as He will' (ibid., 12). But what, among all creatures, in which wisdom reaches mightily from end to end and disposes all things sweetly (Wis.
那麼,還有什麼能被否認是聖神所造的呢?因為經上記載諸天的能力是藉祂堅立的,而受造的智慧也被宣告是祂的工作。因為關於天主賜給祂教會的神恩,蒙福的使徒也說過,並且說:「恩賜有分別,聖神卻是一位;職事有分別,主卻是同一位,祂在眾人裡面運行一切」(格前十二章4節);接著他列舉了天上諸恩賜的種類之後,補充說:「這一切都是同一位聖神所運行的,隨己意分給各人」(同上12節)。而在一切受造物中——智慧在其中有力地從這端達到那端,並溫和地安排萬有(智慧篇……
4:8
VIII, 1), ab operatione sancti Spiritus inveniri poterit alienum, cum se in Spiritu Dei ejicere dæmo­ nia Christus, qui est Dei 342 virtus, et sapientia, protestetur? Ipse enim dixit : Si autemego in Spiritu Dei ejicio dæmonia, ergo pervenit in vos regnum Dei (Matth. XII, 28). Quomodo ergo Fastidiosus Trinita- tem inseparabilem negat, cum opera Trinitatis ea­ dem atque inseparabilia esse in creaturis omnibus nemo negare audeat Christianus Inseparabiliter quippe operatur unus Deus, videlicet Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus sanclus. Eadem namque opera sua c:sc quæ Patris sui, Dei Unigenitus protestatur, dicens : Quæcumque enim Pater facit, hæc cadem Filius simi­ liter facit (Joan. v, 19).
VIII, 1)—what could be found alien to the operation of the Holy Spirit, when Christ, who is the power and wisdom of God, testifies that He casts out demons by the Spirit of God? For He Himself said: 'But if I cast out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you' (Matt. XII, 28). How then does Fastidiosus deny an inseparable Trinity, when no Christian dares deny that the works of the Trinity are the same and inseparable in all creatures? For one God works inseparably, namely the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit. For the Only-begotten of God testifies that His works are the same as those of His Father, saying: 'For whatsoever things the Father does, these the Son likewise does' (John V, 19).
(智慧篇八章1節)——當基督(祂是天主的能力與智慧)證明祂是藉天主的神驅逐魔鬼時,還有什麼能被認為與聖神的運作無關呢?因為祂親自說:「我若是藉天主的神驅魔,那麼天主的國已臨到你們了」(瑪竇福音十二章28節)。既然沒有一個基督徒膽敢否認三位一體的工作在一切受造物中乃是同一而不可分的,法斯提迪奧素又怎能否認不可分的三位一體呢?因為獨一天主,即父、子、聖神,不可分地運作。因為天主的獨生子證明祂的工作與祂父的工作相同,說:「父所做的一切事,子也照樣做」(若望福音五章19節)。
4:9
Et tamen quæ Filius facit, in Spiritu sancto facit, in quo dæmonia ejicit. CAPUT III. Ne vero, pro eo quod diximus quod et Filius ex (forte in) Spiritu sancto facit quæcunque iacit, aliquam diversitatis velint Ariani asserere quæstionem, putan­ tes minorem debere accipi eum in quo aliquid fit ab eo qui facit, audiant Salvatorem nostrum huic per­ versitati omnimodo resistentem in eo quod dicit: Qui autem facit veritatem, venit ad lucem, ut manife- tentur ejus opera, quæ in Deo sunt facla (Joan. III 20). Hic eligant Ariani quomodo velint accipere Deum in Filio nominato, utrum Patrem, aD Filium, an Spiritum sanctum?
And yet what the Son does, He does in the Holy Spirit, in whom He casts out demons. CHAPTER THREE. But lest, on account of our saying that the Son also does in the Holy Spirit whatever He does, the Arians should wish to assert some question of diversity, thinking that He in whom something is done ought to be received as less than He who does it, let them hear our Saviour resisting this perversity in every way in that which He says: 'But he that does truth comes to the light, that his works may be made manifest, because they are done in God' (John III, 20). Here let the Arians choose how they wish to understand God when named in the Son: whether the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit?
然而子所做的,祂是在聖神裡做的,祂在聖神裡驅逐魔鬼。第三章。但恐怕亞略派會因我們所說「子也在聖神裡做祂所做的一切」而想要主張某種差異的問題,以為那位「在祂裡面有事被做成」者應被視為遜於那位「做成之者」;那麼就讓他們聽我們救主用各樣方式抵擋這種悖謬,正如祂所說的:「行真理的必來就光,好使他的行為顯明出來,因為是在天主裡做成的」(若望福音三章20節)。在此,讓亞略派選擇他們願如何理解在子中所稱的「天主」:究竟是父、是子、還是聖神呢?
4:10
Si enim Patrem putaverint accipiendum esse, in quo bona opera ab hominibus fiunt, ipsi destruunt quod personæ Spiritus sancti blasphemantes objiciunt. Neque enim Patrem aude­ bunt minorem dicere, cui secundum divinitatem no­ lunt æqualem Filium prædicare. Ac per hoc, cum in Patre homo bona opera facit, et in Spirilu sancto Christus ejicit dxmonia , cognoscant æqualitatem Patris, et Spiritus sancti. Si vero Filium hic acci- pientum dixerint ex hoc quod in Filio et in Spiritu sancto bona opera Hiant, non solum compelluntur Filium et Spiritum sanctum æquales fateri, verum etiam fatebuntur eadem atque inseparabilia esse opera Patris, et Filii, et Spiritus sancti :
For if they think the Father is to be understood, in whom good works are done by men, they themselves destroy what they object in blaspheming against the person of the Holy Spirit. For they will not dare to call the Father less, to whom according to divinity they refuse to preach the Son as equal. And on this account, since man does good works in the Father, and Christ casts out demons in the Holy Spirit, let them acknowledge the equality of the Father and of the Holy Spirit. But if they say the Son is here to be understood, from the fact that good works are done in the Son and in the Holy Spirit, they are not only compelled to confess the Son and the Holy Spirit equal, but they will also confess that the works of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit are the same and inseparable:
因為他們若認為應當理解為父——善工是人在父裡面所做的——他們自己就摧毀了他們褻瀆聖神位格時所提出的反對。因為他們不敢稱父為較小者,然而他們卻不願按神性宣認子與父相等。因此,既然人在父裡面行善工,而基督在聖神裡驅魔,就讓他們承認父與聖神的相等。但他們若說此處應理解為子——因為善工既在子裡又在聖神裡被做成——他們不僅被迫承認子與聖神相等,而且也將承認父、子、聖神的工作乃是同一而不可分的:
4:11
Omnia enim operatur unus atque idem Spiritu (I Cor. XII, 12), sicut beatus Apostolus testatur. Si vero Spiritum sanctum æstimant Ariani, necesse est ut ex hoc loco compellantur Deum fateri Spiritum sanctum. Non enim dixit spiritus Domini, Qui facit veritatem, ut manifestentur ejus opera, quæ in Spiritu sancto sunt facta ; sed, Quæ in Deo sunt facta, quæ nos non in solo Patre, nec in solo Filio, nec in solo Spiritu sanclo facta dicimus, sed in ipsa Trinitate sancta, quæ unus Deus est, veritatem ab homine fieri confitemur, in quo virtutem a fidelibus tieri beatus David insinuat dicens : In Domino faciemus virtutem, et ipse ad nihi­ lum deducet tribulantes nos (Psal. nIX, 14).
'For all things one and the same Spirit works' (1 Cor. XII, 12), as the blessed Apostle testifies. But if the Arians reckon it to be the Holy Spirit, they must from this passage be compelled to confess the Holy Spirit to be God. For it did not say, 'the spirit of the Lord, He that does truth, that his works may be made manifest, which are done in the Holy Spirit'; but, 'which are done in God'—which we say are done not in the Father alone, nor in the Son alone, nor in the Holy Spirit alone, but in that same holy Trinity, which is one God; we confess that truth is done by man in it, in which blessed David intimates that strength is wrought by the faithful, saying: 'In the Lord we shall do valiantly, and He will bring to nothing them that trouble us' (Ps. LIX, 14).
「因為這一切都是同一位聖神所運行的」(格前十二章12節),正如蒙福的使徒所見證的。但亞略派若認定是聖神,他們必被此段經文所迫,承認聖神是天主。因為經上並未說:「主的靈,行真理的,好使他的行為顯明,是在聖神裡做成的」;而是說「是在天主裡做成的」——我們說這並非單在父裡、也非單在子裡、也非單在聖神裡做成,而是在那同一位聖三位一體裡做成的,這位一體乃是獨一天主;我們承認真理是人在祂裡面所行的,正如蒙福的達味所暗示的,說忠信者在祂裡面顯出剛勇:「我們倚靠天主必顯出勇力,祂必踐踏那些苦害我們的人」(詠五十九篇14節)。
4:12
Ipse enim est unus Deus de quo bealus Apostolus dicit, Quoniam ex ipso et in ipso omnia sunt : ipsi gloria in sæcula (Rom. XI, 36). CAPUT IV. Quomodo igitur sancta Trinitas ab impiis separa­ bilis dicitur, cum inseparabiliter operatur, a quibus, quantum datur intelligi, nec in spiritu quod dicitur separari, sicut rei veritas exigit, cogitatur ? A 343Deo enim nostro, id est ab ipsa Trinitate sancta, nihil potest localiter separari, quia idem Deus summus, verus et bonus, sicut omnia fecit, sic omnia continet et replet immensus. Non est autem corporalis, neque localis, et ideo nec ipsa corporalia possunt a Deo localiter separari; quia in loco est omne corpus, et sine Deo nullus est locus.
For He is the one God of whom the blessed Apostle says: 'For from Him and in Him are all things: to Him be glory for ever' (Rom. XI, 36). CHAPTER FOUR. How then is the holy Trinity called separable by the impious, when it works inseparably—by those by whom, as far as it is given to understand, it is not even conceived to be separated in the spirit, as the truth of the matter requires? For from our God, that is, from that same holy Trinity, nothing can be locally separated, because the same God, supreme, true, and good, as He made all things, so, immeasurable, contains and fills all things. But He is neither corporeal nor local, and therefore not even bodily things can be locally separated from God; because every body is in a place, and without God there is no place.
因為祂就是那位獨一天主,蒙福的使徒論到祂說:「因為萬物都是本於祂、倚靠祂:願榮耀歸於祂,直到永遠」(羅馬書十一章36節)。第四章。那麼,聖三位一體既然不可分地運作,怎能被不虔者稱為可分呢?就他們所能領悟的而言,他們甚至未按事實真相所要求的,在心靈中設想它是被分開的。因為從我們的天主,即從那同一位聖三位一體,沒有什麼能在空間上被分離,因為那同一位至高、真實、美善的天主,既造了萬物,也就無量地包含並充滿萬物。但祂既非有形,亦非受空間限制,因此連有形之物也不能在空間上與天主分離;因為凡物體都在某處,而沒有天主就沒有處所。
4:13
Deus cnim sic nullo continetur loco, ut ipse contineat omnem locum; in quo moles est nulla, et cujus est virtus immensa. Cum igitur cor­ pora, quaesine loco esse non possunt, non possint a Deo localiter separari, procul dubio neque spiritus quos Deus creavit a Deo localiter separantur. Omnis enim spiritus quem creavit Deus in quocunque loco f it, ibi est Deus : qui licet in spiritibus malis non sit per gratiam, per quam quibus ipse vult vitam san­ cLam beatitudinemque largitur, per polentiam tamen naturalem in oinnibus creaturis suis sic semper est, ut nulla creatura vel particula creaturæ inveniri pos­ sit in qua Deus per potentiam non sit.
For God is so contained by no place, that He Himself contains every place; in whom there is no mass, and whose power is immeasurable. Since therefore bodies, which cannot exist without place, cannot be locally separated from God, without doubt neither are the spirits which God created locally separated from God. For every spirit which God created, in whatever place it is, there is God: who, although He is not in evil spirits through the grace by which He bestows a holy life and blessedness on those whom He Himself wills, yet through His natural power He is always so present in all His creatures, that no creature or particle of a creature can be found in which God is not present through His power.
因為天主雖不被任何處所所包含,卻自己包含一切處所;在祂裡面沒有任何體積,而祂的能力是無量的。既然如此,凡不能無處而存的物體,都不能在空間上與天主分離,那麼毫無疑問,天主所造的諸靈也不會在空間上與天主分離。因為天主所造的每一個靈,無論在何處,天主就在那裡:祂雖然不藉恩典而在惡靈中——祂藉那恩典按己意賜給某些人聖潔的生命與福樂——但祂藉本性的能力總是如此臨在於祂一切受造物中,以致找不到任何受造物或受造物的微粒是天主不藉其能力臨在其中的。
4:14
Illa igitur na­ tura separari potest a Deo, quæ potuit aut potest subjaccre peccato. Ncc cst alia res quae possit a Deo discedere, nisi substantia quæ potest aut potuit pro­ pria voluntate peccare. Dicit enim Esaias : Ecce non est abbreviata manus Domini, ut salvare nequeat, ne­ que aggravata est auris ejus, ut non exaudiat ; sed ini­ quitates vestræ dividunt inter vos et Deum vestrum (Isai. LIX, i, 2). In libro quoque Sapientiæ ostendi­ tur homines a Deo, non locis, sed pravis cogitationi­ bus et iniquis actibus scparari. Ibi cnun dicitur : Perversæ enim cogitationes separant a Deo. Probata autem virtus corripit insipientes :
That nature therefore can be separated from God, which was able or is able to be subject to sin. Nor is there any other thing which can depart from God, except the substance which is able or was able by its own will to sin. For Isaiah says: 'Behold, the hand of the Lord is not shortened, that it cannot save, neither is His ear made heavy, that it cannot hear; but your iniquities divide between you and your God' (Isa. LIX, 1, 2). In the book of Wisdom also it is shown that men are separated from God, not by places, but by depraved thoughts and wicked deeds. For there it is said: 'For perverse thoughts separate from God. But virtue, when it is tried, reproves the foolish:'
因此,唯有那能夠或曾能屈服於罪的本性,才能與天主分離。除了那憑自己意志能夠或曾能犯罪的實體之外,再沒有別的東西能離開天主。因為依撒意亞說:「看哪,主的手臂並非縮短到不能施救,祂的耳朵也非沉重到不能垂聽;乃是你們的罪孽使你們與你們的天主隔絕」(依撒意亞五十九章1、2節)。在智慧篇中也顯明,人與天主分離並非因處所,而是因邪僻的思念與不義的行為。因為那裡說:「因為乖僻的思念使人與天主分離。而受試驗的德能斥責愚昧人:」
4:15
quoniam in malevolam animam non introibit sapientia, nec inhabitabit in corde subdito peccatis; Spiritus enim sanctus disciplinæ ef­ fugiet fictum, et auferet se a cogitationibus quæ sunt sine intellectu (Sap. I, 3, 4,5). Hic autem quis non videat trinitatem personarum proprietatibus intima­ tam ? Dictum est enim quoniam perversæ cogitatio­ nes separant a Deo, quo nomine persona Dei Patris agnoscitur. Deinde adjectum est, quoniam in malevo- I lam animam non inlroibit sapientia, quo nomine Chri­ stus ostenditur, quem Dei virtutem et Dei sapientiam Paulus appellat. Deinde dictum est quoniam Spiritu. sanctus effugiet fictum, et auferet se a cogitationibus quæ sunt sine intellectu.
'for wisdom will not enter into a malicious soul, nor dwell in a body subject to sins; for the Holy Spirit of discipline will flee the deceitful, and will withdraw Himself from thoughts that are without understanding' (Wis. I, 3, 4, 5). But who does not here see the Trinity of persons intimated by their properties? For it was said that perverse thoughts separate from God, by which name the person of God the Father is recognized. Then it was added, that wisdom will not enter into a malicious soul, by which name Christ is shown, whom Paul calls the power of God and the wisdom of God. Then it was said that the Holy Spirit will flee the deceitful, and will withdraw Himself from thoughts that are without understanding.
「因為智慧不進入懷惡意的靈魂,也不住在被罪奴役的身體裡;因為訓誨的聖神必逃避詭詐,也必從沒有悟性的思念中退去」(智慧篇一章3、4、5節)。但誰在此看不出三位格藉其特性被表明出來呢?因為經上說乖僻的思念使人與天主分離,這名稱指的是天主聖父的位格。接著補充說智慧不進入懷惡意的靈魂,這名稱指的是基督,保祿稱祂為天主的能力與天主的智慧。然後說聖神必逃避詭詐,也必從沒有悟性的思念中退去。
4:16
Ne quis autem putaret quos­ libet iniquos aut impios ab ista sancta Trinitate, quæ unus, verus, et bonus est Deus, localiter posse sepa­ rari, paulo post Scriptura sic loquitur : Humanus est enim Spiritus sapientiæ, et non liberabit maledictum a labiis suis, quoniam renum illius testis est Deus, et cordis ejus inspector verus, et linguæ illius auditor.. Quoniam Spiritus Domini replevit orbem terrarum (Ibid., 6, 7). Immensilatcm ilaquc sanctæ Trinita­ tis divina non cessant eloquia profiteri. Hanc utique beatus David certissime noverat, et ideo dicebat : Quo ibo a Spiritu tuo, et a facie tua quo fugiam? Si ascendero in cœlum, tu illic es ; si descendero in in­ fernum, ades (Psal.
But lest anyone should think that any wicked or impious persons could be locally separated from that holy Trinity, which is the one, true, and good God, a little after the Scripture speaks thus: 'For the Spirit of wisdom is benevolent (toward man), and will not acquit the evil-speaker from his lips, for God is witness of his reins, and the true searcher of his heart, and a hearer of his tongue. For the Spirit of the Lord has filled the whole world' (ibid., 6, 7). The divine oracles therefore do not cease to profess the immensity of the holy Trinity. This indeed blessed David most surely knew, and therefore said: 'Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit, and whither shall I flee from Thy face? If I ascend into heaven, Thou art there; if I descend into hell, Thou art present' (Ps.
但恐怕有人以為任何邪惡或不虔的人能夠在空間上與那聖三位一體(祂是獨一、真實、美善的天主)分離,經上稍後如此說:「因為智慧的神是仁慈的(善待人的),必不赦免褻瀆者的唇舌之罪,因為天主是他肺腑的見證者、他內心的真實鑒察者、他舌頭的垂聽者。因為主的神充滿了整個世界」(同上6、7節)。因此,天主的聖言不斷宣認聖三位一體的無量。這一點蒙福的達味確實極其明白,因此說:「我往哪裡去躲避你的神?我逃到哪裡去躲避你的面?我若升到天上,你在那裡;我若下到陰間,你也在那裡」(詠……
4:17
CXXXVIII, i, 8).De Sapientia quo­ que, id est Dei Filio, Scriptura dicit, quoniam attin­ git a fine usque ad finem, et disponit omnia suaviter (Sap. VIII, 1). Quoniam igitur a sancta Trinitate, quæubique tota e t, nulla res localiter separatur, sed solæ separant a Dco, sicut jam diximus, iniqui- tales et perversæ cogitationes; quisquis Trinitatem 344 separabilem conatur asserere, necesse est di­ cat, aut Patrem aut Filium, aut Spiritum sanctum pravis cogitationibus et iniquitatibus posse naturali­ ter subjacere.
CXXXVIII, 7, 8). Concerning Wisdom also, that is, the Son of God, Scripture says, that He reaches from end to end and disposes all things sweetly (Wis. VIII, 1). Since therefore nothing is locally separated from the holy Trinity, which is everywhere whole, but iniquities and perverse thoughts alone separate from God, as we have already said; whoever tries to assert a separable Trinity must necessarily say that either the Father, or the Son, or the Holy Spirit can naturally be subject to depraved thoughts and iniquities.
(詠一三八篇7、8節)。至於智慧,即天主聖子,聖經也說祂從這端達到那端,並溫和地安排萬有(智慧篇八章1節)。既然如此,沒有什麼能在空間上與那無處不在、全然完整的聖三位一體分離,而唯有不義與乖僻的思念使人與天主分離(如我們已說過的);那麼凡試圖主張一個可分之三位一體的人,就必然要說父、或子、或聖神能夠本性地屈服於邪僻的思念與不義。
4:18
Quis autem seipsum laqueo tantæ im­ pietatis evolvat, ut aliquam separationem in illa Tri­ nitate, ubi naturalis est unitas, suspicetur, cum per acceptam gratiam, sicut est superius a nobis demon­ stratum, confidat Paulus fidelis a caritate Dei, quæ- est in Christo Jesu Domino nostro, posse nullatenus separari? Beatus autem Joannes apostolus et carita­ tem ex Deo esse, et caritatem Deum esse confirmat his verbis : Carissimi, diligamus invicem quoniam caritas ex Deo est, et omnis qui diligit ex Deo est (I Joan. IV, 7); et, Deus est caritas (Ibid., 1G).A seipsa utique se. arari non potest, quia inseparabilis est.
But who would extricate himself from the noose of such great impiety, as to suspect any separation in that Trinity where the unity is natural, when, through the grace received (as was demonstrated above by us), faithful Paul is confident that he can in no way be separated from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord? And the blessed apostle John confirms both that charity is from God and that charity is God, in these words: 'Dearly beloved, let us love one another, for charity is from God, and everyone that loves is born of God' (1 John IV, 7); and, 'God is charity' (ibid., 16). It surely cannot be separated from itself, because it is inseparable.
但有誰能從如此重大不虔的絞索中脫身,以致在那本性合一的三位一體中懷疑有任何分離呢?因為藉著所領受的恩典(如我們上文所證明的),忠信的保祿確信自己無論如何都不能與天主的愛隔絕,這愛是在我們的主基督耶穌裡的。而蒙福的使徒若望以這些話證實:愛既是出於天主,愛也就是天主:「親愛的,我們應當彼此相愛,因為愛是出於天主的,凡有愛心的都是由天主而生」(若望一書四章7節);又說「天主就是愛」(同上16節)。它必然不能與自己分離,因為它是不可分的。
4:19
Nam cum homines qui a se possunt invicem separari, non solum ipsa inseparala possideat, sed ex multis cordibus atque animabus unum cur unamque animam faciat; quæ dementia est ipsam caritatem separabi­ lem dicere, quæ separatas montes inseparabili solet amore sociare? Hinc est utique quod Paulus dicebat : Nam etsi corpore absens sum, sed spiritu vobiscum sum, gaudens et videns ordinem vestrum (Coloss. II, 5). Et in Actibus apostolorum scriptum est quia mul­ titudinis credentium erat cor et anima una (Act. IV, 32); quod utique non scit nisi spiritus fidei ei caritatis. Cat itas enim Dei diffusa est in cordibus nostris (Ephes. IV, 4).
For since men who can be separated from one another it not only possesses undivided, but out of many hearts and souls it makes one heart and one soul; what madness is it to call that very charity separable, which is wont to bind together separated minds with inseparable love? Hence surely it is that Paul said: 'For though I am absent in body, yet in spirit I am with you, rejoicing and beholding your order' (Col. II, 5). And in the Acts of the Apostles it is written that of the multitude of believers there was one heart and one soul (Acts IV, 32); which surely nothing knows except the spirit of faith and charity. For the charity of God is poured forth in our hearts (Rom. V, 5).
因為那些彼此可以分離的人,愛不僅使他們不被分開地擁有彼此,而且從許多的心和魂中造成一心一魂;那麼,把這慣於用不可分的愛把分離的心靈連結在一起的愛本身稱為可分的,這是何等的癲狂呢?因此,保祿確實說:「我身體雖然不在你們那裡,心靈卻與你們同在,喜歡見你們循規蹈矩」(哥羅森書二章5節)。而在使徒行傳中記載說,眾多信徒是一心一魂的(使徒行傳四章32節);這確實除了信與愛的靈之外,沒有什麼能知曉。因為天主的愛藉聖神澆灌在我們心裡(羅馬書五章5節)。
4:20
Et per ipsum Spiritum fit ut omnes credentes, sicut Apostolus ait, sint unum corpus ct unus spiri­ tus. Unde ipse alio loco dicit : Etenim in uno spiritu omnes nos in unum corpus baptizati sumus, sive A- II.;, sive g ntiles , sive servi, sive liberi, et omnes in uno spiritu potati sumus (I Cor. 111, 13). Baptizari au­ tem omnes gentes in nomine Patris, et Filii, et Spi­ ritus sancti unigenitus Dei Filius ore suo mandavit, CAPUT V. Cum ergo baptisma datur in nomine Trinitatis, in nnum corpus fideles omnes baptizari facit, ut ex hoc unum corpus omnes efficiantur, dicente beato Apo­ stolo, quia unum corpus sumus in Christo, singuli au­ tem alter alterius membra (Rom. XII, 5).
And through that same Spirit it comes about that all believers, as the Apostle says, are one body and one spirit. Whence he himself says in another place: 'For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Gentiles, whether slaves or free, and we were all given to drink of one Spirit' (1 Cor. XII, 13). And the Only-begotten Son of God commanded with His own mouth that all nations be baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. CHAPTER FIVE. Since therefore baptism is given in the name of the Trinity, it makes all the faithful to be baptized into one body, so that from this all may be made one body, as the blessed Apostle says, that 'we are one body in Christ, and each members one of another' (Rom. XII, 5).
並且藉著那同一位聖神,才使一切信徒(如使徒所說)成為一身一靈。因此他自己在別處說:「因為我們無論是猶太人是外邦人、是為奴的是自主的,都在一位聖神裡受洗歸入一個身體,並且都飲於同一位聖神」(格前十二章13節)。而天主的獨生子親口吩咐,要使萬民奉父、子、聖神的名受洗。第五章。既然洗禮是奉三位一體的名施行的,它就使一切信徒受洗歸入一個身體,好叫眾人由此成為一個身體,正如蒙福的使徒所說:「我們在基督裡是一個身體,各人互相為肢體」(羅馬書十二章5節)。
4:21
Multitudinis quoque credenlium fuit cor et anima una per carita­ tem, qux diffusa est in cordibus nostris per Spiritum sanctum, qui datus est nobis. Profecto apparet quanta impietate Trinitas ipsa separabilis dicatur, cum uti- que a Deo quælibet creatura, non loco, non tempore, sed solis iniquitatibus separetur. Inde est quod de quibusdam dicit Deus : Populus hic labiis me honorat, cor autem eorum longe est a me (Matth. xv, 8). Et ta­ men ipse dicit: Ego sum Deus approximans, et eorum Deus a de longinquo. Si absconditus fuerit homo, ego non videbo eum ? nonne cælum et terram ego impleo (Jer. XlIII, 23, 24)? Ipse tamen David dicit: Ecce qui se elongant ante peribunt (Psal. LXXII, 27).
Of the multitude of believers also there was one heart and one soul through charity, which is poured forth in our hearts through the Holy Spirit, who was given to us. Truly it appears with what great impiety that Trinity itself is called separable, when indeed every creature is separated from God, not by place, not by time, but by iniquities alone. Hence it is that God says of certain ones: 'This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me' (Matt. XV, 8). And yet He Himself says: 'I am a God at hand, and their God from afar. If a man be hidden, shall I not see him? Do I not fill heaven and earth?' (Jer. XXIII, 23, 24). Yet David himself says: 'Behold, they that remove themselves far from Thee shall perish' (Ps. LXXII, 27).
眾多信徒也藉著愛成為一心一魂,這愛是藉著賜給我們的聖神澆灌在我們心裡的。真的可見,把那三位一體本身稱為可分的,是何等大的不虔,因為每一個受造物與天主分離,並非因處所、並非因時間,而是唯獨因不義。因此,天主論到某些人說:「這百姓用嘴唇尊敬我,心卻遠離我」(瑪竇福音十五章8節)。然而祂親自說:「我是近處的天主,也是遠處的天主。人若躲藏,我豈不見他嗎?我豈不充滿天地嗎?」(耶肋米亞書二十三章23、24節)達味自己也說:「看哪,那遠離你的必要滅亡」(詠七十二篇27節)。
4:22
Et ut ostendat quid sit elongare a Deo, adjecit, Perdidisti omnes qui fornicantur abs te (Ibidem). Corde igitur receditur a Deo, ad quem et corde acceditur. Nam manifestum est Deum ubique totum esse, sed loco 345 nullatenus contineri. Spiritus est enim Deus, creator utique, non creatus, omnium corporum om- niumque spirituum factor incommutabilis, aeternus, immensus, justus et bonus. Qui ab omnibus rebus quas fecit, nunquam discedit per immensitatem na­ tura. Neque enim fieri potest ut alicui rei quæ habet a Deo ut sit, ipse Deus per potentiam de; it. Et tamen per misericordiam et judicium, quo ei canlare non .desistit Ecclesia (Psal.
And to show what it is to remove oneself far from God, he added: 'Thou hast destroyed all them that go a-whoring away from Thee' (ibid.). Therefore one withdraws from God in heart, to whom also one approaches in heart. For it is manifest that God is everywhere whole, but is in no way contained by place. For God is a Spirit, the Creator indeed, not created, the maker of all bodies and all spirits, unchangeable, eternal, immense, just, and good. Who never departs from all the things which He made, through the immensity of His nature. For it cannot come to pass that God Himself should be lacking by His power to any thing that has from God that it should be. And yet through mercy and judgment, of which the Church does not cease to sing to Him (Ps.
為了顯明何謂遠離天主,他又補充說:「凡離棄你行邪淫的,你都要滅絕」(同上)。因此人在心裡離開天主,也在心裡親近天主。因為顯然天主無處不在、全然完整,卻絕不被處所所包含。因為天主是靈,確是造物主而非受造者,是一切物體與一切靈的創造者,不變、永恆、無量、公義、美善。祂憑其本性的無量,從不離開祂所造的一切事物。因為斷不可能發生天主憑其能力對任何「從天主得其存在」之物有所缺欠。然而藉著仁慈與審判(教會不斷向祂歌唱的,詠……
4:23
c, 1), non incongrue dicitur, et fidelibus adesse, et infidelibus longe abessc. Nam quod attinet ad naturam, quia totum quidquiJ crea­ tum est, sive corporale, sive spiritale, sola sancta Trinitas, id est unus Deus, qui est Pater, et Filius, et Spiritus sanctus, una voluntate, una operatione, una virtute, una benevolentia, unaque omnipotentia fe­ cit: sicut totam creaturam implet Pater, utique vir­ tute, non mole; sic totam implet Filius, sic totam implet Spirilus sanctus. Neque enim totam creaturam sic implet Trinitas, ut partem impleat Pater, partem Filius, partem Spirilus sanctus, nec tamen tota iui­ pleatur a solo Patre, neque a solo Filio, neque a solo Spiritu sancto.
C, 1), it is not inappropriately said both to be present to the faithful and to be far absent from the unfaithful. For as regards nature, since the whole of whatever is created, whether corporeal or spiritual, the holy Trinity alone, that is, one God, who is Father, and Son, and Holy Spirit, made by one will, one operation, one power, one benevolence, and one omnipotence: just as the Father fills the whole creation, by power indeed, not by mass; so the Son fills the whole, so the Holy Spirit fills the whole. For the Trinity does not so fill the whole creation that the Father fills a part, the Son a part, the Holy Spirit a part; nor yet is the whole filled by the Father alone, nor by the Son alone, nor by the Holy Spirit alone.
(詠一〇〇篇1節),可以不無妥當地說:祂既臨在於忠信者,又遠離於不忠者。因為就本性而言,凡受造之物的全體——無論是有形的還是屬靈的——唯有聖三位一體,即獨一天主,就是父、子、聖神,憑一個意志、一個運作、一個能力、一個仁愛、一個全能所造:正如父以能力(而非以體積)充滿整個受造界,子也同樣充滿全體,聖神也同樣充滿全體。因為三位一體並非如此充滿整個受造界,以致父充滿一部分、子充滿一部分、聖神充滿一部分;也並非全體僅由父獨自充滿、或僅由子獨自充滿、或僅由聖神獨自充滿。
4:24
Quis enim sic de Trinitate, id est de uno Deo audeat sentire, non dico stultus, sed om­ nino sacriliegus; cum virtus Dei atque divinitas ne­ cesse est ita sit naturaliter immensa, sicut est natura­ iiter sempiterna? Sed homines carnalibus sensibus dediti etiam ipsum Deum non possunt nisi carnaliler cogitare. Et existimant Patrem, et Filium. et Spiri tum sanctum sic posse ab invicem separari, sicut a se homines separantur; qui sicut distinguuntur modo et quantitate uniuscujusque corporis, necesse est ita discernantur et locis.
For who would dare to think thus concerning the Trinity, that is, concerning the one God—I do not say a fool, but altogether sacrilegious—since the power and divinity of God must necessarily be by nature so immense, as it is by nature everlasting? But men given over to carnal senses cannot think even of God Himself except in a carnal way. And they suppose that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit can be separated from one another, just as men are separated from one another; who, as they are distinguished by the mode and quantity of each one's body, must necessarily be discerned also by places.
因為誰膽敢如此思想三位一體,即思想那獨一天主呢——我不說是愚人,而是全然褻瀆者——因為天主的能力與神性,必然就其本性而言是如此無量,正如就其本性而言是永恆的?但那些沉溺於肉慾感官的人,連對天主自己也只能以肉慾的方式思想。他們設想父、子、聖神能像人彼此分離那樣彼此分離;而人既然按各自身體的方式與大小而被區別,就必然也按處所而被辨別。
4:25
Tales autem dum in tuto carnis animas volvunt, creatis pbantasmalibus suis, et gra­ vati pondere vanilatis, quanto magis in illarum re­ rum cogitatione versantur quæ corporeis oculis cor­ poream ingerunt molem, tanto minus possunt ad in­ telligendam conscendere deitatem. Nec attendunt a Domino Deo per sanctum Esaiam præcipi, ne de illo sic cogitare velimus, sicut de creaturis, quas ab eo factas novimus; quia nec ipse sic cogitat, sicut nos homines cogitamus. Unde dicit Esaias : Non enim cogitationes meæ cogitaliones vestræ, neque rice meæ viæ vestræ, dicit Dominus :
But such men, while they turn their souls over in the enclosure of the flesh, with the phantasms they have created, and weighed down by the burden of vanity, the more they are occupied in the thought of those things which present a corporeal mass to bodily eyes, the less they are able to ascend to understanding the Godhead. Nor do they attend that by the Lord God through holy Isaiah it is commanded that we should not wish to think of Him as of the creatures which we know were made by Him; because neither does He Himself think as we men think. Whence Isaiah says: 'For My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are My ways your ways, says the Lord:'
但這樣的人,當他們在肉體的牢籠中翻轉自己的靈魂、與自己所造的幻象為伍、被虛妄的重擔所壓時,他們愈是專注於思想那些向肉眼呈現有形體積之物,就愈不能上升到領悟神性。他們也不留意,主天主藉聖依撒意亞所吩咐的:我們不當按我們所知是祂所造的受造物那樣思想祂;因為祂自己並不像我們人所思想的那樣思想。所以依撒意亞說:「因為我的思念非同你們的思念,我的道路非同你們的道路,這是主說的:」
4:26
quia sicut exaltantur cœli, a terra, sic exaltata sunt viæ meæ a viis vestris, et cogitationes meæ a cogitationibus vestris (Isai. LV,. 8). CAPUT VI. Deus itaque Pater, et Verbum ejus, et Spiritus sanctus, id est sancta Trinitas. solus, unus, verus et bonus Deus, sicut non est in eo cogitatio, quæ tem­ poris volubilitate varietur (ncque enim, sicut homi-. nes, aliter cogitavit priusquam mundum faceret, ali­ ter cogitat postquam mundum fecit, aut aliter cogi­ taturus est, postquam mundi bujus figura transierit; quia consilium Domini manet in æternum [Psal. XXXII, 11]); sic est inseparabilis, sicut incommutabilis. Tri­ nitas enim unus Deus, nec corpus est, nec creatus spiritus ;
'for as the heavens are exalted above the earth, so are My ways exalted above your ways, and My thoughts above your thoughts' (Isa. LV, 8-9). CHAPTER SIX. God the Father therefore, and His Word, and the Holy Spirit, that is, the holy Trinity, the sole, one, true, and good God, as there is no thought in Him which is varied by the mutability of time (for He does not, like men, think one way before He made the world, another way after He made the world, nor is He going to think another way after the figure of this world has passed; because 'the counsel of the Lord abides for ever' [Ps. XXXII, 11]); so He is inseparable, as He is unchangeable. For the Trinity, one God, is neither body nor created spirit;
「因為天怎樣高過地,照樣我的道路高過你們的道路,我的思念高過你們的思念」(依撒意亞五十五章8—9節)。第六章。因此,天主聖父、祂的聖言、以及聖神,即聖三位一體,那唯一、獨一、真實、美善的天主,正如在祂裡面沒有任何隨時間的變動而變易的思念(因為祂並不像人那樣,在造世界之前這樣思想、在造世界之後那樣思想,也不會在今世的樣式過去之後另作思想;因為「主的旨意永遠長存」〔詠三十二篇11節〕);照樣,祂既是不變的,也是不可分的。因為三位一體、獨一天主,既非物體,也非受造之靈;
4:27
quia corpus loco concluditur, et omnis spi- ritusqui creatus est, naturae suæ modulo terminatur. Trinitas autem unus Deus, sicut est æternus, et nulla illi coxterna sunt tempora; sic est immensus, quem nulla potest 346 concludere creatura; et quia im­ mensus, ubique totus; quia nec continetur loco, nec distenditur, aut contrahitur spatio. Deus itaque sa­ pientia est, Deus veritas est, Deus caritas est. Hoc Pater, hoc Filius, hoc Spiritus sanctus, hoc ipsa Tri­ nitas, qui unus, verus et bonus est Deus. Si quis ergo docere potest, sive in sapientia, sive in veri­ tate, sive in caritate aliquam divisionem esse, audeat indubitanter b et asserere Trinitatem.
because a body is enclosed by place, and every spirit that is created is bounded by the measure of its nature. But the Trinity, one God, as it is eternal, and no times are co-eternal with it; so it is immense, whom no creature can enclose; and because immense, everywhere whole; because it is neither contained by place, nor extended, nor contracted by space. God therefore is wisdom, God is truth, God is charity. This the Father is, this the Son, this the Holy Spirit, this the Trinity itself, which is the one, true, and good God. If then anyone can teach that there is any division either in wisdom, or in truth, or in charity, let him dare without hesitation to assert and divide the Trinity.
因為物體被處所所封閉,而每一個受造之靈都被其本性的尺度所限定。但三位一體、獨一天主,正如它是永恆的,沒有任何時間與它同永恆;照樣它是無量的,沒有任何受造物能封閉它;並且因為無量,就無處不在、全然完整;因為它既不被處所所包含,也不被空間所延伸或收縮。所以,天主是智慧,天主是真理,天主是愛。這是父,是子,是聖神,是三位一體本身,就是那獨一、真實、美善的天主。那麼若有人能教導說在智慧、或在真理、或在愛中有任何分割,就讓他毫不遲疑地膽敢分割並如此主張三位一體吧。
4:28
Si vero nec sapientia, nec veritas, nec caritas aliquatenus divi­ ditur, ex hoc ulique Trinitas indivisibilis atque inse­ parabilis agnoscitur. Apparet igitur magnam fuisse Fastidiosi impietatem, qua nos in eo putavit omnino culpandos, quia fatemur inseparabilem atque indivi­ duam Trinitatem : cum utique, sicut præcedens dis­ putatio docuit (quam non solum ratio, sed et testi­ moniorum sufficiens divinorum copia roboravit), nec loco contineri queat natura Trinitatis immensa, nec peccato subjacere possit quælibet in Trinitate per­ sona : quia ipsa Trinitas est naturaliter æterna, per­ tecta, incommutabilisque justitiæ. Minorem vero Fi­ lium haeretica quidem pravitas male asserere nititur:
But if neither wisdom, nor truth, nor charity is in any way divided, from this surely the Trinity is recognized to be indivisible and inseparable. It appears therefore that great was the impiety of Fastidiosus, whereby he thought we were altogether to be blamed because we confess an inseparable and undivided Trinity: since indeed, as the preceding disputation has taught (which not only reason, but also a sufficient abundance of divine testimonies has strengthened), neither can the immense nature of the Trinity be contained by place, nor can any person in the Trinity be subject to sin: because the Trinity itself is by nature eternal, perfect, and of unchangeable justice. But heretical perversity indeed strives wickedly to assert the Son to be less:
但智慧、真理、愛既然都不以任何方式被分割,由此三位一體確實被認為是不可分割、不可分離的。因此可見,法斯提迪奧素的不虔何等重大,他竟因我們承認不可分、不可分割的三位一體而認為我們全然當受責備:其實,正如前面的論辯所教導的(這論辯不僅有理性,也有充足豐富的天主見證所加強),三位一體的無量本性既不能被處所所包含,三位一體中的任何位格也不能屈服於罪:因為三位一體本身就其本性而言是永恆、全備、有不變公義的。異端的悖謬固然惡意地力圖主張聖子為較小者:
4:29
pietate vero servata, catholica veritas aequalem con­ fitetur. Hæretici quippe incorpoream divinitatem non nisi corporaliter cogitantes, cum secundum na­ turam dicunt Filium minorem, sub imagine Christiani nominis, quam fallaciter prætendunt, idololariæ ne­ fando crimine semetipsos involvunt. Quid est enim denm majorem, et deum minorem in singulis personis dicere, nisi diversi generis diversæque virtutis idola, non in parietibus, sed, quod deterius est, in cordibus collocare? Hinc enim se duos deos colere Ariani evi­ denter ostendunt, dum æqualem Patri Filium ne­ gant; et cum (al.
but with piety preserved, the Catholic truth confesses Him equal. For the heretics, thinking of the incorporeal divinity in no way but corporeally, when according to nature they call the Son less, under the image of the Christian name, which they fallaciously pretend, entangle themselves in the nefarious crime of idolatry. For what is it to say a greater god and a lesser god in the individual persons, but to set up idols of diverse kind and diverse power, not on walls, but—which is worse—in hearts? For hence the Arians evidently show that they worship two gods, while they deny the Son to be equal to the Father; and while they assert Him to be less (i.e.,
但公教真理在保存虔敬的同時,宣認祂與父相等。因為異端者對無形的神性只能以有形的方式思想,當他們按本性稱聖子為較小者時,他們就在基督之名的外表下(那名是他們虛偽地假冒的),使自己陷入偶像崇拜的滔天罪行。因為在各個位格中說一位較大的神和一位較小的神,若不是設立不同種類、不同能力的偶像——不是在牆壁上,而是(更糟的)在心裡——那又是什麼呢?因為亞略派由此明顯顯示他們崇拜兩個神,因他們否認聖子與聖父相等;並且他們主張祂為較小者(即,
4:30
eum) minorem, non assumptione carnis (quod fidei veritas habet), sed natura immensæ divinitatis asseverant, cum de ipso dictum sit, qui sapientia Dei est, qui candor est lucis æternæ (Sap. VII, 26). De quo in Epistola ad Hebræos dicitur : Qui cum sit splendor gratiæ ", et figura substantiæ ejus (Hebr. I, 3). Attendant autem candorem lucis æter­ na;, et agnoscant quia, sicut illa lux æterna est et immensa, ita suum quoque candorem nec posterio­ rem naturaliter habet aliquatenus, nec minorem; sed acternitas immensitatem, æternitatem immensitas æqualem. CAPUT VII.
Him) not by the assumption of flesh (which the truth of faith holds), but by the nature of the immense divinity—although it is said of Him that He is the wisdom of God, who is the brightness of eternal light (Wis. VII, 26). Of whom in the Epistle to the Hebrews it is said: 'Who, being the splendor of glory, and the figure of His substance' (Heb. I, 3). But let them attend to the brightness of eternal light, and acknowledge that, just as that light is eternal and immense, so also its brightness has by nature neither anything later, nor anything less; but eternity has immensity, immensity has eternity as its equal. CHAPTER SEVEN.
祂為較小者),並非因取了肉身(這是信德的真理所持守的),而是因無量神性的本性——雖然論到祂說,祂是天主的智慧,是永恆之光的光輝(智慧篇七章26節)。關於祂,希伯來書中說:「祂是(天主)榮耀的光輝,是祂本體的真像」(希伯來書一章3節)。但讓他們留意永恆之光的光輝,並承認:正如那光是永恆而無量的,照樣它的光輝就其本性而言,既沒有任何在後的,也沒有任何較小的;而是永恆擁有無量、無量擁有永恆,彼此相等。第七章。
4:31
Fides igitur Christiana, quæ novit Unigenitum Deum, et de Patris natura solum natum, et de Vir­ gine Maria creatum, cognoscens in eo veram manere ntramque substantiam, sic eum vere de Patre Deo Patri confitetur æqualem, ut sine mendaci! atque im­ pietatis crimine prædicet et minorem. Nam quia una est illi naturalis cum Patre divinitas, et una cum ma- tre naturalis humanitas, in eo est æqualis Patri Fi­ lius in quo de Patre verus est Deus, et in 347 eo est Pater major Filio in quo ipse Unigenitus Dens verus est homo. Ipsa est ergo fides vera, ipsa pietas sancta, ipsa credulitas Christiana.
The Christian faith therefore, which knows the Only-begotten God, both born of the Father's nature alone, and created of the Virgin Mary, recognizing that in Him both substances truly remain, so confesses Him truly equal to God the Father according to the Father, that without the crime of falsehood and impiety it also proclaims Him less. For because there is to Him one natural divinity with the Father, and one natural humanity with the mother, the Son is equal to the Father in that in which He is true God of the Father, and the Father is greater than the Son in that in which the Only-begotten God is Himself true man. This therefore is the true faith, this the holy piety, this the Christian belief:
因此,基督信仰認識那獨一天主——祂既單由聖父的本性所生,又由童貞瑪利亞所受造——並認清在祂裡面兩種實體真正並存,於是宣認祂按聖父而論真正與天主聖父相等,以致它也無虛謊與不虔之罪地宣告祂為較小者。因為祂與父有同一本性的神性,與母有同一本性的人性,所以在祂是父的真天主這一點上,子與父相等;而在那獨生天主自己是真人這一點上,父大於子。因此,這就是真信仰、這就是聖潔的虔敬、這就是基督徒的信念:
4:32
in uno eodemque Dei Filio, et naturam paternae divinitatis credere, et maternae humanitatis substantiam non negare; nec diversam credere divinitatem Filii a divinitate Dei Patris, nec separari humanitatem Filii ab humanitate Virginis genitricis, sed in eodem vero Deo veram to­ tamque credere nostri generis humanitatem, in eodem vero totoque homine veram plenamque paternæ na­ tunc credere deitatem. Qui enim substantiæ Patris in Filio denegat unitatem, Ariana impietate polluitur; qui autem negat veritatem carnis in Unigenito Deo. Manichææ pestis crimine profanatur; qui vero negat in eodem Dei Filio humanam, id est rationalem ani­ mam, Apollinaristarum sacrilegio protinus inqui­ natur.
in one and the same Son of God, both to believe the nature of the paternal divinity, and not to deny the substance of the maternal humanity; neither to believe the divinity of the Son different from the divinity of God the Father, nor to separate the humanity of the Son from the humanity of the Virgin His mother, but in the same true God to believe the true and whole humanity of our race, in the same true and whole man to believe the true and full deity of the paternal nature. For he who denies in the Son the unity of the Father's substance is polluted with Arian impiety; but he who denies the truth of the flesh in the Only-begotten God is profaned with the crime of the Manichaean pestilence; and he who denies in the same Son of God a human, that is, a rational soul, is straightway defiled with the sacrilege of the Apollinarists.
就是在同一位天主聖子裡,既相信聖父神性的本性,又不否認聖母人性的實體;既不相信聖子的神性與天主聖父的神性有別,也不使聖子的人性與童貞聖母的人性分離,而是在同一位真天主裡相信我們人類真實而完整的人性,在同一位真實而完整的人裡相信聖父本性真實而圓滿的神性。因為凡在聖子裡否認聖父實體之合一的,就被亞略派的不虔所玷污;凡在獨一天主裡否認肉身之真實的,就被摩尼教瘟疫之罪所褻瀆;凡在同一位天主聖子裡否認人性、即理性靈魂的,就立即被亞波里納派的褻瀆所玷污。
4:33
CAPUT VIII Quocirca paternæ maternæeque naturæ in Unigenito Deo veritate ad plenitudinem credita, et in una Christi persona geminæ substantire naturali proprietate ser­ vata, pie vereque Patri Filius æqualis et minor dicitur, pie vereque coæternus et posterior prædicatur, pie vereque et semper natus, et in tempore natus, et semper incommutabilis et in tempore mutatus asseri- tur. Et itaque Filius aequalis Patri, quia hoc semper habet ex Patre. Est etiam Patre minor, quia hoc temporaliter accepit ex Virgine. Quocirca sicut pie Filius æqualis dicitur Patri quando in eo humanitas, qua Patre minor est, non agnoscitur : sic impie mi.
CHAPTER EIGHT. Wherefore, when the truth of the paternal and maternal nature in the Only-begotten God has been believed to fullness, and in the one person of Christ the natural property of the twofold substance has been preserved, the Son is piously and truly said to be both equal and less than the Father, is piously and truly proclaimed both co-eternal and later, is piously and truly asserted to be both always born and born in time, both always unchangeable and changed in time. And so the Son is equal to the Father, because He has this always from the Father. He is also less than the Father, because He received this temporally from the Virgin. Wherefore, just as the Son is piously said to be equal to the Father when the humanity in Him, by which He is less than the Father, is not recognized: so impiously
第八章。因此,當獨一天主中聖父與聖母之本性的真理被圓滿地相信、並在基督的一個位格中兩種實體的本性特質被保存時,聖子就被虔敬而真實地稱為既與父相等又較父為小,被虔敬而真實地宣告為既與父同永恆又在後,被虔敬而真實地主張為既永遠受生又在時間中受生、既永遠不變又在時間中被改變。因此,聖子與父相等,因為祂永遠從父得著這一點。祂也小於父,因為祂在時間中從童貞女領受了這一點。所以,正如當祂裡面那使祂小於父的人性不被認取時,聖子被虔敬地稱為與父相等;照樣,不虔地
4:34
nor idem Filius dicitur quando in eo naturaliter cum Patre divinitatis unitas et æqualitas denegatur. Dici­ mus ergo Filium naturaliter æqualem, dicimus et mi­ norem. Dicimus secundum formam Dei æqualem na­ tum, secundum formam vero servi habitu minoratum. Dicimus æqualem Patri, in quo cognoscimus sine injtio natum de patre ; dicimus et minorem, quia cum venit plenitudo temporis, misit Deus Filium suum factum ex matre, factum sub lege (Gal. iv, 4). Proinde, sicut indubitanler prædicamus natum, sic utique praedicamus et factum. Dicimus enim sine initio natum de corde Patris. dicimus in tempore factum opere Trinitatis.
is the same Son said to be less when the unity and equality of divinity with the Father is naturally denied in Him. We say therefore that the Son is naturally equal, we say also that He is less. We say that according to the form of God He was born equal, but according to the form of a servant He was diminished in condition. We say that He is equal to the Father, in that we recognize Him born of the Father without beginning; we say that He is also less, because when the fullness of time came, God sent His Son, made of a woman, made under the law (Gal. IV, 4). Accordingly, just as we undoubtedly preach Him born, so surely we preach Him also made. For we say that He was born without beginning of the heart of the Father; we say that He was made in time by the work of the Trinity.
稱同一位聖子為較小者,乃是當祂裡面與父同一的神性之合一與相等被本性地否認時。因此我們說聖子本性上與父相等,也說祂為較小者。我們說祂按天主的形象受生為與父相等,卻按僕人的形象在境況上被降卑。我們說祂與父相等,因為我們認清祂無始地由父所生;我們也說祂為較小者,因為時期滿足時,天主差遣祂的兒子,由女子所生、生在律法之下(迦拉達書四章4節)。因此,正如我們無疑地宣講祂為受生的,我們也確實宣講祂為被造的。因為我們說祂無始地由父的心所生;我們說祂在時間中由三位一體的工作所造成。
4:35
Filium enim suum proprium, et de sua natura Pater genuit, et de natura virginis fecit. Quidquid autem fecit, cooperante Filio et Spiritu sancto fecit. Filium ergo suum solus quidem Pater genuit, sed non solus fecit. In Filio enim Uni­ genito solius aeterna generatio Patris, et in eodem Filio facto una totius operatio est Trinitatis. Creator quippe hominis Unigenitus Deus, creatus est homo, et idem qui de viro mulierem fecit, de muliere vir factus est. Unde apparet quia testimonia quae de Evangelio et de Aclibus apostolorum, ac Salomone, Fastidiosus impie protulit, non unitatem Paternæ na­ turæ Filio adimunt, sed sacramentum divina; incar- nationis ostendunt.
For the Father begot His own proper Son, and of His own nature, and made Him of the nature of the Virgin. But whatsoever He made, He made with the Son and the Holy Spirit cooperating. Therefore the Father alone indeed begot His Son, but not alone did He make Him. For in the Only-begotten Son there is the eternal generation of the Father alone, and in the same Son, made, there is one operation of the whole Trinity. For the Only-begotten God, the Creator of man, was created man; and the same who from man made woman, of woman was made man. Whence it appears that the testimonies which Fastidiosus impiously brought forth from the Gospel and from the Acts of the Apostles, and from Solomon, do not take away the unity of the paternal nature from the Son, but show the mystery of the divine incarnation.
因為聖父生了祂自己親屬的兒子,且是出於祂自己的本性;又使祂由童貞女的本性而成。而祂所造的一切,都是與子和聖神共同運作而造成的。因此,聖父固然獨自生了祂的兒子,卻非獨自造成了祂。因為在獨生子裡,唯有聖父永恆的生育;而在那受造的同一位聖子裡,乃是整個三位一體的一個運作。因為那造人的獨一天主,被造成了人;那由男子造出女子的同一位,卻由女子而成為男子。由此可見,法斯提迪奧素從福音、從使徒行傳、以及從撒羅滿所不虔地引用的見證,並非從聖子奪去聖父本性的合一,而是顯明天主降生成人的奧祕。
4:36
Quod certissime sciens Joannes Baptista, dixit : Hic est de quo dixi : Post me venit qui ante me factus est (Joan. I, 15). Cujus sacramenti veritatem prædicans Petrus apostolus ait: Certissime 348 itaque sciat omnis domus Israel quia et Deum illum, et Christum Deus fecit hunc Jesum quem vos crucifixistis (Act. II, 36). Digne utique dixit factum, quem prædicat crucifixum, Deus quippe Unigenitus, incomprehensibilis et immortalis, a nullo factus, et rerum omnium factor æternus, suo disnatus est opere Christus fieri , ut Judaeorum posset opere crucifigi; quia Redemptorem mundi traditum crux nulla ratione portasset, nisi mundi factorem con­ ceptum virginis uterus edidisset.
Knowing this most certainly, John the Baptist said: 'This is He of whom I said: After me comes one who was made before me' (John I, 15). Proclaiming the truth of this mystery, the apostle Peter says: 'Therefore let all the house of Israel know most certainly, that God has made both Lord and Christ this same Jesus whom you crucified' (Acts II, 36). Fittingly indeed did he say made, whom he proclaims crucified; for the Only-begotten God, incomprehensible and immortal, made by none, and the eternal maker of all things, deigned by His own work to become Christ, that He might be able by the work of the Jews to be crucified; because no cross would by any reason have borne the Redeemer of the world delivered up, had not the womb of the Virgin brought forth the maker of the world conceived.
洗者若翰極其確定地知道這點,就說:「這位就是我所說的:在我以後來的,反成了在我以先的」(若望福音一章15節)。使徒伯多祿宣講這奧祕的真理說:「所以,以色列全家當確實地知道:你們所釘十字架的這位耶穌,天主已立祂為主、為基督了」(使徒行傳二章36節)。他把所宣講為被釘十字架的那位稱為「被造成的」,實在恰當;因為那不可測度、不朽、非由任何者所造、卻是萬物永恆造物主的獨一天主,甘願藉自己的工作成為基督,好使祂能藉猶太人的行為被釘十字架;因為若非童貞女的胎孕育並產出所懷的世界之造物主,任何十字架都絕無理由能承載那被交付的世界救贖者。
4:37
Ipse igitur etiam per Salomonem generationis creationisque suæ insi- nuans veritatem, dixit : Dominus creavit me initio viarum suarum in opere suo (Prov. VIII, 22). Sed antc­ quam hoc diceret, manifestum futuræincarnationis suæ præmisit indicium, dicens : Si nuntiavero vobis quæquotidie fiunt, commemorabo quæ a sæculo sunt (Ibid., 21, juxta LXX). Enumeransdeinde subjunxit : Dominus creavit me initio viarum suarum iu opere suo. Hæc utique creatio a sæculo est, non ante sæculum. Nam postmodum dicit, Ante sæcula fundavit me; et paulo post: Ante omnes colles genuit me. Hic quod dicit, ante ,recula, et ante omnes colles, æternitatem voluit intelligi nativitatis divinæ.
He therefore also, through Solomon, intimating the truth of His generation and creation, said: 'The Lord created me in the beginning of His ways in His work' (Prov. VIII, 22). But before He said this, He set forth a manifest indication of His future incarnation, saying: 'If I shall announce to you the things that are done daily, I will call to mind the things that are from the beginning' (ibid., 21, according to the LXX). Then, enumerating, He subjoined: 'The Lord created me in the beginning of His ways in His work.' This creation surely is from the beginning of time, not before time. For afterward He says: 'Before the ages He founded me'; and a little after: 'Before all the hills He begot me.' Here, in that He says 'before the ages' and 'before all the hills,' He wished the eternity of the divine nativity to be understood.
因此,祂也藉撒羅滿暗示其受生與受造的真理,說:「主在祂的化工之先,在祂道路之始,就造了我」(箴言八章22節)。但在祂說這話之前,祂先提出了自己將來降生成人的明顯徵兆,說:「我若把每日所行的事告訴你們,我必記述那從亙古就有的事」(同上21節,依七十士譯本)。接著,祂在列舉之後補充說:「主在祂的化工之先,在祂道路之始,就造了我。」這受造確是從時間之始,而非在時間之先。因為稍後祂說:「在諸世之先,祂就立了我」;再稍後:「在眾山之先,祂就生了我。」在此,祂說「在諸世之先」和「在眾山之先」,是要人領悟神性誕生的永恆。
next part →
← ch. 3ch. 5 →
12345678910111213141516

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.