📜 Verbum
Scripture and the Fathers, read aloud in the original
♥ Support

← All books · Latin Fathers › Works (CSEL)

Works (CSEL) 17 part 14/16

Latin original · 38 verses · some words can be tapped for a gloss · long chapter, split into parts; this part covers 17:503–17:540 (584 verses in all)

← ch. 16
← prev partnext part →
ℹ️ This corpus has no morphological tagging. Glosses are matched by word form against a dictionary — a match does not prove it is the same word (an inflected form can coincide with another word’s lemma). Verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
17:503
denique sicubi alium aliquis confricandum putauerit, leopardus inde exilit nec resistit. cuius uenenata fera odorem non potest sustinere, id tu pro cibo sumis et tuis uisceribus infundis internis! sed medicatur interdum doloribus: sumatur pro medicamento, non pro cibo, sumatur ab aegrotantibus, non ab epulantibus. medicamentum quaeris et ieiunium fugis, quasi maius aliud remedium repperire possis. ieiuni hominis sputum si serpens gustauerit, moritur. uides quanta uis ieiunii sit, ut sputo suo homo terrenum serpentem interficiat et merito spiritalem. quantam dominus etiam minusculis infudit prudentiam! turtur nido suo, ne pullos suos incurset lupus, scillae folia superiacit.
In short, wherever anyone thinks something is to be rubbed with garlic, the leopard leaps away from there and does not resist. The smell which that venomous beast cannot endure, you take in place of food and pour into your inward parts! But sometimes it is used as a medicine for pains: then let it be taken as a remedy, not as food; let it be taken by the sick, not by those who are feasting. You seek a remedy and flee from fasting, as though you could find some greater cure. If a serpent tastes the spittle of a fasting man, it dies. You see how great the power of fasting is, that by his spittle a man kills the earthly serpent—and rightly the spiritual one too. How great a prudence the Lord has instilled even into the smallest creatures! The turtledove casts over its nest leaves of the squill, lest the wolf attack its young.
簡言之,凡人以為某物要用大蒜搓抹之處,豹就從那裡跳開,毫不抵抗。那有毒野獸所不能忍受的氣味,你卻拿來代替食物,灌入你的臟腑!但它有時被用作止痛之藥:那就讓它當作良藥被服用,而非當作食物;讓它被病人服用,而非被赴宴者享用。你尋求療法,卻逃避禁食,彷彿你能找到比這更大的藥方。蛇若嘗到禁食之人的唾沫,便會死去。你看禁食的能力何等大,以致人藉自己的唾沫殺死那屬地的蛇——理所當然也殺死那屬靈的蛇。主甚至在最小的活物身上灌注了何等的智慧!斑鳩在自己的巢上鋪撒海蔥的葉子,免得狼侵害牠的雛鳥。
17:504
nouit enim quod huiusmodi folia lupi fugere consuerunt. nouit uulpecula quomodo posteritatem foueat suam, et tu ignoras, tu neglegis quomodo aduersus lupos nequitiae spiritalis posteritatem uitae huius habeas tutiorem? Sed reuertamur ad senem creaturae et consideremus qua ratione currit currere ruunt angustiora modos ornatum ut leonibus atque tigridibus, ursis quoque, aliis prolixiora ut helefantis et camelis. nonne euidens causa est quia illis feris quae carne uescuntur non erat opus prolixitate ceruicis? non enim in terram pascendi gratia ceruicem atque ora deiciunt, sed aut ceruum inuadunt aut bouem ouemque texuerunt.
For it knows that wolves are accustomed to flee leaves of this kind. The little fox knows how to cherish its posterity, and do you not know—do you neglect—how you may keep the posterity of this life more secure against the wolves of spiritual wickedness? But let us return to the surveyor of creation, and let us consider by what reason He has made the necks of some animals shorter and trimmer in form, as for lions and tigers and bears too, and longer for others, as for elephants and camels. Is not the cause evident, that for those wild beasts which feed on flesh there was no need of length of neck? For they do not cast down neck and mouth to the earth for the sake of feeding, but either fall upon a stag, or have caught an ox or a sheep.
因為牠知道狼向來躲避這類葉子。小狐狸懂得如何照顧自己的後代,你卻不曉得——你竟忽略——如何使你今生的後代更安穩地抵禦那屬靈邪惡之狼呢?但讓我們回到創造的勘察者,思想祂憑什麼道理使某些動物的脖頸較短且形態勻稱,如獅子、老虎和熊,又使另一些較長,如象和駱駝。緣由豈不顯而易見嗎——對那些以肉為食的野獸而言,本不需要長頸?因為牠們並不為進食而把頸與口俯向地面,而是撲向鹿,或擒住牛羊。
17:505
camelus uero cum sit altior, quomodo herbis minutissimis pasceretur, nisi longiora usque ad terram colla ad usum pastionis extenderet ? itaque camelus pro ratione temporibus suae prolixiora colla sortitus est, equus pro ratione, bos quoque simili modo; haec enim pascuntur herbis. helefantus autem etiam prominentem promoscidem habet, quia, cum sit eminentior cunctis, inclinare se ad pascendum non potest. itaque eius ad colligendum cibum utitur ministerio. ea immani bestiae largi potus infundit umorem ideoque concaua est, quo ad restinguendam tantae beluae sitim plenos lacus hauriat, ut collecto flumine possit inundare potantem.
But the camel, since it is taller, how could it feed on the tiniest herbs, unless it stretched out its longer neck all the way down to the earth for the purpose of grazing? And so the camel has been allotted, in proportion to its build, a longer neck; the horse in proportion to its own, the ox likewise in a similar way—for these feed on herbs. The elephant, however, has even a projecting proboscis, because, since it is taller than all, it cannot bend itself down to feed. And so it uses its service for gathering food. To that huge beast it pours in the moisture of abundant drink, and therefore it is hollow, so that for quenching the thirst of so great a beast it may draw up full lakes, that with the gathered stream it may flood the drinker.
但駱駝既然較高,若不為吃草而把較長的頸一直伸到地面,又怎能吃到最細小的草呢?所以駱駝按其體格的比例,分得了較長的頸;馬按其體格的比例,牛也照樣相似——因為這些都以草為食。然而象甚至還有突出的鼻子,因為牠既高過一切,便無法俯身進食。所以牠藉鼻子的功用來取食。象用鼻子把豐盛飲水的水分倒進那龐大的軀體,因此鼻是中空的,好為解這龐然巨獸的渴而吸起滿池的水,藉所聚之水流,將那飲水者灌得飽足。
17:506
ceruix sane diuinae est quam poscit tanti corporis moles, ne ea quoque oneri magis esset quam usui. ideoque nec genua inflectit, quia rigidioribus opus fuit cruribus, quo uelut columnis tanta possit membrorum machina sustineri. calcaneum leuiter incuruat, rigent cetera pedum a summo usque ad imum. nec sicut nos in anquilas saepe deponimus, ita se etiam bestia potest tanta deflectere meritoque non uoluendi se neque curuandi usum cum ceteris animantibus potest habere communem. fulcitur hinc inde trabibus maximis, ut in somno aliquantulum sine periculo dubitari, quia pes eius nulla artuum coniunctione distinguitur.
The neck, indeed, is of a divine design, such as the mass of so great a body demands, lest it too should be more of a burden than of use. And therefore it does not bend its knees, because it had need of stiffer legs, by which, as by columns, so great a frame of limbs could be sustained. It curves its heel slightly, while the rest of its feet are rigid from top to bottom. Nor, as we often lower ourselves into a sitting posture, can so great a beast likewise bend itself; and deservedly it cannot have in common with the other animals the practice of turning or curving itself. It is propped up on this side and that by very large beams, so that in sleep it may rest a little while without danger, because its foot is not distinguished by any jointing of the limbs.
那頸頸的設計實在是出於神的巧思,正合乎這龐大身軀所需,免得它反成負擔多於用處。因此象不屈膝,因為它需要更僵硬的腿,好如柱子般撐起這龐大的肢體構架。它的腳跟略微彎曲,其餘部分從上到下都僵直。它也不能像我們常彎身坐下那樣俯曲自己,這如此龐大的野獸理所當然無法與其他活物共有轉身或彎曲的習慣。它兩側都以極大的梁木支撐,好在睡眠中可稍稍歇息而無危險,因為它的腳並沒有任何關節相連的區分。
17:507
mansuetis igitur ueluti quaedam fulcra eorum quibus hic usus est parantur ingenio, feris autem et agrestibus, quia nemo huiusmodi quibus sustentari queant fulcra substernit, hinc uenit usus periculi. namque arbori innixi aut costas fricant aut in somno sese relaxant. quae nonnumquam uicta atque inflexa tanto corpore frangitur atque ille qui sese in eandem refuderat corruit nec erigere atque eleuare se potest ibique iacens interit aut gemitu suo proditus sternitur, dum uentre ceterisque iuxta mollioribus ad uulnus patet; nam dorsum eius ceteraque exteriora non ulla facile solent tela penetrare.
For the tame ones, then, such props as those which have need of this use are provided by human ingenuity; but for the wild and savage ones, since no one lays beneath them props of this kind by which they might be supported, hence comes the danger they incur. For, leaning on a tree, they either rub their ribs or relax themselves in sleep. And the tree sometimes, overcome and bent by so great a body, is broken, and he who had flung himself upon it falls down and cannot raise and lift himself up, and lying there perishes, or, betrayed by his own groaning, is laid low, while his belly and the other softer parts nearby lie open to a wound; for his back and other outer parts no weapons easily wont to penetrate.
那麼,對於溫馴的象,人的巧思為這需要支撐的象備好了支架;但對於野生兇猛的象,既然無人在牠們身下放置這類可供倚靠的支架,由此便生出牠們所遭遇的危險。因為牠們倚著樹,或是磨蹭肋骨,或是在睡中放鬆身體。那樹有時被如此龐大的身軀壓倒彎折而斷裂,撲伏其上的象便倒下,無法起身抬起自己,躺在那裡死去;或因自己的呻吟而暴露被擊倒,這時牠的腹部和近旁其餘較柔軟之處便暴露在攻擊之下;至於牠的背及其餘外部,任何兵器都不易刺穿。
17:508
sunt autem qui propter ebor has illis insidias parant, ut arbores eas, quibus se adplicare consueueunt consueuerint , ex alia parte, qua infrequentior eis usus sii sit , firmamentum reClaam , ui membris se deserit paradisi membrorum eius sustinere non possint ruinamque eius arcessant. sed si quis ista reprehendit, reprehendat etiam altitudinem inluminant, quia citius grauem minantur ruinam et diffiemus difficilius lapsa reparantur. uerum si illa aut propter pulchritudinem aut propter speculam frequenter adtollimus, haec quoque in helefantis probare debemus, quia magnum rebus bellicis usum ministrant.
There are, however, those who, for the sake of ivory, lay these snares for them: that the trees against which they are wont to lean, on the other side, where they make less frequent use of them, they so weaken the support, that, when the beast lets itself down, it cannot sustain the limbs of its body, and they bring about its fall. But if anyone finds fault with this, let him also find fault with the height of trees, because the higher ones threaten a heavier fall and, once fallen, are more difficult to restore. Yet if we frequently raise up those trees either for the sake of beauty or for a lookout, we ought to approve these qualities also in elephants, because they furnish great use in matters of war.
然而,有些人為了象牙而為象設下這樣的陷阱:就是把象慣常倚靠的樹,從牠們較少倚靠的另一側削弱其支撐力,以致當象放下身體時,那樹撐不住牠的肢體,便使象傾倒。但若有人對此挑剔,也讓他去挑剔樹的高度吧,因為較高的樹預示著更重的倒塌,而且一旦倒下更難扶起。然而我們既常為著美觀或瞭望而培植高樹,就也當在象身上肯定這些特質,因為牠們在戰事上提供了極大的用處。
17:509
inde interpellari Persarum ferox bellis, ualida sagittis omnique telorum iactu, quia de reflexos ad inferiora ualidiore nisu tela torquentur. acies eorum uelut gradientibus turribus saepta procedit. in mediis campis quasi de muro dimicant et uelut in arce quadam et specula conlocati spectant magis bella quam subeunt itaque alieni a periculo uidentur tuti molibus bestiarum. quis enim eas adire audeat, cum desuper iaculis facile figatur, inferius helefantorum conteratur incursu ? denique cedunt illis acies et armatorum cunei et castra illa quadrata signorum. intolerabili namque inpetu in hostes niunt ruunt .
Hence the Persian battle-line, fierce in wars, is checked—mighty in arrows and in every casting of weapons—because the weapons are hurled from above with a stronger effort, bent down toward the lower parts. Their line advances fenced about as it were by moving towers. In the midst of the plains they fight as though from a wall, and, placed as in some citadel and watchtower, they look upon the battles more than they undergo them; and so, removed from danger, they seem safe upon the masses of the beasts. For who would dare to approach them, when from above he is easily transfixed by javelins, and below is crushed by the onset of the elephants? In short, battle-lines yield to them, and the wedges of armed men, and those squared encampments of the standards. For with an unbearable onrush they rush upon the enemy.
因此波斯的戰陣——在戰爭中凶猛、長於弓箭和各樣投擲兵器——也被遏制,因為兵器是從高處俯向下方、以更猛之力擲出的。他們的戰陣彷彿被移動的城樓圍護般前進。在平原中央他們如同從城牆上作戰,又彷彿置身於某種堡壘和瞭望台上,與其說是親身投入戰鬥,不如說是觀看戰鬥;如此,他們遠離危險,安然憑藉著這些野獸的龐大身軀。有誰敢靠近他們呢——從上方輕易被標槍貫穿,從下方又被象的衝撞踐踏?簡言之,戰陣在牠們面前退讓,武裝的人群與那些方陣旗下的營壘也是如此。因為牠們以不可抵擋的衝勢撲向敵人。
17:510
ut nullo agmine bellatorum, nulla constipatione militum, nullo clipeorum retardentur obiectu, uelut quidam mobiles montes uersantur in proeliis et ut colles alto eminent uert;ce, mugitus fragore omnium perturbant confidentiam. quid his faciat pedes, quamuis lacertis ualidus et manu promptus, cum sibi saeptus armatorum populis gradienti motu murus occurrat? quid faciat eques, cum equus eius perterrefactus tantae bestiae inmanitate diffugiat? quid faciat sagittarius, cum desuper ferrata uirorum corpora iaculi ictum sentire non possint, bestia quoque nec nuda facile penetrabilis ferro sit et munita loricis obuias sine sui periculo acies secet, conterat turmas ?
So that they are held back by no battle-line of warriors, by no dense crowd of soldiers, by no opposing wall of shields, but like certain moving mountains they turn about in the battles, and like hills they tower with lofty summit, and with the crash of their bellowing they throw into confusion the confidence of all. What can the foot-soldier do against them, however strong of arm and ready of hand, when a wall hemmed in by hosts of armed men runs against him with its advancing motion? What can the horseman do, when his horse, terrified out of its wits by the monstrousness of so great a beast, scatters in flight? What can the archer do, when from above the iron-clad bodies of the men cannot feel the blow of the javelin, and the beast too is not easily penetrable by iron even when bare, and, fortified with breastplates, cuts through the opposing battle-lines without danger to itself, and crushes the squadrons?
以致牠們不被任何戰士的陣列、任何密集的兵卒人群、任何盾牌相對的牆所阻擋,反倒像幾座移動的山在戰場中往來,又像丘陵般以高聳的頂巔聳立,並以吼聲的轟鳴攪亂眾人的鬥志。步兵縱然臂力強健、出手敏捷,又能拿牠們怎樣呢——當一道被武裝人群圍著的牆,以前進之勢向他撞來?騎兵又能怎樣呢——當他的馬被這龐然巨獸的怪異嚇得魂飛魄散、四散奔逃?弓箭手又能怎樣呢——當那些身披鐵甲的人從上方感覺不到標槍的擊打,而那野獸縱然赤身也不易被鐵刺穿,又披上護甲,毫無自身危險地砍開當前的戰陣、踐踏騎兵的隊伍?
17:511
itaque ut inmensa aedificia ita helefanti fundamentis ualidioribus sustinentur; alioquin inparibus fulti pedibus intra breuem laberentur aetatem. nunc autem trecentis et bestiis conexione annis uitam producere, quia omnia sibi ad magnitudinem membra conueniunt. ideoque non distincti ut nobis, sed conpacti artus sunt, quo sint robustiores. quam cito hominibus, si diu steterint aut uelocius cucurrerint uel iugiter ambutaueunt ambulauerint , genua uexantur et plantae! coniuncta enim et articulata facilius quam concreta atque solidata aut doloris sensum aut causam offensionis admittunt.
And so, like vast buildings, the elephants are sustained by stronger foundations; otherwise, supported on unequal feet, they would collapse within a short span of life. As it is, however, they prolong their life to three hundred years, and the beasts by their joining of limbs—because all their limbs are fitted to their great size. And therefore their limbs are not separated as ours are, but compacted, so that they may be the stronger. How quickly are men's knees and soles afflicted, if they have stood long, or run too swiftly, or walked continuously! For limbs that are joined and articulated more readily than those that are grown together and solidified admit either a feeling of pain or a cause of injury.
所以,象如同巨大的建築物,由更堅固的根基支撐;否則,若靠不勻稱的腳支撐,牠們不出多久便會在短短的壽限內崩塌。然而事實上,牠們能延壽至三百年,這些野獸藉著肢體的緊密相連——因為牠們一切肢體都與其龐大的身量相稱。因此牠們的肢體不像我們的那樣分開,而是緊湊相連,好使其更為強壯。人若久站、或跑得太快、或不停行走,膝蓋和腳掌何等迅速便受損傷!因為相連並具關節的肢體,比那些長成一體、堅實凝固的,更容易接納痛感或受傷的緣由。
17:512
et quid miraris, si uestiti armis timentur, quandoquidem dentibus suis tamquam naturalibus spiculis semper armati sunt? promoscide sua quidquid inuoluerint frangunt, pede uero quidquid conpresserint uelut quodam lapsu ruinae ingentis exanimant. inuoluunt promoscide nemora ad sui escam et quasi quidam altissimi dracones serpentinis quos ceperint spiris flagellant. plerumque eas in orbem colligunt, maxime cum de terra cibus legitur aut potus hauritur. documento itaque nobis sunt, quod nihil superfluum sit creatum. et tamen haec tantae molis bestia subiecta nobis imperiis seruit humanis. Etenim quoniam de hominis creatura dicturi sumus, commendationem eius praestruere et praelibare debemus.
And why do you marvel if they are feared when clad in armor, since they are always armed with their own teeth as with natural darts? Whatever they wrap with their proboscis, they break; and whatever they crush with their foot, they make lifeless as by a kind of collapse of a huge ruin. They wrap groves with their proboscis for their own food, and like certain loftiest serpents they scourge with serpentine coils those they have seized. Often they gather them into a circle, especially when food is picked up from the ground or drink is drawn. They are therefore a proof to us that nothing has been created superfluous. And yet this beast of so great a bulk, made subject to us, serves human commands. For indeed, since we are about to speak of the creation of man, we ought to build up beforehand and foretaste his commendation.
牠們既身披鎧甲就令人畏懼,這又何足為奇呢——既然牠們始終以自己的牙、如同天然的箭矛般武裝著?凡牠們用鼻子捲住的,就折斷;凡牠們用腳踩住的,便如同某種巨大坍塌般使其斷氣。牠們用鼻子捲取叢林為自己的食物,又像某些最高大的蛇,用蛇般的盤捲鞭打牠們所擒住的。牠們常把這些東西捲成一圈,尤其是從地上拾取食物或汲取飲水時。因此牠們向我們證明,沒有一樣受造之物是多餘被造的。然而這龐然巨獸竟被置於我們之下,服事人的命令。因為我們既要論到人的受造,就當先行建立並預嘗對他的稱許。
17:513
uidebatur nihil helefantis creatura habere robustius, nihil tam terribile uel procerum, nihil tam ferum quam leones uel tigrides sunt. et haec seruiunt homini et naturam suam humana institutione deponunt. obliuiscuntur quod nata sunt, induunt quod iubentur. quid multa? docentur ut paruoli, seruiunt ut infirmi, uerberantur ut timidi, corriguntur ut subditi, in mores nostros transeunt, quoniam motus proprios perdiderunt. mirabilis igitur natura in maximis — mirabilis enim in excelsis dominus -, mirabilis etiam in minimis.
It seemed that creation had nothing more robust than the elephants, nothing so terrible or so tall, nothing so fierce as lions and tigers are. And these serve man and lay aside their own nature under human instruction. They forget what they were born to be, and put on what they are commanded. Why say more? They are taught like little children, they serve like the weak, they are beaten like the timid, they are corrected like subjects, they pass into our ways, since they have lost their own movements. Wondrous, therefore, is nature in the greatest things—for wondrous is the Lord in the heights—wondrous also in the smallest.
看來受造之物中沒有比象更強壯的,沒有像獅子、老虎那樣可怕、那樣高大、那樣兇猛的。然而這些都服事人,在人的調教下放下自己的本性。牠們忘了自己生來的本性,穿上所被吩咐的。何必多說呢?牠們像小孩般受教,像軟弱者般服事,像膽怯者般被打,像順服者般被矯正,進入我們的習性,因為牠們已失去自己原有的動作。所以本性在至大之物中是奇妙的——因為主在高處是奇妙的——在至小之物中也是奇妙的。
17:514
sicut enim non minus plana camporum quam montium alta miramur possunt plus altitudinem caedri stupemus quam uitis aut oleae breuis fecunditatem, ita non amplius miror poterit, quia procerus est, quam murem, quia terribilis helefanto est. naturae igitur haec potentia est, ut terribilia aliis aliis meticulosa sint. est enim donata praerogatiua quaedam singulis creaturis, ut quibusdam priuilegiis propriis fulciantur. formidabilis tauris helefantus, murem timet. leo quidem rex ferarum exiguo scorpionis aculeo exagitatur et ueneno serpentis occiditur. eximia leonis pulchritudo: comantis ceruice toros excutit uel sublato pectore adtollit ora:
For just as we marvel at the level plains no less than at the heights of mountains—we can be more astounded at the loftiness of the cedar than at the brief fruitfulness of the vine or the olive—so it will be possible to marvel no more because something is tall than at the mouse, because it is terrible to the elephant. This, then, is the power of nature: that things terrible to some are objects of dread to others. For a certain prerogative has been granted to individual creatures, that they may be supported by certain proper privileges. The elephant, formidable to bulls, fears the mouse. The lion indeed, the king of beasts, is agitated by the tiny sting of a scorpion and is killed by the venom of a serpent. Surpassing is the beauty of the lion: he shakes the muscles on his maned neck, or, with chest lifted high, raises his face.
正如我們驚嘆平坦的原野不亞於高山——我們會對香柏木的高聳比對葡萄樹或橄欖樹短暫的果實更為驚奇——照樣,因某物高大而驚嘆,並不會勝過對老鼠的驚嘆,因為牠對象來說是可怕的。那麼,這就是本性的能力:對某些活物可怕的,對另一些卻成了畏懼的對象。因為某種特權已賜給各個受造物,使牠們得以憑某些專屬的特恩得著支持。象令公牛畏懼,卻懼怕老鼠。獅子雖是百獸之王,卻被蠍子微小的螫刺所擾,又被蛇的毒液所殺。獅子的美麗超群絕倫:牠抖動長鬃頸上的肌肉,或高昂胸膛、抬起牠的臉。
17:515
sed quis non miretur tam breui scorpionis aculeo, ut incorporeum putes, ingentium corporum exire mortem ? Nec hoc quispiam reprehendat, quod creator serpentis creaturis suis et alia uel animantium uel herbarum genera uenenata miscuerit. nata sunt enim haec ad correptionem nostram, non ad deformationem. nam quae ignauis aut infirmibus aut impiis plerumque offensioni atque terrori sunt, aliis usui ita sunt haec ut paedagogi paruolis.
But who would not marvel that out of so small a sting of a scorpion—so small that you would think it bodiless—there should come the death of huge bodies? Nor let anyone find fault with this, that the Creator of the serpent has mingled among His creatures other kinds also, whether of animals or of herbs, that are venomous. For these were created for our correction, not for our disfigurement. For the things which are most often an occasion of offence and terror to the slothful or the weak or the impious, are thus a use to others, like tutors to little children.
但有誰不驚嘆呢——從蠍子如此微小的螫刺,微小到你以為它沒有形體,竟能致龐大身軀於死地?也別讓人對此挑剔,說那造蛇的創造主在祂的受造物中也摻入了其他有毒之類,無論是動物還是草藥。因為這些是為著管教我們而造的,不是為損毀我們。因為那些對怠惰者、軟弱者或不敬虔者多半成為冒犯與恐懼之由的,對另一些人卻如此有益,正如師傅之於小孩童。
17:516
amari uidentur, acerbi et molesti, formidabiles uerbere, libertatem lasciuiendi negant, necessitatem disciplinae exigunt, pueriles animos, ne luxu defluant, terrore constringunt, ideoque horum austeritate frugi euadunt, sobrii, continentes, laudi magis quam ludo dediti. uides quid terribilia illa flagella proficiant ? sic et serpentes flagella sunt eorum quibus infirma animi aetas et quaedam puerilis mentis est uirtus: ceterum fortioribus nocere non possunt. denique confidenti in domino dictum est: super aspidem et basiliscum ambulabis et conculcabis leonem et draconem. Paulum momordit uipera, et putabant eum quasi peccatorem uix de naufragio seruatum ueneno esse moriturum:
They seem bitter, harsh and troublesome, formidable with the lash; they deny the freedom of wantonness, they exact the necessity of discipline, they restrain childish spirits with terror, lest they melt away in luxury; and therefore by their severity these turn out frugal, sober, self-controlled, given more to praise than to play. Do you see what those terrible scourges accomplish? So too serpents are scourges for those whose age of mind is feeble and whose virtue is, as it were, of a childish mind; but they cannot harm the stronger. In short, to him who trusts in the Lord it is said: 'You shall walk upon the asp and the basilisk, and you shall trample the lion and the dragon.' A viper bit Paul, and they thought that he, like a sinner scarcely saved from shipwreck, would die of the venom:
它們看似苦澀、嚴厲、令人困擾,以鞭笞令人畏懼;它們不容放縱的自由,強求紀律的必須,以恐懼約束幼稚的心靈,免得他們沉溺於奢逸;因此藉著它們的嚴厲,這些人反倒變得節儉、清醒、自制,更傾心於受讚揚而非嬉戲。你看那些可怕的鞭子成就了什麼嗎?照樣,蛇對那些心智年幼、其美德彷彿出於孩童心智的人也是鞭子;但牠們傷不了較剛強的人。簡言之,對那信靠主的人有話說:「你要踹在虺蛇和毒蛇身上,要踐踏獅子和大龍。」一條毒蛇咬了保羅,眾人以為他像個僅從船難中勉強得救的罪人,必因毒液而死:
17:517
sed posteaquam inuiolabilis mansit excussa in ignem uipera, plus apud intuentes uenerationis inuenit. sed et ipse dominus ad omnes ait: qui crediderit et baptizatus fuerit hic saluus salu erit; qui uero non crediderit damnabitur. signa autem credentium haec dixit fore, ut serpentes manu mulceant, uenena his atque omne mortiferum, etiamsi biberint, nocere non possint. tua igitur tibi magis incredulitas, o homo, quam uenena metuenda serpentium sunt. time igitur illa, ut saltem dum formidantur illa ad fidem prouocare te possint. quod si deum non times, uel ultricia perfidiae uenena formides.
but after he remained unharmed, the viper shaken off into the fire, he found greater veneration among those who beheld him. And the Lord Himself too says to all: 'He who believes and is baptized shall be saved; but he who does not believe shall be condemned.' And He said that these would be the signs of those who believe: that they should handle serpents with the hand, and venoms and every deadly thing, even if they drink them, should not be able to harm them. Therefore your own unbelief, O man, is more to be feared by you than the venoms of serpents. Fear them, then, so that at least, while they are dreaded, they may be able to provoke you to faith. But if you do not fear God, then dread at least the avenging venoms of faithlessness.
但他抖落毒蛇於火中,安然無恙之後,在那些觀看的人中反得了更大的敬重。主自己也對眾人說:「信而受洗的必然得救;不信的必被定罪。」祂又說,這些是信者的神蹟:他們要用手拿蛇,毒物和一切致命之物,即使喝了,也不能害他們。所以人哪,你自己的不信比蛇的毒液更該被你懼怕。那就懼怕那些毒蛇吧,好叫至少在牠們被人畏懼時,能激動你歸向信德。但你若不懼怕神,至少當畏懼那報應不忠之罪的毒液。
17:518
nunc quoniam et helefantos uides tibi subditos et leones esse subiectos, cognosce te maritus o homo, quod non, ut ferunt, Apollinis Pythii, sed Solomonis sancti est, qui ait: nisi scias te, formonsa in mulieribus, quamquam multo ante Moyses in Deuteronomio scripsit: adtende tibi. homo, tibi adtende ait lex et propheta ait: nisi scias te. cui hoc dicit? formonsa inquit in mulieribus. quae est pulchra in mulieribus nisi anima, quae in utroque sexu praestantiam possidet pulchritudinis ? et merito decora est, quae non terrena sed caelestia, non corruptibilia sed incorrupta desiderat, in quibus decus perire non soleat;
Now, since you see that the elephants are subjected to you and the lions made subject, know yourself, O man—not, as they say, the saying of Pythian Apollo, but of holy Solomon, who says: 'Unless you know yourself, O fair one among women'—although long before Moses wrote in Deuteronomy: 'Take heed to yourself.' 'O man, take heed to yourself,' says the Law, and the prophet says: 'Unless you know yourself.' To whom does he say this? 'O fair one,' he says, 'among women.' What is fair among women but the soul, which in both sexes possesses an excellence of beauty? And deservedly it is comely, which desires not earthly but heavenly things, not corruptible but incorrupt, in which beauty is not wont to perish;
如今,你既看見象被置於你之下、獅子被使順服,人哪,就當認識你自己——這不是如人們所說的、皮提亞的阿波羅的話,而是聖者所羅門的話,他說:「美女啊,你若不認識自己」——雖然在那之前許久,摩西已在《申命記》中寫道:「你要謹慎自守。」律法說:「人哪,你要謹慎自守」,而先知說:「你若不認識自己。」他這話是對誰說的呢?他說:「眾女子中的美女啊。」眾女子中何為美呢?豈不就是靈魂嗎——這靈魂在兩性中都擁有美的卓越。它理當是秀美的,因它所渴慕的不是屬地而是屬天的,不是會朽壞而是不朽的,在這些之中,美麗向來不至消逝;
17:519
corporalia enim omnia processu aetatis aut aegritudinis inaequalitate marcescunt. huic adtende, dicit Moyses, in qua tu totus es, in qua melior tui portio est. denique interpretatus est dominus qui sis tu dicens: adtendite uobis a falsis prophetis; isti enim animam debilitant, mentem subruunt. non igitur caro tu es. quid enim est caro sine animae gubernaculo, mentis uigore? caro hodie sumitur, cras deponitur. caro temporalis, anima diuturna. caro amictus est animae, quae se induit quodam corporis uestimento. non igitur tu uestimentum es, sed qui uestimento uteris.
for all bodily things wither away with the advance of age or with the unevenness of sickness. 'Take heed to this,' says Moses, 'in which you wholly are, in which is the better portion of yourself.' In short, the Lord has interpreted who you are, saying: 'Take heed to yourselves of false prophets'; for these weaken the soul, undermine the mind. You are not, therefore, flesh. For what is flesh without the governance of the soul, the vigor of the mind? Flesh is taken up today, laid aside tomorrow. The flesh is temporal, the soul lasting. The flesh is the garment of the soul, which clothes itself in a certain vesture of the body. You are not, therefore, the garment, but he who uses the garment.
因為一切屬身體的,都隨年歲的增長或疾病的失調而枯萎。摩西說:「你要謹慎看顧這靈魂,你的全人都在其中,你較美好的部分也在其中。」簡言之,主已解明你是誰,說:「你們要防備假先知」;因為這些削弱靈魂、傾覆心智。所以你不是肉體。沒有靈魂的掌管、心智的活力,肉體又是什麼呢?肉體今日承受,明日卸下。肉體是暫時的,靈魂是長存的。肉體是靈魂的衣裳,靈魂給自己披上某種身體的衣著。所以你不是那衣裳,而是那使用衣裳的。
17:520
ideo muneris dicitur ut expolians ueterem hominem cum actibus eius nouum induas, qui non in corporis qualitate, sed in spiritu muneri!:! et agnitione renouatur. non, inquam, caro es tu; neque enim carni dicitur: templum enim dei sanctum est, quod estis uos et alibi: templum dei uos estis, et spiritus dei sanctus habitat in uobis, sed renouatis dicitur et fidelibus, in quibus permanet spiritus dei. in carnalibus autem non permanet, quia scriptum est: non permanebit spiritus meus in istis hominibus, quoniam caro sunt. Sed ipsius creationis nostrae senem consideremus. faciamus inquit hominem ad munus et similitudinem nostram. quis hoc dicit? nonne deus, qui te fecit? quid est deus?
Therefore it is said of the gift, that putting off the old man with his deeds, you may put on the new, who is renewed not in the quality of the body, but in the spirit and the acknowledgment of the gift. You are not flesh, I say; for it is not to the flesh that it is said: 'For the temple of God is holy, which you are,' and elsewhere: 'You are the temple of God, and the holy Spirit of God dwells in you'; but it is said to the renewed and the faithful, in whom the Spirit of God remains. In the carnal, however, it does not remain, because it is written: 'My Spirit shall not remain in these men, since they are flesh.' But let us consider the surveyor of our very creation. 'Let us make,' He says, 'man after the gift and likeness of Ourselves.' Who says this? Is it not God, who made you? What is God?
因此論到這恩賜,有話說:你既脫去舊人和舊人的行為,便要穿上新人,這新人在更新上不是在身體的性質上,而是在靈和對這恩賜的認識上。我說,你不是肉體;因為這話不是對肉體說的:「神的殿是聖的,這殿就是你們」,別處又說:「你們是神的殿,神的聖靈住在你們裡面」;這話乃是對那些更新了的、忠信的人說的,神的靈住在他們裡面。然而在屬肉體的人裡面,祂卻不長住,因為經上記著:「人既屬乎血氣,我的靈就不長住在他們裡面。」但讓我們思想我們受造之事的勘察者。祂說:「我們要照著我們的形像和樣式造人。」這是誰說的?豈不是那造你的神嗎?神是什麼呢?
17:521
caro an spiritus? non caro utique, sed spiritus, cuius similis caro esse non potest, quia ipse incorporeus et nam est, caro autem et conprehenditur et uidetur. cui dicit? non sibi utique, quia non dicit (nam. sed \'faciamus\', non angelis, quia ministri sunt, serui autem cum domino et opera cum auctore non possunt operationis habere consortium, sed dicit filio, etiamsi Iudaei nolint, etiamsi Ariani repugnent. sed et Iudaei conticiscant et Ariani cum suis parentibus nam, qui dum unum a consortio diuinae operationis excludunt, plures inserunt et praerogatiuam quam filio negant seruolis donant. sed esto ut adminiculo seruorum ad operandum deus uobis indiguisse uideatur:
Flesh or spirit? Not flesh, surely, but spirit, whose likeness flesh cannot be, because He Himself is incorporeal and invisible, but flesh is both grasped and seen. To whom does He speak? Not to Himself, surely, because He does not say 'I make,' but 'Let us make'; not to the angels, because they are ministers, and servants together with the Lord, and works together with the Author cannot have a partnership in the work; but He speaks to the Son, even though the Jews are unwilling, even though the Arians resist. But let both the Jews be silent and the Arians together with their forefathers, who, while they exclude One from the partnership of the divine work, insert many, and the prerogative which they deny to the Son they bestow on petty slaves. But grant that God seemed to you to have needed the aid of servants in order to work:
是肉體還是靈呢?必定不是肉體,而是靈,肉體不能成為祂的樣式,因為祂自己是非物質、不可見的,肉體卻是既可觸又可見的。祂這話是對誰說的呢?必定不是對自己說,因為祂不說「我造」,而說「我們要造」;也不是對天使說,因為天使是執事,是與主同列的僕役,受造之工與創造者不能在工作上有夥伴關係;祂乃是對聖子說,縱然猶太人不情願,縱然亞流派抗拒。但願猶太人都閉口,亞流派也連同他們的先輩一同緘默,他們一面把一位排除在神聖工作的夥伴關係之外,一面卻塞進許多位,又把他們不肯給聖子的特權,賜給卑微的奴僕。但就算神在你看來似乎需要僕役的協助才能工作:
17:522
si operatio communis est cum angelis deo, numquid deo et angelis imago communis est? numquid angelis diceret: faciamus hominem ad imaginem et similitudinem nostram? sed qui sit imago dei audi dicentem: qui eripuit nos inquit de potestate tenebrarum et transtulit in regnum fili claritatis suae, in quo habemus redemptionem et remissionem peccatorum, qui est imago dei inuisibilis et primogenitus uniuersae creaturae. ipse est imago patris, qui semper est et erat in principio. denique imago est qui dicit: Philippe, qui uidet me uidet et patrem. et quomodo tu, cum imaginem uiuam patris uiuentis uideas, dicis: ostende nobis patrem? non credis quia ego in patre et pater in me est?
if the work is common to God with the angels, is the image then common to God and the angels? Would He say to angels: 'Let us make man after the image and likeness of Ourselves'? But hear who the image of God is, from Him who says: 'He who rescued us,' he says, 'from the power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom of the Son of His glory, in whom we have redemption and the remission of sins, who is the image of the invisible God and the firstborn of all creation.' He Himself is the image of the Father, who always is and was in the beginning. In short, He is the image who says: 'Philip, he who sees Me sees the Father also.' And how is it that you, when you see the living image of the living Father, say: 'Show us the Father'? Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father in Me?
若這工作是神與天使所共有的,那麼形像也是神與天使所共有的嗎?祂會對天使說:「我們要照著我們的形像和樣式造人」嗎?且聽那位說話者所講的,誰是神的形像:他說:「祂救了我們脫離黑暗的權勢,把我們遷到祂榮耀之子的國裡,我們在祂裡面得蒙救贖,罪得赦免,祂是那不能看見之神的像,是首生的,在一切受造之先。」祂自己就是父的像,永遠存在,太初就有。簡言之,祂就是那說話者所講的像:「腓力,看見我的,就是看見了父。」既然你看見了永活之父的永活之像,怎麼還說:「將父顯給我們看」呢?你不信我在父裡面、父在我裡面嗎?
17:523
imago dei uirtus est, non infirmitas, imago dei sapientia est, imago dei iustitia est. sed sapientia diuina est et sempiterna iustitia est. imago dei est solus ille qui dixit: ego et pater unum sumus, ita habens similitudinem patris, ut diuinitatis et plenitudinis habeat unitatem. ubi dicit faciamus, quomodo inaequalitas? cum iterum dicat ad similitudinem nostram, ubi est dissimilitudo? sic et in euangelio, ubi dicit ego et pater, utique non una persona est; ubi autem ait unum sumus, nulla est discrepantia diuinitatis aut operis. non igitur in utroque una persona, sed una substantia est. et bene addidit sumus, quia semper esse diuinum est, ut coaeternum credas quem nam esse dissimilem.
The image of God is power, not weakness; the image of God is wisdom; the image of God is justice. But wisdom is divine, and justice everlasting. The image of God is He alone who said: 'I and the Father are one,' having so the likeness of the Father that He has the unity of divinity and of fullness. Where He says 'Let us make,' how is there inequality? When again He says 'after Our likeness,' where is there unlikeness? So too in the Gospel, where He says 'I and the Father,' surely it is not one Person; but where He says 'are one,' there is no discrepancy of divinity or of work. Not, therefore, in both is there one Person, but one substance. And He well added 'we are,' because to be always is divine, so that you may believe Him coeternal whom you cannot believe to be unlike.
神的形像是能力,不是軟弱;神的形像是智慧;神的形像是公義。但智慧是屬神的,公義是永恆的。神的形像唯獨是那說「我與父原為一」的那一位,祂如此地具有父的樣式,以致祂擁有神性與豐滿的合一。祂說「我們要造」之處,何來不平等?祂又說「照著我們的樣式」之處,何來不相似?福音書中也是如此,祂說「我與父」之處,必定不是一個位格;但祂說「原為一」之處,神性或工作上便毫無分歧。所以二者並非一個位格,乃是一個本質。祂又妥切地加上「我們」二字,因為永遠存在乃是屬神的,好叫你既不能信祂是不相似的,便信祂是同永的。
17:524
aeternus est enim de quo dicit Moyses: qui est misit me. pulchre etiam illud praemisit ego nam. nam si patrem praemisisset, tu minorem filium iudicares; sed praemisit filium, quem non conuenit credi patre superiorem, adiunxit patrem, ut aduertas deum patrem et filium eius ordinis praeiudicio non teneri. Adtende inquit tibi soli. aliud enim sumus nos, aliud sunt nostra, alia quae circa nos sunt. nos sumus, hoc est anima et mens, nostra sunt corporis membra et sensus eius, circa nos autem pecunia est, serui sunt et uitae istius adparatus.
For He is eternal of whom Moses says: 'He who is has sent me.' Beautifully too did He set first the 'I am.' For if He had set the Father first, you would judge the Son to be lesser; but He set the Son first, who is not fittingly to be believed superior to the Father, and joined the Father, that you may perceive that God the Father and His Son are not held by any prejudgment of rank. 'Take heed,' He says, 'to yourself alone.' For one thing are we ourselves, another thing are the things that are ours, others the things that are about us. We ourselves are, that is, soul and mind; ours are the members of the body and its senses; about us, however, are money, slaves, and the equipment of this life.
因為祂是永恆的,摩西論到祂說:「那自有的差遣了我。」祂把「我是」放在前面,也是美妙的。因為祂若把父放在前面,你便會判斷子為次等;但祂把子放在前面——子是不宜被信為高過父的——又連上父,好叫你明白,父神與祂的子並不受任何等級先入之見的轄制。祂說:「你要單單謹慎自守。」因為一樣是我們自己,另一樣是屬於我們的,再有一樣是我們身外之物。我們自己,就是靈魂與心智;屬於我們的,是身體的肢體及其感官;至於我們身外之物,乃是錢財、僕役,以及今生的種種裝備。
17:525
tibi igitur adtende, te ipsum scito, hoc est non quales lacertos habeas, non quantam corporis fortitudinem, non quantas possessiones, quantam potentiam, sed qualem animam ac mentem, unde omnia consilia proficiscuntur, ad quam operum tuorum fructus refertur. illa est enim plena sapientiae, plena pietatis atque iustitiae, quoniam omnis uirtus a deo est. cui dicit deus: ecce, Hierusalem, pinxi muros tuos. illa anima a deo pingitur, quae habet in se uirtutum gratiam renitentem splendoremque pietatis. illa anima bene picta est, in qua elucet diuinae operationis effigies, illa anima bene picta est, in qua est splendor gloriae et paternae imago substantiae.
Take heed, therefore, to yourself; know yourself—that is, not what kind of arms you have, not how great a bodily strength, not how great possessions, how great power, but what kind of soul and mind, from which all counsels proceed, to which the fruit of your works is referred. For it is the soul that is full of wisdom, full of devotion and justice, since all virtue is from God. To it God says: 'Behold, O Jerusalem, I have painted your walls.' That soul is painted by God which has in itself the gleaming grace of the virtues and the splendor of devotion. That soul is well painted in which the likeness of the divine working shines forth; that soul is well painted in which is the splendor of glory and the image of the paternal substance.
所以你要謹慎自守,認識你自己——這不是說認識你有何等的武力,何等的身體力量,何等的產業、何等的權勢,而是認識你有何等的靈魂與心智,一切的籌算都從這裡發出,你一切工作的果效都歸於這裡。因為靈魂才是充滿智慧、充滿敬虔與公義的,既然一切美德都是從神而來。神對它說:「耶路撒冷啊,看哪,我已描畫了你的牆垣。」那靈魂是被神所描畫的,它自身有著眾美德閃耀的恩典和敬虔的光輝。那靈魂被描畫得美好,在其中有神聖工作的形像照耀;那靈魂被描畫得美好,在其中有榮耀的光輝和父之本質的形像。
17:526
secundum hanc imaginem, quae refulget, pictura pretiosa est. secundum hanc imaginem Adam ante peccatum, sed ubi lapsus est, deposuit imaginem caelestis, sumpsit terrestris effigiem. sed fugiamus hanc imaginem, quae intrare ciuitatem dei non potest, quia scriptum est: domine, in ciuitate tua imaginem eorum ad nihilum rediges. et non intrat indigna imago et quae intrarit excluditur, quia non intrabit inquit in eam omne commune et qui facit execrationem et mendacium, sed ille intrabit in eam cuius in fronte agni nomen enim est. amma igitur nostra ad imaginem dei est. in hac totus es, homo, quia sine hac nihil es, sed es terra et in terram resolueris.
According to this image, which shines back, the painting is precious. According to this image was Adam before sin; but when he fell, he laid aside the image of the heavenly and took on the likeness of the earthly. But let us flee this image, which cannot enter the city of God, because it is written: 'Lord, in Your city You shall bring their image to nothing.' And an unworthy image does not enter, and what has entered is shut out, because, it says, 'there shall not enter into it anything common, and he who does abomination and a lie, but he shall enter into it whose name is in his forehead'—namely, the Lamb's name. Our soul, therefore, is after the image of God. In this you are wholly, O man, because without this you are nothing, but you are earth, and into earth you shall be dissolved.
照著這反照出來的形像,那畫便是寶貴的。亞當在犯罪以前正是照著這形像;但他一墮落,就卸下了屬天者的形像,取了屬地者的樣式。但讓我們逃離這形像,它不能進入神的城,因為經上記著:「主啊,在你的城中,你要使他們的形像歸於無有。」那不配的形像不得進入,已進入的也被攆出,因為經上說:「凡不潔淨的、行可憎與虛謊之事的,總不得進去;惟有名字寫在額上的才得進去」——就是羔羊的名。所以我們的靈魂是照著神的形像。人哪,你的全人都在這靈魂裡,因為沒有這靈魂你就一無所是,不過是塵土,又要歸回塵土。
17:527
denique ut scias quia sine anima caro nihil est, nolite inquit timere eos qui possunt corpus occidere, animam autem non possunt. quid igitur in carne praesumis, qui nihil amittis, si carnem amiseris? sed illud time, ne animae tuae defrauderis auxilio. quam enim dabit homo commutationem pro anima sua, in qua non exigua sui portio, sed totius humanae uniuersitatis substantia est? haec est, per quam ceteris ferarum auiumque dominans dominaris animantibus, haec est ad imaginem dei, corpus autem ad speciem bestiarum. in hac pium diuinae imitationis insigne, in illo cum feris ac beluis uile consortium. Sed tractemus limatius quid sit ad imaginem dei. caro numquid ad imaginem dei est?
In short, that you may know that without the soul the flesh is nothing, 'Do not,' He says, 'fear those who can kill the body, but cannot kill the soul.' Why, then, do you presume upon the flesh, you who lose nothing if you lose the flesh? But fear this, lest you be defrauded of the help of your soul. For what exchange shall a man give for his soul, in which there is no small portion of himself, but the substance of the whole human totality? This is that by which, ruling over the rest, you rule over the animals of beasts and birds; this is that which is after the image of God, but the body is after the likeness of the beasts. In the one is the holy mark of divine imitation; in the other, a base fellowship with wild beasts and monsters. But let us treat more finely what it is to be after the image of God. Is the flesh, then, after the image of God?
簡言之,為叫你知道沒有靈魂肉體就一無所是,祂說:「那殺身體卻不能殺靈魂的,不要怕他們。」那麼,你既失去肉體也毫無虧損,又為何倚仗肉體呢?倒要懼怕這事,免得你被剝奪靈魂的幫助。人拿什麼換自己的靈魂呢?這靈魂裡有的不只是他自己微小的一部分,乃是全人類整體的本質。這靈魂正是你藉以管轄其餘、轄制走獸飛鳥的;這靈魂正是照著神形像的,身體卻是照著走獸的樣式。在靈魂裡有效法神聖之事的神聖印記;在身體裡卻有與野獸怪物為伍的卑賤夥伴關係。但讓我們更精細地論述「照著神的形像」是什麼意思。那麼,肉體是照著神的形像嗎?
17:528
ergo in deo terra est, quia caro terra est, ergo corporeus deus, ergo infirmus ut caro passionibusque subiectus? et forte caput tibi uideatur ad similitudinem dei, quia eminet, aut oculi, quia intuentur, uel aures, quia audiunt. si altitudinem spectes, aedificiorum proceri uidemur, quia paululum uertice eminemus a terris? sed ideo non pudet eo nos similes dei dici, quia serpentibus ceterisque reptantibus aut quia dammulis atque ouibus aut lupis celsiores sumus? et quantum in ea parte cameli nobis atque helefanti proceriores sunt! optutus est quidem praestans spectare elementa mundi, cognoscere quae nullus adnuntiet, sed tuus deprehendat aspectus:
Then earth is in God, because flesh is earth; then God is corporeal; then He is weak as flesh, and subject to passions? And perhaps the head seems to you to be after the likeness of God, because it is prominent, or the eyes, because they behold, or the ears, because they hear. If you consider height, do we seem tall in comparison with buildings, because we project a little above the earth with our crown? But is it for this reason not shameful that we are called like to God—because we are taller than serpents and other creeping things, or than little does and sheep, or wolves? And how much, in that respect, are the camel and the elephant taller than we! The gaze, indeed, is excellent for beholding the elements of the world, for knowing things that no one announces, but which your sight detects:
那麼地土就在神裡面,因為肉體是地土;那麼神就是有形體的;那麼祂就軟弱如肉體,並受制於各樣情慾嗎?也許頭在你看來是照著神的樣式,因為它高聳;或是眼睛,因為它們觀看;或是耳朵,因為它們聽聞。你若論高度,我們與建築物相比顯得高大嗎——只因我們的頭頂略微高出地面?難道因我們高過蛇及其他爬行之物,或高過小鹿、綿羊或狼,被稱為與神相似就不可羞愧嗎?而在那方面,駱駝和象又比我們高出多少!眼目觀看世界的諸元素固然卓越,能認識無人宣告、卻被你的目光所察覺的事物:
17:529
uerum hoc ipsum quantum est quod uidemus, ut eo ad similitudinem dei nos esse dicamus, qui omnia uidet, spectat omnia, latentes deprehendit affectus, scrutatur cordis occulta? non pudet hoc dicere, cum ipse me totum uidere non possim? quod ante pedes est uideo, quod a tergo est uidere non possum. ceruicem meam nescio, non noui occipitium, renis meos uidere non possum. similiter quantum est quod audimus, cum id quod paululum distet uidere et audire non possim ? si creaturas parietes sint, inpeditur aspectus, inpeditur auditus. deinde corpus nostrum uno in loco haeret, angusto includitur spatio; omnes ferae latiores sunt homine, omnes etiam uelociores.
yet how great a thing is this very thing which we see, that on account of it we should say we are after the likeness of God, who sees all things, beholds all things, detects hidden affections, searches out the secrets of the heart? Am I not ashamed to say this, when I cannot see my whole self? What is before my feet I see; what is behind my back I cannot see. I do not know my own neck, I am not acquainted with the back of my head, I cannot see my own loins. Likewise, how great a thing is it that we hear, when I can neither see nor hear what is even a little way off? If creatures—if walls—be in the way, sight is hindered, hearing is hindered. Then, our body sticks fast in one place, is shut up in a narrow space; all wild beasts are broader than man, all also swifter.
然而我們所看見的這事本身又算什麼大事,竟要我們因此說自己是照著神的樣式——神看見萬有,洞察萬有,察覺隱藏的情感,鑑察人心的隱秘?我說這話豈不羞愧嗎——既然我連自己的全身都看不見?我看得見腳前之物,卻看不見背後之物。我不認得自己的頸項,不熟悉自己的後腦,看不見自己的腰。同樣,我們所聽見的又算什麼大事,既然連稍遠一點之物我都既看不見也聽不見?若有受造之物——若有牆——擋在當中,視覺就受阻,聽覺也受阻。再者,我們的身體膠著於一處,被囿於狹小的空間;一切野獸都比人寬大,也都比人迅捷。
17:530
non ergo caro potest esse ad imaginem dei, sed anima nostra, quae libera est et diffusis cogitationibus atque consiliis huc atque illud uagatur, quae considerando spectat omnia. ecce nunc sumus in Italia et cogitamus quae ad orientales aut ad occidentales partes spectare uideantur et cum illis uersari uidemur qui in Perside sunt constituti et illos uidemus qui degunt in Africa, si quos cognitos nobis ea terra susceperit, sequimur proficiscentes, inhaeremus inlecebris, copulamur absentibus, adloquimur separatos, defunctos quoque ad conloquium resuscitamus eosque ut uiuentes conplectimur et tenemus et uitae officia his usumque deferimus.
It is not, then, the flesh that can be after the image of God, but our soul, which is free and roams hither and thither with its far-ranging thoughts and counsels, which by reflection beholds all things. Behold, we are now in Italy, yet we ponder things that seem to belong to the eastern or the western regions; we seem to converse with those who are stationed in Persia, and we see those who dwell in Africa. If that land has received any whom we know, we follow them as they journey, we cling to its allurements, we are joined to the absent, we address the parted; and the dead too we rouse up to converse with us, and we embrace them as though living, and hold them fast, and render to them the offices and use of life.
因此能照著神的形像受造的,並非肉體,乃是我們的靈魂;靈魂是自由的,憑著廣布的思想與計謀往來於此處彼處,藉著思索觀看萬有。看哪,我們如今身在義大利,卻思想那似乎屬於東方或西方各地的事,並彷彿與那些駐紮在波斯的人相往來,又看見那些居住在非洲的人。若那地接納了我們所認識的人,我們便隨著他們的行程而去,依戀那地的誘惑,與不在身邊的人相聯,向分離的人說話;甚至把已故的人喚起與我們交談,像對待活人一樣擁抱他們、握住他們,並向他們獻上生命的禮節與情誼。
17:531
ea igitur est ad imaginem dei quae non corporeo aestimatur, sed mentis uigore, quae absentes uidet, transmarina uisu obit, transcurrit aspectu, scrutatur abdita, huc atque illuc uno momento sensus suos per totius orbis finis et mundi secreta circumfert: quae deo iungitur, Christo adhaeret, descendit in infernum atque ascendit, libera uersatur in caelo. denique audi dicentem : nostra autem conuersatio in caelis est. non est ergo ad imaginem dei in qua deus semper est? sed audi quia ad imaginem dei. dicit enim apostolus: nos itaque omnes reuelata facie gloriam dei speculantes ad eandem imaginem reformamur a gloria in gloriam sicut a domini spiritu.
That, therefore, is after the image of God which is reckoned not by bodily measure but by the vigour of the mind: which beholds the absent, traverses lands beyond the sea by its gaze, runs across them with a look, searches out hidden things, and in a single moment carries its perceptions hither and thither through the bounds of the whole world and the secret places of the universe; which is joined to God, cleaves to Christ, descends into the lower regions and ascends, and dwells freely in heaven. Hear, then, the apostle who says: 'But our citizenship is in heaven.' Is it not, then, after the image of God, the soul in which God ever abides? But hear that it is after the image of God; for the apostle says: 'We all, with unveiled face beholding the glory of God, are transformed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord.'
所以照著神形像受造的,乃是那不以身量、而以心智之活力來衡量者:它看見不在眼前的事,憑視覺越過海外,以一瞥之間奔馳而過,探究隱密之事,在一瞬之間將它的知覺往來遍及全世界的疆界與宇宙的奧祕;它與神聯合,緊緊跟隨基督,下到陰間又升上,自由地居於天上。你且聽使徒所說:『我們的國籍卻是在天上。』那麼,神恆常居於其中的靈魂,豈不是照著神的形像麼?你且聽,它確是照著神的形像;因為使徒說:『我們眾人既然敞著臉,得以看見主的榮光,好像從鏡子裡返照,就變成主的形狀,榮上加榮,如同從主的靈變成的。』
17:532
Quia igitur cognouimus animam esse ad imaginem dei, nunc consideremus utrum de anima potuerit priuilegium: faciamus hominem. sed audi et istud, quia anima nomine hominis nuncupatur. scriptum est enim in Genesi: fili autem Ioseph, qui facti sunt illi in Aegypto, animae nouem. omnes ergo animae, quae intrauerunt cum Iacob in Aegyptum septuaginta et quinque. et multo aptius anima uel unitus latine uel graece ἄνθρωπος dicitur, alterum ab humanitate, alterum ab intuendi habens uiuacitate, quae magis animae quam corpori conuenire non dubium est. cui rei etiam illud iure concurrit dictum in Threnis Hieremiae: bonus est dominus sustinentibus eum, animae quae quaerit eum.
Since, therefore, we have learned that the soul is after the image of God, let us now consider whether the privilege was spoken of the soul: 'Let us make man.' But hear this also, that the soul is called by the name of 'man.' For it is written in Genesis: 'And the sons of Joseph, who were born to him in Egypt, were nine souls. All the souls, therefore, that entered with Jacob into Egypt were seventy-five.' And far more fittingly is it called the soul, whether in Latin 'unitus' or in Greek 'anthropos': the one term taken from humanity, the other from the keenness of beholding — which without doubt suits the soul rather than the body. To this same matter that saying in the Lamentations of Jeremiah also rightly accords: 'The Lord is good unto them that wait for him, to the soul that seeketh him.'
因此,既然我們已曉得靈魂是照著神的形像受造的,現在就讓我們思考那特權是否是論到靈魂而說的:『我們要造人。』但你也要聽這話,就是靈魂被稱為『人』的名。因為創世記裡寫著:『約瑟在埃及所生的兒子,共有九人;凡與雅各同到埃及去的,共有七十五人。』而靈魂被稱呼,無論是拉丁文的 unitus,或是希臘文的 ἄνθρωπος(人),都更為恰當:前者取自人性,後者取自觀看的敏銳之力——這無疑更適合靈魂,而非身體。對這同一件事,耶利米哀歌中的那句話也理當與此相合:『凡等候耶和華、心裡尋求他的,耶和華必施恩給他。』
17:533
de hominibus dixit et animam adiciendam putauit; melius enim quaerit ista, si sola sit, abducens se a corporis caeno et a cupiditate carnali. ipsa est ad imaginem dei conformis domini Iesu, qui autem conformes fili dei sancti sunt. sic enim legimus dicente Paulo: scimus autem quoniam diligentibus deum omnia concurrunt in bonum, uiderint qui secundum propositum uocati sunt sancti, quos praesciuit et praedestinauit conformes fieri imaginis filii sui, ut sit ipse primogenitus in multis fratribus. quos autem praedestinauit hos et uocauit et quos uocauit hos et iustificauit, quos autem iustificauit hos et glorificauit.
He spoke of men, yet thought it right to add 'the soul'; for the soul seeks better when it is alone, withdrawing itself from the mire of the body and from carnal desire. It is itself after the image of God, conformed to the Lord Jesus; and they who are conformed to the Son of God are holy. For thus we read, Paul saying: 'And we know that to them that love God all things work together for good, to them who, according to his purpose, are called holy; whom he foreknew, he also predestinated to be conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. And whom he predestinated, them he also called; and whom he called, them he also justified; and whom he justified, them he also glorified.'
他論到人,卻認為理當加上『靈魂』;因為靈魂獨處時尋求得更好,使自己脫離身體的污泥和肉體的情慾。它本身就是照著神的形像,效法主耶穌的;凡效法神兒子的,都是聖徒。因為我們這樣讀到,保羅說:『我們曉得萬有都互相效力,叫愛神的人得益處,就是按他旨意被召的聖徒。因為他預先所知道的人,就預先定下效法他兒子的形像,使他兒子在許多弟兄中作長子。預先所定下的人又召他們來,所召來的人又稱他們為義,所稱為義的人又叫他們得榮耀。』
17:534
utrum igitur secundum corpus an secundum animam iustificatio tibi conferri uideatur, quaeso respondeas. sed dubitare non potes, cum iustitia, unde iustificatio salu est, mentis utique, non corporis sit. pictus es ergo, o homo, pictus a domino deo tuo. bonum habes arCem atque pictorem. noli bonam delere picturam, non fuco sed ueritate fulgentem, non cera expressam sed gratia. deles picturam, mulier, si uultum tuum materiali superiorum oblinas, si adquisito rubore perfundas.
Whether, then, justification seems to you to be conferred according to the body or according to the soul, I pray you answer. But you cannot doubt, since righteousness, from which justification comes, belongs surely to the mind and not to the body. You are painted, therefore, O man, painted by the Lord your God. You have a good citadel and a good painter. Do not blot out the good painting, which shines not by a false dye but by truth, not pressed out in wax but in grace. You blot out the painting, O woman, if you smear your face with material pigments, if you overspread it with an acquired blush.
那麼,無論你以為稱義是按著身體還是按著靈魂賜下的,求你回答我。但你不能懷疑,既然公義——稱義由之而來——必定是屬於心智的,而非屬於身體的。所以人哪,你是被繪畫的,是被你的主神所繪畫的。你有一座美好的城堡,又有一位美好的畫師。不要塗抹那美好的畫,它不是靠著虛假的染料,乃是靠著真理發光;不是用蠟刻劃出來的,乃是用恩典。婦人哪,你若用物質的顏料塗污你的臉,若用後天添得的紅暈遍抹其上,你就是塗抹了那畫。
17:535
illa pictura uitii, non decoris est, illa pictura fraudis, non simplicitatis est, illa pictura temporalis est — aut pluuia aut sudore tergetur —, illa pictura fallit et decipit, ut neque illi placeas cui placere desideras, qui intellegit non tuum, sed alienum esse quod placeat, et tuo displiceas auctori, qui uidet opus suum esse deletum. dic mihi, si supra artificem aliquem inducas alterum, qui opus illius superioris nouis operibus obducat, nonne ille qui opus suum adulteratum esse cognouerit dolet? noli tollere picturam dei et picturam meretricis adsumere, quia scriptum est: tollam membra Christi et faciam membra meretricis? absit!
That painting belongs to vice, not to beauty; that painting belongs to deceit, not to simplicity; that painting is temporary — it is wiped away either by rain or by sweat —; that painting beguiles and deceives, so that you neither please him whom you desire to please (for he perceives that what pleases is not yours but another's), and you displease your own Maker, who sees that his work has been blotted out. Tell me: if upon some craftsman's work you were to bring in another, who should overlay the work of that former artist with new works, would not he who recognizes that his own work has been adulterated grieve? Do not take away the painting of God and assume the painting of a harlot, since it is written: 'Shall I take the members of Christ and make them the members of a harlot? God forbid!'
那畫是屬於罪惡的,而非屬於美麗的;那畫是屬於詭詐的,而非屬於純樸的;那畫是暫時的——不是被雨水、就是被汗水抹去——;那畫迷惑人、欺哄人,以致你既不能討你所願討的人的喜悅(因為他看出那討喜的並非你自己的,乃是別人的),又得罪你自己的創造主,因他看見他的作品已被塗抹。告訴我:你若在某位工匠的作品之上引進另一位,用新的工作覆蓋那前位畫師的作品,那認出自己作品被竄改的人,豈不憂傷麼?不要除去神的畫,反取了妓女的畫,因為經上記著:『我可以將基督的肢體作為娼妓的肢體麼?斷乎不可!』
17:536
quod si qui adulterat opus dei, graue superioribus admittit. graue est enim crimen ut putes quod melius te homo pingat quam deus. graue est ut de te dicat deus: \'non agnosco colores meos, non agnosco imaginem meam, non agnosco uultum, quem ipse formaui. reicio ego quod meum non est. illum- quaere qui te pinxit, cum illo habeto consortium, ab illo sume gratiam cui mercedem dedisti.\' quid respondebis? quod si graue est adulterare opus dei, quid de illis dicemus qui inter- Sciunt opus dei, qui humanum sanguinem fundunt, qui uitam quam deus donauit extorquent, qui dicunt: tollamus iustum, quia inutilis est nobis? unde bene lectum est hodie:
But if anyone adulterates the work of God, he commits a graver offense than the former. For it is a grave crime that you should think a man can paint you better than God. It is grave that God should say of you: 'I do not recognize my own colours, I do not recognize my own image, I do not recognize the countenance which I myself formed. I reject what is not mine. Seek the one who painted you; with him keep fellowship; from him receive the grace to whom you have paid the wage.' What will you answer? And if it is grave to adulterate the work of God, what shall we say of those who do away with the work of God, who shed human blood, who wrest away the life that God has given, who say: 'Let us take away the just man, for he is unprofitable to us'? Whence it was well read today:
但若有人竄改神的作品,他所犯的比前者更重。因為你竟以為人能比神畫得更好,這乃是重大的罪。神論到你說:『我不認得我自己的顏色,我不認得我自己的形像,我不認得我親手所塑造的容貌。凡不屬我的,我都棄絕。去尋找那繪畫你的,與他保持交通,從那你已付了工價的他領受恩典。』——這話實在沉重。你要怎樣回答呢?若竄改神的作品已是重罪,那麼對於那些毀壞神作品的人,我們又當說甚麼呢?就是那些流人血、奪去神所賜之生命的人,那些說『我們把這義人除掉吧,因為他與我們無益』的人?因此今日所讀的這段甚是相宜:
17:537
uulpes foueas habent et uolucres caeli nidos ubi requiescant, filius autem hominis non habet ubi caput suum reclinet. uulpis ergo se abscondit in fouea, aues se tuentur in nido: homo non absconditur in fouea, sed decipitur. fouea uero os hominis est, fouea alta pectus est hominis, ubi sunt noxia et fraudulenta consilia, malae cogitationes. tu ambulas, et alius tibi fecit parat. in medio laqueorum ambulas, quos absconderunt tibi in uia inimici tui. omnia ergo circum inspice, ut effugias sicut dammula de retibus et sicut auis de laqueo. dammula retia aspectus uiuacitate declinat, auis euitat laqueos, si ad superiora se conferat et terrena superuolet;
'The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests where they may rest; but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head.' The fox, then, hides itself in a hole, the birds protect themselves in a nest; but man is not hidden in a hole, but is ensnared. For the hole is the mouth of man, the deep hole is the breast of man, where are harmful and fraudulent designs and evil thoughts. You walk along, and another prepares a snare for you. You walk in the midst of nooses, which your enemies have hidden for you in the way. Look about you, therefore, on every side, that you may escape like a roe from the nets and like a bird from the snare. The roe by the keenness of its sight avoids the nets, the bird shuns the snares if it betakes itself to the heights and flies above earthly things;
『狐狸有洞,天空的飛鳥有窩可以安歇,只是人子沒有枕頭的地方。』狐狸藏身於洞中,飛鳥在窩裡護衛自己;但人卻不藏於洞中,反被誘陷。那洞乃是人的口,那深洞乃是人的胸懷,其中有害人詭詐的計謀和邪惡的念頭。你行走,別人卻為你預備陷阱。你行在網羅之中,就是你的仇敵在路上為你暗藏的。所以你要四面察看,好叫你像羚羊脫離網羅、像飛鳥脫離捕鳥人的網。羚羊憑其敏銳的眼力躲開羅網,飛鳥若飛向高處、越過屬地之物,便躲避了網羅;
17:538
in superioribus enim nemo tendit retia, laqueum nullus abscondit. ideo cuius conuersatio in supernis est, huius non solet in praedam uenire captura. sed quid miraris, si homo decipiatur ab homine, quando filius hominis ubi requiesceret non habebat? et ille quidem talem hominem fecit, in quo caput suum reclinaret: sed posteaquam in pectore nostro non requies proximi coepit esse, sed fouea, posteaquam alter alteri nectere coepit insidias, quem iuuare deberet, caput suum Christus auertit a nobis, sed postea tamen maluit illud morti offerre pro nobis. noli igitur esse fraudulentus, crudelis, inmitis, ut in te Christus caput reclinet.
for in the heights no one stretches nets, no one hides a snare. Therefore he whose citizenship is in the things above is not wont to fall as prey into the trap. But why do you marvel if man is deceived by man, when the Son of man had not where to rest? And he indeed made such a man as one in whom he might lay his head; but after there began to be in our breast not a resting place for our neighbour but a pit, after one began to weave snares for another whom he ought to help, Christ turned his head away from us; yet afterward he chose rather to offer that very head to death for us. Be not, therefore, fraudulent, cruel, harsh, that Christ may rest his head in you.
因為在高處無人張開羅網,無人暗藏網羅。所以那國籍在上面之物的人,不至於墮入網羅而成為獵物。但人既被人欺哄,你又何必希奇呢?連人子尚且沒有安歇的地方。他原造了這樣一個人,作為他可以枕首之處;但自從在我們的胸懷裡,不再是鄰舍的安歇之所,反成了陷坑,自從一個人開始向他本當幫助的另一個人設下埋伏,基督就把他的頭從我們轉開;然而他後來卻寧願將那頭為我們交與死亡。所以你不要詭詐、殘忍、苛刻,好叫基督在你裡面枕首。
17:539
IDemque cum feCIsset piscium beiuas, cum lecisset lerarum genera et bestiarum, non requieuit: requieuit autem, posteaquam hominem ad imaginem suam fecit. in quo requiescat audi dicentem: aut supra quem requiescam nisi super humilem et quietum et trementem uerba mea? esto ergo humilis et quietus, ut in tuo deus requiescat adfectu. qui non requieuit in bestiis multo magis non requiescit in pectore bestiali. sunt enim animi bestiales, sunt ferae forma hominum indutae,-de quibus dicit dominus: adtendite uobis a falsis prophetis, qui ueniunt ad uos in uestitu ouium, intus autem sunt lupi rapaces.
And likewise, when he had made the monsters of the sea, when he had made the kinds of wild beasts and of cattle, he did not rest; but he rested after he had made man after his own image. In whom he might rest, hear him saying: 'Or upon whom shall I rest, save upon the humble and the quiet and him that trembleth at my words?' Be, then, humble and quiet, that God may rest in your affection. He who did not rest in the beasts, much more does he not rest in a bestial breast. For there are bestial spirits, there are wild beasts clothed in the form of men, of whom the Lord says: 'Beware of false prophets, who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly are ravening wolves.'
照樣,當他造了海中的巨獸,當他造了各類的野獸與牲畜時,他並未安息;他乃是在按著自己的形像造了人之後才安息。他要安息在誰裡面呢?你聽他說:『我要安息在誰身上呢?豈不是那謙卑、安靜、因我話而戰兢的人麼?』所以你要謙卑安靜,好叫神安息在你的情感之中。那不安息在野獸裡的,更不安息在獸性的胸懷裡。因為有獸性的心,有披著人形的野獸,主論到他們說:『你們要防備假先知,他們到你們這裡來,外面披著羊皮,裡面卻是殘暴的狼。』
17:540
in his autem non requiescit deus, sed requiescit in moribus humanis, quos fecit deus ad imaginem suam et similitudinem, quando fecit uirum, qui non debet uelare caput suum, quoniam imago et gloria est dei. huius uiri animae dicit: ecce ego, Hierusalem, pinxi muros tuos. non dixit: \'pinxi uentrem tuum\', non dixit: \'pinxi inferiora tua\' sed dicit: \'pinxi muros tuos- ualida se adserens homini murorum dedisse praesidia, ut si peruigil speculator in muris sit, obsidionis possit periculum propulsare. dicit itaque:
In these, however, God does not rest, but he rests in human characters, which God made after his own image and likeness, when he made the man, who ought not to veil his head, since he is the image and glory of God. To the soul of this man he says: 'Behold, O Jerusalem, I have painted thy walls.' He did not say, 'I have painted thy belly,' he did not say, 'I have painted thy lower parts,' but he says, 'I have painted thy walls' — declaring himself to have given to man the strong defenses of walls, so that, if there be a watchful sentinel upon the walls, he may be able to repel the danger of a siege. And so he says:
然而神不安息在這些人裡面,乃安息在神按著自己的形像與樣式所造的人的品格中,就是當他造那不該蒙頭的男人時,因為男人是神的形像和榮耀。神對這人的靈魂說:『耶路撒冷啊,看哪,我已繪畫了你的牆垣。』他沒有說『我繪畫了你的腹』,沒有說『我繪畫了你的下體』,乃是說『我繪畫了你的牆垣』——表明他賜給人堅固的牆垣作防衛,以致若有警醒的守望者在牆上,就能擊退被圍困的危險。所以他說:
← prev partnext part →
← ch. 16
1234567891011121314151617

Tell me when new readings are published

One email per new chapter reading. Double opt-in; one-click unsubscribe.