ℹ️ This corpus has no verse-level morphological tagging. Lemmas come mainly from word-level tagging of other books in the same language (not from this verse), falling back to dictionary form-matching for the rest. Rare homographs can still be misread; verify against the original and a specialist lexicon where precision matters.
ℹ️ The Chinese and English alongside are this site's own translation, made directly from the original text on this page (not the CUV or the WEB, which follow the Masoretic Text and a different textual tradition).
3:1
Εἰοὖνἐμὲἔχειςκοινωνὸν, προσλαβοῦαὐτὸνὡςἐμέ
'If then you hold me as a partner, receive him as myself.'
「你若以我為同伴,就當接納他,如同接納我一樣。」
3:2
Εἰδέτιἠδίκησέσε, ἢὀφείλει, ἐμοὶτοῦτοἐλλόγει
'But if he has wronged you in anything, or owes you anything, charge that to my account.'
After saying that he is 'my child,' that he is 'a partner in the gospel,' that he is 'my very heart,' that 'you have a brother in him,' that 'hold him as a brother'—then he added, 'as myself.'
For since the loss of money is especially wont to sting men, in order that Philemon might not make any complaint even about this (for it was likely that these things had actually been squandered),
因為錢財的損失最能刺痛人心,為使腓利門不至於連這事也加以責難(因為那些錢財很可能已被揮霍一空),
3:14
τότετοῦτοτίθησικαίφησιν·
then he sets this down and says:
他才提出這事,說道:
3:15
Εἴτιἔκλεψεν, ἀλλὰτί;Εἴτιἠδίκησεν
'If he stole anything'—but what does he say? 'If he has wronged you in anything.'
At once he both confessed the fault, and yet not as the fault of a slave, but as of a friend toward a friend, using the word 'wrong' rather than the word 'theft.'
And this both to shame him and at the same time with pleasant charm; for if Paul did not decline even to execute a bond on his behalf, would Philemon himself decline to receive this man?
Then, lest it should seem to be an insult to the one who is being asked—as though Paul had not been confident to make the request concerning the theft and to obtain it—he softens this too in a certain way:
See how everywhere he provides for both things: both to make the request with much security, and yet not to let this become proof that he presumed too greatly upon him.
你看他處處兼顧兩面:既極為穩妥地提出請求,又不讓這事成為他過分冒昧倚仗對方的憑據。
3:32
Τίἐστι, Ναὶ, ἀδελφέ;Προσλαβοῦ, φησὶν, αὐτόν·
What is the meaning of 'Yes, brother'? 'Receive him,' he says;
What stone would these words not have softened? What wild beast would they not have tamed and disposed to receive him sincerely? After having borne witness to him amid such great virtues, he does not decline to make his defense yet again.
for he would have been ashamed, if for no other reason, holding such a reputation in his eyes—that he does even beyond what is asked—not to do so much.
And this too belonged to one greatly confident; or rather, this too was on behalf of Onesimus, in order that they might not grow negligent, but knowing that he would certainly return and hear what had been done concerning him, might put away all remembrance of wrongs, and rather grant the favor.
And in yet another way he puts him to shame: if this man's own fellow citizen has become his fellow prisoner and shares in his ill-treatment, while he himself will not so much as grant a favour on behalf of his own household servant.
And by these titles too he addresses him, urging him the more towards obedience, and he calls them fellow workers, thereby also shaming him into granting the request.
but if we deprive our neighbours of these very things, how do we wish to obtain them? 'Blessed,' He says, 'are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy.'
What, then, have you done for another? Do you wish to be forgiven your offences? Why then did you yourself not forgive the one who had offended you? Yet you come to God asking for the kingdom of heaven, while you yourself, when asked for money, did not give it. For this reason we are not shown mercy—because we do not show mercy.
For how could he be merciful who deals kindly with the cruel and savage man, the one who inflicts countless evils upon his neighbour? 'What then?' he says; 'did not the laver save us, who had wrought countless evils?' It delivered us from those evils—not that we should do them again, but that we should not do them.
Since physicians too free the fever-stricken from the flame, not that they may misuse their health for harm and disorder (since it were better to be ill, if one were to be made well for this purpose—that he might again nail himself to the sick-bed), but that, having learned the evils that come from sickness, they may no longer fall into the same ills, may hold to their health more securely, and may do everything that contributes to it.
'How then,' he says, 'is God loving toward mankind, if indeed He will not save the wicked?' For in many places I hear many saying this too, that He is loving toward mankind and will surely save all.
That there will indeed be a Gehenna, we have, as I think, sufficiently perhaps demonstrated, by bringing forward the Flood and the former evils, and by saying that it is not possible that He who did those things should leave unpunished those of the present.
The question, then, was raised: How is He good, and how loving toward mankind, if indeed He punishes? And we deferred the discourse, so as not to overwhelm your hearing with the multitude of matters.
For once, in conversation with a certain Marcionite, I said, 'Are not these things marks of goodness?' And he said, 'If He did not demand an account of sins, it would be goodness;
For tell me: if He did not demand an account of us, would human life have stood firm? Should we not have fallen away into the state of wild beasts? For if, with fear and reckonings and courts of judgment hanging over us, we have outdone the fishes in devouring one another, and have hidden the lions and the wolves by our plundering of one another's goods;
if He did not demand an account of us—and of this too we are persuaded—with how much confusion and turmoil would life have been filled? What was the fabled labyrinth compared to the disorder of the world that would follow? Would you not have seen countless absurdities and disorders? For who then would have reverenced a father? Who would
have spared his mother? Who would have left untried any pleasure, any wickedness? And that these things are so, I will try to persuade you from a single household alone.
How? If I make it clear to you who ask these questions and who own household servants, that even though they should ruin your mastery over the house, and insult your very body, and carry off everything, and turn things upside down, and treat you as enemies would, you will not threaten them, not punish them, not take vengeance, nor even grieve them so much as with words;
does this then seem to you to be a mark of goodness? But I show that it is a mark of the utmost cruelty—not only because by this untimely kindness the wife and the children are betrayed, but also because those very servants are, before all these, destroyed.
Is this then a mark of goodness, tell me—to trample down the nobility of the soul, and to destroy both themselves and one another? Do you see that to demand a reckoning is the very thing that belongs to great kindness? And why do I speak of servants, who come more readily to these sins? But let someone have sons, and let him permit them to dare everything, and let him not punish them: than whom, tell me, will they not become worse? Then, in the case of human beings, punishing is a mark of goodness and not punishing a mark of cruelty; but in the case of God, is it no longer so? So that, because He is good, for this reason He prepared Gehenna beforehand.
Not because he takes excessive delight in it—God forbid!—but because, fearing lest he himself suffer the same things, he will make his own life the more pure.
他並非因此而過度快樂——斷乎不是!——乃是因為懼怕自己也遭受同樣的事,就把自己的生活修得更加潔淨。
3:126
Πολλῆςἄρατοῦτοκηδεμονίαςἐστί
This, then, is a mark of great solicitude.
如此看來,這正是極大關懷的表現。
3:127
ἀλλ'ἀπειλῆσαιμόνονἐχρῆν, μὴμέντοικαὶκολάσαι
'But it would have been enough merely to threaten, and not also to punish.'
if it were truly only a threat, would you not have grown even more heedless? Had the Ninevites known that the matter was merely a threat, they would not have repented;
假使那真的只是威嚇,你豈不會變得更加漫不經心嗎?尼尼微人若曉得那事不過是威嚇,他們就不會悔改了;
3:130
ἐπειδὴδὲμετενόησαν, μέχριῥημάτωντὴνἀπειλὴνἔστησαν
but because they did repent, they caused the threat to stop at mere words.
然而正因他們悔改了,就使那威嚇止於言語而已。
3:131
Βούλειαὐτὸἀπειλὴνεἶναι;σὺκύριοςεἶτοῦπράγματος·
Do you wish it to be a threat? You are the master of the matter;
but may the God who loves mankind grant that all of us, being brought to sound-mindedness even now from this present life, may attain unto those ineffable good things;
of which may it be granted to us all to be counted worthy, by the grace and love toward mankind of our Lord Jesus Christ, with whom, together with the Holy Spirit, be glory, might, and honour unto the Father, now and ever, and unto the ages of ages. Amen.