📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Letters & Polemics (CSEL)

Letters & Polemics (CSEL) 3 part 7/87

Latin original · 39 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 3:239–3:277 (3370 verses in all)

← ch. 2ch. 4 →
← prev partnext part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
3:239
qua factum est, ut inmoderatis inhians et secundis rebus elatus ac praecipitatus magis ipse periret in moribus, quam inimicos in corporibus perderet. Haec illi di uere tristia uereque lugenda non extis, non auguriis, non cuiusquam somnio uel uaticinio praenuntiabant. Magis enim timebant ne corrigeretur quam ne uinceretur. Immo satis agebant, ut uictor ciuium gloriosus uictus adque captiuus nefandis uitiis et per haec ipsis etiam daemonibus multo obstrictius subderetur. CAPUT XXV. Quantum maligni spiritus ad flagitia incitent homines, cum in committendis sceleribus quasi diuinam exempli sui interponunt auctoritatem.
by which it came about that, gaping after immoderate things and lifted up and cast down by prosperity, he himself perished more in his character than he destroyed his enemies in their bodies. These things, truly sad and truly to be lamented, those gods foretold to him neither by entrails, nor by auguries, nor by anyone's dream or prophecy. For they feared more lest he be corrected than lest he be conquered. Nay, they took sufficient pains that, as a glorious conqueror of his fellow citizens, he should himself be conquered and made captive by abominable vices, and through these be subjected far more tightly to the very demons themselves. CHAPTER XXV. How greatly the malign spirits incite men to crimes, when in the committing of wickedness they interpose, as it were, the divine authority of their own example.
由此便發生這事:他貪求無度,被順境高舉又被它拋下,結果他在自己的品格上敗壞自己,比他在仇敵的身體上消滅仇敵更甚。這些真正可悲、真正當哀悼的事,那些神明既不藉臟腑,也不藉占卜,也不藉任何人的夢或預言向他預告。因為牠們更怕他被糾正,過於怕他被擊敗。不但如此,牠們竭力使他作為同胞之榮耀的征服者,自己卻被可憎的惡行所征服、所擄掠,並藉此更牢固地被那些鬼魔本身所轄制。第二十五章。論惡靈如何極力煽動人去犯罪,當牠們在唆使人作惡時,彷彿以自己榜樣的神聖權威來介入。
3:240
Illinc uero quis non intellegat, quis non uideat, nisi qui tales deos imitari magis elegit quam diuina gratia ab eorum societate separari, quantum moliantur maligni isti spiritus exemplo suo uelut diuinam auctoritatem praebere sceleribus? quod etiam in quadam Campaniae lata planitie, ubi non multo post ciuiles acies nefario proelio conflixerunt, ipsi inter se prius pugnare uisi sunt. Namque ibi auditi sunt primum ingentes fragores, moxque multi se uidisse nuntiarunt per aliquot dies duas acies proeliari. Quae pugna ubi destitit, uestigia quoque uelut hominum et equorum, quanta de illa conflictatione exprimi poterant, inuenerunt.
From this, indeed, who would not understand, who would not see—except one who has chosen rather to imitate such gods than to be separated from their fellowship by divine grace—how greatly these malign spirits strive to lend, by their own example, a kind of divine authority to crimes? This was so even on a certain broad plain of Campania, where not long afterward civil battle-lines clashed in unspeakable combat: there they themselves were first seen fighting among themselves. For there at first vast crashes were heard, and presently many reported that they had seen two battle-lines fighting for several days. And when that combat ceased, they found also traces, as it were, of men and horses, as great as could be impressed by such a struggle.
由此,誰會不明白,誰會看不出——除非是那寧可效法這等神明、而不肯藉神聖恩典脫離其團夥的人——這些惡靈何等竭力以自己的榜樣,給罪惡賦予一種彷彿神聖的權威?這事甚至發生在坎帕尼亞的一片廣闊平原上,不久之後內戰的軍陣在那裡以可憎的廝殺彼此衝突:在那裡,這些靈先彼此交戰被人看見。因為起初那裡聽見巨大的轟鳴,隨後許多人報告說,他們曾一連數日看見兩支軍陣交戰。那場廝殺停止之後,他們還發現彷彿人馬的足跡,其規模大到正如那番激鬥所能留下的。
3:241
Si ergo ueraciter inter se numina pugnauerunt, iam bella ciuilia excusantur humana; consideretur tamen quae sit talium deorum uel malitia uel miseria: si autem se pugnasse finxerunt, quid aliud egerunt, nisi ut sibi Romani bellando ciuiliter tamquam deorum exemplo nullum nefas admittere uiderentur? Iam enim coeperant bella ciuilia, et aliquot nefandorum proeliorum strages exsecranda praecesserat. Iam multos mouerat, quod miles quidam, dum occiso spolia detraheret, fratrem nudato cadauere agnouit ac detestatus bella ciuilia se ipsum ibi perimens fraterno corpori adiunxit.
If, then, the divinities truly fought among themselves, civil wars among men are thereby excused; yet let it be considered what the malice or the misery of such gods may be. But if they only pretended to fight, what else did they accomplish but that the Romans, by waging war among fellow citizens, might seem to commit no crime, as though following the example of the gods? For civil wars had already begun, and the execrable slaughter of several unspeakable battles had preceded. It had already moved many that a certain soldier, while stripping the spoils from a man he had slain, recognized his brother in the stripped corpse, and, cursing civil wars, slew himself there and joined himself to his brother's body.
那麼,倘若神明真的彼此交戰,人間的內戰便由此得了開脫;然而仍當思想,這等神明所懷的究竟是惡毒還是悲慘。但若牠們只是假裝交戰,牠們所成就的豈不正是:使羅馬人在彼此爭戰中,彷彿效法神明的榜樣,顯得沒有犯任何罪?因為內戰早已開始,幾場可憎之戰那當受咒詛的殺戮已經發生在先。早已有許多人深受震動,因為某個士兵在剝取自己所殺之人的甲冑時,在那剝光的屍體上認出是自己的兄弟,便咒詛內戰,在那裡自殺,把自己投在兄弟的屍身旁。
3:242
Ut ergo huius tanti mali minime taederet, sed armorum scelestorum magis magisque ardor incresceret, noxii daemones, quos illi deos putantes colendos et uenerandos arbitrabantur, inter se pugnantes hominibus apparere uoluerunt, ne imitari tales pugnas ciuica trepidaret adfectio, sed potius humanum scelus diuino excusaretur exemplo. Hac astutia maligni spiritus etiam ludos, unde multa iam dixi, scaenicos sibi dicari sacrarique iusserunt, ubi tanta deorum flagitia theatricis canticis adque fabularum actionibus celebrata et quisquis eos fecisse crederet et quisquis non crederet, sed tamen illos libentissime sibi talia exhiberi cerneret, securus imitaretur.
Therefore, lest there should be the least weariness at so great an evil, but rather lest the ardor for criminal arms should grow more and more, the noxious demons—whom those men, thinking them gods, judged worthy to be worshiped and venerated—willed to appear to men fighting among themselves, so that the civic affection might not tremble to imitate such battles, but rather human wickedness might be excused by a divine example. By this cunning the malign spirits also commanded scenic shows—about which I have already said much—to be dedicated and consecrated to themselves, where such great enormities of the gods, celebrated in theatrical songs and in the performances of fables, would be imitated without scruple, both by whoever believed they had done them and by whoever did not believe it, yet saw that they themselves most gladly had such things displayed to them.
所以,為叫人對如此大的惡毫不感到厭倦,反倒使對罪惡兵器的狂熱愈發增長,那些有害的鬼魔——那些人以為牠們是神,認為當敬拜尊崇——便願意以彼此交戰的姿態向人顯現,使公民的情感不致畏懼去效法這樣的爭戰,反倒使人類的罪惡藉神聖的榜樣得了開脫。藉著這詭計,惡靈還吩咐人把戲劇演出——關於這些我已說了許多——奉獻並祝聖給牠們,在那裡,神明如此大的醜行,藉戲劇的歌曲與寓言的演出而被頌揚,無論是相信牠們確曾行過這些的人,還是不信、卻看見牠們極樂意叫人把這些演給牠們看的人,都毫無顧忌地加以效法。
3:243
Ne quis itaque existimaret in deos conuicia potius quam eis dignum aliquid scriptitasse, ubicumque illos inter se pugnasse poetae commemorarunt, ipsi ad decipiendos homines poetarum carmina firmauerunt, pugnas uidelicet suas non solum per scaenicos in theatro, uerum etiam per se ipsos in campo humanis oculis exhibentes. Haec dicere conpulsi sumus, quoniam pessimis moribus ciuium Romanam rem publicam iam antea perditam fuisse nullamque remansisse ante aduentum Christi Iesu domini nostri auctores eorum dicere et scribere minime dubitarunt. Quam perditionem dis suis non inputant, qui mala transitoria, quibus boni, seu uiuant seu moriantur, perire non possunt, Christo nostro inputant:
And so, lest anyone should suppose that the poets had written things insulting to the gods rather than worthy of them, wherever the poets recorded that they had fought among themselves, the gods themselves, to deceive men, confirmed the poets' songs, displaying their battles to human eyes not only through stage-players in the theater, but even by themselves in the field. We have been compelled to say these things, because the authors of those men have by no means hesitated to say and write that the Roman commonwealth had already before been ruined by the most wicked morals of its citizens, and that nothing of it had remained before the coming of Christ Jesus our Lord. This ruin they do not impute to their own gods, who impute to our Christ the transitory evils by which the good cannot perish, whether they live or die:
因此,免得有人以為詩人寫的是侮辱神明、而非配得神明的事,凡詩人記載牠們彼此交戰之處,神明自己為要欺騙人,便印證詩人的歌詠,不僅藉劇場中的戲子,甚至親自在戰場上把牠們的爭戰陳於世人眼前。我們不得不說這些話,因為那些人的著作家毫不遲疑地宣稱並書寫:羅馬國早在我們的主基督耶穌降臨之前,就已因公民最邪惡的道德而敗壞,並無餘剩。這敗壞他們不歸咎於自己的神明,反倒把那些暫時的禍患歸咎於我們的基督——而義人無論活著或死去,都不能因那些禍患而滅亡:
3:244
cum Christus noster tanta frequentet pro moribus optimis praecepta contra perditos mores; di uero ipsorum nullis talibus praeceptis egerint aliquid cum suo cultore populo pro illa re publica, ne periret; immo eosdem mores uelut suis exemplis auctoritate noxia corrumpendo egerunt potius, ut periret. Quam non ideo tunc perisse quisquam, ut arbitror, iam dicere audebit, quia \'discessere omnes adytis arisque relictis di\', uelut amici uirtutibus, cum uitiis hominum offenderentur; quia tot signis extorum auguriorum uaticiniorum, quibus se tamquam praescios futurorum adiutoresque proeliorum iactare et commendare gestiebant, conuincuntur fuisse praesentes;
whereas our Christ continually inculcates so many precepts for the best morals against corrupt ones; but their own gods did nothing with such precepts for the people that worshiped them, on behalf of that commonwealth, that it might not perish; nay rather, by corrupting those very morals as it were by their own examples with noxious authority, they brought it about rather that it should perish. That it did not perish then for this reason—because, as I think, no one will now dare to say it, that 'all the gods departed, leaving their shrines and altars,' as though friends of virtues, offended by the vices of men—is shown by the fact that by so many signs of entrails, auguries, prophecies, by which they were eager to boast and commend themselves as foreknowers of the future and helpers in battles, they are convicted of having been present;
反倒我們的基督不斷諄諄教導如此眾多嘉美道德的訓誡,以對抗敗壞的道德;然而他們的神明卻沒有用任何這樣的訓誡,為那敬拜牠們的子民、為那國家行些什麼,使它不致滅亡;不但如此,牠們以有害的權威、彷彿用自己的榜樣去敗壞那些道德,反倒使它滅亡。至於它當時並非因此緣故滅亡——即並非因為(我想如今無人敢說)「眾神都離去,撇下了神龕與祭壇」,彷彿德行的友伴因人的惡行受了冒犯——這由以下事實得以顯明:牠們藉著如此眾多臟腑、占卜、預言的記號(牠們極想藉這些誇耀並推薦自己為未來的先知、戰爭的助手),被證實是在場的;
3:245
qui si uere abscessissent, mitius Romani in bella ciuilia suis cupiditatibus quam illorum instigationibus exarsissent. CAPUT XXVI. De secretis daemonum monitis, quae pertinebant ad bonos mores, cum palam in sacris eorum omnis nequitia disceretur. Quae cum ita sint, cum palam aperteque turpitudines crudelitatibus mixtae, obprobria numinum et crimina, siue prodita siue conficta, ipsis exposcentibus et nisi fieret irascentibus etiam certis et statis sollemnitatibus consecrata illis et dicata claruerint adque ad omnium oculos ut imitanda proponerentur, spectanda processerint:
and had they truly departed, the Romans would have been kindled to civil wars more mildly by their own desires than by the instigations of those gods. CHAPTER XXVI. Concerning the secret admonitions of demons that pertained to good morals, while in their sacred rites all wickedness was openly taught. Since these things are so—since openly and plainly basenesses mingled with cruelties, the disgraces and crimes of the deities, whether published or fabricated, were, at their own demand and with their anger if it were not done, consecrated and dedicated to them at fixed and appointed solemnities, and were set before the eyes of all to be imitated, and brought forth to be watched—
倘若牠們果真離去了,羅馬人本會因自己的私慾而較溫和地被點燃投入內戰,過於因那些神明的煽動。第二十六章。論鬼魔關乎良善道德的隱秘勸誡,而在牠們的祭儀中卻公然教導一切的邪惡。既然事情如此——既然與殘忍混雜的種種卑劣、神明的醜事與罪行,無論是公開傳述的或是捏造的,都按牠們自己的要求、並在不照辦時牠們便發怒,於固定而指定的節期被祝聖、奉獻給牠們,並被陳列在眾人眼前供人效法,被搬演出來供人觀看——
3:246
quid est, quod idem ipsi daemones, qui se huiusce modi uoluptatibus inmundos esse spiritus confitentur, qui suis flagitiis et facinoribus, siue indicatis siue simulatis, eorumque sibi celebratione petita ab inpudentibus, extorta a pudentibus auctores se uitae scelestae inmundaeque testantur, perhibentur tamen in adytis suis secretisque penetralibus dare quaedam bona praecepta de moribus quibusdam uelut electis sacratis suis? Quod si ita est, hoc ipso callidior aduertenda est et conuincenda malitia spirituum noxiorum.
what is it that these same demons, who by pleasures of this kind confess themselves to be unclean spirits, who by their own enormities and crimes—whether revealed or feigned—and by the celebration of them, sought from the shameless and extorted from the modest, attest themselves to be authors of a wicked and unclean life, are nevertheless reported to give, in their shrines and secret inner sanctuaries, certain good precepts concerning morals to certain, as it were, chosen ones consecrated to them? If this is so, by this very thing the malice of these noxious spirits must be detected and convicted as the more cunning.
那麼,這同一批鬼魔——牠們藉這類享樂承認自己是污穢的靈,藉自己的醜行與罪惡(無論是顯露的或假裝的),並藉那從無恥之人所求得、從端正之人所勒索來的對這些罪行的頌揚,證實自己是邪惡污穢生活的始作俑者——竟據說在牠們的神龕與隱秘的內殿中,向某些彷彿蒙揀選、被祝聖歸給牠們的人,傳授某些關乎道德的良善訓誡,這是怎麼回事?若果真如此,正是藉這一點,這些有害之靈的惡毒便當被察覺、被定罪為更加狡猾。
3:247
Tanta enim uis est probitatis et castitatis, ut omnis uel paene omnis eius laude moueatur humana natura, nec usque adeo sit turpitudine uitiosa, ut totum sensum honestatis amiserit. Proinde malignitas daemonum, nisi alicubi se, quem ad modum scriptum in nostris litteris nouimus, transfiguret in angelos lucis, non inplet negotium deceptionis. Foris itaque populis celeberrimo strepitu inpietas inpura circumsonat, et intus paucis castitas simulata uix sonat; praebentur propatula pudendis et secreta laudandis; decus latet et dedecus patet; quod malum geritur omnes conuocat spectatores, quod bonum dicitur uix aliquos inuenit auditores, tamquam honesta erubescenda sint et inhonesta glorianda.
For so great is the power of probity and chastity, that all, or nearly all, of human nature is moved by their praise, nor is it so far depraved by baseness as to have lost all sense of honor. Accordingly, the malignity of the demons, unless somewhere—as we know it is written in our Scriptures—it transforms itself into angels of light, does not accomplish its business of deception. And so abroad among the peoples, with most crowded uproar, impure impiety resounds all around, while within, to a few, a feigned chastity scarcely makes a sound; what should be hidden is laid open, and what should be praised is kept secret; honor lies hidden and dishonor lies exposed; the evil that is done summons all spectators, the good that is spoken scarcely finds any hearers, as though honorable things were to be blushed at and dishonorable things to be gloried in.
因為正直與貞潔的力量何等之大,以致全人類、或幾乎全人類都被它們的美名所感動,人性也並未敗壞到喪盡一切廉恥的地步。所以,鬼魔的惡毒,若不是在某處——正如我們所知聖經所載——把自己裝作光明的天使,便無法成就其欺騙的勾當。於是在外面,眾民中以最喧嚷的鼓噪,污穢的不敬虔四下迴響;而在裡面,向少數人,一種假冒的貞潔卻幾乎無聲。當隱藏的被攤開,當稱讚的被隱秘;榮譽藏匿,恥辱顯露;所行的惡召聚一切觀眾,所講的善卻幾乎找不到聽眾,彷彿正當之事當以為羞,而不正之事當引以為榮。
3:248
Sed ubi hoc nisi in daemonum templis? ubi nisi in fallaciae deuersoriis? Illud enim fit, ut honestiores, qui pauci sunt, capiantur; hoc autem, ne plures, qui sunt turpissimi, corrigantur. Ubi et quando sacrati Caelestis audiebant castitatis praecepta, nescimus; ante ipsum tamen delubrum, ubi simulacrum illud locatum conspiciebamus, uniuersi undique confluentes et ubi quisque poterat stantes ludos qui agebantur intentissimi spectabamus, intuentes alternante conspectu hinc meretriciam pompam, illinc uirginem deam: illam suppliciter adorari, ante illam turpia celebrari; non ibi pudibundos mimos, nullam uerecundiorem scaenicam uidimus; cuncta obscenitatis inplebantur officia.
But where does this happen except in the temples of demons? where except in the lodging-houses of deceit? For the one is done that the more honorable, who are few, may be ensnared; the other, lest the many, who are most base, should be corrected. Where and when those consecrated to Caelestis heard precepts of chastity, we do not know; yet before that very shrine, where we beheld that idol placed, we, all flowing together from every side and standing wherever each could, watched with the keenest attention the games that were performed, gazing with alternating glances on this side at the harlot's parade, on that at the virgin goddess: that one adored with supplication, before that one shameful things celebrated; there we saw no bashful mimes, no more modest stage-woman; all the offices of obscenity were being fulfilled.
但這事除了在鬼魔的廟宇中,又在哪裡發生呢?除了在詭詐的客棧裡,又在何處呢?因為前者是要使那為數不多較尊貴的人落入網羅;後者則是免得那眾多極卑劣的人得到糾正。那些獻身給凱萊絲提斯的人何時何地聽見貞潔的訓誡,我們不得而知;然而就在那神龕之前,在那安放著那偶像、我們親眼看見之處,我們眾人從四面八方匯聚而來,各人能站在哪裡就站在哪裡,極其專注地觀看所演的競技,目光交替地一邊望著妓女的遊行,一邊望著那童貞女神:那位被人卑屈地敬拜,在她面前卻演著醜事;在那裡我們看不見一個含羞的丑角,看不見一個較端莊的女戲子;一切淫穢的勾當都在被搬演。
3:249
Sciebatur uirginali numini quid placeret, et exhibebatur quod de templo domum matrona doctior reportaret. Nonnullae pudentiores auertebant faciem ab inpuris motibus scaenicorum et artem flagitii furtiua intentione discebant. Hominibus namque uerecundabantur, ne auderent inpudicos gestus ore libero cernere; sed multo minus audebant sacra eius, quam uenerabantur. casto corde damnare. Hoc tamen palam discendum praebebatur in templo, ad quod perpetrandum saltem secretum quaerebatur in domo, mirante nimium, si ullus ibi erat, pudore mortalium, quod humana flagitia non libere homines committerent, quae aput deos etiam religiose discerent iratos habituri, nisi etiam exhibere curarent.
It was known what pleased the virginal deity, and what was displayed was such as the more learned matron might carry home from the temple to her house. Some more modest women turned their faces away from the impure motions of the players, and yet learned the art of debauchery by a furtive attention. For they were ashamed before men, lest they should dare to behold the lewd gestures with an open face; but far less did they dare, with chaste heart, to condemn the sacred rites of her whom they venerated. Yet this was offered to be learned openly in the temple, while at least secrecy was sought in the home for its perpetration—the shame of mortals being exceedingly astonished, if any was there at all, that men did not freely commit the human enormities which they were even learning religiously in the presence of the gods, who, they were sure, would be angry unless they took care also to perform them.
那童貞女神所喜悅的乃為人所知,所搬演的也正是較有見識的婦人能從廟裡帶回家中的那種。有些較端莊的婦女把臉從戲子污穢的動作上轉開,卻又以偷偷的留意學會了淫穢的伎倆。因為她們在人面前感到羞恥,不敢以坦然的面容觀看那些下流的姿態;但她們更加不敢以貞潔的心去定她們所敬奉者的祭儀為罪。然而這事卻是公然地在廟裡供人學習,而至少要在家中尋個隱秘之處去施行——世人的羞恥心若還存留一絲,必極其詫異:人竟不肯公然犯下那些連在神明面前都虔誠學習的人間醜行,而他們深知,若不也設法搬演出來,那些神明便要發怒。
3:250
Quis enim alius spiritus occulto instinctu nequissimas agitans mentes et instat faciendis adulteriis et pascitur factis, nisi qui etiam sacris talibus oblectatur, constituens in templis simulacra daemonum, amans in ludis simulacra uitiorum, susurrans in occulto uerba iustitiae ad decipiendos etiam paucos bonos, frequentans in aperto inuitamenta nequitiae ad possidendos innumerabiles malos? CAPUT XXVII. Quanta euersione publicae disciplinae Romani dis suis placandis sacrauerint obscena ludorum. Vir grauis et philosophaster Tullius aedilis futurus clamat in auribus ciuitatis, inter cetera sui magistratus officia sibi Floram matrem ludorum celebritate placandam;
For what other spirit is it that, stirring the basest minds by a hidden instinct, both urges to the committing of adulteries and feeds upon the deeds done, except the one who also delights in such sacred rites—setting up in the temples images of demons, loving in the games images of vices, whispering in secret words of justice to deceive even the few who are good, frequenting in the open the enticements to wickedness to possess the innumerable wicked? CHAPTER XXVII. With how great an overthrow of public discipline the Romans consecrated the obscene things of the games to appease their gods. That grave man and would-be philosopher Tully, when about to be aedile, proclaims in the ears of the city that, among the other duties of his magistracy, Flora the mother is to be appeased by him through the celebration of games;
還有什麼別的靈,藉著隱秘的本能攪動那最卑劣的心思,既慫恿人去犯姦淫,又以所行的勾當為食,若不就是那也以這樣的祭儀為樂的靈——在廟中設立鬼魔的偶像,在競技中愛慕惡行的形像,在隱密處低語公義的言詞以欺騙那少數良善的人,在公開處頻頻擺出邪惡的引誘以擄掠那無數邪惡的人?第二十七章。羅馬人為討好他們的神明,以何等敗壞公共紀律的方式,把競技中淫穢之事祝聖。那位莊重的人物、自命的哲學家圖利烏斯,在將任營造官之際,向全城的耳中宣告說,在他官職的其他職責中,他要藉競技的盛舉去討好「花神之母」弗洛拉;
3:251
qui ludi tanto deuotius, quanto turpius celebrari solent. Dicit alio loco iam consul in extremis periculis ciuitatis, et ludos per decem dies factos, neque rem ullam quae ad placandos deos pertineret praetermissam; quasi non satius erat tales deos inritare temperantia quam placare luxuria, et eos honestate etiam ad inimicitias prouocare quam tanta deformitate lenire. Neque enim grauius fuerant quamlibet crudelissima inmanitate nocituri homines, propter quos placabantur, quam nocebant ipsi, cum uitiositate foedissima placarentur.
and these games are wont to be celebrated all the more devoutly, the more basely. He says in another place, now as consul, in the extreme dangers of the city, that games were held for ten days, and that no measure pertaining to the appeasing of the gods was omitted; as though it were not better to provoke such gods by temperance than to appease them by luxury, and to call them to enmity by honorable conduct rather than to soothe them by so great a deformity. For the men on whose account they were being appeased could not have done harm, by however cruel a savagery, more grievously than they themselves did harm, when they were being appeased by the foulest viciousness.
而這些競技愈是卑劣,便愈被人虔誠地舉行。他在另一處,已身為執政官、在全城處於極大危難之時,說競技舉行了十天,凡關乎討好神明之事一無遺漏;彷彿以節制激怒這樣的神明,不比以奢靡討好牠們更好;以正當的行為招致牠們的敵意,不比以如此醜陋的事討好牠們更好。因為那些為其緣故而要討好神明的人,無論以何等殘忍的暴行,所能造成的危害,也不及這些神明自己在被那最污穢的惡行討好時所造成的危害更為慘重。
3:252
Quando quidem ut auerteretur quod metuebatur ab hoste in corporibus, eo modo di conciliabantur, quo uirtus debellaretur in mentibus, qui non obponerentur defensores obpugnatoribus moenium, nisi prius fierent expugnatores morum bonorum.
Since indeed, in order that what was feared from the enemy might be averted from men's bodies, the gods were reconciled in such a way that virtue might be vanquished in men's minds—gods who would not be set as defenders against the assailants of the walls, unless they were first made stormers of good morals.
既然如此,為使所懼怕、來自仇敵之事得以從人的身體上挪去,那些神明竟以這樣的方式被討好,以致德行在人的心思中被打敗——這等神明,除非先被立為善德的攻破者,便不肯被立為抵禦城牆攻擊者的守衛。
3:253
Hanc talium numinum placationem petulantissimam inpurissimam inpudentissimam nequissimam inmundissimam, cuius actores laudanda Romanae uirtutis indoles honore priuauit, tribu mouit, agnouit turpes, fecit infames, hanc, inquam, pudendam ueraeque religioni auersandam et detestandam talium numinum placationem, [has] fabulas in deos inlecebrosas adque criminosas, haec ignominiosa deorum uel scelerate turpiterque facta uel sceleratius turpiusque conficta oculis et auribus publicis ciuitas tota discebat, haec commissa numinibus placere cernebat, et ideo non solum illis exhibenda, sed sibi quoque imitanda credebat, non illud nescio quid uelut bonum et honestum, quod tam paucis et tam occulte dicebatur (si tamen dicebatur), ut magis ne innotesceret, quam ne non fieret, timeretur.
This appeasement of such deities—most wanton, most impure, most shameless, most wicked, most unclean, whose performers the praiseworthy temper of Roman virtue deprived of honor, expelled from the tribe, recognized as base, and made infamous—this appeasement, I say, shameful and to be shunned and detested by true religion, these fables alluring and criminal against the gods, these ignominious deeds of the gods, whether wickedly and basely done or yet more wickedly and basely fabricated, the whole city learned with public eyes and ears, and perceived that these things committed were pleasing to the deities, and therefore believed that they were not only to be displayed to them, but also to be imitated by itself—not that I-know-not-what supposed good and honorable thing, which was spoken to so few and so secretly (if indeed it was spoken at all), so that it was feared rather lest it become known than lest it not be done.
這對這等神明的討好——最放蕩、最污穢、最無恥、最邪惡、最不潔,其表演者被那值得稱讚的羅馬美德剝奪了榮譽、逐出部族、認定為卑賤、定為惡名昭著——我說,這當受真宗教所唾棄憎惡的可恥的討好,這些對神明充滿誘惑與罪惡的寓言,這些神明可恥的事跡——無論是邪惡卑劣地行的,還是更邪惡卑劣地捏造的——全城都以公眾的眼目和耳朵去學習,並察覺所行的這些事是討神明喜悅的,因此便相信這些不僅當搬演給神明看,更當由自己加以效法——而不是那不知為何物、貌似良善正當的東西,那東西只向極少數人、極隱秘地被講論(倘若曾被講論過的話),以致人所懼怕的,寧是怕它被人知曉,而非怕它不被施行。
3:254
CAPUT XXVIII. De Christianae religionis salubritate.
CHAPTER XXVIII. On the wholesomeness of the Christian religion.
第二十八章。論基督教信仰的有益健全。
3:255
Ab istarum inmundissimarum potestatum tartareo iugo et societate poenali erui per Christi nomen homines et in lucem saluberrimae pietatis ab illa perniciosissimae inpietatis nocte transferri queruntur et murmurant iniqui et ingrati et illo nefario spiritu altius obstrictiusque possessi, quia populi confluunt ad ecclesiam casta celebritate, honesta utriusque sexus discretione, ubi audiant quam bene hic ad tempus uiuere debeant, ut post hanc uitam beate semperque uiuere mereantur, ubi sancta scriptura iustitiaeque doctrina de superiore loco in conspectu omnium personante et qui faciunt audiant ad praemium, et qui non faciunt audiant ad iudicium.
That men are rescued through the name of Christ from the hellish yoke and penal fellowship of those most unclean powers, and are transferred into the light of most wholesome piety from that night of most pernicious impiety—the wicked and ungrateful complain and murmur at this, those more deeply and tightly possessed by that abominable spirit, because the peoples flow together to the church in chaste assembly, with honorable distinction of both sexes, where they may hear how well they ought to live here for a time, that after this life they may be worthy to live blessedly and forever; where the holy Scripture and the doctrine of righteousness resound from a higher place in the sight of all, and both those who do it hear it unto reward, and those who do not do it hear it unto judgment.
人藉著基督的名得以從那些最污穢權勢的地獄之軛與刑罰之夥同中被救出,並從那最致命之不敬虔的黑夜被遷入那最有益之虔敬的光明——那些被那可憎之靈更深、更牢牢轄制的不義忘恩之人,卻為此抱怨並嘟囔,因為眾民以貞潔的聚集、兩性合宜的分別匯聚到教會,在那裡他們可以聽見:他們在此世暫時當如何良善地生活,好叫他們在此生之後配得有福地、永遠地活著;在那裡,神聖的聖經與公義的教導從高處在眾人眼前發聲,那遵行的人聽見便得賞賜,那不遵行的人聽見便受審判。
3:256
Quo etsi ueniunt quidam talium praeceptorum inrisores, omnis eorum petulantia aut repentina mutatione deponitur, aut timore uel pudore conprimitur. Nihil enim eis turpe ac flagitiosum spectandum imitandumque proponitur, ubi ueri Dei aut praecepta insinuantur aut miracula narrantur, aut dona laudantur aut beneficia postulantur. CAPUT XXVIIII. De abiciendo cultu deorum cohortatio ad Romanos. Haec potius concupisce o indoles Romana laudabilis o progenies Regulorum Scaeuolarum Scipionum Fabriciorum; haec potius concupisce, haec ab illa turpissima uanitate et fallacissima daemonum malignitate discerne.
And though some scoffers at such precepts do come there, all their wantonness is either laid aside by a sudden change, or restrained by fear or shame. For nothing base and disgraceful is set before them to be watched and imitated, where the precepts of the true God are imparted, or his miracles narrated, or his gifts praised, or his benefits sought. CHAPTER XXIX. An exhortation to the Romans to cast off the worship of the gods. Desire rather these things, O praiseworthy Roman temper, O offspring of the Reguli, the Scaevolae, the Scipios, the Fabricii; desire rather these things, distinguish these from that most base vanity and most deceitful malignity of demons.
縱然有些譏誚這等訓誡的人到那裡來,他們一切的放縱,或因驟然的改變而被擱下,或因懼怕與羞恥而被約束。因為在那裡,凡真神的訓誡被傳授、祂的神蹟被述說、祂的恩賜被稱頌、祂的恩惠被祈求之處,並無任何卑劣可恥之事擺在他們面前供人觀看效法。第二十九章。勸羅馬人棄絕對神明的敬拜。哦,值得稱讚的羅馬本性啊,哦,雷古路斯家、斯凱沃拉家、西庇阿家、法布里齊烏斯家的後裔啊,你倒要渴慕這些事;你倒要渴慕這些事,把這些與那最卑劣的虛妄、與鬼魔最詭詐的惡毒分別開來。
3:257
Si quid in te laudabile naturaliter eminet, non nisi uera pietate purgatur adque perficitur, inpietate autem disperditur et punitur. Nunc iam elige quid sequaris, ut non in te, sed in Deo uero sine ullo errore lauderis. Tunc enim tibi gloria popularis adfuit, sed occulto diuinae prouidentiae iudicio uera religio quam eligeres defuit. Expergiscere, dies est, sicut experrecta es in quibusdam, de quorum uirtute perfecta et pro fide uera etiam passionibus gloriamur, qui usquequaque aduersus potestates inimicissimas confligentes easque fortiter moriendo uincentes sanguine nobis hanc patriam peperere suo.
If anything praiseworthy stands out in you naturally, it is purified and perfected only by true piety, but by impiety it is utterly ruined and punished. Now then choose what you will follow, that you may be praised not in yourself, but in the true God, without any error. For then popular glory attended you, but by the hidden judgment of divine providence the true religion which you might choose was lacking to you. Awake, it is day, as you have awakened in certain ones of whose perfected virtue, and for the true faith even by their sufferings, we glory—who, contending everywhere against the most hostile powers and conquering them by bravely dying, have brought forth this fatherland for us by their own blood.
你裡面若有什麼天然值得稱讚的,唯有藉真虔敬才得潔淨並成全,而藉不敬虔卻被徹底毀滅、被刑罰。如今你當揀選你所要跟從的,使你得稱讚不在於你自己,乃在於那真神,毫無謬誤。因為從前世俗的榮耀曾隨著你,然而藉神聖護理隱秘的判斷,那你本可揀選的真宗教卻是你所缺乏的。醒來吧,天已亮了,正如你在某些人身上已經醒來——我們為他們成全的德行、並為那真信德甚至為他們的受苦而誇耀——他們處處與最敵對的權勢爭戰,藉著勇敢赴死而戰勝那些權勢,以自己的血為我們生出這個家鄉。
3:258
Ad quam patriam te inuitamus et exhortamur, ut eius adiciaris numero ciuium, cuius quodam modo asylum est uera remissio peccatorum. Non audias degeneres tuos Christo Christianisue detrahentes et accusantes uelut tempora mala, cum quaerant tempora, quibus non sit quieta uita, sed potius secura nequitia. Haec tibi numquam nec pro terrena patria placuerunt. Nunc iam caelestem arripe, pro qua minimum laborabis, et in ea ueraciter semperque regnabis. Illic enim tibi non Vestalis focus, non lapis Capitolinus, sed Deus unus et uerus nec metas rerum nec tempora ponit, Imperium sine fine dabit. Noli deos falsos fallacesque requirere; abice potius adque contemne in ueram emicans libertatem.
To this fatherland we invite and exhort you, that you may be added to the number of its citizens, whose asylum, in a certain manner, is the true remission of sins. Do not listen to your own degenerate sons who disparage Christ and Christians and accuse, as it were, the times as evil, when they are seeking times in which life may not be peaceful, but rather wickedness may be secure. These things have never pleased you, not even for your earthly fatherland. Now then lay hold of the heavenly one, for which you shall labor very little, and in it you shall truly and forever reign. For there it is not the Vestal hearth, not the Capitoline stone, but the one and true God who sets neither bounds to things nor times—'He will give empire without end.' Do not seek false and deceitful gods; rather cast them off and despise them, leaping forth into true liberty.
我們邀請並勸勉你歸向這家鄉,使你得列入它公民的數目之中——這家鄉的庇護所,在某種意義上,就是罪真正的赦免。不要聽你那些墮落的兒女詆毀基督和基督徒,並彷彿控告這時代為邪惡,其實他們所尋求的,是那種生活不得安寧、惡行反倒可以穩妥的時代。這些事從未討你的喜悅,連為了你那屬地的家鄉也不曾。如今你倒要抓住那屬天的家鄉,為它你只需付出極少的勞苦,並要在其中真實地、永遠地作王。因為在那裡,賜給你的並非維斯太的爐火,並非卡庇托的石頭,乃是那獨一真神,祂既不為萬物設限,也不為它定時——「祂必賜下無窮的國度。」不要尋求虛假詭詐的神明;倒要把牠們棄絕、藐視,奮力躍入真正的自由。
3:259
Non sunt di, maligni sunt spiritus, quibus aeterna tua felicitas poena est. Non tam Iuno Troianis, a quibus carnalem originem ducis, arces uidetur inuidisse Romanas, quam isti daemones, quos adhuc deos putas, omni generi hominum sedes inuident sempiternas. Et tu ipsa non parua ex parte de talibus spiritibus iudicasti, quando ludis eos placasti et per quos homines eosdem ludos fecisti, infames esse uoluisti. Patere adseri libertatem tuam aduersus inmundos spiritus, qui tuis ceruicibus inposuerant sacrandam sibi et celebrandam ignominiam suam. Actores criminum diuinorum remouisti ab honoribus tuis:
They are not gods; they are malign spirits, to whom your eternal felicity is a torment. Not so much does Juno seem to have begrudged the Roman citadels to the Trojans, from whom you draw your carnal origin, as do these demons—whom you still think gods—begrudge everlasting abodes to the whole race of men. And you yourself have, in no small part, passed judgment on such spirits, when you appeased them with games, and through the men by whom you held those same games, you willed that they should be infamous. Suffer your liberty to be asserted against the unclean spirits, who had laid upon your necks their own disgrace, to be consecrated and celebrated to them. You removed the performers of divine crimes from your honors:
牠們不是神,乃是惡靈,你永遠的福樂對牠們乃是刑罰。尤諾忌恨羅馬的城堡不肯給特洛伊人(你的肉身源頭由他們而出),其程度還不及這些鬼魔——你至今仍以為是神的——忌恨全人類得著永恆的居所。而你自己也在不小的程度上已經審判過這等靈了,因為你用競技討好牠們,並藉著那些為你舉行這些競技的人,你立意使他們蒙受惡名。你當容許自己的自由得以伸張,去抵抗那些污穢之靈——牠們曾把自己的恥辱加在你的頸項上,要被祝聖、被頌揚歸給牠們。你已從你的榮譽中除去那些扮演神明罪行的人:
3:260
supplica Deo uero, ut a te remoueat illos deos, qui delectantur criminibus suis, seu ueris, quod ignominiosissimum est, seu falsis. quod malitiosissimum. Bene, quod tua sponte histrionibus et scaenicis societatem ciuitatis patere noluisti; euigila plenius! Nullo modo his artibus placatur diuina maiestas, quibus humana dignitas inquinatur. Quo igitur pacto deos, qui talibus delectantur obsequiis, haberi putas in numero sanctarum caelestium potestatum, cum homines, per quos eadem aguntur obsequia, non putasti habendos in numero qualiumcumque ciuium Romanorum? Incomparabiliter superna est ciuitas clarior, ubi uictoria ueritas, ubi dignitas sanctitas, ubi pax felicitas, ubi uita aeternitas.
now supplicate the true God, that he may remove from you those gods who delight in their own crimes, whether true (which is most ignominious) or false (which is most malicious). It is well that of your own accord you were unwilling to open the fellowship of the city to actors and stage-players; awaken more fully! In no way is the divine majesty appeased by those arts by which human dignity is defiled. By what compact, then, do you suppose that gods who delight in such services are to be held in the number of the holy heavenly powers, when you have judged that men, through whom those same services are performed, are not to be held in the number of citizens of Rome of any kind whatsoever? Incomparably more glorious is the city on high, where the victory is truth, where dignity is holiness, where peace is felicity, where life is eternity.
如今你當懇求那真神,求祂從你身上除去那些以自己的罪行為樂的神明,無論那罪行是真的(這是最可恥的),還是假的(這是最惡毒的)。你曾自願不肯把全城的公民身分向戲子與舞台演員敞開,這是好的;要更全然地醒過來!絕不能以那玷污人之尊嚴的伎倆去討好神聖的威嚴。那麼,你憑什麼約定,竟以為那以這等服事為樂的神明當列在聖潔屬天權能的數目之中,既然你已判定那些藉以行這同樣服事的人不當列入任何一種羅馬公民的數目之中?那在上之城無可比擬地更為榮耀,在那裡勝利就是真理,尊嚴就是聖潔,平安就是福樂,生命就是永恆。
3:261
Multo minus habet in sua societate tales deos, si tu in tua tales homines habere erubuisti. Proinde si ad beatam peruenire desideras ciuitatem, deuita daemonum societatem. Indigne ab honestis coluntur, qui per turpes placantur. Sic isti a tua pietate remoueantur purgatione Christiana, quo modo illi a tua dignitate remoti sunt notatione censoria.
Much less does it have such gods in its fellowship, if you have blushed to have such men in yours. Accordingly, if you desire to attain to the blessed city, shun the fellowship of demons. Unworthily are they worshiped by the honorable, who are appeased by the base. So let these be removed from your piety by Christian purification, in the same way as those were removed from your dignity by the censorial mark.
那城更加不會在它的團夥中容有這樣的神明,既然你以在你的團夥中容有那樣的人為羞。所以,你若渴望進入那有福之城,就當躲避鬼魔的團夥。那些靠卑賤之人才得討好的神明,被尊貴的人敬拜實在不配。所以,就讓這些藉基督的潔淨從你的虔敬中被除去,正如那些藉監察官的標記從你的尊嚴中被除去一樣。
3:262
De bonis autem carnalibus, quibus solis mali perfrui uolunt, et de malis carnalibus, quae sola perpeti nolunt, quod neque in his habeant quam putantur habere isti daemones potestatem (quamquam si haberent, deberemus potius etiam ista contemnere, quam propter ista illos colere et eos colendo ad illa, quae nobis inuident, peruenire non posse), — tamen nec in istis eos hoc ualere, quod hi putant, qui propter haec eos coli oportere contendunt, deinceps uidebimus, ut hic sit huius uoluminis modus. CAPUT I. De aduersitatibus, quas solas mali metuunt et quas semper passus est mundus, cum deos coleret.
But concerning carnal goods, which alone the wicked wish to enjoy, and concerning carnal evils, which alone they refuse to endure, that these demons do not have even in these the power which they are thought to have (although, even if they had it, we ought rather to despise these very things than to worship them for the sake of these things, and by worshiping them to be unable to attain to those things which they begrudge us)—yet that not even in these things they prevail to this extent which those think, who contend that they ought to be worshiped on account of these, we shall see in what follows, so that this may be the limit of this volume. CHAPTER I. On the adversities, which alone the wicked fear, and which the world has always suffered, while it worshiped the gods.
但論到肉體的好處——惡人唯獨願意享受這些;以及論到肉體的禍患——他們唯獨不肯忍受這些;這些鬼魔即便在這些事上,也並不具有人所以為牠們具有的權柄(雖然縱使牠們有,我們也寧可藐視這些事本身,而不該為這些事去敬拜牠們,又因敬拜牠們而無法得著那些牠們所忌恨於我們的事物)——然而,即便在這些事上,牠們也並不像那些主張當為這些緣故敬拜牠們之人所以為的那樣有能力,這我們將在下文看見,好叫此卷就此為止。第一章。論那唯獨惡人所懼怕的禍患,以及世界在敬拜眾神時始終所遭受的禍患。
3:263
Iam satis dictum arbitror de morum malis et animorum, quae praecipue cauenda sunt, nihil deos falsos populo cultori suo, quo minus eorum malorum aggere premeretur, subuenire curasse, sed potius, ut maxime premeretur, egisse. Nunc de illis malis uideo dicendum, quae sola isti perpeti nolunt, qualia sunt fames morbus, bellum exspoliatio, captiuitas trucidatio, et si qua similia iam in primo libro commemorauimus. Haec enim sola mali deputant mala, quae non faciunt malos; nec erubescunt inter bona, quae laudant, ipsi mali esse qui laudant, magisque stomachantur, si uillam malam habeant, quam si uitam, quasi hoc sit hominis maximum bonum, habere bona omnia praeter se ipsum.
I think enough has now been said about the evils of morals and of minds, which are chiefly to be guarded against—that the false gods took no care to come to the aid of their worshiping people, that they might be less crushed under the heap of those evils, but rather acted that they might be crushed all the more. Now I see that I must speak of those evils which alone these men refuse to endure, such as famine, disease, war, plunder, captivity, slaughter, and any like things which we have already mentioned in the first book. For these alone the wicked reckon as evils, which do not make men evil; nor do they blush, amid the goods they praise, themselves to be evil who praise them, and they are more vexed if they have a bad farm than if they have a bad life—as though this were a man's greatest good, to have all goods except his own self.
我想關於道德與心思的惡——那些尤其當提防的惡——如今已說得夠多了:即那些假神毫不留意去援助敬拜牠們的子民,使他們不致更受那些惡之重壓,反倒行事使他們更受重壓。如今我看出必須論到那些唯獨這些人所不肯忍受的禍患,就如饑荒、疾病、戰爭、劫掠、被擄、屠殺,以及我們已在第一卷提及的諸如此類之事。因為惡人唯獨把那些不使人變惡的事算作惡;而他們在自己所稱讚的好處中,竟不以自己這稱讚之人為惡為恥,並且若有一座壞農莊,比有一個壞人生更令他們惱怒——彷彿這就是人最大的好處:除了自己之外,擁有一切的好處。
3:264
Sed neque talia mala, quae isti sola formidant, di eorum, quando ab eis libere colebantur, ne illis acciderent obstiterunt. Cum enim uariis per diuersa temporibus ante aduentum Redemtoris nostri innumerabilibus nonnullisque etiam incredibilibus cladibus genus contereretur humanum, quos alios quam istos deos mundus colebat, excepto uno populo Hebraeo et quibusdam extra ipsum populum, ubicumque gratia diuina digni occultissimo adque iustissimo Dei iudicio fuerunt? Verum ne nimis longum faciam, tacebo aliarum usquequaque gentium mala grauissima:
But not even such evils, which these men alone dread, did their gods, when they were freely worshiped by them, hinder from befalling them. For while at various times throughout diverse regions, before the coming of our Redeemer, the human race was being ground down by innumerable and some even incredible disasters, what other gods did the world worship than these, except for the one Hebrew people and certain individuals outside that people, wherever any were worthy of divine grace by the most hidden and most just judgment of God? But, lest I make it too lengthy, I will be silent about the most grievous evils of other nations everywhere:
但即便是這些人唯獨所懼怕的這等禍患,他們的神明在被他們自由敬拜之時,也並未阻止其臨到他們。因為當人類在我們的救贖主降臨之前,於不同的時代、遍及各處,被無數的、甚至有些難以置信的災禍碾壓時,世界所敬拜的,除了這些神明之外還有別的嗎?惟獨那一個希伯來民族,以及那民族之外的某些個人例外——凡按著神最隱秘、最公義的判斷而配得神聖恩典的人。但為免過於冗長,我要對別國各處最慘重的禍患保持緘默:
3:265
quod ad Romam pertinet Romanumque imperium tantum loquar, id est ad ipsam proprie ciuitatem et quaecumque illi terrarum uel societate coniunctae uel condicione subiectae sunt, quae sint perpessae ante aduentum Christi, cum iam ad eius quasi corpus rei publicae pertinerent. CAPUT II. An di, qui et a Romanis et a Graecis similiter colebantur, causas habuerint, quibus Ilium paterentur exscindi. Primum ipsa Troia uel Ilium, unde origo est populi Romani, (neque enim praetereundum aut dissimulandum est, quod et in primo libro adtigi) eosdem habens deos et colens quur a Graecis uictum, captum adque deletum est? Priamo, inquiunt, sunt reddita Laomedontea paterna periuria\'.
as far as it pertains to Rome and the Roman empire, I will speak only of this much—that is, of the city itself properly, and of whatever lands were joined to it either by alliance or subjected by condition—what things they endured before the coming of Christ, when they already belonged, as it were, to the body of that commonwealth. CHAPTER II. Whether the gods, who were similarly worshiped by both Romans and Greeks, had reasons for which they suffered Ilium to be destroyed. First, Troy itself, or Ilium, whence is the origin of the Roman people (for it must not be passed over or dissembled, which I touched upon in the first book), having and worshiping the same gods—why was it conquered, captured, and destroyed by the Greeks? 'To Priam,' they say, 'were repaid the ancestral perjuries of Laomedon.'
就羅馬與羅馬帝國而言,我只說這麼多——也就是說,論到那城本身、以及凡藉同盟與它相連、或按處境受它管轄的地方——他們在基督降臨之前忍受了什麼,那時他們彷彿已屬於那國家的身體。第二章。論那些同樣被羅馬人與希臘人敬拜的神明,是否有理由容許伊利昂被摧毀。首先,特洛伊本身,即伊利昂,乃羅馬民族的源頭(這事不可越過或隱諱,我在第一卷已略加提及),它擁有並敬拜著同樣的神明——為何卻被希臘人征服、攻取、摧毀?他們說:「拉俄墨冬祖傳的背誓之罪,臨到了普里阿摩斯身上以作報應。」
3:266
Ergo uerum est, quod Apollo adque Neptunus eidem Laomedonti mercennariis operibus seruierunt? Illis quippe promisisse mercedem falsumque iurasse perhibetur. Miror Apollinem nominatum diuinatorem in tanto opificio laborasse nescientem quod Laomedon fuerat promissa negaturus. Quamquam nec ipsum Neptunum, patruum eius, fratrem Iouis, regem maris, decuit ignarum esse futurorum.
Is it then true that Apollo and Neptune served that same Laomedon by hired labors? For they are said to have promised him a wage and to have falsely sworn it. I marvel that Apollo, named a diviner, labored in so great a work, not knowing that Laomedon would deny what had been promised. Although neither did it befit Neptune himself, his uncle, the brother of Jove, the king of the sea, to be ignorant of the future.
那麼,阿波羅和涅普頓真的曾以受雇的勞役服事那同一個拉俄墨冬嗎?因為據說牠們曾應許他工價,又起了假誓。我詫異那被稱為占卜者的阿波羅,竟在如此浩大的工程中勞苦,卻不知拉俄墨冬將要否認所應許的。雖然涅普頓自己——他的叔父、朱庇特的兄弟、海洋的王——也同樣不該對未來無知才是。
3:267
Nam hunc Homerus de stirpe Aeneae, a cuius posteris [condita] Roma est, cum ante illam urbem conditam idem poeta fuisse dicatur, inducit magnum aliquid diuinantem, quem etiam nube rapuit, ut dicit, ne ab Achille occideretur, cuperet cum uertere ab imo, quod aput Vergilium confitetur, Structa suis manibus periurae moenia Troiae. Nescientes igitur tanti di, Neptunus et Apollo, Laomedontem sibi negaturum esse mercedem, structores moenium Troianorum gratis et ingratis fuerunt. Videant ne grauius sit tales deos credere quam dis talibus peierare.
For Homer represents him—from the stock of Aeneas, from whose posterity Rome was founded, since the same poet is said to have lived before that city was founded—as divining something great; whom also he snatched away in a cloud, as he says, lest he be slain by Achilles, though he desired to overturn from their foundation, as he confesses in Virgil, 'the walls of perjured Troy built by his own hands.' Ignorant therefore, those great gods, Neptune and Apollo, that Laomedon would deny them their wage, were builders of the Trojan walls for nothing and unthanked. Let them see whether it be not graver to believe in such gods than to perjure oneself to such gods.
因為荷馬把他描繪——他出自埃涅阿斯的世系(羅馬乃由埃涅阿斯的後裔所建立),既然據說這同一位詩人生活在那城建立之前——說他預言著某件大事;荷馬又說,他被一片雲擄去,免得被阿喀琉斯殺死,雖然他渴望把那城從根基傾覆,正如他在維吉爾筆下所承認的:「特洛伊背誓的城牆,是他親手所築。」所以,涅普頓和阿波羅這兩位大神,因不知拉俄墨冬將否認他們的工價,竟白白地、不受感謝地為特洛伊人築了城牆。讓他們看看,相信這樣的神明,豈不比對這樣的神明背誓更為嚴重?
3:268
Hoc enim nec ipse Homerus facile credidit, qui Neptunum quidem contra Troianos, Apollinem autem pro Troianis pugnantem facit, cum illo periurio ambos fabula narret offensos. Si igitur fabulis credunt, erubescant talia colere numina; si fabulis non credunt, non obtendant Troiana periuria, aut mirentur deos periuria punisse Troiana, amasse Romana. Unde enim coniuratio Catilinae in tanta tamque corrupta ciuitate habuit etiam eorum grandem copiam, quos manus adque lingua periurio aut sanguine ciuili alebat? Quid enim aliud totiens senatores corrupti in iudiciis, totiens populus in suffragiis uel in quibusque causis, quae aput eum contionibus agebantur, nisi etiam peierando peccabant?
For not even Homer himself easily believed this, who makes Neptune indeed fight against the Trojans, but Apollo fight for the Trojans, although the fable narrates that both were offended by that perjury. If, then, they believe the fables, let them blush to worship such deities; if they do not believe the fables, let them not put forward the Trojan perjuries, or let them marvel that the gods punished Trojan perjuries but loved the Roman ones. For whence, in so great and so corrupt a city, did the conspiracy of Catiline have so great an abundance of those whose hand and tongue were fed by perjury or by civil bloodshed? For what else were the senators, so often corrupted in judgments, the people so often corrupted in their votes or in whatever causes were transacted before them in assemblies, doing, but also sinning by perjury?
因為連荷馬自己也不輕易相信這事,他把涅普頓描繪成與特洛伊人爭戰,卻把阿波羅描繪成為特洛伊人爭戰,雖然那寓言敘述二者都因那背誓而受了冒犯。那麼,他們若相信這些寓言,就當以敬拜這樣的神明為羞;他們若不相信這些寓言,就不要提出特洛伊人的背誓,否則就當詫異:神明竟懲罰特洛伊人的背誓,卻喜愛羅馬人的背誓。否則,在如此大、如此腐敗的城中,喀提林的陰謀怎會擁有如此眾多以背誓或內戰流血為生、其手與舌靠這些餵養的人?那一再在審判中被收買的元老們、一再在投票或在會中議事的種種案件裡被收買的百姓,所做的豈不也是藉背誓而犯罪?
3:269
Namque corruptissimis moribus ad hoc mos iurandi seruabatur antiquus, non ut ab sceleribus metu religionis prohiberentur, sed ut periuria quoque sceleribus ceteris adderentur. CAPUT III. Non potuisse offendi deos Paridis adulterio, quod inter ipsos traditur frequentatum. Nulla itaque causa est, quare di, quibus, ut dicunt, steterat illud imperium, cum a Graecis praeualentibus probentur uicti, Troianis peierantibus fingantur irati. Nec adulterio Paridis, ut rursus a quibusdam defenduntur, ut Troiam desererent, suscensuerunt. Auctores enim doctoresque peccatorum esse adsolent, non ultores.
For amid the most corrupt morals, the ancient custom of swearing was preserved to this end—not that men might be deterred from crimes by the fear of religion, but that perjuries too might be added to their other crimes. CHAPTER III. That the gods could not have been offended by the adultery of Paris, which is reported to have been a frequent practice among themselves. There is therefore no reason why the gods, on whom, as they say, that empire rested, when they are proved to have been conquered by the prevailing Greeks, should be feigned to be angry at the perjuring Trojans. Nor were they incensed at the adultery of Paris—as they are again defended by some—so as to desert Troy. For they are wont to be the authors and teachers of sins, not the avengers.
因為在那最腐敗的道德之中,古老的起誓習俗被保存,其目的並非要人因敬畏宗教而被攔阻不去犯罪,乃是要把背誓也加在他們其餘的罪上。第三章。論神明不可能因帕里斯的姦淫而受冒犯,因為據傳這事在牠們自己中間屢見不鮮。所以毫無理由說:那些(據他們所言)那帝國所倚靠的神明,當牠們被證實已被佔上風的希臘人征服時,竟被臆想為向背誓的特洛伊人發怒。牠們也並非因帕里斯的姦淫而動怒——正如某些人又如此為牠們辯護——以致離棄特洛伊。因為牠們慣於作罪的始作俑者與教唆者,而非報復者。
3:270
\'Urbem Romam, inquit Sallustius, sicuti ego accepi, condidere adque habuere initio Troiani, qui Aenea duce profugi sedibus incertis uagabantur\'. Si ergo adulterium Paridis uindicandum numina censuerunt, aut magis in Romanis aut certe etiam in Romanis puniendum fuit, quia Aeneae mater hoc fecit. Sed quo modo in illo illud flagitium oderant, qui in sua socia Venere non oderant (ut alia omittam) quod cum Anchise commiserat, ex quo Aenean pepererat? An quia illud factum est indignante Menelao, illud autem concedente Vulcano? Di enim, credo, non zelant coniuges suas usque adeo, ut eas etiam cum hominibus dignentur habere communes.
'The city of Rome,' says Sallust, 'as I have received it, the Trojans founded and held at the beginning, who, with Aeneas as their leader, wandered as fugitives in uncertain dwellings.' If, then, the deities judged that the adultery of Paris was to be avenged, it should have been punished either more so in the Romans, or at least also in the Romans, because Aeneas's mother did this very thing. But how did they hate that enormity in him, who did not hate—to omit other things—in their own associate Venus, what she had committed with Anchises, by whom she had borne Aeneas? Was it because the one was done with Menelaus indignant, but the other with Vulcan consenting? For the gods, I suppose, are not jealous of their wives to such a degree as to deign even to share them with men.
撒路斯特說:「羅馬城,據我所領受的,起初是特洛伊人所建立、所佔有的,他們以埃涅阿斯為首領,作為流亡者在不定的居所中漂泊。」那麼,倘若神明判定帕里斯的姦淫當受報應,這報應就更該臨到羅馬人身上,或至少也臨到羅馬人身上,因為埃涅阿斯的母親正是行了這事。但牠們怎能恨帕里斯身上的這醜行,卻不恨——別的且不提——牠們自己同夥維納斯與安喀塞斯所犯、並由此生下埃涅阿斯的那事呢?難道是因為前者是在墨涅拉俄斯憤慨之下所行,後者卻是在伏爾甘默許之下所行?因為我想,眾神並不那樣嫉妒自己的妻子,以致竟肯把她們與凡人共享。
3:271
Inridere fabulas fortassis existimor nec grauiter agere tanti ponderis causam. Non ergo credamus, si placet, Aenean esse Veneris filium: ecce concedo, si nec Romulum Martis. Si autem illud, quur non et illud? An deos [fas est] hominibus feminis, mares autem homines deabus misceri nefas? Dura uel potius non credenda condicio, quod ex iure Veneris in concubitu Marti licuit, hoc in iure suo ipsi Veneri non licere. At utrumque firmatum est auctoritate Romana. Neque enim minus credidit recentior Caesar auiam Venerem quam patrem antiquior Romulus Martem. CAPUT IIII. De sententia Varronis, qua utile esse dixit, ut se homines dis genitos mentiantur. Dixerit aliquis: Itane tu ista credis?
Perhaps I am thought to be deriding the fables, and not to be treating a cause of so great weight gravely. Let us then, if it please, not believe that Aeneas is the son of Venus: behold, I concede it, if also Romulus is not the son of Mars. But if the one, why not also the other? Or is it lawful for gods to mingle with human women, but wicked for male humans to mingle with goddesses? A harsh, or rather an incredible, condition, that what by the right of Venus was permitted to Mars in intercourse, this should not be permitted to Venus herself in her own right. But both have been confirmed by Roman authority. For the later Caesar believed Venus to be his grandmother no less than the more ancient Romulus believed Mars to be his father. CHAPTER IV. On the opinion of Varro, by which he said it was useful for men to feign themselves born of the gods. Someone may say: Do you then believe these things?
或許有人以為我是在嘲笑這些寓言,而非莊重地處理一件如此重大的事。那麼,若你願意,我們就不信埃涅阿斯是維納斯的兒子:看哪,我承認此說,只要羅慕路斯也不是瑪爾斯的兒子。但若承認前者,為何不也承認後者?難道神明與凡間婦女交合是合法的,而凡間男子與女神交合卻是邪惡的?這是個苛刻、或者說難以置信的條件:照維納斯的權利,瑪爾斯在交媾中所許可的,竟不許可維納斯自己照她自己的權利去行。然而二者都已被羅馬的權威所確立。因為那較晚的凱撒相信維納斯是他的祖母,正如那較古的羅慕路斯相信瑪爾斯是他的父親,二者不相上下。第四章。論瓦羅的見解,他說人假稱自己出於神明乃是有益的。或許有人會說:那麼,你竟相信這些事嗎?
3:272
Ego uero ista non credo. Nam et uir doctissimus eorum Varro falsa haec esse, quamuis non audacter neque fidenter, paene tamen fatetur. Sed utile ciuitatibus esse dicit, ut se uiri fortes, etiamsi falsum sit, dis genitos esse credant, ut eo modo animus humanus uelut diuinae stirpis fiduciam gerens res magnas adgrediendas praesumat audacius, agat uehementius et ob hoc inpleat ipsa securitate felicius. Quae Varronis sententia expressa, ut potui, meis uerbis cernis quam latum locum aperiat falsitati, ubi intellegamus plura iam sacra et quasi religiosa potuisse confingi, ubi putata sunt ciuibus etiam de ipsis dis prodesse mendacia. CAPUT V.
I, for my part, do not believe these things. For even their most learned man, Varro, almost confesses—though not boldly nor confidently—that these things are false. But he says it is useful for cities that brave men should believe themselves, even if it be false, to be born of the gods, so that in that way the human mind, bearing as it were the confidence of a divine stock, may more boldly presume to undertake great enterprises, may act more vigorously, and on this account may, by that very security, accomplish them more happily. This opinion of Varro, expressed as I could in my own words, you perceive how wide a place it opens to falsehood, where we understand that many things now sacred and as it were religious could have been invented, where lies were thought to profit citizens even concerning the gods themselves. CHAPTER V.
我自己,這些事我並不相信。因為連他們最有學問的人瓦羅——雖不大膽、也不堅決——卻幾乎承認這些事是虛假的。但他說,對城邦而言,叫勇敢的人相信自己出於神明(即便這是假的)乃是有益的,好叫人的心思藉此彷彿懷著神聖血統的自信,更大膽地敢於著手偉大的事業,行事更為奮勇,並因此憑著那份篤定而更順遂地成就。瓦羅這見解,我盡力以自己的話表達出來,你便看出它為虛假敞開了何等寬廣的地步:在那裡我們明白,許多如今被視為神聖、彷彿宗教性的事,原是可以被捏造出來的,既然連關乎神明本身的謊言,都被認為對公民有益。第五章。
3:273
Non probari quod di adulterium Paridis punierint, quod in Romuli matre non ulti sunt. Sed utrum potuerit Venus ex concubitu Anchisae Aenean parere uel Mars ex concubitu filiae Numitoris Romulum gignere, in medio relinquamus. Nam paene talis quaestio etiam de scripturis nostris oboritur, qua quaeritur, utrum praeuaricatores angeli cum filiabus hominum concubuerint, unde natis gigantibus, hoc est nimium grandibus ac fortibus uiris, tunc terra conpleta est. Proinde ad utrumque interim modo nostra disputatio referatur. Si enim uera sunt, quae aput illos de matre Aeneae et de patre Romuli lectitantur, quo modo possunt dis adulteria displicere hominum, quae in se ipsis concorditer ferunt?
That it cannot be approved that the gods punished the adultery of Paris, which they did not avenge in the mother of Romulus. But whether Venus could from intercourse with Anchises bear Aeneas, or Mars from intercourse with the daughter of Numitor beget Romulus, let us leave undecided. For nearly such a question arises also from our own Scriptures, in which it is asked whether the transgressing angels lay with the daughters of men, from whom, when giants were born—that is, exceedingly great and strong men—the earth was then filled. Accordingly, let our discussion for the present be referred to both cases. For if those things are true which are read among them concerning the mother of Aeneas and the father of Romulus, how can the adulteries of men displease the gods, which they bear in concord among themselves?
論不能贊同神明懲罰帕里斯的姦淫,因為牠們並未在羅慕路斯母親的事上加以報應。但維納斯是否能藉與安喀塞斯交合生下埃涅阿斯,瑪爾斯是否能藉與努米托爾之女交合生下羅慕路斯,我們姑且懸而不決。因為從我們自己的聖經中也生出近乎這樣的問題,其中問道:那些犯罪的天使是否與人的女子同寢,由此生出巨人——即極其高大強壯的人——當時地上充滿了這等人。所以,讓我們眼下的討論同時涉及這兩種情形。因為,倘若他們中間所讀關於埃涅阿斯之母與羅慕路斯之父的那些事是真的,那麼人的姦淫怎能使神明不悅,既然牠們自己中間和睦地容忍這些事?
3:274
Si autem falsa sunt, ne sic quidem possunt irasci ueris adulteriis humanis, qui etiam falsis delectantur suis. Huc accedit, quoniam, si illud de Marte non creditur, ut hoc quoque de Venere non credatur, nullo diuini concubitus obtentu matris Romuli causa defenditur. Fuit autem sacerdos illa Vestalis, et ideo di magis in Romanos sacrilegum illud flagitium quam in Troianos Paridis adulterium uindicare debuerunt. Nam et ipsi Romani antiqui in stupro detectas Vestae sacerdotes uiuas etiam defodiebant, adulteras autem feminas, quamuis aliqua damnatione, nulla tamen morte plectebant: usque adeo grauius quae putabant adyta diuina quam humana cubilia uindicabant. CAPUT VI.
But if they are false, neither so can they be angry at true human adulteries, who delight even in their own false ones. To this is added that, since—if that concerning Mars is not believed, so that this concerning Venus also is not believed—then, with no pretext of divine intercourse, the cause of Romulus's mother is left undefended. Now she was a Vestal priestess, and therefore the gods ought rather to have avenged that sacrilegious enormity in the Romans than the adultery of Paris in the Trojans. For the ancient Romans themselves used even to bury alive the priestesses of Vesta caught in defilement, but adulterous women, though with some condemnation, they punished with no death at all—to such a degree did they avenge more grievously what they thought to be divine sanctuaries than human bedchambers. CHAPTER VI.
但倘若那些事是假的,那麼牠們既然連自己虛假的姦淫都引以為樂,也就同樣不能向人真實的姦淫發怒。此外還當加上:既然——若關於瑪爾斯的事不被相信,以致關於維納斯的事也不被相信——那麼便毫無神聖交合的藉口,羅慕路斯母親的案情就無從辯護了。而她原是維斯太的女祭司,所以神明本當更去報應羅馬人身上那褻瀆的醜行,過於報應特洛伊人身上帕里斯的姦淫。因為古羅馬人自己甚至慣於把被查出失貞的維斯太女祭司活埋,而對行姦的婦女,雖加以某種定罪,卻全然不處死刑——可見他們報應那被視為神聖的殿堂,遠比報應人的臥房更為嚴厲。第六章。
3:275
De parricidio Romuli, quod di non uindicarunt. Aliud adicio, quia, si peccata hominum illis numinibus displicerent, ut offensi Paridis facto desertam Troiam ferro ignibusque donarent, magis eos contra Romanos moueret Romuli frater occisus quam contra Troianos Graecus maritus inlusus; magis inritaret parricidium nascentis quam regnantis adulterium ciuitatis. Nec ad causam, quam nunc agimus, interest, utrum hoc fieri Romulus iusserit aut Romulus fecerit, quod multi inpudentia negant, multi pudore dubitant, multi dolore dissimulant. Nec nos itaque in ea re diligentius requirenda per multorum scriptorum perpensa testimonia demoremur:
On the murder of Romulus' brother, which the gods did not avenge. I add a further point. If the sins of men were displeasing to those deities, so that, offended by the deed of Paris, they handed over abandoned Troy to sword and fire, then the slaying of Romulus' brother ought to have moved them against the Romans far more than the mockery inflicted upon a Greek husband moved them against the Trojans; the parricide of a city at its birth ought to have provoked them more than the adultery of a city at the height of its reign. And it does not matter, for the case we are now pleading, whether Romulus ordered this to be done or did it himself, which many deny out of shamelessness, many doubt out of modesty, and many gloss over out of grief. Let us therefore not delay over investigating that matter too carefully through the weighed testimonies of many writers.
論羅慕路斯謀殺其兄弟之事,眾神並未為此復仇。我再補充一點:倘若人的罪惡使那些神祇不悅,以致他們因帕里斯的行為而受冒犯,便把被棄的特洛伊交付刀劍與烈火,那麼羅慕路斯兄弟的被殺,理應使他們對羅馬人發怒,遠勝於一個希臘丈夫所受的戲弄使他們對特洛伊人發怒;一座城在其誕生之時所犯的弒親之罪,理應比一座城在其鼎盛之時所犯的姦淫更激起他們的怒氣。而對於我們現在所辯論的案件而言,無論是羅慕路斯下令做此事,還是羅慕路斯親手所為,這並不重要;許多人因厚顏而否認,許多人因羞恥而存疑,許多人因悲痛而掩飾。因此,讓我們不必為了過於細究此事而停留於眾多作者所權衡的見證之上。
3:276
Romuli fratrem palam constat occisum, non ab hostibus, \' non ab alienis. Si aut perpetrauit aut imperauit hoc Romulus, magis ipse fuit Romanorum quam Paris Troianorum caput; quur igitur Troianis iram deorum prouocauit ille alienae coniugis raptor, et eorundem deorum tutelam Romanis inuitauit iste sui fratris extinctor? Si autem illud scelus a facto imperioque Romuli alienum est: quoniam debuit utique uindicari, tota hoc illa ciuitas fecit, quod tota contemsit, et non iam fratrem, sed patrem, quod est peius, occidit. Uterque enim fuit conditor, ubi alter scelere ablatus non permissus est esse regnator.
It is openly established that Romulus' brother was slain, not by enemies, not by strangers. If Romulus either perpetrated or commanded this, he himself was more the head of the Romans than Paris was of the Trojans. Why then did that ravisher of another man's wife provoke the wrath of the gods against the Trojans, while this destroyer of his own brother invited the protection of those same gods upon the Romans? But if that crime was foreign to the deed and command of Romulus, then since it surely ought to have been avenged, that whole city committed it, in that the whole city overlooked it; and so it slew not now a brother, but a father, which is worse. For each was a founder, since the one, carried off by crime, was not permitted to be a ruler.
羅慕路斯的兄弟乃公然被殺,這是確鑿無疑的——不是被敵人所殺,也不是被外人所殺。倘若羅慕路斯親自犯下或下令此事,那麼他作為羅馬人的首領,更甚於帕里斯作為特洛伊人的首領。那麼,為何那擄掠他人之妻的人,激起眾神對特洛伊人的怒氣,而這殺害自己兄弟的人,卻招來那同樣的眾神對羅馬人的庇護呢?但倘若那罪行與羅慕路斯的行為和命令無關,那麼既然此罪本當受報應,整座城便都犯了此罪,因為整座城都對它視而不見;於是它所殺的,已不再是兄弟,而是父親——這更為惡劣。因為二人都是奠基者,既然其中一位因罪被除,未獲准成為統治者。
3:277
Non est, ut arbitror, quod dicatur quid mali Troia meruerit, ut eam di desererent, quo posset extingui, et quid boni Roma, ut eam di inhabitarent, quo posset augeri; nisi quod uicti inde fugerunt et se ad istos, quos pariter deciperent, contulerunt; immo uero et illic manserunt ad eos more suo decipiendos, qui rursus easdem terras habitarent, et hic easdem artes fallaciae suae magis etiam exercendo maioribus honoribus gloriati sunt. CAPUT VII. De euersione Ilii, quod dux Marii Fimbria excidit. Certe enim ciuilibus iam bellis scatentibus quid miserum commiserat Ilium, ut a Fimbria, Marianarum partium homine pessimo, euerteretur, multo ferocius adque crudelius quam olim a Graecis?
There is no reason, I think, to ask what evil Troy deserved that the gods should abandon it so that it might be destroyed, and what good Rome deserved that the gods should dwell in it so that it might be enlarged—unless it be that, conquered, they fled from there and betook themselves to these people, whom they would deceive in like manner; nay rather, they remained there too, to deceive after their custom those who would again inhabit those same lands, while here they gloried in greater honours by plying the same arts of their deceit even more vigorously. CHAPTER VII. On the destruction of Ilium, which Fimbria, the general of Marius, overthrew. For surely, when the civil wars were already raging, what wretched offence had Ilium committed, that it should be overthrown by Fimbria, a most wicked man of the Marian faction, far more savagely and cruelly than once by the Greeks?
我認為,無需追問特洛伊究竟有何惡,使得眾神拋棄它以致它被毀滅;又有何善,使得眾神居於羅馬以致它得以壯大——除非是說,眾神戰敗後便從那裡逃走,投靠了這些人,要照樣欺騙他們;不,他們甚至留在那裡,按其慣常的伎倆欺騙那些日後再來居住那同一片土地的人,而在此處,他們以更熱切地施展同樣的欺詐之術,誇耀於更大的尊榮。第七章 論伊利昂之傾覆,即馬略的將領芬布里亞所摧毀者。因為當內戰已然熾烈之時,伊利昂究竟犯了什麼可悲的過錯,竟要被芬布里亞——馬略黨中最邪惡之人——以遠比昔日希臘人更兇殘暴虐的手段所傾覆呢?
← prev partnext part →
← ch. 2ch. 4 →
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.